Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 13, pp 4289–4308 | Cite as

Farmers’ Management of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.) diversity in Tigray, Ethiopia and Implications for on-Farm Conservation

  • Yemane Tsehaye
  • Trygve Berg
  • Bayush Tsegaye
  • Tesema Tanto


Tigray (region) is one of the major finger millet growing regions in Ethiopia and an important site from an archeobotanical point of view. Three zones of Tigray (east, central and west) were identified as representative sites in the region and a total of 14 districts/ ‘Woreda’ were surveyed. Thirty-seven landraces/farmers’ varieties of finger millet were identified/recorded. Farmers in Tigray undertake pre and post harvest selection in finger millet and sometimes they also select seeds from storage based on a number of attributes. Farmers maintain diversity as a way to ensure harvest security or stability of production, to promote diversity of diet and income sources, minimize crop failure risk, reduce insect and disease incidences and ensure efficient use of labour. The traditional management of finger millet in the entire study area is generally found to be demand driven, showing the existence of potential sites for on-farm conservation. The high morphological diversity (H =0.76 ± 0.09) found in the gene bank collections of Tigrayan origin also reveals the importance of linking ex situ with in situ conservation activities. Furthermore, the enhancement and conservation significance of the crop is discussed.


Diversity Farmers’ varieties Finger millet On-farm conservation Tigray Ethiopia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altieri M. and Merrick C.L. (1987). Econ. Bot. 41(1): 86–96Google Scholar
  2. Asfaw Z. 1997. Ethnobiology in enhancement and utilization of landraces. In: Fassil K., Abebe D. and Seyfu K. (eds), Community Biodiversity Development and Conservation. Proceedings of the first meeting of the national project advisory and overseeing committee (NPAOC), coordinating unit and partner institutions. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
  3. Bellon M.R. (1996). The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmer level. Econ. Bot. 50(1): 26–39Google Scholar
  4. Bellon M.R. (2003). Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Dev. 32: 159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellon M.R. and Taylor J.E. (1993). Farmer soil taxonomy and technology adoption. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 41: 764–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg T. (1993). The science of plant breeding-support or alternative to traditional practices?. In: De Boef, W., Amanor, K., Wellard, K. and Bebbington, A. (eds) Cultivating Knowledge: Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research, pp 72–77. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Brush S.B. (1991). Farmer-based approach to conserving crop Germplasm. Econ. Bot. 45: 153–165Google Scholar
  8. Bureau of Agricuture and Natural resources Development (BoANRD). (1997). Tigray soil and water conservation action programmedraft main report. Mekelle, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  9. CSA. (1999). Agricultural sample survey. Report on area and production for major crops. Statistical Bulletin. Central Statistical Authority (CSA), Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  10. De Wet J.M.J., Rao K.E.P., Brink D.E. and Mengesha M.H. (1984). Systematics and evolution of Eleusine coracana (Gramineae). Amer. J. Bot 71(4): 550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO. (1996). Global plan of action on the conservation and sustainable utilization of plant genetic resources. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Guarino L. (1995). Secondary sources on cultures and indigenous knowledge systems. In: Guarino, L., Rao, V.R. and Reid, R. (eds) Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity Technical Guidelines, pp 195–228. CAB International, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilu K.W., De Wet J.M.J. and Harlan J.R. (1979). Archaeobotanical studies of Elueusine coracana ssp. coracana (finger millet). Am. J. Bot. 66: 330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jain S.K., Qualset C.O., Bhatt G.M. and Wu K.K. (1975). Geographical patterns of phenotypic diversity in a world collection of durum wheat. Crop Sci. 15: 700–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Magurran A. (1991). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurements. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Mehra K.L. (1963). Considerations on the African origin of Eleusine coracana (L.). Gaertn. Curr. Sci 32: 300–301Google Scholar
  17. National Research Council. (1996). Lost crops of Africa: Grains. 1. National Academy Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  18. Oosterhout V.S. (1993). Sorghum genetic resources of small-scale farmers in Zimbabwe. In: De Boef, W., Amanor, K., Wellard, K. and Bebbington, A. (eds) Cultivating Knowledge: Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research, pp 89–95. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Phillips O. and Gentry A.H. (1993a). The useful plants of TambopataPeru: I. statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ. Bot. 47: 15–32Google Scholar
  20. Phillipson D.W. 2001. Archaeology at AksumEthiopia. 1993-7. Vol I & II. David Brown book Co.Google Scholar
  21. Ramachandra G., Virupaksha T.K. and Shadaksharaswamy M. (1977). Relationship between tannin levels and in vitro protein digestibility in finger millet (Eleusine caracana Gaertn.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 25: 1101–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SAS. (1999). SAS User’s guideReleased 8.2 editions. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA Google Scholar
  23. Teshome A., Torrance J.K., Baum B.R., Fahrig L., Lambert J.H. and Amase T.J. (1999). Traditional farmers’ knowledge of sorghum [sorghum bicolour [Poaceae] landrace storability in Ethiopia. Econ. Bot. 53: 69–78 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yemane Tsehaye
    • 1
  • Trygve Berg
    • 2
  • Bayush Tsegaye
    • 2
  • Tesema Tanto
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biodiversity and Conservation (IBC)Ethiopia
  2. 2.Noragric – Department of International Environment and Development StudiesNorwegian University of Life SciencesAasNorway

Personalised recommendations