Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1873–1886 | Cite as

Application of IUCN Red Listing Criteria at the Regional and National Levels: A Case Study from Central Asia

  • E. J. Milner-Gulland
  • E. Kreuzberg-Mukhina
  • B. Grebot
  • S. Ling
  • E. Bykova
  • I. Abdusalamov
  • A. Bekenov
  • U. Gärdenfors
  • C. Hilton-Taylor
  • V. Salnikov
  • L. Stogova
Special Issue: Extinction Risk: Predicting, Assessing, Prioritising and Redressing

Abstract

We assessed the threatened status of 163 Central Asian vertebrates using the IUCN Red List Criteria (Version 3.1) at the national and regional levels, and compared these assessments to the global assessments given in the IUCN 2002 Red List. We thus compared threat status at three spatial scales; national for five countries separately (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tadjikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan), regional for the five countries together, and global. This analysis was undertaken as a test of the applicability of IUCN criteria at the sub-global level. Generally the criteria worked well. In 4% of cases, the threat category was lower at the smaller scale of assessment. This was predominately caused by the use of decline rate criteria at the larger scale when populations at the smaller scale were stable. We also encountered issues with the listing of migratory species at the sub-global level. We used our data to carry out a preliminary assessment of Protected Area coverage in the region, and found evidence suggesting that threatened species and endemics are not well covered by the current protected area system.

Keywords

Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Protected area coverage Tadjikistan Threatened species Turkmenistan Uzbekistan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collar, N.J., Crosby, N.J., Stattersfield, A.J. 1994Birds to Watch 2: The Birdlife International World Checklist of BirdsBirdlife InternationalCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Gärdenfors, U. 2001Classifying threatened species at a national versus global levelTrends Ecol. Evol.16511516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gärdenfors, U., Hilton-Taylor, C., Mace, G.M., Rodríguez, J.P. 2001The Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional LevelsConserv. Biol.1512061212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. IUCN1994IUCN Red List Categories Version 2.3IUCN Species Survival CommissionGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. IUCN2001IUCN Red List Categories and CriteriaVersion 31IUCN Species Survival CommissionGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. IUCN2003Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCNGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones N. 2003. South Aral Sea “gone in 15 years”. New Scientist 2404, 19th July 2003. Available online at www.newscientist.com/article.ns? id=dn3947.Google Scholar
  8. Kovshar A.F., Bekenov A.B. and Dukravetz G.M. 1996. Red Data Book of Kazakhstan, Vol. 1. Animals. Part. 1. Vertebrates, 3rd ed. Konzhik, Almaty.Google Scholar
  9. Pinchera, F., Boitani, L. 1997Application to the terrestrial vertebrates of Italy of a system proposed by IUCN for a new classification of national Red List categoriesBiodiv. Conserv.6959978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J. 1988Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral SciencesMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. Milner-Gulland
    • 1
  • E. Kreuzberg-Mukhina
    • 2
  • B. Grebot
    • 1
  • S. Ling
    • 1
  • E. Bykova
    • 2
  • I. Abdusalamov
    • 3
  • A. Bekenov
    • 4
  • U. Gärdenfors
    • 5
  • C. Hilton-Taylor
    • 6
  • V. Salnikov
    • 7
  • L. Stogova
    • 8
  1. 1.Imperial College LondonAscotUK
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologyUzbekistan
  3. 3.Institute of Zoology and ParasitologyTadjikistan
  4. 4.Institute of ZoologyKazakhstan
  5. 5.Swedish Species Information CentreUppsala
  6. 6.IUCN-SSCCambridgeUK
  7. 7.Flora and FaunaNational Institute of DesertsTurkmenistan
  8. 8.Institute of Botany and PhytointroductionKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations