Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1943–1966 | Cite as

Habitats and Resources: The Need for a Resource-based Definition to Conserve Butterflies

  • Roger L. H. Dennis
  • Tim G. Shreeve
  • Hans Van Dyck
Special Issue: Extinction Risk: Predicting, Assessing, Prioritising and Redressing

Abstract

Current definitions of habitat are closely allied to the concept of patch and matrix. This concept is, for instance, central to the prevailing metapopulation models of population dynamics. But, butterfly population dynamics, mobility and spatial structure can only properly be understood in the context of a resource-based definition of habitats. In criticising current definitions of habitat, we illustrate how habitat is best understood in terms of resource distributions. These transcend vegetation-based definitions of habitat and lie at the root of life history strategies, the vulnerability of butterflies to environmental changes and extinction, and govern conservation status. We emphasise the need for a resource-use database and demonstrate the shortcomings of current data for conserving butterflies; patch based definitions of habitats are inappropriate for some species and for others do not provide a universal panacea, inadequately explaining spatial occurrence when scaled over space and time. A resource-based habitat definition challenges the bipolar, patch vs. matrix view of landscape; the alternative is to view landscape as a continuum of overlapping resource distributions. We urge greater attention to the details of butterfly behaviour and resource use as the keys to understanding how landscape is exploited and therefore to successful conservation at the landscape scale.

Keywords

Arthropods Biotopes Habitat Matrix Metapopulations Patch quality Resources 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auckland, J.N., Debinski, D.M., Clark, W.R. 2004Survival, movementand resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodiusEcol. Entomol.29139149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baguette, M. 2003Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillaryEcography26153160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baguette, M., Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N. 2003Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomiaComptes Rendus Biol.326S200S209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brakefield P.M. 1979. An experimental study of the maintenance of variation in spot pattern in Maniola jurtina. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, S.R., Shreeve, T.G. 2002The use of artificial neural networks in ecological analysis: estimating microhabitat temperatureEcol. Entomol.27424432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtney S.P. 1980. Studies on the biology of the butterflies Anthocharis cardamines L. and Pieris napi L. in relation to speciation in Pierinae. Ph.D. Thesis, University Durham, Durham, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Boer, P.J., Reddingius, J. 1996Regulation and stabilization paradigms in population ecologyChapman & HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis, R.L.H. 1993Butterflies and Climate ChangeManchester University PressManchesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis, R.L.H. 2004aButterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisitedEcol. Entomol.29744752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennis, R.L.H. 2004bJust how important are structural elements as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with conservation statusJ. Insect Conserv.83745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dennis, R.L.H. 2004cLandform resources for territorial nettle-feeding Nymphalid butterflies: biases at different spatial scalesAnim. Biodiversity Conserv.273745Google Scholar
  12. Dennis, R.L.H., Bardell, P. 1996The impact of extreme weather on Great Orme populations of Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758) and Plebejus argus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Papilionoidea: Satyrinae and Lycaenidae): hindsightinference and lost opportunitiesEntomol. Gazette47211225Google Scholar
  13. Dennis, R.L.H., Bramley, M.J. 1985The influence of man and climate on dispersion patterns within a population of adult Lasiommata megera (L.) (Satyridae) at Brereton HeathCheshireNota Lepidopterol.8309324Google Scholar
  14. Dennis, R.L.H., Eales, H.T. 1997Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolationJ. Insect Conserv.1167176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennis, R.L.H., Eales, H.T. 1999Probability of patch site occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller) (Lepidoptera: Satryinae) determined from geographical and ecological dataBiol. Conserv.87295301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G. 1996Butterflies on British and Irish offshore islandsGem Publishing CompanyWallingford, OxonGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennis R.L.H. and Sparks T.H. 2005. Landscape resources for the territorial nymphalid butterfly Inachis io: micro-site landform selection and behavioural responses to environmental conditions. J. Insect Behav. 18: 725–742.Google Scholar
  18. Dennis R.L.H. and Sparks T.H. 2006. When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argos. Biol. Conserv. In Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G., Dyck, H. 2003Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpointOikos102417426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dennis, R.L.H., Hodgson, J.G., Grenyer, R., Shreeve, T.G., Roy, D.B. 2004Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host-plant strategies drive butterfly status?Ecol. Entomol.291226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dover, J.W. 1996Factors affecting the distribution of butterflies on arable farmlandJ. Appl. Ecol.33723734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dover, J.W. 1997Conservation headlands: effects on butterfly distribution and behaviourAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.633149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dover, J.W., Fry, G.L.A. 2001Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscapeEntomol. Exp. Appl.100221233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dover, J., Sparks, T. 2000A review of the ecology of butterflies in British hedgerowsJ. Environ. Manage.605163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dover, J., Sotherton, N., Gobbett, K. 1990Reduced pesticide inputs on cereal field margins – the effects on butterfly abundanceEcol. Entomol.151724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dover, J.W., Sparks, T., Clarke, S., Gobbett, K., Glossop, S. 2000Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanesAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.80227242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dover, J.W., Sparks, T.H., Greatorex-Davies, J.N. 1997The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapesJ. Insect Conserv.18997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Driscoll, D.A. 2005Is the matrix a sea? Habitat specificity in a naturally fragmented landscapeEcol. Entomol.30816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ehrlich, P.R., Hanski, I. 2004On the Wings of Checkerspots. A Model System for Population BiologyOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Elton, C.S. 1966The Pattern of Animal CommunitiesMethuenNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M. 1986Landscape EcologyWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Frohawk, F.W. 1934The Complete Book of British ButterfliesWard Locke & Co.LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall, L.S., Krausman, P.R., Morrison, M.L. 1997The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminologyWildlife Soc. Bull.25173182Google Scholar
  34. Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. 1997Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics, and EvolutionAcademic PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanski, I., Simberloff, D. 1997

    The metapopulation approachits history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation

    Hanski, I.Gilpin, M.E. eds. Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics, and EvolutionAcademic PressLondon526
    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanski, I., Thomas, C.D. 1994Metapopulation dynamics. A spatially explicit model applied to butterfliesBiol. Conserv.68167180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henderson, P.A. 2003Practical Methods in EcologyBlackwell PublishingOxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Lewis, O.T. 1996Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structureJ. Anim. Ecol.65725735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis, O.T., Thomas, C.D., Hill, J.K., Brookes, M.I., Crane, T.P.R., Graneau, Y.A., Mallet, J.L.B., Rose, O.C. 1997Three ways of assessing metapopulation structure in the butterfly Plebejus argusEcol. Entomol.22283293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindenmayer, D.B. 2000Factors at multiple scales affecting distribution patterns and their implications for animal conservation – Leadbeater's Possum as a case studyBiodiversity Conserv.91535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matter, S.F., Roland, J. 2002An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheusEcol. Entomol.27308316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matter, S.F., Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., Sabourin, K. 2003The effects of isolation, habitat area and resources on the abundancedensity and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheusAm. Midland Natural.1502636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2004Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamicsOikos106243252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merckx, T., Dyck, H. 2002Interrelations between habitat usebehaviorand flight-related morphology in two co-occurring satyrine butterflies, Maniola jurtinaPyronia tithonusJ. Insect Behav.15541561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nieminen, M., Siljander, M., Hanski, I. 2004

    Structure and dynamics of Melitaea cinxia populations

    Ehrlich, P.R.Hanski, I. eds. On the Wings of Checkerspots. A Model System for Population BiologyOxford University PressOxford6391
    Google Scholar
  46. Ouin, A., Aviron, S., Dover, J., Burel, F. 2004Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapesAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.103473479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker, R. 2003Suffolk grassland as a butterfly habitatTrans. Suffolk Natural Hist. Soc.39421Google Scholar
  48. Peachey C.A. 1980. The ecology of the butterfly community of Bernwood Forest. M.Phil. Thesis (CNAA), Oxford Polytechnic, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Porter K. 1981. The population dynamics of small colonies of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. Pullin, A.S., Knight, T.M. 2001Effectiveness in conservation practice. Pointers from medicine and public healthConserv. Biol.155054Google Scholar
  51. Rodwell, J.S. 1991et seq. British Plant Communities, Vol. 1–5Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., Fownes, S. 2000Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal. Effects of landscape and population sizeEcology8116421653Google Scholar
  53. Schneider, C., Dover, J., Fry, G.L.A. 2003Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study areaEcol. Entomol.28219227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shreeve T.G. 1985. The population biology of the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Ph.D. Thesis. Oxford Polytechnic, Oxford.Google Scholar
  55. Shreeve, T.G. 1986Egg-laying by the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria) – the role of female behaviourhost plant abundance and temperatureEcol. Entomol.11229236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shreeve, T.G. 1987The mate location behaviour of the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeriathe effect of phenotypic differences in hind-wing spottingAnim. Behav.35682690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shreeve, T.G. 1990Microhabitat use and hindwing phenotype in Hipparchia semele (LepidopteraSatyrinae) – thermoregulation and background matchingEcol. Entomol.15201213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shreeve, T.G. 1995

    Butterfly mobility

    Pullin, A.S. eds. Ecology and Conservation of butterfliesChapman & HallLondon3745
    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shreeve, T.G., Mason, C.F. 1980The number of butterfly species in woodlandsOecologia45414418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H., Roy, D.B., Moss, D. 2001An ecological classification of British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancyJ. Insect Conserv.5145161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H., Van Dyck, H. 2004Resources, habitats and metapopulations – whither reality?Oikos106404408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singer, M.C. 2004

    Measurementcorrelates, and importance of oviposition preference in the life of checkerspots

    Ehrlich, P.R.Hanski, I. eds. On the Wings of Checkerspots. A Model System for Population BiologyOxford University PressOxford112137
    Google Scholar
  63. Singer, M.C., Stefanescu, C., Pen, I. 2002When random sampling does not work: standard design falsely indicates maladaptive host preferences in a butterflyEcol. Lett.516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Southwood, T.R.E. 1977Habitatthe template for ecological strategiesJ. Anim. Ecol.46337365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. 2000Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitatsEcol. Lett.3449456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. 2002Insect communities and biotic interactions on fragmented calcareous grasslands – a mini reviewBiol. Conserv.104275284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Summerville, K.S., Crist, T.O. 2001Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation on patch use by butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera)Ecology8213601370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M., Knight, T.M. 2004The need for evidence-based conservationTrends Ecol. Evolut.19305308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, C.D., Harrison, S. 1992Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly speciesJ. Anim. Ecol.61437446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thomas, C.D, Kunin, W.E. 1999The spatial structure of populationsJ. Anim. Ecol.68647657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas, C.D., Bodsworth, E.J., Wilson, R.J., Simmons, A.D., Davies, Z.G., Musche, M., Conradt, L. 2001Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range marginsNature411577581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomas, C.D., Warren, M.S., Thomas, J.A. 1992Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapesOecologia92563567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thomas, J.A. 1983The ecology and conservation of Lysandra bellargus (LepidopteraLycaenidae) in BritainJ. Appl. Ecol.205983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thomas, J.A., Bourn, N.A.D., Clarke, R.T., Stewart, K.E., Simcox, D.J., Pearman, G.S., Curtis, R., Goodger, B. 2001The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapesProc. Royal Soc. London Ser. B. Biol. Sci.26817911796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomas, J.A., Clarke, R.T., Elmes, G.W., Hochberg, M.E. 1998

    Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), in insect populations: in theory and practice

    Dempster, J.P.McLean, I.F. eds. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society, Vol. 19Chapman & HallLondon261290
    Google Scholar
  76. Tutt J.W. 1905–14. A Natural History of British Butterflies. Vols. 1–4, London.Google Scholar
  77. Valimaki, P., Itamies, J. 2003Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats – effects of patch characteristicsEcography26679691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Van Dyck H. and Baguette M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 535–545.Google Scholar
  79. Warren M.S. 1981. The ecology of the Wood White butterfly, Leptidea sinapis L. (LepidopteraPieridae). Ph.D. Thesis. University of CambridgeCambridgeUK.Google Scholar
  80. Whittaker, R.H., Levin, S.A., Root, R.B. 1973Nichehabitatand ecotopeAm. Natural.107321338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiens, J.A. 1996

    Wildlife in patchy environments: metapopulations, mosaics, and management

    McCullough, D.R. eds. Metapopulations and Wildlife ConservationIsland PressWashington, DC5384
    Google Scholar
  82. Wiklund, C. 1981Generalist vs specialist oviposition behavior in Papilio machaon (Lepidoptera) and functional-aspects on the hierarchy of oviposition preferencesOikos36163170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Willmott, K.J. 1985A survey of Glanville Fritillary roosting sitesNews Brit. Butterfly Conserv. Soc.353536Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger L. H. Dennis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tim G. Shreeve
    • 1
  • Hans Van Dyck
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological and Molecular SciencesOxford Brookes UniversityHeadingtonUK
  2. 2.NERC Centre for Ecology and HydrologyHuntingdonUK
  3. 3.Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology & Biogeography UnitCatholic University of Louvain (UCL)Louvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations