Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 11, pp 2543–2573 | Cite as

Participatory Resource Monitoring as a Means for Promoting Social Change in Yunnan, China

  • Jeannette Van RijsoortEmail author
  • Zhang Jinfeng


Recent international forest policies stimulate involvement of communities in forest management as a strategy to improve biodiversity conservation and the quality of local livelihoods. Increasingly, the role of local people in monitoring forest resources is also acknowledged. This paper presents a participatory resources monitoring (PRM) system developed and implemented by representatives of 12 villages, six each within and adjacent to two nature reserves in Yunnan, China. The short-term objectives are to monitor resource and wildlife abundance, resource use, wildlife damage to crops, and land use. Main methods used by the village monitoring team are: (1) observation through forest walk, (2) village interview, and (3) market survey. Monitoring is implemented throughout the year to fit in the daily work of villagers. Staff from the nature reserve or forestry bureau provide support by visiting the villages several days per year. Results indicate that participatory monitoring is a valuable tool for villagers to engage in self-owned management actions. We discuss how monitoring is also a process which could lead to social change. Based on narratives we suggest that participatory monitoring builds trust between stakeholders, changes perceptions and attitudes and leads to more democratic and transparent decision-making. In discussing accuracy, we argue that all stakeholders perceive and interpret nature differently based on different worldviews, knowledge systems, values and beliefs. We argue that if participatory monitoring is to be sustainable, community-based monitoring – preferably linked to scientific monitoring and patrolling – should be designed as a discursive institution where the process of building social capital and inter-actor learning is extremely important. Finally, we briefly reflect upon efforts to scale up participatory monitoring.

Key words

China Locally-based monitoring Participatory monitoring Perceptions Process approach Social change Yunnan 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal, A., Gibson, C.C. 1999Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservationWorld Develop.27629649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose-Oji B., Lawrence A., Wong J., Lysinge R., Fraser P., Hall J., O’Connor H. and Healey J. 2002. Obtaining local values for biodiversity: protocols used by the ERP Mount Cameroon Project. Summarised case study. In: ETFRN (ed.), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). 7–25 January 2002. ETFRNEnvironmental Change Institute DFID and Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
  3. Becker C.D., AgredaA., Astudillo E., Constantino M. and Torres P. 2005. Community-based surveys of fog capture and biodiversity monitoring at Loma AltaEcuador enhance social capital and institutional cooperation. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2695–2707.Google Scholar
  4. Berger P.L. and Luckmann T. 1981. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  5. Bliss, J., Aplet, G., Hartzell, C., Harwood, P., Jahnige, P., Kittredge, D., Lewandowski, S., Soscia, M.L. 2001Community-based ecosystem monitoringJ. Sustain. Forest.12143167Google Scholar
  6. Danielsen F., Burgess N. and Balmford A. 2005. Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2507–2542.Google Scholar
  7. Dupar M. and Badenoch N. 2002. EnvironmentLivelihoods, and Local Institutions. Decentralisation in Mainland Southeast Asia. World Resources Institute, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Estrella, M., Gaventa, J. 1998Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: a literature reviewInstitute of Development StudiesBrighton, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, R.J. 1995Collaborative management of forests for conservation and development. Issues in forest conservationIUCN and WWFGlandSwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  10. Guijt I., Arevalo M. and Saladores K. 1998. Tracking change together. In: Arevalo M. et al. (eds),PLA Notes 31: Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. IIED, London, UK, pp. 28–36.Google Scholar
  11. IUCN 2003. 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Scholar
  12. Kellert, S.R., Mehta, J.N., Ebbin, S.A., Lichtenfeld, L.L. 2000Community natural resource management: promises, rhetoric, and realitySoc. Nat. Resour.13705715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrence A. 2002. The Art of Science: Background Paper for the ETFRN PAMEB Conference. In: ETFRN (ed.), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). 7–25 January 2002. ETFRNEnvironmental Change Institute DFID and Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence A. and Elphick M. 2002. Summary report. In: Lawrence A. and Elphick M. (ed.), Policy Implications of Participatory Biodiversity Assessment. ETFRN International Seminar for Policy-Makers and Implementers, London, UK. ETFRN Environmental Change InstituteDFID and Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
  15. Lawrence A. and van Rijsoort J. 2003. How should a participatory biodiversity assessment be conducted?. In: UNEP World Conservation and Monitoring Centre(ed.), Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring. Guidance for Practitioners. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Leach, M. 2002Plural perspectives and institutional dynamics: challenges for community forestryOglethorpe, J.A.E. eds. Adaptive Management: From Theory to PracticeIUCNGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK6682Google Scholar
  17. Li Z.B., Zhao X.D., Yang S.Y., Shi X.C., Yang X.H., Ning B., Cheng B.R., Zhang S.Q., Zhang Y.B., Liu H.Z., Xia L. and Li A.P. 1999. Preliminary Integrated Management Plan of the provincial level Xiaoheishan Nature Reserve. Unpublished project report. Xiaoheishan Nature Reserve Management Office, Baoshan, Yunnan, P.R. China.Google Scholar
  18. Malhotra, Y. 2001Expert systems for knowledge management: crossing the chasm between information processing and sense makingExpert Syst. Appl.20716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Rijsoort J. and Zhang J. 2002. Development of participatory resources monitoring in two nature reserves in Yunnan, P.R. China. A case study. In: ETFRN (ed.), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). 7–25 January 2002. ETFRN, Environmental Change Institute, DFID and Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
  20. van Rijsoort, J., Zhang, J. In pressThe development of a strategy for Participatory Resources Monitoring in Yunnan, P.R. China and its value for forest conservation and local needsLawrence, A. eds. Taking Stock of NatureCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Sabel, C.F. 1994Learning by monitoring: the institutions of economic developmentSmelser, N.J.Swedberg, R. eds. The Handbook of Economic SociologyPrinceton Press and Russel Sage FoundationPrinceton, NJ and New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Schanz, H. 2002National forest programmes as discursive institutionsForest Policy and Economics4269279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheil, D. 2001Conservation and biodiversity monitoring in the Tropics: realities, priorities, and distractionsConserv. Biol.1511791182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiersum K.F. 1999. Normative pluriformity in forest management: professional and community perspectives. In: FAO et al. (eds),Pluralism and Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development. FAO, RomeItaly. 9–12 December 1997, pp. 365–380.Google Scholar
  25. Wilshusen, P.R., Brechin, S.R., Fortwangler, C.L., West, P.C. 2002Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservationSoc. Nat. Resour.151740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong J., Healey J. and Phyllips O. 2002. Incorporating values into biodiversity assessment and monitoring – An introduction to some current issues. In: ETFRN (eds), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). ETFRN, Environmental Change Institute, DFID and Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
  27. Xu J., Zuo T. and Yang Y. 2001. The Impact of Decentralisation and Local Participation on Upland Watersheds Management in Yunnan, China. A collaborative Project between Resources Policy Support Initiative (REPSI) and Centre for Biodiversity and Indigenous Knowledge (CBIK). Project document. Centre for Biodiversity and Indigenous Knowledge (CBIK), Kunming, P.R. China.Google Scholar
  28. Zhuo P.Y., Qu L.S., Chang Z.J. and Peng H.F. 2000. Preliminary Integrated Management Plan of the Provincial level Tongbiguan Nature Reserve. Unpublished project document.Tongbiguan Nature Reserve Management Office, Mangshi, Yunnan, P.R. China.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Forest and Nature Conservation Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Research Institute of Economic Forests, Yunnan Academy of ForestryKunmingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations