Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp 2213–2230 | Cite as

Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania

  • Jafari R. KidegheshoEmail author
  • Eivin Røskaft
  • Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
Original Paper


Attitudinal studies are increasingly being adopted as tools for evaluating public understanding, acceptance and the impact of conservation interventions. The findings of these studies have been useful in guiding the policy interventions. Many factors affect conservation attitudes positively or negatively. The factors inspiring positive attitudes are likely to enhance the conservation objectives while those inducing negative attitudes may detrimentally undermine these objectives. The magnitude of the resultant effects of each particular factor is determined by the historical, political, ecological, socio-cultural and economic conditions and this may call for different management interventions. In this study we examined how conservation attitudes in western Serengeti are shaped by the following factors: level of conflicts with protected areas; wildlife imposed constraints (inadequate pasture, water, diseases, loss of livestock during migration, theft and depredation); participation in the community based project; and socio-demographic factors (age, education level, wealth, immigration, gender and household size). The results indicated that the level of conflicts, participation in the community based project, inadequate pasture, lack of water, diseases, wealth and education were important in shaping peoples’ attitudes. However, in a stepwise linear regression analysis, 59% of the variation in peoples’ attitudes was explained by three variables i.e., conflict level with protected areas, lack of water and participation in the community based project. In addition to these variables, level of education also contributed in explaining 51% of the variation in people’s attitude regarding the status of the game reserves. Five variables (lack of water, level of education, inadequate pasture, participation in the community based project and diseases) explained 12% of the variation in people’s attitude towards Serengeti National Park. The paper discusses the implications for conservation of these results and recommends some measures to realise effective conservation of wildlife resources.


Attitudes Benefits Conflicts Conservation Protected areas Socio-demographic variables Tanzania Western Serengeti 



We are deeply indebted to several institutions and individuals, who contributed in one way or another in completion of this study. The Norwegian Council for Higher Education’s Programme for Development Research and Education (NUFU) funded this study. The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) played a facilitation role while the permission to conduct this study was granted by Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI). We also thank Serengeti Regional Conservation Project (SRCP) for accommodation and other support during the entire period of research work. Thanks are also due to Mrs Raskina J Kideghesho who participated actively in data collection. We also wish to recognise the rural communities of Western Serengeti for their willingness to participate in the interview. Lastly, but not least we are grateful to anonymous reviewers for constructive comments which have immensely shaped this paper.


  1. Archabald K, Naughton-Treves L (2001) Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities. Environ Conserv 28(2):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldus R, Kibonde B, Siege L (2003) Seeking conservation partnership in the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Parks 13(1):50–61Google Scholar
  3. Barrett CB, Arcese P (1995) Are integrated conservation-development projects (ICDPs) sustainable ? on the conservation of large mammals in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 23(7):1073–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrows EM, Fabricius C (2002) Do local people really benefit from areas: rhetoric or reality? Parks 12:67–79Google Scholar
  5. Bonner R (1993) At the hand of man: Peril and hope for Africa’s wildlife, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, p 322Google Scholar
  6. Brockington D (2004) Community conservation, inequality and injustice: myths of power in protected area management. Conserv Soc 2(2):411–432Google Scholar
  7. Chape S, Harrison J, Lysenko I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philos Trans: Biol Sci (Roy Soc Lond) 360(1454):443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Boer WF, Baquete DS (1993) Natural resource use, crop damage and attitudes of rural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique. Environ Conserv 25:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadd ME (2005) Conservation outside of parks: attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environ Conserv 32(1):50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillingham S, Lee PC (1999) The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environ Conserv 26(3):218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hackel JD (1999) Community conservation and the future of Africa’s wildlife. Conserv Biol 13(4):726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmes CM (2003) The influence of protected area outreach on conservation attitudes and resource use patterns: a case study from western Tanzania. Oryx 37(3):305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulme D (1997) Community Conservation in Practice: A Case Study of Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. IDPM, Manchester, 51 p (IDPM Community Conservation in Africa Working Papers No. 3)Google Scholar
  14. IIED (1994) Whose eden: an overview of community approaches to wildlife management, International Institute for Environment Development, Overseas Development Administration (London), London UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Infield M (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biol Conserv 45:21–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johannesen AB (2003) Essays on the economics of African wildlife utilization and management. In: Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, 187 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T, Vittersø J (1999) Attitudes toward large carnivores among sheep farmers, wildlife managers, and research biologists in Norway. Human Dimen and Wildlife 4:57–73Google Scholar
  18. Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T (2002). The relationship of general life values to attitudes toward large carnivores. Human Ecol Rev 9(1):55–61Google Scholar
  19. Kideghesho JR, Holmern T, Røskaft E, Kaltenborn BP, Songorwa AN (2005a) Community Conservation in Serengeti, Tanzania: Is there adequate and genuine commitment? In: The paper presented at the Fourth Annual Scientific Conference of Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) on December 3–5, 2005, Arusha TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  20. Kideghesho JR, Røskaft E, Kaltenborn BP, Mokiti TMCT (2005b) Serengeti shall not die’: can the ambition be sustained? Int J Biod Sci Manage 3(1):150 –166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis D, Kaweche GB, Mwenya A (1990) Wildlife conservation outside protected areas—Lessons from an experiment in Zambia. Conserv Biol 4(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Machlis GE (1989) Managing parks as human ecosystems. In: Altman I, Zube EH (eds) Public places and spaces. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, pp 255–275Google Scholar
  23. Madulu NF (2004) Assessment of linkages between population dynamics and environmental change in Tanzania. Afr J Environ Assess Manage 9:88–102Google Scholar
  24. McClanahan TR, Davies J, Maina J (2005) Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environ Conserv 32(1):42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naughton-Treves L, Grossberg R, Treves A (2003) Paying for tolerance: Rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conserv Biol 17(6):1500–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB, Brandon K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annu Rev Environ Res 30:219–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neumann RP (1992) Political ecology of wildlife conservation in the Mt. Meru area of North East Tanzania. Land Degrad Rehabil 3:99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newmark WD, Hough JL (2000) Conserving wildlife in Africa: integrated conservation and development projects and beyond. BioSci 50(7):585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newmark WD, Leonard NL, Sariko HI, Gamassa DM (1993) Conservation attitude of the local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biol Conserv 63:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norton-Griffiths M (1995) Economic incentives to develop the rangelands of the Serengeti: implications for wildlife conservation. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II. Dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, pp 506–533Google Scholar
  31. Parry D, Campbell B (1992) Attitude of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe enclave and Mababe depression, Botswana. Environ Conserv 19(3):245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Røskaft E, Hagen ML, Hagen TL, Moksnes A (2004) Patterns of outdoor recreation activities among Norwegians: an evolutionary approach. Ann Zool Fennici 41:609–618Google Scholar
  33. Røskaft E, Håndel B, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP (in press) Attitudes of humans towards large carnivores in Norway. Journal of Wildlife BiologyGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinclair ARE (1995) Serengeti past and present. In: Sinclair A, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II: Dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  35. Songorwa AN (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: are the communities interested? World Dev 27(12):2061–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Songorwa AN (2004a) Human population increase and wildlife conservation in Tanzania: are the wildlife managers addressing the problems or treating the symptoms? Afr J Environ Assess Manage 9:49–77. At www.ajeam-ragee.orgGoogle Scholar
  37. Songorwa AN (2004b) Wildlife conservation for community development: experiences from Selous Conservation Programme and other community-based wildlife management programmes in Tanzania. “Uongozi”. J Manage Dev 16(1):50–77Google Scholar
  38. Songorwa AN, Buhrs T, Hughey KFD (2000) Community-based wildlife management in Africa: a critical assessment of the literature. Nat Res J 40(3):603–643Google Scholar
  39. Stankey GH, Shindler B (2006) Formation of social acceptability judgements and their implications for management of rare and little known species. Conserv Biol 20(1):28–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UNESCO (2003) World Heritage List. < http:/ > accessed on 12 May 2006Google Scholar
  41. URT (1974) The Wildlife Conservation Act, 1974.The Gazette of the United Republic of Tanzania, Vol. LV. Nov. 1974Google Scholar
  42. URT (2002) Population Census and Housing Census. In: Bureau of Statistics, President’s Office, Planning Commission, Dar es Salaam TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  43. WB (2003) World Development Indicators. In:, accessed on 08 April 2006Google Scholar
  44. Wells M, Brandon K (1992) People and Parks: linking protected area management with local communities. World Bank, World Wildlife Fund and U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Western D (1984) Amboseli National Park: human values and the conservation of the savanna ecosystem. In: McNeely JA, Miller KR (eds) National Parks, conservation and development. Smithsonion Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Western D (2001) Taking a broad view: a response to Adams and Hulme. Oryx 35:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jafari R. Kideghesho
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eivin Røskaft
    • 2
  • Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Wildlife ManagementSokoine University of Agriculture (SUA)Chuo Kikuu, MorogoroTanzania
  2. 2.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Biologisk InstituttTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)Fakkelgården, StorhoveNorway

Personalised recommendations