Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1359–1378 | Cite as

What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers

Article

Abstract

Conservation managers and policy makers must often justify the need for protection of biodiversity. However, results of scientific studies testing for a positive value of biodiversity in terms of community stability and ecosystem function have been complex and inconsistent. We review recent information on the consequences of loss of biodiversity for natural systems. The relationships described vary with scale of interest – for instance, biodiversity at local scales typically has strong effects on ecosystem function, although the opposite relationship is often found at regional scales. These inconsistencies lead to some concern as to whether these relationships can be used to justify biodiversity protection. This is particularly relevant to policy, where holistic protection of biodiversity has most often been mooted and justified. For managers, who most often work to protect single species, communities or ecosystem functions, biodiversity research has failed to address questions of critical concern such as consequences of the loss of rare species or the identification of functional keystone species. For the general public, we believe that the confusion and debate surrounding biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships is in danger of eroding the positive value society places on biodiversity. We further warn that using those relationships in policy documents as justifications for biodiversity protection is fraught with difficulties. Finally, we contend that biodiversity research has largely not addressed issues of concern to conservation managers, and list a set of priorities for relevant research on the consequences of biodiversity loss.

Key words

Biodiversity Ecosystem function Policy Social Species loss Stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allison G.W. (2004). The influence of diversity and stress intensity on community resistance and resilience. Ecol. Monogr. 74: 117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altieri M.A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asner G.P. and Beatty S.W. (1996). Effects of an African grass invasion on Hawaiian shrubland nitrogen biogeochemistry. Plant Soil 186: 205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belden and Russonello 1996. Human values and nature's future: Americans attitudes on biological diversity, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beldon R. and Stewart 2002. Americans and biodiversity: new perspectives in 2002, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berlow E.L. (1999). Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398: 300–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bolam S.G., Fernandes T.F. and Huxham M. (2002). Diversity, biomass, and ecosystem processes in the marine benthos. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 599–615Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bond E.M. and Chase J. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 5: 467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borrvall C., Ebenman B. and Jonsson T. (2000). Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs. Ecol. Lett. 3: 131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bowen B.W. (1999). Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy. Mol. Ecol. 8: s5–s10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bullock J.M., Pywell R.F., Burke M.J.W. and Walker K.J. (2001). Restoration of biodiversity enhances agricultural production. Ecol. Lett. 4: 185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caldeira M.C., Ryel R.J., Lawton J.H. and Pereira J.S. (2001). Mechanisms of positive biodiversity–production relationships: insights provided by δ13C analysis in experimental Mediterranean grassland plots. Ecol. Lett. 4: 439–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campbell B.M., Jeffrey S., Kozanayi W., Luckert M., Mutamba M. and Zindi C. (2002). Household livelihoods in semi-arid regions: options and constraints. Centre for International Forestry Research, BogorIndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cardinale B.J., Palmer M.A. and Collins S.C. (2002). Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415: 426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crawley M.J., Brown S.L., Heard M.S. and Edwards G.R. (1999). Invasion resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity?. Ecol. Lett. 2: 140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Convention on Biological Diversity. 1992. United Nations Environmental Program.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dirzo R. and Raven P.H. (2003). Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28: 137–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doak D.F., Bigger D., Harding E.K., Marvier M.A., O'Malley R.E. and Thomson D. (1998). The statistical inevitability of stability–diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151: 264–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Downing A.L. and Leibold M. (2002). Ecosystem consequences of species richness and composition in pond food webs. Nature 416: 837–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duffy J.E., Macdonald K.S., Rhode J.M. and Parker J.D. (2001). Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: an experimental test. Ecology 82: 2417–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dukes J.S. (2001). Biodiversity and invasibility in grassland microcosms. Oecologia 126: 563–568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dukes J.S. (2002). Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecol. Appl. 12: 602–617Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ehrlich P.R. and Ehrlich A.H. (1981). Extinctions: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. Ballantine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    El Serafy S. (1998). Pricing the unpriceable. Ecol. Econ. 25: 25–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elton C.S. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Emmerson M.C., Solan M., Emes C., Paterson D.M. and Raffaelli D. (2001). Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Nature 411: 73–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Engelhardt K.A.M. and Ritchie M.E. (2001). Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature 411: 687–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Environment Canada. (2003). Species at Risk Act. Ottawa, Canada Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Figge F. (2004). Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 827–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Finke D.L. and Denno R.F. (2004). Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429: 407–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fonseca C.R. and Ganade G. (2001). Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J. Ecol. 89: 118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fricke H. (2001). Coelacanths: a human responsibility. J. Fish Biol. 59: 332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fukami T. and Morin P.J. (2003). Productivity–biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature 424: 423–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Griffiths B.S., Ritz K., Bardgett R.D., Cook R., Christensen S., Ekelund F., Sørensen S.J., Bååth E., Bloem J., de Ruiter P.C., Dolfing J. and Nicolardot B. (2000). Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90: 279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hall R., Tank J.L. and Dybdahl M.F. (2003). Exotic snails dominate nitrogen and carbon cycling in a highly productive stream. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heemsbergen D.A., Berg M.P., Loreau M., van Hal J.R., Faber J.H. and Verhoef H.A. (2004). Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity science. Science 306: 1019–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hilborn R., Quinn T.P., Schindler D.E. and Rogers D.E. (2003). Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 6564–6568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hooper D.U. and Dukes J.S. (2004). Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment. Ecol. Lett. 7: 95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hooper D.U. and Vitousek P.M. (1998). Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68: 121–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hooper D.U., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setala H., Symstad A.J., Vandermeer J., Wardle D.A. and Chapin F.S. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monog. 75: 3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hughes J.B. and Roughgarden J. (2000). Species diversity and biomass stability. Am. Nat. 155: 618–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ives A.R., Gross K. and Klug J.L. (1999). Stability and variability in competitive communities. Science 286: 542–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ives A.R., Klug J.L. and Gross K. (2000). Stability and species richness in complex communities. Ecol. Lett. 3: 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jonsson M. and Malmqvist B. (2000). Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf-eating, aquatic insects. Oikos 89: 519–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jonsson M., Malmqvist B. and Hoffsten P. (2001). Leaf litter breakdown rates in boreal streams: does shredder species richness matter?. Freshw. Biol. 46: 161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jonsson M. and Malmqvist B. (2003). Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses. Oecologia 134: 554–559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kennedy T., Naeem S., Howe K.J., Knops J.M.H., Tilman D. and Reich P.B. (2002). Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417: 636–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kinzig A.P., Pacala S.W. and Tilman D. (eds) (2001). The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kolar C.S. and Lodge D.M. (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kula E. (2001). Islam and environmental conservation. Environ. Conserv. 28: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Laird S.A. (2002). Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnerships in Practice. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Levine J.M. (2000). Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local processes to community pattern. Science 288: 852–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Levine J.M. and D'Antonio C.M. (1999). Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Levine J.M., Adler P.B. and Yelenik S.G. (2004). A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7: 975–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lhomme J. and Winkel T. 2002. Diversity–stability relationships in ecommunity ecology: re-examination of the Portfolio Effect. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 62: 271–279.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Livingstone D.M. (1994). The historic roots of our ecological crisis – a reassessment. Fides et Historia 26: 38–55Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Loreau M., Naeem S. and Inchausti P. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lyons K.G. and Schwartz M.W. (2001). Rare species loss alters ecosystem function – invasion resistance. Ecol. Lett. 4: 358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    MacArthur R.H. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36: 533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Marchetti M.P., Moyle P.B. and Levine R. (2001). Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non-native fishes across invasion stages in California. Freshw. Biol. 49: 646–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    May R.M. (1973). The Stability and Complexity of Model Ecosystems. Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McCann K., Hastings A. and Huxel G.R. (1998). Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395: 794–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Memmott J., Waser N.M. and Price M.V. (2004). Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Series B – Biol. Sci. 271: 2605–2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Online at http://milleniumassessment.org.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Morin P. and McGrady-Steed J. (2004). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in aquatic microbial systems: a new analysis of temporal variation and species richness-predictability relations. Oikos 104: 458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mouquet N., Moore J.L. and Loreau M. (2002). Plant species richness and community productivity: Why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecol. Lett. 5: 56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Murray M. (2003). Overkill and sustainable use. Science 299: 1851–1853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Naeem S., Hahn D.R. and Schuurman G. (2000). Producer-decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature 403: 762–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. 1997. State of New Zealand's Environment 1997. Wellington.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Petchey O.L., McPhearson P.T., Casey T.M. and Morin P.J. (1999). Environmental warming alters food web structure and ecosystem function. Nature 402: 69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Petchey O.L., Casey T.J., Jiang L., McPhearson P.T. and Price J. (2002). Species richness, environmental fluctuations, and temporal change in total community biomass. Oikos 99: 231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Petchey O.L., Downing A.L., Mittelbach G.G., Persson L., Steiner C.F., Warren P.H. and Woodward G. (2004). Species loss and the structure and functioning of multitrophic aquatic systems. Oikos 104: 467–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pfisterer A.B. and Schmid B. (2002). Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. Nature 416: 84–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Pimm S.L., Russell G.J., Gittleman J.L. and Brooks T.M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Posey D.A. (ed.) 1996. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Raffaelli D., Emmerson M., Solan M., Biles C. and Paterson D. (2003). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in shallow coastal waters: an experimental approach. J. Sea Res. 49: 133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Reich P.B., Knops J., Tilman D., Craine J., Ellsworth D., Tjoelker M., Lee T., Wedin D., Naeem S., Bahauddin D., Hendrey G., Jose S., Wrage K., Goth J. and Bengston W. (2001). Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410: 809–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ruesink J.L. and Srivastava D.S. (2001). Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores. Oikos 93: 221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sala O.E., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D.M.H., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Poff N.L., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M., Wall D.H. and Chapin F.S. (2000). Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sankaran M. and McNaughton S.J. (1999). Determinants of biodiversity regulate compositional stability of communities. Nature 401: 691–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sax D.F., Gaines S.D. and Brown J.H. (2002). Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. Am. Nat. 160: 766–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sax D.F. and Gaines S.D. (2003). Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Scheffer M., Carpenter S., Foley J.A., Folke C. and Walker B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Schwartz M.W., Brigham C.A., Hoeksema J.D., Lyons K.G., Mills M.H. and van Mantgem P.J. (2000). Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122: 297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sekercioglu C.H., Daily G.C. and Ehrlich P.R. (2004). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 18042–18047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Simon K.S., Townsend C.R., Biggs B.J.F., Bowden W.B. and Frew R.D. (2004). Habitat-specific nitrogen dynamics in New Zealand streams containing native or invasive fish. Ecosystem 7: 777–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Smith M.D. and Knapp A.K. (2003). Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol. Lett. 6: 509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Smith E.A. and Wishnie M. (2000). Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 29: 493–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Solan M., Cardinale B.J., Downing A.L., Engelhardt K.A.M., Ruesink J.L. and Srivastava D.S. (2004). Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science 306: 1177–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Srivastava D.S. (2002). The role of conservation in expanding biodiversity research. Oikos 98: 351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Stachowicz J.J., Whitlatch R.B. and Osman R.W. (1999). Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286: 1577–1579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Stachowicz J.J., Fried H., Osman R.W. and Whitlatch R.B. (2002). biodiversity, invasion resistanceand marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83: 2575–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Taiepa T., Lyver P., Horsley P., Davis J., Bragg M. and Moller H. (1997). Comanagement of New Zealand's Conservation Estate by MGori and Pakeha: a review. Environ. Conserv. 24: 236–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Tilman D. and Downing J. (1994). Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367: 363–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tilman D., Reich P.B., Knops J., Wedin D., Mielke T. and Lehman C. (2001). Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294: 843–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Toledo V.M. (2001). Indigenous peoples and biodiversity. In: Levin, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, pp. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Turner-Erfort G. (1996). Public awareness and perceptions of biodiversity. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 77: 449–452 Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    UNEP. 2003. Traditional lifestyles and biodiversity use. Regional report: Europe and Russia. Prepared for the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity by UNEP-WCMC.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    UNESCO. 1972. World Heritage Convention.. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    vanden Born R.J.G., Lenders R.H.J., de Groot W.T. and Huijsman E. (2001). The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environ. Conserv. 28: 65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    van Ruijven J. and Berendse F. (2003). Positive effects of plant species diversity on productivity in the absence of legumes. Ecol. Lett. 6: 170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Vitousek P.M., Aber J.D. Howarth R.W., Likens G.E., Matson P.A., Schindler D.A., Schlesinger W.H. and Tilman D. (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl. 7: 737–750Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Walker B. (1992). Biological diversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 6: 18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wilson E.O. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Wilson E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Wilson E.O. (1997). Introduction. In: Reaka-Kudla, M.L., Wilson, D.E. and Wilson, E.O. (eds) Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting our Biological Resources, pp 1–3. Joseph Henry Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wohl D.L., Arora S. and Gladstone J.R. (2004). Functional redundancy supports biodiversity and ecosystem function in a closed and constant environment. Ecology 85: 1534–1540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Yachi S. and Loreau M. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1463–1468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C., Peacock A.D. and Tilman D. (2003). Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links?. Ecology 84: 2042–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Zavaleta E.S. and Hulvey K.B. (2004). Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders. Science 306: 1175–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Zimmerman B., Peres C.A., Malcolm J.R. and Turner T. (2001). Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazoniaa tropical forest indigenous people. Environ. Conserv. 28: 10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biodiversity Research CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver BCCanada
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations