Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 14, pp 4335–4356 | Cite as

Attitudes of Scottish City Inhabitants to Cetacean Conservation

  • C. Howard
  • E. C. M. Parsons


In 2003, a survey was conducted in two major Scottish cities in order to investigate current perceptions of the public towards cetaceans and their conservation. Public concern about cetacean conservation was high. Overall the issues considered to be the greatest threats to cetacean populations were related to pollution: oil spills, and chemical and sewage pollution (serious threat: 68, 65, and 63%, respectively). Concern was also high regarding the depletion of cetacean prey from over-fishing, entanglement in fishing gear, marine litter and global warming, (serious threat: 54, 51, 44, and 43%, respectively). Conservation issues that are of specific concern to Scottish waters were also noted: military activities, fish farming and oil exploration. Least concern was expressed about whale-watching (not a threat: 48%). Women and older respondents expressed significantly higher levels of concern about cetacean conservation. Generally, the opinions of the public were similar to those of a test group of marine conservation professionals and advocates, although the public tended to show slightly greater levels of concern for most issues. However, the public expressed significantly higher levels of concern over oil spills, sewage pollution and chemical pollution than did marine conservation professionals/advocates. Most participants (60%) were unsure as to whether there was currently sufficient legal protection for cetaceans in Scotland, but eight out of ten respondents thought that there should be legislation specifically for cetacean conservation. Moreover, 40% stated that the proposal of a law specifically for the protection of cetaceans would make them view a political party or politician more favourably. Eighty percent of those interviewed were in favour of seeing more marine environmental education, including information on cetaceans and their environment, in the Scottish school curriculum.


Dolphins Pollution Public opinion Threats Whales 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold H. (1997). The Dolphin Space Programme: the development and assessment of an accreditation scheme for dolphin watching boats in the Moray Firth. In: (eds) Scottish Wildlife Trust, pp. Scottish Natural Heritageand the EU Life Programme, InvernessGoogle Scholar
  2. Balcomb K.C. and Claridge D.E. (2001). A mass stranding of cetaceans caused by naval sonar in the Bahamas. Bahamas J. Sci. 8: 1–12Google Scholar
  3. Clark R.B. (2002). Marine Pollution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobham Resource Consultants (1997). Review of attitudes and aspirations of people towards the marine environment of Scotland with respect to its uses, controls and conservation importance. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 67. Scottish Natural Heritage, Battleby, PerthGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans P.G.H. (1980). Cetaceans in British waters. Mammal Rev. 10: 1–52Google Scholar
  6. Evans P.G.H. (1992). Status Review of Cetaceans in British and Irish Waters. The Mammal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Frantzis A. (1998). Does acoustic testing strand whales?. Nature 392: 29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill A. (1999). Study to investigate the extent and nature of the fixed-net fishery in Hebridean waters and possible conflicts with harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) populations. Hebridean Whale and Dolphin Trust, Tobermory, MullGoogle Scholar
  9. Gill A., Reid R.J. and Fairbairns B.R. (2000). Photographic and strandings data highlighting the problem of marine debris and creel rope entanglement to minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) and other marine life in Scottish waters. Eur. Res. Cetaceans 14: 173–178Google Scholar
  10. Gordon J. and Moscrop A. (1996). Underwater noise pollution and its significance for whales and dolphins. In: Simmonds M., Hutchinson J.D. (eds) The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins – Science and Practice, pp 281–319. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  11. Grillo V., Parsons E.C.M. and Shrimpton J.H. 2001. Scientific Committee Paper53rd Meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 3–16 July 2001. London, SC/53/E13.Google Scholar
  12. Harwood J. and Wilson B. (2001). The implications of developments on the Atlantic Frontier for marine mammals. Cont. Shelf Res. 21: 1073–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (1992). Council Directive 2143/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Communities, No206/7, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. International Whaling Commission. (2004). Report of the Scientific Committee. International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UK, 70Google Scholar
  15. Jepson P.D., Arbelo M., Deaville R., Patterson I.A.P., Castro P., Baker J.R., Degollada E., Ross H.M., Herraéz P., Pocknell A.M., Rodríguez F., Howiell F.E., Espinosa A., Reid R.J., Jaber J.R., Martin V., Cunningham A.A. and Fernández A. (2003). Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans: was sonar responsible for a spate of whale deaths after an Atlantic military exercise?. Nature 425: 575–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jepson P.D., Bennett P.M., Deaville R., Allchin C.R., Baker J.R. and Law R.J. (2005a). Relationship between PCBs and health status in UK-stranded harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24: 238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jepson P.D., Deaville R., Patterson I.A.P., Pocknell A.M., Ross H.M., Baker J.R., Howie F.E., Reid R.J., Colloff A. and Cunningham A.A. (2005b). Acute and chronic gas bubble lesions in cetaceans stranded in the United Kingdom. Vet. Pathol. 42: 291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston D.W. (2002). The effect of acoustic harassment devices on harbour poipoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Biol. Conserv. 108: 113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston P.W., Stringer R.L. and Santillo D. (1996). Cetaceans and environmental pollution: the global concerns. In: Simmonds M. and Hutchinson J.D. (eds) The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins – Science and Practice, pp 219–261. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. Laist D.W. (1987). Overview of the biological effects of lost and discarded plastic debris in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 18: 319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laist D.W. (1997). Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. In: Coe J.M. and Rogers D.B. (eds) Marine Debris: Sources, Impacts and Solutions, pp 99–139. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Law R.J., Allchin C.R. and Mead L.K. (2005). Brominated Biphenyl ethers in the blubber of twelve species of marine mammals stranded in the UK. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50: 356–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacGarvin M. and Simmonds M.P. (1996). Whales and climate change. In: Simmonds M. and Hutchinson J.D. (eds) The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins – Science and Practice, pp 321–332. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  24. MacLeod C.D., Bannon S.M., Pierce G.J., Schweder C., Learmouth J.A., Herman J.S. and Reid R.J. (2005). Climate change and the cetacean community of north-west Scotland. Biol. Conserv. 124: 477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markowitz T.M., Harlin A.D., Würsig B. and McFadden C.J. (2004). Dusky dolphin foraging habitat: overlap with aquaculture in New Zealand. Aquat. Conserv. 14: 133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKenzie C., Rogan E., Reid R.J. and Wells D.E. (1997). Concentrations and patterns of organic contaminants in Atlantic white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus acutus) from Irish and Scottish coastal waters. Environ. Pollut. 98: 15–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morizur Y., Berrow S.D., Tregenza N.J.C., Couperus A.S. and Pouvreau S. (1999). Incidental catches of marine mammals in pelagic trawl fisheries of the Northeast Atlantic. Fish. Res. 41: 297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morton A.B. and Symonds H.K. (2002). Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high amplitude sound in British ColumbiaCanada. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59: 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulvaney K. and McKay B. (2000). Small cetaceans: small whales, dolphins and porpoises. In: Sheppard C. (eds) Seas at the Millennium: An Environmental Assessment Volume III, pp 49–63. Elsevier Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Northridge S.P. and Hammond P.S. 1999. Estimation of porpoise mortality in UK gill and tangle net fisheries in the North Sea and West of Scotland. Scientific Committee Paper, 51st meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 1–15 May 1999.Grenada SC/51/SM42.Google Scholar
  31. Omerod S.J. (2003). Current issues with fish and fisheries: editor’s overview and introduction. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 204–213Google Scholar
  32. Parsons E.C.M., Birks I., Evans P.G.H., Gordon J.G., Shrimpton J.H. and Pooley S. (2000). The possible impacts of military activity on cetaceans in West Scotland. Eur. Res. Cetaceans 14: 185–190Google Scholar
  33. Parsons E.C.M., Shrimpton J. and Evans P.G.H.(1999). Cetacean conservation in Northwest Scotland: perceived threats to cetaceans. Eur. Res. Cetaceans 13: 128–133Google Scholar
  34. Parsons E.C.M. and Woods-Ballard A. (2003). Acceptance of voluntary whale-watching codes of conduct in West Scotland: the effectiveness of governmental versus industry-led guidelines. Current Issues in Tourism 6: 172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Read A.J. (1996). Incidental catches of small cetaceans. In: Simmonds M. and Hutchinson J.D. (eds) The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins – Science and Practice, pp 109–128. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  36. Read A.J., Drinker P. and Northridge S.P. (2003). By-catches of marine mammals in US fisheries and a first attempt to measure the magnitude of global marine mammal bycatch. Scientific Committee Paper, Berlin, SC/55/BC5Google Scholar
  37. Reid J.B., Evans P.G.H. and Northridge S.P. (2003). Atlas of Cetacean Distribution in North-west European Waters. JNCC, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  38. Reijnders P.J.H. (1996). Organohalogen and heavy metal contaminations in cetaceans: observed effects, potential impact and future prospects. In: (eds) The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins – Science and Practice, pp 205–217. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott N.J. and Parsons E.C.M. (2004). A survey of public awareness of the occurrence and diversity of cetaceans in Southwest Scotland. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. UK 84: 1101–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott N.J. and Parsons E.C.M. (2005). A survey of public opinions in Southwest Scotland on cetacean conservation issues. Aquat. Conserv. 15: 299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shrimpton J.H. and Parsons E.C.M. (2000). Cetacean Conservation in West Scotland. Hebridean Whale and Dolphin Trust, Tobermory, MullGoogle Scholar
  42. Simmonds M., Dolman S. and Weilgart L. (2003). Oceans of Noise. Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, ChippenhamGoogle Scholar
  43. Simmonds M. and Lopez-Jurado L.F. (1991). Whales and the military. Nature 337: 448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simmonds M. and Murray L. (1998). The Atlantic Frontier: Britain’s Last Ocean Wilderness. Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society and Greenpeace, BathGoogle Scholar
  45. Teisl M.F., Roe B. and Hicks R.L. (2002). Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labelling. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 43: 339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vos J.G., Bossart G.D., Fournier M. and O’Shea T.J. (2003). Toxicology of Marine Mammals. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Weir C.R., Pollock C., Cronin C. and Taylor S. (2001). Cetaceans of the Atlantic Frontiernorth and west of Scotland. Cont. Shelf Res. 21: 1047–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White P.C.L., Jennings N.V., Renwick A.R. and Barker N.H.L. (2005). Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolff W.J. (2000). The south-eastern North Sea: losses of vertebrate fauna during the last 2000 years. Biol. Conserv. 95: 209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woods-Ballard A., Parsons E.C.M., Hughes A.J., Velander K.A., Ladle R.J. and Warburton C.A. (2003). The sustainability of whale-watching in Scotland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 11: 40–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Würsig B. and Gailey G.A. (2002). Marine mammals and aquaculture: conflicts and potential resolutions. In: Stickney R.R. and McVey J.P. (eds) Responsible Marine Agriculture, pp 45–59. CAB International Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life SciencesHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.Environment Agency, TFS National ServiceWarringtonEngland
  3. 3.University Marine Biological StationMillportScotland
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Science and Policy, David King BuildingGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations