Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1973–1981 | Cite as

Medicinal plant conservation and management: distribution of wild and cultivated species in eight countries

Original Paper

Abstract

In order to understand the particular challenges that medicinal plant conservation and management raise at the global level, it is necessary to address issues pertaining their distribution and the environments where they grow. When reviewing medicinal plant studies from eight countries in four regions we found that a high proportion of the reported medicinal plants had wide distributions across countries and continents. Most plants are found wild (40.5%) or naturalized (33.9%), while only 3.3% are cultivated. Since many species are distributed in wild conditions, cultivated and naturalized in several continents, conservation and management interventions would be best served through collaboration between host countries.

Keywords

Biodiversity Agro-landscapes Species diversity Medicinal plants Conservation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

M.Aguilar Støen has received support from the Norwegian Research Council project number 158984/510.

References

  1. Abe T, Higashi M (1991) Cellulose centered perspective on terrestrial community structure. Oikos 60:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcorn J (1984) Huastec Mayan ethnobotany. University of Texas Press, Austin TexasGoogle Scholar
  3. Balasingh J, Thiruchelthil B, Jerlin B, Samuel A, Muthukumar A (2000) Medicinal flora of a tropical scrub jungle. J Econ Taxon Bot 24:737–745Google Scholar
  4. Balick MJ, Elisabetsky E, Laird SA (1996) Medicinal Resources of the Tropical Forest: Biodiversity and its importance to Human Health. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Beinart W, Middleton K (2004) Plant transfer in historical perspective: A review article. Environ Hist 10:3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caniago I, Siebert SF (1998) Medicinal plant ecology, knowledge and conservation in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Econ Bot 52:229–250Google Scholar
  7. Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Caballero J, Cortés L, Dávila P, Lira R, Rodríguez I (2000) Plant resources of the Tehuacan-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot 55(1):129–166Google Scholar
  8. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defense. Science 230:895–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox B (2001) The biogeographic regions reconsidered. J Biogeogr 28:511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farnsworth NR, Soejarto DD (1991) Global importance of medicinal plants. In: Akerele O, Heywood V, Synge H (eds) The conservation of medicinal plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler C, Hodgkin T (2004) Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: assessing global availability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:143–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frei B, Sticher O, Heinrich M (2000) Zapotec and Mixe use of tropical habitats for securing medicinal plants in Mexico. Econ Bot 54:73–81Google Scholar
  14. Giday M, Asfaw Z, Elmqvist T, Woldu Z (2003) An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Zay people in Ethiopia. J Ethnopharmacol 85:43–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Girón LM, Freire V, Alonzo A, Cáceres A (1991) Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal flora used by the Caribs of Guatemala. J Ethnopharmacol 34:173–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. González-Tejero MR, Molero-Mesa J, Casares-Porcel M, Martínez Lirola MJ (1995) New contributions to the ethnopharmacology of Spain. J Ethnopharmacol 45:157–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Halberstein R (2005) Medicinal plants: Historical and cross cultural usage patterns. Annu Epidemiol 15:686–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton AC (2004) Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodivers Conserv 13:1477–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollis S, Brummitt RK (1991) World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  20. Ivancheva S, Stantcheva B (2000) Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants in Bulgaria. J Ethnopharmacol 69:165–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kapur SK, Shahi AK, Sarin YK, Moerman DE (1992) The medicinal flora of Majouri-Kirchi forests (Jammu and Kashmir State), India. J Ethnopharmacol 36:87–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lirio LG, Hermano ML, Fontanilla MQ (1998) Antibacterial activity of medicinal plants from The Philippines. Pharmaceutical Biol 36:357–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moerman DE, Pemberton RW, Kiefer D, Berlin B (1999) A comparative analysis of five medicinal floras. J Ethnobiol 19:49–67Google Scholar
  24. Palacios XF (1999) Contribution to the estimation of countries’ interdependence in the area of plant genetic resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Background Study Paper No. 7 Google Scholar
  25. Posey DA (1984) A preliminary report on diversified management of tropical forest by the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. In: Prance GT, Kallunki JA (eds) Ethnobotany in the neotropics. New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 112–126Google Scholar
  26. Shrestha P, Dhillion SS (2003) Medicinal plant diversity and use in the highlands of Dolakha district, Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol 86:81–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stepp JR, Moerman DE (2001) The importance of weeds in ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 75:19–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tabuti JRS, Lye KA, Dhillion SS (2003) Traditional herbal drugs of Bulamogi, Uganda: plants, use and administration. J Ethnopharmacol 88:19–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. USDA, NRCS (2004) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874–4490 USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Voeks RA (1996) Tropical forest healers and habitat preference. Econ Bot 50:381–400Google Scholar
  31. Voeks RA (2004) Disturbance pharmacopeias: Medicine and myth from the humid tropics. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(4):868–888Google Scholar
  32. Wiersema JH, León B (1999) World economic plants. a standard reference. CRC Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Development and the Environment (SUM)University of OsloBlindern, OsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life SciencesAsNorway

Personalised recommendations