Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 2335–2357 | Cite as

Ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats in forest fragments and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil

  • Deborah Faria
  • Mateus Luís Barradas Paciencia
  • Marianna Dixo
  • Rudi Ricardo Laps
  • Julio Baumgarten
Original Paper

Abstract

The traditional shade cacao plantations (cabrucas) of southern Bahia, Brazil, are biologically rich habitats, encompassing many forest-dwelling species. However, a critical question for the conservation management of this specific region, and the highly fragmented Atlantic forest in general, is to what extent the conservation value of cabrucas relies on the presence of primary forest habitat in the landscape. We investigated the relative importance of cabrucas and forests for the conservation of five diverse biological groups (ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats) in two contrasting landscapes in southern Bahia, one dominated by forest with some interspersed cabrucas, and one dominated by cabrucas with interspersed forest fragments. The community structure (richness, abundance and diversity) of all biological groups differed between cabrucas and forests, although these differences varied among groups. A high number of forest species was found in the cabrucas. However, there were pronounced differences between the two landscapes with regard to the ability of cabrucas to maintain species richness. Irrespective of the biological group considered, cabrucas located in the landscape with few and small forest fragments supported impoverished assemblages compared to cabrucas located in the landscape with high forest cover. This suggests that a greater extent of native forest in the landscape positively influences the species richness of cabrucas. In the landscape with few small forest fragments interspersed into extensive areas of shade cacao plantations, the beta diversity of birds was higher than in the more forested landscape, suggesting that forest specialist species that rarely ventured into cabrucas were randomly lost from the fragments. These results stress both the importance and the vulnerability of the small forest patches remaining in landscapes dominated by shade plantations. They also point to the need to preserve sufficient areas of primary habitat even in landscapes where land use practices are generally favorable to the conservation of biodiversity.

Keywords

Atlantic forest Bats Birds Butterflies Cabruca Ferns Frogs Landscape context Lizards Shade cacao plantation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Raw, R. Peres, R. Ewers, C. Harvey, G. Schroth and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and revisions. This study was possible due to the collaborative work of the ‘RestaUna’ team. Financial support was granted by PROBIO—PRONABIO/MMA—CNPq/BIRD. Doctoral and Master fellowships from FAPESP were granted to D. Faria and M. Dixo, respectively, CAPES provided grants to J. Baumgarten and M. Paciencia, and CNPq- Programa Nordeste supported R. Laps. Permits for collect bats (02001.001003/97) and herpetological material (02201.005580/98) were provided by the Brazilian Federal Environmental Agency (IBAMA). Logistical facilities during field work were provided by UESC and IBAMA. Special thanks go to Saturnino de Sousa, Director of Reserva Biológica de Una, and to local landowners Sam and Camilo, Seu Mário, Zé Raimundo, Juarez, Helfred, Lilo and Dr. Amilton. We are also grateful to IESB for providing aerial photographs and satellite imagery.

References

  1. Accacio GM (2004) Comunidades de Borboletas Frugívoras em Mosaico de Ambientes Florestais na Região de Una, Bahia. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  2. Alger K (1998) The reproduction of the cocoa industry and biodiversity in Southern Bahia, Brazil. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Sustainable Cocoa Growing, 3/30-4/2 1998 Panama City, Panama. Smithsonian migratory bird center, Panama. http://www.nationalzoo.si.edu/smbc/research/cacao/cacao.aspGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves MC (1990) The Role of cacao plantations in the conservation of the Atlantic forest of southern Bahia, Brazil. M.S. Thesis, University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  4. Araújo M, Alger K, Rocha R, Mesquita CAB (1998) A Mata Atlântica do sul da Bahia: situação atual, ações e perspectivas. Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica – MAB – UNESCO. Caderno 8:1–36Google Scholar
  5. Argôlo AJS (2004) As serpentes dos Cacauais do Sudeste da Bahia. Editora da UESC, Ilhéus, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  6. Blondel J, Ferry C, Frochot B (1970) La méthode des indices ponctuels d’abondance (IPA) ou des relevés d’avifaune par “stations d’écoute”. Alauda 38:55–71Google Scholar
  7. Canedo C, Dixo M, Pombal JP Jr (2004) A new species of Chiasmocleis Méhelÿ, 1904 (Anura, Microhylidae) from the Atlantic rainforest of Bahia, Brazil. Herpetologica 60:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cechin SZ, Martins M (2000) Eficiência de armadilhas de queda (pitfall traps) em amostragens de anfíbios e répteis no Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 17:729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CEPLAC (2006) http://www.ceplac/radar/cacao.htm. Accessed on December 2006Google Scholar
  10. da Silva JMC, Casteleti CHM (2003) Status of the biodiversity of the Atlantic forest of Brazil: the Atlantic forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. In: Galindo-Leal C, Câmara IG (eds) Center for applied biodiversity, conservation international. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 43–59Google Scholar
  11. Delabie JHC, do Nascimento IC, Mariano C, dos SF (1999) Importance de l’agriculture cacaoyère pour le maintien de la biodiversité: étude comparée de la myrmécofaune de différents milieux du sud-est de Bahia, Brésil (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Proceedings, XII International Cocoa Research Conference, (Salvador, BA), pp 23–30Google Scholar
  12. Dietz JM, Sousa SN, Billerbeck R (1996) Population dynamics of golden-headed lion tamarins Leontopithecus chrysomelas in Una Reserve, Brazil. Dodo J Wildl Preserv Trusts 32:115–122Google Scholar
  13. Dixo MBO (2001) Efeito da Fragmentação da Floresta sobre a Comunidade de Sapos e Lagartos de Serapilheira no Sul da Bahia. M.S. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  14. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (2002) Bats in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat-island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biol Conserv 103:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R, Meritt D Jr (1993) Bat species richness and abundance in tropical rain forest fragments and in agricultural habitats at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Ecography 16:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R, Meritt D Jr (1994) Non flying mammals and landscape changes in the tropical rain forest region of Las Tuxtlas, Mexico. Ecography 17:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Faria D (2006) Phyllostomid bats of a fragmented landscape in the north-eastern Atlantic forest, Brazil. J Trop Ecol 21(4):1–12Google Scholar
  19. Faria D, Baumgarten J (2007) Shade cacao plantations (Theobroma cacao) and bat conservation in southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 16:291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Faria D, Laps RR, Baumgarten J, Cetra M (2006) Bat and bird assemblages from forests and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic rainforest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 15:587–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC (2000) The conservation value for birds of cacao plantations with diverse planted shade in Tabasco, Mexico. Anim Conserv 3:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1–9Google Scholar
  23. Harvey CA, Medina A, Merlo Sánchez D, Vílchez S, Hernández B, Sáenz JC, Maes JM, Casanoves F, Sinclair FL (2006) Patterns of animal diversity associated with different forms of tree cover retained in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 16:1986–1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinen JT (1992) Comparisons of the leaf litter herpetofauna in abandoned cacao plantations and primary rain forest in Costa Rica: some implications for faunal restoration. Biotropica 24:431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johns ND (1999) Conservation in Brazil’s chocolate forest: the unlike persistence of the traditional cocoa agroecosystem. Environ Manage 23:31–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper & Row Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Kupfer JA, Malanson GP, Franklin SB (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landau EC, Hirsch A, Musinsky J (2003) Cobertura Vegetal e Uso do Solo do Sul da Bahia – Brasil, escala 1:100.000, data dos dados: 1996–1997. In: Prado PI, Landau EC, Moura RT, Pinto LPS, Fonseca GAB, Alger K (eds) Corredor de Biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica do Sul da Bahia – CD-ROM, Ilhéus, IESB/CI/CABS/UFMG/UNICAMPGoogle Scholar
  29. Laps RR, Cordeiro PHC, Kajiwara D, Ribon R, Rodrigues AAF, Uejima AMK (2003) Aves. In: Rambaldi DM, Oliveira DAS (eds) Fragmentação de Ecossistemas. Causas, Efeitos Sobre a Diversidade e Recomendações de Políticas Públicas. MMA/SBF, Brasília, pp 153–181Google Scholar
  30. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lieberman SS (1986) Ecology of the leaf litter herpetofauna of a neotropical rain forest: La Selva, Costa Rica. Acta Zoológica Mexicana Nueva Series 15:1–72Google Scholar
  32. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Mori SA, Boom BB, Carvalho AM, Santos TS (1983) Southern Bahian moist forests. Bot Rev 49:155–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL (2000) Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793–810Google Scholar
  35. Oliver WLR, Santos IB (1991) Threatened endemic mammals of the Atlantic Forest region of south-east Brazil. Jersey Wildl Preserv Trust Special Sci Rep 4:1–126Google Scholar
  36. Pacheco JF, Whitney BM, Gonzaga LP (1996) A new genus and species of Furnariid (Aves; Furnariidae) from the cocoa-growing region of southeastern Bahia, Brazil. Wilson Bulletin 108:397–433Google Scholar
  37. Paciencia MLB, Prado J (2005a) Distribuição espacial da assembléia de pteridófitas em uma paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atlântica no sul da Bahia, Brasil. Hoehnea 32(1):103–117Google Scholar
  38. Paciencia MLB, Prado J (2005b) Effects of forest fragmentation on pteridophyte diversity in a tropical rain forest in Brazil. Plant Ecol 180:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pardini R (2004) Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biodivers Conserv 13:2567–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pardini R, Souza SM, Braga-Neto R, Metzger JP (2005) The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol Conserv 124:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perfecto I, Mas A, Dietschi T, Vandermeer JH (2003) Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico. Biodivers Conservs 12:1239–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pineda E, Moreno C, Escobar F, Halffeter G (2005) Frog, bat, and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veractuz, Mexico. Conserv Biol 19(2):400–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinto LPS, Rylands AB (1997) Geographic distribution of the Golden-headed Lion Tamarin, Leontopithecus chrysomelas: implications for its management and conservation. Folia Primatologica 68:161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poulsen AD, Nielsen IH (1995) How many ferns are there in one hectare of Tropical Rain Forest? Am Fern J 85(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pough FH, Andrews RM, Cadle JE, Crump ML, Savitzky AH, Wells KD (2001) Herpetology. Princet Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  46. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in frtagmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodrigues MT, Dixo M, Accacio GM (2002) A large sample of Leposoma (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) from the Atlantic Forests of Bahia, the status of Leposoma annectans Rubial, 1952, and notes on conservation. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, São Paulo 42(5):103–117Google Scholar
  48. Rolim SG, Chiarello AG (2004) Slow death of Atlantic forest trees in cocoa agroforestry in southeastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 13:2679–2694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sambuichi RHR (2002) Fitossociologia e diversidade de espécies arbóreas em cabruca (mata atlântica raleada sobre plantação de cacau) na região sul da Bahia, Brasil. Acta Botânica Brasilica 16:89–101Google Scholar
  50. Schroth G, Harvey CA, Vincent G (2004) Complex agroforests: their structure, diversity, and potential role in landscape conservation. In: Schroth G, Fonseca G, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos H, Izac AM (eds) Agroforestry and conservation of biodiversity in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 227–260Google Scholar
  51. Schulze CH, Walter M, Kessler PJA, Pitopang R, Shadbuddin D, Veddeler M, Mühlenberg S, Gradstein R, Leuschner C, Steffen-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: comparing plants, birds and insects. Ecol Appl 14:1321–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas WMW, Carvalho AMV, Amorim AMA, Garrison J, Arbeláez AL (1998) Plant endemism in two forests in southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 7:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Faria
    • 1
  • Mateus Luís Barradas Paciencia
    • 2
  • Marianna Dixo
    • 3
  • Rudi Ricardo Laps
    • 4
    • 5
  • Julio Baumgarten
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Estadual de Santa CruzIlheusBrazil
  2. 2.Herbário UNIPUniversidade PaulistaSao PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Ecologia da Paisagem e Conservação (LEPAC). Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade de São PauloSao PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Departamento de Ciências NaturaisUniversidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)BlumenauBrazil
  5. 5.Pós-Graduação em EcologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations