Biodiversity & Conservation

, 15:4633 | Cite as

Animal Preferences and Acceptability of Wildlife Management Actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

  • Bjørn P. KaltenbornEmail author
  • Tore Bjerke
  • Julius W. Nyahongo
  • Daniel R. Williams


Wildlife management policies are often based on expert perceptions of the ecological importance of certain species and poorly informed perceptions of how public attitudes toward management are formed. Little is known about why preferences vary greatly and how this affects support for management actions. This paper explores preferences for a range of wildlife species among a sample of the rural population adjacent to Serengeti National Park in Tanzania. We also examine the degree of acceptance for alternative management interventions when potentially dangerous animals pose different levels of problems to human beings, and the extent to which these attitudes are related to species preferences. Gender has a significant effect on species preferences. Men like most species better than women. Age has no significant effect, but level of education affects preference level for some species. Species preferences have a positive effect on support for management intervention when dangerous animals cause small or moderate problems to humans, i.e. there is a higher degree of acceptance of problems caused by animals that are well liked. In situations where human life is threatened, species preferences have no effect on preferred management actions. Appreciation of animals is a combination of functional, consumptive and cultural dimensions, and there is no simple link between species preferences and attitudes toward management actions. The local context and concrete experience with wildlife encounters is more important for shaping normative beliefs like attitudes towards management actions than global wildlife attitudes.

Key words

Animal preferences Flagship species Serengeti Wildlife management 


  1. Arrindell W.A. (2000). Phobic dimensions: IV. The structure of animal fears. Behav. Res. Therapy 38: 509–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes R.F.W. (1996). The conflict between humans and elephants in the central African forests. Mammal Rev. 26: 67–80Google Scholar
  3. Bjerke T. and Bevanger K. (2002). Frykt for hoggorm – hva betyr kjønn, alder og erfaring? (Fear of the adder Vipera berus – the significance of sex, ageand experience.) (In Norwegian, English summary). Fauna 55: 7–13Google Scholar
  4. Bjerke T. and Thrane C. 2003. Self-reported fear of spiders across demographic groups in Norway. Fauna norvegica 23: 9–13.Google Scholar
  5. Bjerke T. and Østdahl T. 2004. Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös. 17(2): 109–129Google Scholar
  6. Bjerke T., Ødegårdstuen T.S. and Kaltenborn B.P. (1998). Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian children and adolescents: species preferences. Anthrozoös 11: 227–235Google Scholar
  7. Bjerke T., Skogen K. and Kaltenborn B.P. (2002). Nordmenns holdnninger til store rovpatte-dyr. (Attitudes toward large carnivores in Norway. In Norwegian, English summary). NINA Oppdragsmelding 768, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowen-Jones E. and Entwistle A. (2002). Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx 36: 189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of statistics. 1992. Population census. Regional Profile Mara. Unpubl. Report. President's OfficePlanning Commission, Dar es SalaamTanzania293 pp.Google Scholar
  10. De Boer W.F. and Baquete D.S. (1998). Natural resource usecrop damage and attitudes ofrural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant ReserveMozambique. Environm. Conserv. 25: 208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davey G.C.L. (1994). Self-reported fears to common indigenous animals in an adult UK population: the role of disgust sensitivity. Brit. J. Psychol. 85: 541–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Durrheim D.N. and Leggat P.A. (1999). Risk to tourists posed by wild animals in South Africa. J. Travel Med. 6: 172–179 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. East M.L. and Hofer H. 2000. The impact of bush-meat hunting on non-target species: commuting spotted hyenas, Crocuta crocutain the Serengeti. African Wildlife Management in the New Millenium Conference. College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Tanzania 13–15 December 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Entwistle A.C. and Stephenson P.J. (2000). Small mammals and the conservation agenda. In: Entwistle, A. and Dunstone, N. (eds) Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day?, pp 119–139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Ericsson G. and Heberlein T.A. (2002). Attityder til varg och vargjakt I Sverige. (Attitudes toward wolves and hunting in Sweden. In Swedish). Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  16. Galaty J.R. (1998). The Maasai ornithorium: tropic flights of avian imagination in Africa. Ethnology 37: 227–238Google Scholar
  17. Gillingham S. and Lee P.C. (1999). The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environm. Conserv. 26: 218–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinen J.T. and Low B.S. (1992). Human behavioural ecology and environmental conservation. Environm. Conserv. 19: 105–116Google Scholar
  19. Hill C.M. (1998). Conflicting attitudes toward elephants around the Budongo Forest ReserveUganda. Environm. Conserv. 25: 244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaltenborn B.P. and Bjerke T. (submitted) Living with problem animals – self-reported fear of potentially dangerous species in the Serengeti region, Tanzania. Submitted to Human Dimensions of Wildlife.Google Scholar
  21. Kellert S.R. (1996). The Value of Life. Biological Diversity and Human Society. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  22. Kellert S.R. and Berry J.K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledgeand behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 15: 363–371Google Scholar
  23. Kellert S.R. and Westervelt M.O. 1983. Children's attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward animals. Government Printing Office, report no. 024-010-00641-2. 202 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Kellert S.R. and Wilson E.O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleiven J., Bjerke T. and Kaltenborn B.P. 2004. Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 1647–1658.Google Scholar
  26. Kuriyan R. (2002). Linking local perceptions of elephants and conservation: samburu pastoralists in Northern Kenya. Soc. Nat. Resour. 15: 949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linnell J.D.C., Swenson J.E. and Andersen R. (2000). Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones?. Biodiv. Conserv. 9: 857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naughton-Treves L. (1997). Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. The Geograph. Rev. 87: 27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nyahongo J.W. 2003. The impact of humans on the carnivore population in the Western Serengeti Ecosystem. Thesis submitted for Master of Science, University of Dar es Salaam.Google Scholar
  30. O’Connell-Rodwell C.E., Rodwell T., Rice M. and Hart L.A. (2000). Living with the modern conservation paradigm: Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East CapriviNamibia. Biol. Conserv. 93: 381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Osborn F.V. and Parker G.E. (2003). Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx 37: 80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parry D. and Campbell B. (1992). Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe Enclave and Mababe Depression, Botswana. Environm. Conserv. 19: 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rusca G. and Tonucci F. (1992). Development of the concept of living and animal in the child. Eur. J. Psychol. Edu. 7: 151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinclair A.R.E. and Arcese P.(eds) 1995. Serengeti II. Dynamics, Managementand Conservation of an Ecosystem. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 665 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Zinn H.C., Manfredo M.J., Vaske J.J. and Wittmann K. (1998). Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Soc. Nat. Resour. 11: 649–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tore Bjerke
    • 1
  • Julius W. Nyahongo
    • 2
  • Daniel R. Williams
    • 3
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature Research FakkelgårdenLillehammerNorway
  2. 2.Tanzania Wildlife Research InstituteArushaTanzania
  3. 3.USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations