Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 2495–2513 | Cite as

The use of incidence-based species richness estimators, species accumulation curves and similarity measures to appraise ethnobotanical inventories from South Africa

  • Vivienne L. WilliamsEmail author
  • Edward T. F. Witkowski
  • Kevin Balkwill
Original Paper

Abstract

The incorporation of suitable quantitative methods into ethnobotanical studies enhances the value of the research and the interpretation of the results. Prediction of sample species richness and the use of species accumulation functions have been addressed little in applied ethnobotany. In this paper, incidence-based species richness estimators, species accumulation curves and similarity measures are used to compare and predict species richness, evaluate sampling effort and compare the similarity of species inventories for ethnobotanical data sets derived from the trade in traditional medicine in Johannesburg and Mpumalanga, South Africa. EstimateS was used to compute estimators of species richness (e.g. Jackknife), rarefaction curves, species accumulation curves and complimentarity. Results showed that while the Michaelis–Menten Means estimator appeared to be the best estimator because the curve approached a horizontal asymptote, it was not able to accurately predict species richness for one of the data sets when two of its subsamples were individually tested. Instead, the first-order Jackknife estimator best approximated the known richness.

Keywords

Traditional medicine trade Quantitative ethnobotany Species accumulation curves Rarefaction Richness estimation Complimentarity Sampling effort EstimateS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Begossi A (1996) Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany. Econ Bot 50:280–289Google Scholar
  2. Bunge J, Fitzpatrick M (1993) Estimating the number of species: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 88:364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botha J (2001) Perceptions of availability and values of medicinal plants traded on the western boundary of the Kruger National Park, South Africa. MSc dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiarucci A, Enright NJ, Perry GLW, Miller BP, Lamont BB (2003) Performance of nonparametric species richness estimators in a high diversity plant community. Divers Distrib 9:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colwell RK (2001) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 6. User’s guide and application published at: http://www.viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
  6. Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User’s Guide and application published at: http://www.purl.oclc.org/estimates
  7. Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1995) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. In: Hawksworth DL (ed), Biodiversity, measurement and estimation. Chapman and Hall, pp 101–118Google Scholar
  8. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85(10):2717–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham AB (1988) An investigation of the herbal medicine trade in Natal-Kwazulu. Investigational Report No. 29, Institute of Natural Resources, University of Natal, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham AB (2001) Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation. People and Plants Conservation Manual, Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Dold AT, Cocks ML (2002) The trade in medicinal plants in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. South African J Sci 98(11–12):589–597Google Scholar
  12. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear. http://www.homepages.together.net/∼gentsmin/ecosim.htm
  14. Hanazaki N, Tamashiro JY, Leitão-Filho HF, Begossi A (2000) Diversity of plant use in two Caiçara communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Biodiv Conserv 9:597–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayek LC, Buzas MA (1997) Surveying natural populations. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Heck KL, van Belle G, Simberloff D (1975) Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56:1459–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Höft M, Barik SK, Lykke AM (1999) Quantitative ethnobotany: applications of multivariate and statistical analysis in ethnobotany. People and Plants working paper 6. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology—a primer on methods and computing. John Wiley and Sons, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  20. Magurran A (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Magurran A (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley InterScience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Soberón J, Llorente J (1993) The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conserv Biol 7:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sørenson L (2004) Composition and diversity of the spider fauna in the canopy of the montane forest in Tanzania. Biodiv Conserv 13:437–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toti DS, Coyle FA, Miller JA (2000) A structured inventory of Appalachian grass bald and heath bald spider assemblages and a test of species richness estimator performance. J Arachnol 28:329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams VL (2003) Hawkers of health: an investigation of the Faraday Street traditional medicine market in Johannesburg, Gauteng. Plant Ecology and Conservation Series No. 15, University of the Witwatersrand (Report to the Gauteng Directorate for Nature Conservation, DACEL), p␣215Google Scholar
  27. Williams VL, Balkwill K, Witkowski ETF (1997) Muthi traders on the Witwatersrand, South Africa – an urban mosaic. S Afr J Bot 63(6):378–381Google Scholar
  28. Williams VL, Balkwill K, Witkowski ETF (2000) Unravelling the commercial market for medicinal plants and plant parts on the Witwatersrand, South Africa. Econ Bot 54(3):310–327Google Scholar
  29. Williams VL, Witkowski ETF, Balkwill K (2005) Application of diversity indices to appraise plant availability in traditional medicinal markets in Johannesburg, South Africa. Biodiv Conserv 14:2971–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams VL (2005) Market networks for medicinal bark in southern Africa. In: Trees for health—forever: Implementing sustainable medicinal bark use in southern Africa. Regional Workshop, Johannesburg, South Africa, 1–3 November 2005. DFID-FRP Project R8305, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivienne L. Williams
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edward T. F. Witkowski
    • 1
  • Kevin Balkwill
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Animal, Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandWitsSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations