Biodiversity and Conservation

, 17:155

The ground beetle fauna (Coleoptera:Carabidae) of abandoned fields, as related to plant cover, previous management and succession stage

Original Paper

Abstract

This study describes differences in species richness, diversity and composition of Carabidae in gradients from recently abandoned, non-grazed fields over stages of overgrowth into forest on formerly agricultural land in a large, sandy outwash plain, south Sweden. Totally 80 pitfall traps, (4 succession stages, each represented by 4 sites; 5 traps per site) installed on 29 March 2006 were emptied continuously until 1 November. Succession stages were: 7–10 y old fallows after cereals with thin and low vegetation of small perennial and annual herbs (Ia), 7–10 y old fallows abandoned as lay with a rich plant cover of broad-leaved grasses and herbs (Ib), 20–25 y old fallows with a shrub layer of colonising pine and narrow-leaved grasses (II), and ca 80 y old pine stands planted on originally cultivated ground with a rich shrub layer but lacking herbaceous plants (III). A total of 14,068 individuals of 71 carabid species were captured. Species richness was highest in stage Ib, whereas Shannon species diversity was highest in Ia. Both species richness and diversity were lowest in III, sites II being intermediate. Total number of individuals captured site−1 was low in III, being highest in Ib. Mean body weight and total dry mass of species, however, increased with succession stage. Amara and Harpalus species were most common in Ia but important also in Ib, with large differences in species composition between the two stages. These genera were almost lacking in III, where Carabus spp. and Pterostichus niger dominated. The share of Calathus was highest in II, where C. fuscipes played a dominating role. P. versicolor dominated in Ib, whereas P. lepidus was quite common in all non-forest stages. Duration and intensity of capturing activity necessary to find most species of the sites are discussed. Many scarce or rare species in south Scandinavia were captured, mainly in Ib. Abandoned non-grazed fields are important hibernating and breeding refuges for many carabids. Using extensive and non-expensive management this ought to be considered as an additional alternative in environment conservation policy, which now usually recommends economically subsidised grazing on set-aside land.

Keywords

Body weight Environmental conservation Habitat properties Old field Sand Soil fertility Species diversity Species richness Sweden 

References

  1. Barone M, Frank T (2003) Habitat age increases reproduction and nutritional condition in a generalist arthropod predator. Oecologia 135:78–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belaoussoff S, Kevan PG, Murphy S, Swanton C (2003) Assessing tillage disturbance on assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae) by using a range of ecological indices. Biodivers Conserv 12:851–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake S, Foster GN, Eyre MD, Luff ML (1994) Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 38:502–512Google Scholar
  4. Braun SD, Jones TH, Perner J (2004) Shifting average body size during regeneration after pollution––a case study using ground beetle assemblages. Ecol Entomol 29:543–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterfield J (1997) Carabid community succession during the forestry cycle in conifer plantations. Ecography 20:614–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark MS, Gage SH, Spence JR (1997) Habitats and management associated with common ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a Michigan agricultural landscape. Environ Entomol 26:519–527Google Scholar
  7. Desender K, Bosmans R (1998) Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) on set-aside fields in the Campine region and their importance for nature conservation in Flanders (Belgium). Biodivers Conserv 7:1485–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  9. Glück E, Deuschle J (2005) Ground beetle distribution of distinct size and feeding type due to grassland management treatments in orchards (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Entomol Gen 28:39–63Google Scholar
  10. Hemerik L, Brussaard L (2002) Diversity of soil macro-invertebrates in grasslands under restoration succession. Eur J Soil Biol 38:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoernes U, Irmler U (2004) Raumliche Verteilung epigäischer Carabiden in einer halboffenen weidelandschaft in abhängigkeit von Nützung und Standortsparametern. Faun-Ökol Mitteilungen 31(Suppl): 57–104Google Scholar
  12. Jorum P (1980) Life cycles and annual activity patterns of Pterostichus melanarius and Pterostichus niger Coleoptera Carabidae in a Danish beech wood. Entomologiske Meddelelser 48:19–25Google Scholar
  13. Klinge A (1993) Die Sukzession der Arthropodfauna brachliegender ehemaliger Sandäcker als Folge von Flächenstillegungen. Faun-Ökol Mitteilungen 15(Suppl):39–63Google Scholar
  14. Koivula M, Kukkonen J, Niemela J (2002) Boreal carabid-beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodivers Conserv 11:1269–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ljungberg H (2002) Important habitats for red-listed ground beetles in Sweden. Entomologisk Tidskrift 123:167–185 (In Swedish; English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Lövei GL, Magura T, Tothmeresz B, Ködöböcz V (2006) The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in habitat islands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:283–289Google Scholar
  17. MacLeod A, Wratten SD, Sotherton NW, Thomas MB (2004) ‘Beetle banks’ as refuges for beneficial arthropods in farmland: long-term changes in predator communities and habitat. Agr Forest Entomol 6:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niemela J, Halme E (1992) Habitat associations of carabid beetles in fields and forest on the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Ecography 15:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pavuk DM, Purrington FF, Williams CE, Stinner BR (1997) Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) activity density and community composition in vegetationally diverse corn agroecosystems. Am Midl Nat 138:14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Purtauf T, Dauber J, Wolters V (2004) Carabid communities in the spatio-temporal mosaic of a rural landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 67:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shah PA, Brooks DR, Ashby JE, Perry JN, Woiwod IP (2003) Diversity and abundance of the coleopteran fauna from organic and conventional management systems in southern England. Agr Forest Entomol 5:51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siemann E, Haarstad J, Tilman D (1999) Dynamics of plant and arthropod diversity during old field succession. Ecography 22:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallin H (1985) Spatial and temporal distribution of some abundant carabid beetles Coleoptera Carabidae in cereal fields and adjacent habitats. Pedobiologia 28:19–34Google Scholar
  24. Wallin H (1986) Habitat choice of some field-inhabiting carabid beetles Coleoptera Carabidae studied by recapture of marked individuals. Ecol Entomol 11:457–466Google Scholar
  25. Wallin H (1988) The effects of spatial distribution on the development and reproduction of Pterostichus cupreus L., Pterostichus melanarius Ill., Pterostichus niger Schall., and Harpalus rufipes DeGeer Coleoptera Carabidae on arable land. J Appl Entomol 106:483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yamazaki K, Sugiura S, Kawamura K (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and other insect predators overwintering in arable and fallow fields in central Japan. Appl Entomol Zool 38:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologyLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations