Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 13, pp 3755–3780 | Cite as

Are important bird areas and special protected areas enough for conservation?: the case of Bonelli’s eagle in a Mediterranean area

  • Pascual López-López
  • Clara García-Ripollés
  • Álvaro Soutullo
  • Luis Cadahía
  • Vicente Urios
Original Paper

Abstract

The Bonelli’s eagle (BE) is considered by the European Union as a high-priority species for conservation in the Valencian Community (East of Spain). However, in 2006 the European Union opened a legal procedure against the Spanish Kingdom, accused of lacking of an adequate network of special protected areas (SPAs) to preserve the BE in the region. Here we evaluate whether important bird areas (IBAs) and SPAs network is enough to preserve this species, on the basis of a thorough analysis of habitat preferences. A GAP analysis is performed to conduct a revision of current SPAs and BirdLife proposed IBAs. Our results suggest that the current network of SPAs becomes insufficient to protect the BE. The IBAs network, although improves the current network of SPAs, increasing the percentage of BE potential habitat included, also results inadequate. We propose a new SPAs network according to the potential suitable habitat for the species. Given the trade-off between financial investment and the conservation of biodiversity, we propose to maximize the surface of potential habitat included in the protected network minimizing the surface of the region that would be necessary to protect, thus avoiding an unnecessary expense and otherwise unrealistic results.

Keywords

GAP analysis GIS Habitat selection Hieraaetus fasciatus Predictive models Raptors Spain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank F. García-López, J.M. Aguilar and J. Verdejo for helping in the fieldwork and their valuable suggestions about raptor biology. We also thank P. Mateache, J. Jimenez and E. Rodríguez of the Conselleria de Territori i Habitatge of the Generalitat Valenciana for their support and GIS assistance. We are grateful to E. Barba for his support and confidence. P. López-López and L. Cadahía are supported by FPU grants of the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (references AP2005-0874 and AP2001-1444, respectively). All the research was compliant with all the laws of Spain where it was conducted. This paper is a part of P. López-López PhD thesis.

References

  1. Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5954–5959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo MB (2004) Matching species with reserves–uncertainties from using data at different resolutions. Biol Conserv 118:533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argos (1996) User’s manual. CLS/Service Argos, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  4. BirdLife (2004a) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. BirdLife (2004b) Species factsheet: Hieraaetus fasciatus. BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Burley F (1988) Monitoring biological diversity for setting priorities in conservation. In: Wilson E (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 227–230Google Scholar
  7. Carroll C, Noss RF, Paquet PC (2001) Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecol Appl 11:961–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Klerk HM, Fjeldsa J, Blyth S, Burgess ND (2004) Gaps in the protected area network for threatened Afrotropical birds. Biol Conserv 117:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Del Moral JC (2006) El águila perdicera en España. Población en 2005 y método de censo. SEO/BirdLife, MadridGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz RW, Czech B (2005) Conservation deficits for the continental United States: an ecosystem gap analysis. Conserv Biol 19:1478–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Encarta-online (2006) “Valencian Community”, In Microsoft© Encarta© Encyclopedia online 2006. 1997–2006 ©Microsoft CorporationGoogle Scholar
  12. ESRI (1999) ArcView GIS 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. 1992–1999, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Fjeldsa J, Burgess ND, Blyth S, de Klerk HM (2004) Where are the major gaps in the reserve network for Africa’s mammals? Oryx 38:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Groom M, Gary KM, Ronald CC (2006) Principles of conservation biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Keating KA, Cherry S (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. J Wildl Manage 68:774–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keating KA, Brewster WG, Key CH (1991) Satellite telemetry–performance of animal-tracking systems. J Wildl Manage 55:160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenward R (2001) A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerr JT (1997) Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conserv Biol 11:1094–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirkpatrick JB (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves–an example from Tasmania. Biol Conserv 25:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Aguilar JM, García-López F, Verdejo J (2006) Modelling breeding habitat preferences of Bonelli’s eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus) in relation to topography, disturbance, climate and land use at different spatial scales. J Ornithol 147:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Urios V (in press a) Population size, breeding performance and territory quality of Bonelli’s eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus) in eastern Iberian Peninsula. Bird StudyGoogle Scholar
  24. López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Soutullo Á, Cadahía L, Urios V (in press b) Identifying potentially nesting habitat for golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) applied to Important Bird Areas design. Anim ConservGoogle Scholar
  25. Maiorano L, Falcuccia A, Boitani L (2006) Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape. Biol Conserv 133:455–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manly BFJ, McDonald L, Thomas DL, McDonald T, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  27. Meffe G, Ronald C (1997) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy DD, Noon BR (1992) Integrating scientific methods with habitat conservation planning–reserve design for northern spotted owls. Ecol Appl 2:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. T & AD Poyser, Berkhamstead, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Oldfield TEE, Smith RJ, Harrop SR, Leader-Williams N (2004) A gap analysis of terrestrial protected areas in England and its implications for conservation policy. Biol Conserv 120:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Modell 133:225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pressey RL (1994) Ad hoc reservations–forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems. Conserv Biol 8:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Primack RB (2000) A primer of conservation biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  34. Pullin AS (2004) Conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Real J (2004) Águila-azor perdicera, Hieraaetus fasciatus. In: Madroño A, González C, Atienza JC (eds) Red book of the birds of Spain. Libro Rojo de las Aves de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SEO/Birdlife, Madrid, pp 154–157Google Scholar
  36. Rodrigues ASL, Tratt R, Wheeler BD, Gaston KJ (1999) The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversity. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 266:1453–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scott JM, Csuti B, Jacobi JD, Estes JE (1987) Species richness–a geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity. Bioscience 37:782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott JM, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss R, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, Derchia F, Edwards TC, Ulliman J, Wright RG (1993) Gap analysis–a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildl Monogr 121:1–41Google Scholar
  40. Scott JM, Davis FW, McGhie RG, Wright RG, Groves C, Estes J (2001) Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecol Appl 11:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SEO (2006a) Luxembourg judges Spain for insufficient SPA. Luxemburgo juzga a España por insuficientes ZEPA La Garcilla 127:39Google Scholar
  42. SEO (2006b) The Luxembourg Council considers insufficient the Spanish SPA network. El Tribunal de Luxemburgo considera insuficiente la red de ZEPA del estado español. La Garcilla 128:47Google Scholar
  43. Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L (2005) Top predators and biodiversity. Nature 436:192–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J Appl Ecol 43:1049–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman WH and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Soutullo Á, Cadahía L, Urios V, Ferrer M, Negro JJ (in press) Accuracy of lightweight satellite telemetry: a case study in the Iberian Peninsula. J Wildl ManageGoogle Scholar
  47. StatSoft (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. StatSoft Incorporated, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  48. Steenhof K, Kochert MN (1982) An evaluation of methods used to estimate raptor nesting success. J Wildl Manage 46:885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sutherland WJ, Green RE (2004) Habitat assessment. In: Sutherland WJ, Newton I, Green RE (eds) Bird ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Viada C (1998) Áreas Importantes para las Aves en España. Monografía n° 5. SEO/BirdLife, MadridGoogle Scholar
  51. Yip JY, Corlett RT, Dudgeon D (2004) A fine-scale gap analysis of the existing protected area system in Hong Kong, China. Biodivers Conserv 13:943–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascual López-López
    • 1
    • 2
  • Clara García-Ripollés
    • 3
  • Álvaro Soutullo
    • 2
  • Luis Cadahía
    • 2
  • Vicente Urios
    • 2
  1. 1.“Cavanilles” Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Estación Biológica Terra Natura (CIBIO - Fundación Terra Natura)Universidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  3. 3.Plaza Jesús de Medinaceli 6-3°-14ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations