Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 969–989 | Cite as

Bird assemblages in pine plantations replacing native ecosystems in NW Patagonia

  • María Victoria LantschnerEmail author
  • Verónica Rusch
  • Celina Peyrou
Original Paper

Abstract

Forest plantations of exotic conifers represent an important economic activity in NW Patagonia, Argentina. However, there is a remarkable lack of information on the impact of forestry on native biodiversity. We analyzed the effect of Pinus ponderosa plantations on bird communities, considering different stand management practices (dense and sparse tree covers), and different landscape contexts where they are planted (Austrocedrus chilensis forest and steppe). Ultimately we wished to assess in which way plantations may be designed and managed to improve biodiversity conservation. Bird richness and abundance did not change significantly in the steppe, although community composition did, and was partially replaced by a new community, similar to that of ecotonal forests. In contrast, in the A. chilensis forest areas, species richness decreased in dense plantations, but bird community composition remained relatively constant when replacing the native forest with pine plantations. Also, in A. chilensis forest, stand management practices aiming at maintaining low tree densities permit the presence of many bird species from the original habitat. In the steppe area in turn, both dense and sparse plantations are unsuitable for most steppe species, thus it is necessary to manage them at higher scales, maintaining the connectivity of the native matrix to prevent the fragmentation of bird populations. We conclude that pine plantations can provide habitat for a substantial number of native bird species, and this feature varies both with management practices and with the landscape context of areas where afforestation occurs.

Keywords

Austrocedrus chilensis Bird diversity Exotic tree plantations Forest management Landscape context Steppe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the landowners who provided access to their lands where fieldwork was conducted. We also thank M. Sarasola and staff from APN (Administración de Parques Nacionales) for assistance during the fieldwork, P. Willems during statistical analysis, and J. Corley and four anonymous referees for the comments on this manuscript. This study was funded by SAGPyA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentos) through the project PIA 01/00, INTA (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Manejo Sustentable de Plantaciones” Project) and Turner Foundation.

References

  1. Barros VR, Cordon VH, Moyano CL, Méndez RJ, Forquera JC, Pizzio O (1983) Cartas de Precipitación de la zona oeste de las Provincias de Río Negro y Neuquén. Informe de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Cinco Saltos, Neuquén, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  2. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockerhoff E, Ecroyd CE, Leckie AC, Kimberley MO (2003) Diversity and succession of adventive and indigenous vascular understory plants in Pinus radiata plantation forests in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 185(3):307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabrera A (1976) Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería. ACME, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson A (1986) A comparison of birds inhabiting pine plantation and indigenous forest patches in a tropical mountain area. Biol Conserv 35:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carnus JM, Parrotta J, Brockerhoff EG, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, O´Hara K, Walters B (2006) Planted forests and biodiversity. J For 104(2):65–77Google Scholar
  7. Castellón TD, Sieving KE (2006) An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conserv Biol 20:135–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao A (1984) Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270Google Scholar
  9. Christie MI, Ramilo EJ, Bettinelli MD (2004) Aves del noroeste patagónico: Atlas y Guía. L.O.L.A, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  10. Clout MN, Gaze PD (1984) Effects of plantation forestry on birds in New Zealand. J Appl Ecol 21:795–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colwell RK (2005) Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5, <purl.oclc.org/estimate>Google Scholar
  12. Corley J, Sackmann P, Rusch V, Bettinelli J, Paritsis J (2006) Effects of pine silviculture on the ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Patagonian steppe. For Ecol Manage 222:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curry GN (1991) The influence of proximity to plantation edge on diversity and abundance of bird species in an exotic pine plantation in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildl Res 18:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Díaz AI, Armesto JJ, Reid S, Sieving KE, Willson MF (2005) Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloé Island, Chile. Biol Conserv 123:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Díaz IA, Armesto JJ, Willson MF (2004) Mating success of the endemic Des Murs’ Wiretail (Silviorthorhynchus desmursii) in Chilean fragmented rainforests. Austral Ecol 31(1):13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Díaz M, Carbonell R, Santos T, Tellería JL (1998) Breeding bird communities in pine plantations of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetation effects. J Appl Ecol 35:562–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Driscoll PV (1977) Comparison of bird counts from pine forests and indigenous vegetation. Aust Wildl Res 4:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Estades CF (1994) Impacto de la sustitución del bosque natural por plantaciones de Pinus radiata sobre una comunidad de aves en la Octava Región de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 1:8–14Google Scholar
  19. Estades CF, Temple S (1999) Deciduous-forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations. Ecol Appl 9:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gjerde I, Saetersdal M (1997) Effects on avian diversity of introduced spruce Picea spp. plantations in the native pine Pinus sylvestris forests of western Norway. Biol Conserv 79:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. González-Gómez PL, Estades CF, Simonetti JA (2006) Strengthed insectivory in a temperate fragmented forest. Oecologia 148:137–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Grigera D, Úbeda C, Reca A (1996) Estado de conservación de las aves del Parque y Reserva Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Hornero 14:1–13Google Scholar
  24. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol Electron 4(1):1–9Google Scholar
  25. Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manage 155:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Humphrey JW, Davey S, Peace AJ, Ferris R, Harding K (2002) Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and dedwood. Biol Conserv 107(2):165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IUCN (2006) 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 11 August 2006
  28. Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Laclau P (1997) Los ecosistemas forestales y el hombre en el sur de chile y argentina. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Boletín Técnico N° 34Google Scholar
  30. Lantschner MV (2005) Estructura de las comunidades de aves de los fondos de valle y laderas bajas de la cuenca del río Foyel (Prov. Río Negro), en relación a los disturbios antrópicos. Undergraduate dissertation, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina, p 116Google Scholar
  31. Lantschner MV, Rusch V (2007) Impacto de diferentes disturbios antrópicos sobre las comunidades de aves de bosques y matorrales de Nothofagus antarctica en el NO Patagónico. Ecología Austral 17:99–112Google Scholar
  32. Leberton P, Pont B (1987) Avifaune et altérations forestières. Acta OEcologica 8:227–235Google Scholar
  33. Lindenmayer DB (2002) Plantation design and biodiversity conservation. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Donnelly CF, Nix H, Lindenmayer BD (2002) Forest fragmentation on bird assemblages in a novel landscape context. Ecol Monogr 72(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (1997) Managing stand structure as part of ecologically sustainable forest management in Australian mountain ash forests. Conserv Biol 11:1053–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindenmayer DB, McIntyre S, Fischer J (2003) Birds in eucalypt and pine forests: landscape alteration and its implications for research models of faunal habitat use. Biol Conserv 110(1):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindenmayer DB, Munks S (2000) Principles and recommendations. In: Munks S, McArthur C (eds) Plantation design and fauna conservation. Fauna Issues and Plantation Design Workshop, Horbat, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsden SJ, Whiffin M, Galetti M (2001) Bird diversity and abundance in forest fragments and Eucalyptus plantation around an Atlantic forest reserve, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 10:737–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller JH (2001) Pine plantation communities: how do we begin to manage for plant diversity? Paper presented in the 54th Annual Southern Weed Science Society Meeting, Biloxi, Mississippi, 22–24 January 2001Google Scholar
  40. Mitra SS, Sheldon FH (1993) Use of an exotic tree plantation by Bornean lowland forest birds. The Auk 110(3):529–540Google Scholar
  41. Moore SE, Allen HL (1999) Plantation forestry. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Narosky T, Babarksas M (2000) Aves de la Patagonia, Guía para su reconocimiento. Vázquez Mazzini Editores, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  43. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12(3):402–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paritsis J (2002) Efectos de las plantaciones de coníferas exóticas sobre el ensamble de plantas vasculares, coleópteros epigeos y aves del bosque de Nothofagus dombeyi. Undergraduate dissertation, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina, p 93Google Scholar
  45. Petit LJ, Petit DR (2003) Evaluating the importance of human-modified lands for neotropical bird conservation. Conserv Biol 17(3):687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pomeroy D, Dranzoa C (1998) Do tropical plantations of exotic trees Uganda and Kenya have conservation value for birds? Bird Popul 4:23–36Google Scholar
  47. Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, De Sante DF (1993) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CAGoogle Scholar
  48. Reid S, Díaz IA, Armesto JJ, Willson MF (2004) Importance of native bamboo for understory birds in Chilean temperate forest. The Auk 121(2):515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rusch V, Sarasola M, Schlichter T (2005a) Indicadores de biodiversidad en bosques Nothofagus. IDIA 8:8–14Google Scholar
  50. Rusch V, Schlichter T, Corley JC (2005b) Integration of spatial scales for the conservation of biodiversity in forest plantations. Paper presented at the ‘‘IUFRO International Conference: Biodiversity and Conservation Biology in Plantation Forests’’. Bordeaux, France, 26–29 April 2005Google Scholar
  51. Rusch V, Schlichter T (2005) El empleo de principios, criterios e indicadores. ¿Quiénes se benefician con su uso? Paper presented at the “Congreso Forestal Argentino y Latinoamericano”. Corrientes, Argentina, 6–9 May, 2005Google Scholar
  52. SAGPyA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentos) (1999) Argentina, oportunidades de inversión en bosques cultivados. Buenos Aries, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  53. Sayer J, Chokkalingam U, Poulson J (2004) The restoration of forest biodiversity and ecological values. For Ecol Manage 201:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schlichter T, Laclau P (1998) Ecotono estepa-bosque y plantaciones en la Patagonia norte. Ecología Austral 8:285–296Google Scholar
  55. Schnell MR, Pik AJ, Dangerfield JM (2003) Ant community succession within eucalypt plantations on used pasture and implications for taxonomic sufficiency in biomonitoring. Austral Ecol 28(5):553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shankar U, Lama SD, Bawa KS (1998) Ecosystem reconstruction through “taungya” plantations following commercial logging of a dry, mixed deciduous forest in Darjeeling Himalaya. For Ecol Manage 102(2):131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sieving KE, Willson MF, De Santo TL (1996) Habitat barriers to movement of understory birds in south-temperate rainforest. Auk 113(4):944–949Google Scholar
  58. Sieving KE, Willson MF, De Santo TL (2000) Defining corridors for endemic birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Conserv Biol 14(4):1120–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Soriano A, Volkheimer W, Walter H, Box EO, Marcolín AA, Vaierini JA, Movia CP, Leon RJ, Gallardo JM, Rumboli M, Canevari M, Canevari P, Vasina WG (1983) Deserts and semi-deserts of Patagonia. In: West NE (ed) Ecosystems of the world. Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  61. Vergara PM, Simonetti JA (2003) Forest fragmentation and Rhinocryptid nest predation in central Chile. Acta Oecologica 24:285–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vergara PM, Simonetti JA (2004) Avian responses to fragmentation of the Maulino forest in central Chile. Oryx 38(4):383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vila AR (ed) (2002) Visión de la biodiversidad para la eco-región de los bosques templados valdivianos. CD-Rom, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  64. Vuilleumier F (1972) Brid species diversity in Patagonia (Temperate South-America). Am Nat 106:266–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vuilleumier F (1985) Forest birds of Patagonia. Ornithol Monogr 36:255–304Google Scholar
  66. Walker S, Novaro A, Funes M, Baldi R, Chehebar C, Ramilo E, Ayesa J, Bran D, Vila A (2005) Rewilding Patagonia. Wild Earth, Fall Winter 2004–2005:36–41Google Scholar
  67. Willson MF (2004) Loss of habitat connectivity hinders pair formation and juvenile dispersal of Chucao tapaculos in Chilean rainforest. The Condor 106:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Willson MF, De Santo T, Sabag C, Armesto JJ (1994) Avian communities of fragmented south-temperated rainforests in Chile. Conserv Biol 8(4):508–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yirdaw E (2001) Diversity of naturally regenerated native woody species in forest plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. New For 22:159–177Google Scholar
  70. Zobrist KW, Hinckley TM (2005) A literature review of management practices to support increased biodiversity in intensively managed Douglas-fir plantations. Final Technical Report to the National Commission on Science for Sustainable Forestry (NCSSF), USAGoogle Scholar
  71. Zurita GA, Rey N, Varela DM, Villagra M, Bellocq MI (2006) Conversion of Atlantic Forest into native and exotic tree plantations: effects on bird communities from the local and regional perspectives. For Ecol Manage 235:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Victoria Lantschner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Verónica Rusch
    • 1
  • Celina Peyrou
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo de Ecología ForestalINTA EEA BarilocheBarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations