Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 11, pp 2713–2734 | Cite as

Relationship of butterfly diversity with nectar plant species richness in and around the Aokigahara primary woodland of Mount Fuji, central Japan

  • Masahiko KitaharaEmail author
  • Mitsuko Yumoto
  • Takato Kobayashi
Original Paper

Abstract

We examined the relationships between the diversities of vegetation, adult nectar plants, and butterflies in and around the Aokigahara primary woodland on the northwestern footslopes of Mount Fuji, central Japan. The results showed that the nectar resource utilization by adult butterflies was significantly biased to herbaceous plants, especially to perennials, compared to woody species, although most of the study area was in and near a primary woodland. There were greater nectar plant species in sites with greater plant species richness. Among the butterfly community indices analyzed, the strongest correlation was detected between butterfly species richness and nectar plant species richness at each site. Another close correlation was detected between the species richness of nectar plants and herbaceous plants at each site. These results suggest that herbaceous plant species richness in a habitat plays a central role in its nectar plant species richness, and the nectar plant richness is a highly important factor supporting its adult butterfly species richness. Consequently, we propose that the maintenance and management of herbaceous plant species richness in a butterfly habitat, which lead to those of its nectar plant species richness, are very important for conservation of butterfly diversity even in and around woodland landscapes of temperate regions.

Keywords

Adult nectar plants Butterfly diversity Herbaceous plants Plant–butterfly relations Species richness Vegetation Woodland habitats 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences, especially Drs. H. Imaki, Z. Jiang, H. Ueda, and Y. Yoshida, and Mss. M. Watanabe, K. Ogawa, A. Fujisono, and H. Furuya of the lab. of Animal Ecology for their suggestions, help, and cooperation for this study. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (no. 17310138) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to M. Kitahara.

References

  1. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations, and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clausen HD, Holbeck HB, Reddersen J (2001) Factors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark. Biol Conserv 98:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook LM, Dennis RLH, Hardy PB (2001) Butterfly-hostplant fidelity, vagrancy and measuring mobility from distribution maps. Ecography 24:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croxton PJ, Hann JP, Greatorex-Davies JN, Sparks TH (2005) Linear hotspots? The floral and butterfly diversity of green lanes. Biol Conserv 121:579–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennis RLH (2001) Progressive bias in species status in symptomatic of fine-grained mapping units subject to repeated sampling. Biodivers Conserv 10:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennis RLH (2004) Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecol Entomol 29:744–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis RLH, Bramley MJ (1985) The influence of man and climate on dispersion patterns within a population of adult Lasiommata megera (L.) (Satyridae) at Brereton Hearth Cheshire (UK). Nota Lepid 8:309–324Google Scholar
  9. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH, Hardy PB (1999) Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the effects of sampling effort. J Insect Conserv 3:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennis RLH, Donato B, Sparks TH, Pollard E (2000) Ecological correlates of island incidence and geographical range among British butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 9:343–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dennis RLH, Hodgson JG, Grenyer R, Shreeve TG, Roy DB (2004) Host plants and butterfly biology: Do host-plant strategies drive butterfly status? Ecol Entomol 29:12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Arnold HR, Roy DB (2005) Does diet breadth control herbivorous insect distribution size? Life history and resource outlets for specialist butterflies. J Insect Conserv 9:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douwes P (1975) Distribution of a population of the butterfly Heodes virgaureae. Oikos 26:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dover JW (1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 33:723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich PR, Gilbert LE (1973) Population structure and dynamics of the tropical butterfly Heliconius ethilla. Biotropica 5:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feber RE, Smith H, Macdonald DW (1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J Appl Ecol 33:1191–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gall LF (1985) Measuring the size of Lepidopteran populations. J Res Lepid 24:97–116Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert LE, Singer MC (1973) Dispersal and gene flow in a butterfly species. Am Nat 107:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossmueller DW (1987) The role of nectar source distribution in habitat use and oviposition by the tiger swallowtail butterfly. J Lepid Soc 41:159–165Google Scholar
  23. Hardy PB, Dennis RLH (1999) The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodivers Conserv 8:1261–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am Nat 161:40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogsden KL, Hutchinson TC (2004) Butterfly assemblages along a human disturbance gradient in Ontario, Canada. Can J Zool 82:739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holl KD (1995) Nectar resources and their influence on butterfly communities on reclaimed coal surface mines. Restor Ecol 3:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holl KD (1996) The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. J Appl Ecol 33:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Inoue T (2003) Chronosequential change in a butterfly community after clear-cutting of deciduous forests in a cool temperate region of central Japan. Entomol Sci 6:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ishii M (1996) Species diversity of butterfly communities in different environment of forests in southern Osaka. In: Tanaka B, Arita Y (eds) Decline and conservation of butterflies in Japan, vol IV. The Lepidopterological Society of Japan, Osaka, pp 63–75 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  30. Ishii M, Yamada M, Hirowatari T, Yasuda T (1991) Diversity of butterfly communities in urban parks in Osaka prefecture. Jpn J Environ Entomol Zool 3:183–195 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  31. Ishii M, Hirowatari T, Fujiwara S (1995) Species diversity of butterfly communities in ’Mt, Mikusa Coppice’ for Zephyrus. Jpn J Environ Entomol Zool 7:134–146 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  32. Kamimura Y (2004) Nectar-source plants and their usage patterns by an adult butterfly community in a riparian biotope. Nat Environ Sci Res 17:107–115 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  33. Kitahara M (2000) Food resource usage patterns of adult butterfly communities in woodland habitats at the northern foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Jpn J Environ Entmol Zool 11:61–81 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  34. Kitahara M (2004) Butterfly community composition and conservation in and around a primary woodland of Mount Fuji, central Japan. Biodivers Conserv 13:917–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kitahara M, Fujii K (1994) Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: an analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. specialist strategies. Res Popul Ecol 36:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitahara M, Watanabe M (2001) Relationships of butterfly community diversity to vegetational species richness in and around the Aokigahara woodland at the northern foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Jpn J Environ Entomol Zool 12:131–145 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  37. Kitahara M, Watanabe M (2003) Diversity and rarity hotspots and conservation of butterfly communities in and around the Aokigahara woodland of Mount Fuji, central Japan. Ecol Res 18:503–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kitahara M, Sei K, Fujii K (2000) Patterns in the structure of grassland butterfly communities along a gradient of human disturbance: further analysis based on the generalist/specialist concept. Popul Ecol 42:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kocher SD, Williams EH (2000) The diversity and abundance of North American butterflies vary with habitat disturbance and geography. J Biogeogr 27:785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol Appl 2:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lincoln R, Boxshall G, Clark P (1998) A dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Loertscher M, Erhardt A, Zettel J (1995) Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaic-like habitat: the role of nectar sources. Ecography 18:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Mano T (2004) Butterfly communities in the center of Toyota City. Yahagi-River Res 8:115–121 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  45. Munguira ML, Thomas JA (1992) Use of road verges by butterfly and burnet populations, and the effect of roads on adult dispersal and mortality. J Appl Ecol 29:316–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murphy DD (1983) Nectar sources as constraints on the distribution of egg masses by the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona (Lepidoptera: Nympharidae). Environ Entomol 12:463–466Google Scholar
  47. Murphy DD, Wilcox BA (1986) Butterfly diversity in natural habitat fragments: a test of the validity of vertebrate-based management. In: Verner J, Morrison M, Ralph CJ (eds) Wildlife 2000, modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 287–292Google Scholar
  48. Natuhara Y (2000) Changes in butterfly assemblage along the urban-forest gradient. Jpn J Landsc Res 63:515–518 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  49. Natuhara Y, Imai C, Takahashi M (1999) Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt. Ikoma, Osaka, Japan. Ecol Res 14:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. New TR (1991, 1997) Butterfly conservation, 1st edn, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  51. Pianka ER (1988) Evolutionary ecology, 4th edn. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Pivnick KA, McNeil JN (1987) Diel patterns of activity of Thymelicus lineola adults (Lepidoptera:Hesperiidae) in relation to weather. Ecol Entomol 12:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pollard E (1984) Synoptic studies on butterfly abundance. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PK (eds) The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp 59–61Google Scholar
  55. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Primack RB (1993) Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  57. Primack RB (1995) A primer of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  58. Pryke SR, Samways MJ (2003) Quality of remnant indigenous grassland linkages for adult butterflies (Lepidoptera) in an afforested African landscape. Biodivers Conserv 12:1985–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR, Carvell C, Petit S, Firbank LG (2004) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Conserv 118:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ries L, Debinski DM, Wieland ML (2001) Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conserv Biol 15:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sakuratani Y, Fujiyama S (1991) Influence of highway construction on butterfly communities. Jpn J Environ Entomol Zool 3:15–23 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  62. Schmitt T (2003) Influence of forest and grassland management on the diversity and conservation of butterflies and burnet moths (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Hesperiidae, Zygaenidae). Anim Biodivers Conserv 26:51–67Google Scholar
  63. Schneider C, Fry GLA (2001) The influence of landscape grain size on butterfly diversity in grasslands. J Insect Conserv 5:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seido K (1991) Age of the hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) natural stands and their distribution on the Aokigahara Woodland, Mt. Fuji. Trans Meet Kanto Branch Jpn For Soc Society 42:33–36 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  65. Sharp MA, Parks DR, Ehrlich PR (1974) Plant resources and butterfly habitat selection. Ecology 55:870–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shreeve TG, Mason CF (1980) The number of butterfly species in woodlands. Oecologia 45:414–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH, Roy DB, Moss D (2001) An ecological classificationof British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancy. J Insect Conserv 5:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simonson SE, Opler PA, Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW (2001) Rapid assessment of butterfly diversity in a montane landscape. Biodivers Conserv 10:1369–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sparks TH, Parish T (1995) Factors affecting the abundance of butterflies in field boundaries in Swavesey Fens, Cambridgeshire, UK. Biol Conserv 73:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spitzer K, Novotny V, Tonner M, Leps J (1993) Habitat preferences, distribution and seasonality of the butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a montane tropical rain forest, Vietnam. J Biogeogr 20:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Spitzer K, Jaros J, Havelka J, Leps J (1997) Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biol Conserv 80:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1997) Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fields. Oecologia 109:294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thomas JA (1983) A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. Biol Conserv 27:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomas CD, Mallorie HC (1985) Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco. Biol Conserv 33:95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tiple AD, Deshmukh VP, Dennis RLH (2006) Factors influencing nectar plant resource visits by butterflies on a university campus: implications for conservation. Nota lepid 28:213–224Google Scholar
  77. Tudor O, Dennis RLH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Sparks TH (2004) Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern. Biol Conserv 119:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Usher MB, Keiller SWJ (1998) The macrolepidoptera of farm woodlands: determinants of diversity and community structure. Biodivers Conserv 7:725–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Väisänen R (1992) Distribution and abundance of diurnal Lepidoptera on a raised bog in southern Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 29:75–92Google Scholar
  80. Warren MS (1985) The influence of shade on butterfly numbers in woodland rides, with special reference to the wood white Leptidea sinapis. Biol Conserv 33:147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiko Kitahara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mitsuko Yumoto
    • 2
  • Takato Kobayashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal EcologyYamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences (YIES)FujiyoshidaJapan
  2. 2.MitomiJapan

Personalised recommendations