Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines
Some conservation organizations publish magazines that showcase current conservation and research projects, attract new subscribers and maintain membership, often using flagship species to promote these objectives. This study investigates the nature of flagship species featured on the covers of ten representative US conservation and nature magazines, Defenders, National Wildlife, Wildlife Conservation, Zoonooz, Nature Conservancy, Outdoor America, Sierra, Audubon, California Wild and Natural History. Operationally defining flagship species by diet, taxonomic order, body size and IUCN status, we found that magazines tend to use mammal and bird species rather than invertebrate, fish, amphibian, reptile or plant taxa on their covers. Featured birds were mostly omnivorous or piscivorous, large-bodied and of little conservation concern; featured mammals were mainly carnivorous or herbivorous, large-bodied and of considerable conservation concern. These analyses confirm, for the first time, anecdotal observations about conservation organizations focusing their publicity and programmes on large, charismatic species to raise awareness and funds and raise the spectre that the public may be exposed to only a selected sample of conservation problems.
KeywordsBody size Diet Endangered status Taxon
B.C. and K.M. were both supported by National Science Foundation fellowships. We thank the Animal Behavior Graduate Group Thursday night meetings, Annie Leonard, and Andy Marshall for useful suggestions.
- Downer CC (1996) The mountain tapir, endangered ‘flagship’ species of the high Andes. Oryx 30:45–58Google Scholar
- Dunning JB (ed) (1993) CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Heywood VH (ed) (1995) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Leader-Williams N, Dublin HT (2000) Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship’ species. In: Entwistle A, Dunstone N (eds) Has the Panda had its day? Future priorities for the conservation of mammal diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 53–81Google Scholar
- MacDonald D (ed) (2001) The new encyclopedia of mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Ord TJ, Blumstein DT (2002) Size constraints and the evolution of display complexity: why do large lizards have simple displays? Biol J Linn Soc 76:145–161Google Scholar
- Perrins C (ed) (2003) The new encyclopedia of birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Silva M, Downing JA (1995) CRC handbook of mammalian body masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) (2005) Mammal species of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, MarylandGoogle Scholar