Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 11, pp 2695–2707 | Cite as

Community-based Monitoring of Fog Capture and Biodiversity at Loma Alta, Ecuador Enhance Social Capital and Institutional Cooperation

  • C. Dustin BeckerEmail author
  • Ana Agreda
  • Evelyng Astudillo
  • Melina Costantino
  • Pascual Torres
Article

Abstract

Monitoring of fog capture and bird communities helped to build social capital for conservation at Loma Alta, Ecuador and encouraged the local community to protect 3000 hectares of tropical forest. Data collected during monitoring were used to facilitate action and cooperation at local, regional, national, and international levels for conservation of biodiversity in western Ecuador, including the designation of an Important Bird Area in the region. Through involvement with the monitoring efforts, local people became more aware of the value of ecosystem services, learned about local birds and their conservation status, became familiar with ecotourism, and began to include conservation of biodiversity with sustainable development planning in their community. The context of monitoring, the objectives and participants, field methods, impacts in terms of conservation action, and the costs and benefits of the two monitoring initiatives are described.

Keywords

Community-based conservation Ecological monitoring Ecuador Important Bird Area Locally-based monitoring Tropical biodiversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, C.D., López-Lanús, B. 1997Conservation value of a garúa forest in the dry season: a bird survey in the Reserva Ecológica de Loma AltaEcuadorCotinga86674Google Scholar
  2. Becker, C.D. 1999Protecting a garúa forest in Ecuador: the role of institutions and ecosystem valuationAmbio28156161Google Scholar
  3. Becker, C.D. 2002Grassroots to grassroots: why forest preservation was rapid at Loma Alta, EcuadorWorld Deve.31163176Google Scholar
  4. Becker C.D. and Ghamire K. 2003. Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conserv. Ecol. (online).Google Scholar
  5. Bennun L., Matiku P., Mulwa R., Mwangi S. and Buckley P. 2005. Monitoring important bird areas in Africa: towards a sustainable and scaleable system. Biodivers. Conserv. (this issue).Google Scholar
  6. Best, B.J., Kessler, M. 1995Biodiversity and Conservation in Tumbesian Ecuador and PeruBirdLife InternationalCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Birdlife International. 2004. What is an Important Bird Area? http://www.birdlife.net/action/campaigns/iba_campaign/whats_an_iba.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. Collar, N.J., Crosby, M.J., Stattersfield, A.J. 1994Birds to Watch 2: The World List of Threatened BirdsBirdlife InternationalCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehrlich, P.R., Wilson, E.O. 1991Biodiversity studies: science and policyScience253758762Google Scholar
  10. Estudillo, E., Becker, C.D. 2002Las Aves endémicas de la Región Tumbesina presentes en la Reserva Ecológica Comunal LomaCongreso Binacional entre Ecuador y PerúCiudad de Piura, PerúGoogle Scholar
  11. Gentry, A.H. 1977Endangered plant species and habitats of Ecuador and Amazonian PeruPrance, G.T.Elaisi, T.S. eds. Extinction is ForeverNew York Botanic GardenNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. GBIF. 2000. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. http://www.gbif.org/Google Scholar
  13. Gibson, C., Becker, C.D. 2000Lack of institutional demand: why a strong local community in western Ecuador fails to protect its forestGibson, C.McKean, M.Ostrom, E. eds. People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and the Governance of ForestsMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberg, R. 1996Managed forest patches and the diversity of birds in southern MexicoSchelhas, J.Greenberg, R. eds. Forest Patches in Tropical LandscapesIsland PressWashington DC, USAChapter 4Google Scholar
  15. Lubchenco, J. 1998Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for scienceScience279491496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers, N. 1988Threatened biotas: hot spots in tropical forestsEnvironmentalist8187208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. NBII. 2001. National Biological Information Infrastructure 2001. http://www.nbii.gov/Google Scholar
  18. Ostrom, E. 1990Governing the CommonsCambridge University PressNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Ostrom E. 1998. The International Forestry Resources and Institutions Research Program: a methodology for relating human incentives and actions on forest cover biodiversity. In: Dallmeier F. and Cominskey J.A. (eds), in Forest Biodiversity in NorthCentral, and South America and the Caribbean: Research and Monitoring. Man and the Biosphere Series 22: 1–28.Google Scholar
  20. Pretty, J. 2003Social capital and the collective management of resourcesScience30219121914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ridgely, R.S., Greenfield, P.J. 2001The Birds of EcuadorCornell University PressIthaca, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Rijsoort, J., Jinfeng, Z. 2005Participatory resource monitoring as a means for promoting social change in Yunnan, P.R. ChinaBiodivers. Conserv.1425432573Google Scholar
  23. Soulé, M.E., Wilcox, B.A. 1980Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological PerspectiveSinauer AssociatesSunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Stattersfield, A.J., Crosby, M.J., Long, A.J., Wege, D.C. 1998Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity ConservationBirdLife InternationalCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevenson R.D. and Morris R.A. 2004. Community Science for Biodiversity Monitoring, 4 pp. http://www.cs.umb.edu/efg/CommSci/Monitoring.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Dustin Becker
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ana Agreda
    • 1
  • Evelyng Astudillo
    • 1
  • Melina Costantino
    • 1
  • Pascual Torres
    • 1
  1. 1.Earthwatch Institute and Aves de Ecuador and CECIAUSA
  2. 2.University of New MexicoZuniUSA

Personalised recommendations