Rescuing the extinction of experience
Beyond instrumental value
Miller (2005) and Stokes (2006) draw our attention to a crucial issue: humans are losing touch with nature, particularly in the urban environment. Miller (2005) has called this the ‘extinction of experience’. We are on the threshold between a real world and a virtual world, which is disconnecting us and nature. The outcome is a loss of appreciation of our reliance on nature. As we are an intrinsic part of the world around us, there are some issues requiring close focus before we embark on a rescue of the extinction of experience.
Conservation biology’s traditional viewpoint is that biodiversity is the variety of life; structural, compositional and functional, from genes to ecosystems (Noss 1990). This is a biotic everything, sometimes leading to the view that it thus has little hard currency. Nevertheless, this approach is a good working framework for initial conceptualization of biodiversity, as well as the scaffolding for scientific studies. Although...
KeywordsConservation Biology Urban Park Game Reserve Scientific Conservation Bird Watching
- Baillie JEM, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart S (eds) (2004) A global species assessment. IUCN, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Fox W (1993) Why care about the world around us? Resurgence 161:10–12Google Scholar
- Midgley M (2001) Science and poetry. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Palmer M, Finlay V (2003) Faith in conservation. The World Bank, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Rolston H III (1994) Conserving natural value. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Rothenberg D (1989) Introduction: ecosophy T – from institution to system. In: Naess A (ed) Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 1–22Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar