Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 2829–2852 | Cite as

The Importance of Stakeholder Engagement in Invasive Species Management: A Cross-jurisdictional Perspective in Ireland

  • K. E. Stokes
  • K. P. O℉Neill
  • W. I. Montgomery
  • J. T. A. Dick
  • C. A. Maggs
  • R. A. McDonald
Article

Abstract.

The management of invasive non-native species is a frequent cause of conflict in the field of biodiversity conservation because perceptions of their costs and benefits differ among stakeholder groups. A lack of cohesion between scientific researchers, the commercial sector and policy makers lies at the root of a widespread failure to develop and implement sustainable management practices for invasive species. The crisis of this situation is intensified by drivers stemming from international conventions and directives to address invasive species issues. There are further direct conflicts between legislative instruments promoting biodiversity conservation on the one hand while liberalizing trade at the national, European and global level on the other. The island of Ireland provides graphic illustration of the importance of cross-jurisdictional approaches to biological invasions. Using primarily Irish examples in this review, we emphasize the importance of approaching risk assessment, risk reduction and control or eradication policies from a cost-efficient, highly flexible perspective, incorporating linkages between environmental, economic and social objectives. The need for consolidated policies between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland is particularly acute, though few model cross-border mechanisms for such consolidation are available. The importance of engaging affected stakeholders through positive interactions is discussed with regard to reducing the currently fragmented nature of invasive species management between the two jurisdictions.

Keywords

Invasive species policy Ireland Joint-jurisdictions Stakeholder engagement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R., Bell, A.C. 2002A first record of the Lily Beetle Liliocerus lilii (Scopoli) in IrelandColeopterist1190Google Scholar
  2. Alderman, D.J., Wickins, J.F. 1996Crayfish CULTURE, Laboratory Leaflet No. 76CEFAS LowestoftMAFF, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellingham, P.J., Duncan, R.P., Lee, W.G., Buxton, R.P. 2004Seedling growth rate and survival do not predict invasiveness in naturalized woody plants in New ZealandOikos106308316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackburn, T.M., Duncan, R.P. 2001Determinants of establishment success in introduced birdsNature414195197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boag, B., Yeates, G.W. 2001The potential impact of the New Zealand flatworma predator of earthworms, in western EuropeEcol. Appl.1112761286Google Scholar
  6. Bullock, J.M., Hodder, K.H., Manchester, S.J., Stevenson, M.J. 1996Review of Information, Policy and Legislation on Species Translocations. JNCC Report No. 261Joint Nature Conservation CommitteePeterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J.H. 1989

    Patterns, modes and extents of invasions by vertebrates

    Drake, J.A.Mooney, H.A.di Castri, F.Groves, R.H.Kruger, F.G.Rejamek, M.Williamson, M. eds. Biological Invasions: A Global PerspectiveJohn Wiley & SonsChichester, UK85110
    Google Scholar
  8. Callaghan D. 2003. Alien species research requirements for delivery of the UK Biodiversity Action Plan – Discussion Paper. Just Ecology, URL: www.justecology.co.uk.Google Scholar
  9. Cassey, P. 2002Life history and ecology influences establishment success of introduced birdsBiol. J. Linn. Soc.76465480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, P.F., Rainbow, P.S., Robbins, R.S., Smith, B., Yeomans, W.E., Thomas, M., Dobson, G. 1998The alien Chinese mitten crabEriocheir sinesis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura), in the Thames catchmentJ. Marine Biol. Assoc. UK7812151221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commission for Environmental Co-operation (CEC) 2002. The North American Mosaic: A State of the Environment Report. Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Costello, M.J. 1993Biogeography of alien amphipods occurring in Irelandand interactions with native speciesCrustaceana65287299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, M.L. 2001The status of the Lily Beetle Lilioceris lilii (Scopoli1763) in Britain (Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae)Coleopterist10520Google Scholar
  14. Cross, R.J. 1975Biological flora of the British Isles Rhododendron ponticumJ. Ecol.63345365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cross, J.R. 1981The establishment of Rhododendron ponticum in the Killarney oakwoods, SW IrelandJ. Ecol.69807824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cross, J.R. 1982The invasion and impact of Rhododendron ponticum in native Irish vegetationJ. Life Sci. Roy. Dublin Soc.3209220Google Scholar
  17. Dalmazzone, S. 2000

    Economic factors affecting the vulnerability to biological invasions

    Perrings, C.Williamson, M.Dalmazzone, S. eds. The Economics of Biological InvasionsEdward Elgar PublishingCheltenham, UK1730
    Google Scholar
  18. Daly, H.V. 1995Endangered species: doctoral students in systematic entomologyAm. Entomol.415559Google Scholar
  19. Department for EnvironmentFood and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)2003Review of Non-native Species Policy. Report of the Working GroupDEFRA publicationsLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Department of Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentNorthern Ireland (DARD), 2004. Cap Reform. Cross-Compliance Consultation Paper. http://www.dardni.gov.uk/file/con0409b.doc.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, J., Case, T.J. 1986

    Overview: introductions, extinctions, exterminations and invasions

    Diamond, J.Case, T.J. eds. Community EcologyHarper & RowNew York, USA6579
    Google Scholar
  22. Dick, J.T.A., Elwood, R.W., Montgomery, W.I. 1995The behavioural basis of a species-replacement – differential aggression and predation between the introduced Gammarus-pulexthe native Gammarus duebeni celticus (Amphipoda)Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.37393398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drake, J.A.Mooney, H.A.di Castri, F.Groves, R.H.Kruger, F.G.Rejmánek, M.Williamson, M. eds. 1989Biological Invasions: A Global PerspectiveJohn Wiley & SonsChichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Duncan, R.P., Blackburn, T.M., Sol, D. 2003The ecology of bird introductionsAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.347198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunne, R. 2003

    Some recent insect and mite introductions to Ireland

    Moriarty, C.Murray, D. eds. Biological Invaders: The Impact of Exotic SpeciesRoyal Irish AcademyDublin, Ireland115118
    Google Scholar
  26. Emerson, H.J., Gillmor, D.A. 1999The Rural Environment Protection Scheme of the Republic of IrelandLand Use Policy16235245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fairley J. 2001. A Basket of Weasels (Published privately). Belfast, Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
  28. Fenner, F., Ratcliffe, F.N. 1965MyxomatosisCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Forsyth, D.M., Duncan, R.P., Bomford, M., Moore, G. 2004Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in AustraliaConserv. Biol.18557569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Godfray, H.C.J. 2002Challenges for taxonomy. The discipline will have to reinvent itself if it is to survive and flourishNature4171719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gosling, L.M., Baker, S.J. 1989The eradication of the muskrats and coypus from BritainBot. J. Linn. Soc.383951Google Scholar
  32. Grainger, J.N.R. 1992The probable effects of climate change on invertebrate growth and reproduction with particular reference to IrelandInvertebr. Reprod. Dev.22239244Google Scholar
  33. Gropp, R.E. 2003Are university natural science collections going extinct?Bioscience5550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grotkopp, E., Rejmanek, M., Rost, T.L. 2002Towards a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 Pine (Pinus) speciesAm. Nat.159396419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayden, T., Harrington, R. 2000Exploring Irish MammalsTownhouseDublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  36. Hemami, M.R., Watkinson, A.R., Dolman, P.M. 2004Habitat selection by sympatric muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland commercial pine forestFor. Ecol. Manage.1944960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Herborg, L.M., Rushton, S.P., Clare, A.S., Bentley, M.G. 2003Spread of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards) in Continental Europe: analysis of a historical data setHydrobiologia5032128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Higgins, S.I., Richardson, D.M., Cowling, R.M. 2000Using a dynamic landscape model for planning the management of alien plant invasionsEcol. Appl.1018331848Google Scholar
  39. Hilty, J., Merenlender, A.M. 2003Studying biodiversity on private landsConserv. Biol.17132137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holden, N.M., Bereton, A.J., Fealy, R., Sweeney, J. 2003Possible changes in Irish climate and its impact on barley and potatoe yieldsAgric. For. Meterol.116181196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holdich, D.M., Rodgers, W.D. 1997The white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Great Britain and Ireland with particular reference to its conservation in Great BritainBull. Francais Peche Pisicult.347597616Google Scholar
  42. House of Lords.2002What on Earth? The Threat to the Science Underpinning ConservationSelect Committee on Science and Technology, third report, HL Paper 118(i)London, Stationary Office, UKGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopkins, G.W., Freckleton, R.P. 2002Declines in the number of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservationAnim. Conserv.5245249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. IAC (Industries Assistance Commission)1985Biological Control of Echium Species (Including Patersons Curse/Salvation Jane). Industries Assistance Commission Report No. 371Australian Government Publishing ServiceCanberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  45. IUCN (World Conservation Union)2000Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive SpeciesIUCNGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  46. Jetter, K., Paine, T.D. 2004Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for biological control in the urban landscapeBiol. Control30312322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Judgement of the Court 03-12-1998. Anklagemyndighed v. Ditlev Bluhme. http://www.eel.nl/cases/HvJEG/697j0067.htm.Google Scholar
  48. Kelly, D.W., Dick, J.T.A., Montgomery, W.I., MacNeil, C. 2003Differences in composition of macroinvertebrate communities with invasive and native Gammarus spp.(Crustacea: Amphipoda)Freshwater Biol.48306315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kiely, G. 1999Climate change in Ireland from precipitation and streamflow observationsAdv. Water Resour.23141151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. King, C.M. 1984Immigrant Killers. Introduced Predators and the Conservation of Birds in New ZealandOxford University PressAuckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  51. Kleijn, D., Sutherland, W.J. 2003How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?J. Appl. Ecol.40947969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kolar, C.S., Lodge, D.M. 2001Progress in invasion biology: predicting invadersTrends Ecol. Evol.16199204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levine, J.M., d’Antonio, C.M. 2003Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international tradeConserv. Biol.17322326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levine, J.M., Adler, P.B., Yelenik, S.G. 2004A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasionsEcol. Lett.7975989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lonsdale, W.M. 1994Inviting trouble – introduced pasture species in northern AustraliaAust. J. Ecol.19345354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lonsdale, W.M. 1999Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibilityEcology8015221536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mack, R.N. 1996Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approachesBiol. Conserv.78107121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M., Bazzaz, F.A. 2000Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and controlEcol. Appl.10689710Google Scholar
  59. MacNeil, C., Elwood, R.W., Dick, J.T.A. 1999Predator–prey interactions between brown trout Salmo trutta and native and introduced amphipods; their implications for fish dietsEcography22686696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Manchester, S.J., Bullock, J.M. 2000The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of controlJ. Appl. Ecol.37845864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McCorrey, M., Curtis, T.G.F., Otte, M.L. 2003

    Spartina in Ireland

    Otte, M.L. eds. Wetlands of IrelandDistribution, Ecology, Uses and Economic ValueUniversity College PressDublin, Ireland4450
    Google Scholar
  62. Minchin, D. 2000

    Modes of introduction of exotic animals into Irish waters

    Rushton, B.S. eds. Biodiversity: The Irish DimensionRoyal Irish AcademyDublin Ireland147155
    Google Scholar
  63. Minchin, D., Maguire, C.M., Rossell, R. 2003The zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorha. Pallas) invades Ireland: human mediated vectors and the potential for rapid international dispersalBiol. Environ.103B2330Google Scholar
  64. Moody, M.E., Mack, R.N. 1988Controlling the spread of plant invasions – the importance of nascent fociJ. Appl. Ecol.2510091021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moore, J.P., Dynes, C., Murchie, A.K. 1998The status and public perception of the New Zealand flatwormArtioposthia triangulata (Dendy) in Northern IrelandPedobiologia2563571Google Scholar
  66. O’Connor, C., Marvier, M., Kareiva, P. 2003Biological vs. social, economic and political priority-setting in conservationEcol. Lett.6706711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Olden, J.D., Poff, N.L. 2004Clarifying biotic homogenizationTrends Ecol. Evol.19283284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Perrings, C.Williamson, M.Dalmazzone, S. eds. 2000The Economics of Biological InvasionsEdward ElgarCheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  69. Perrings, C., Williamson, M., Barbier, E.B., Delfino, D., Dalmazzone, S., Shogren, J., Simmons, P., Watkinson, A.R. 2002Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspectiveConserv. Ecol.61Google Scholar
  70. Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R., Morrison, D. 2000Environmental and economic costs of non-indigenous species in the United StatesBioscience505365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pullin, A.S., Knight, T.M. 2001Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public healthConserv. Biol.155054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Putman, R.J., Moore, N.P. 1998Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitatsMammal Rev.28141163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Raupp, M.J., Davidson, J.A., Koehler, C.J., Sador, C.S., Reichelderfer, K. 1988Decision-making consideration for aesthetic damage caused by pestsBull. Ecol. Soc. Am.342732Google Scholar
  74. Ricciardi, A., Atkinson, S.K. 2004Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystemsEcol. Lett.7781784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rouget, M., Richardson, D.M. 2003Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factorsAm. Nat.162713724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sandler, T. 1997Global ChallengesCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  77. Schrader, G., Unger, J.G. 2003Plant quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European UnionBiol. Invas.5357364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seaman, J.T., Turvey, W.S., Ottaway, J.S., Dixon, R.J., Gilmour, A.R. 1989Investigations into the toxicity of Echium plantagineum in sheep. Part 1. Field grazing experimentsAust. Veter. J.66279285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sharov, A.A., Liebhold, A.M. 1998Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zonesEcol. Appl.8833845Google Scholar
  80. Shea, K. 1998Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and controlTrends Ecol. Evol.13371375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shea, K., Chesson, P. 2002Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasionsTrends Ecol. Evol.17170176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sheail, J. 1988The extermination of the muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) in inter-war BritainArch. Nat. Hist.15155170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Simberloff, D. 1995Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas?Pacific Sci.498797Google Scholar
  84. Simberloff, D., Alexander, M. 1998

    Assessing risks to ecological systems from biological introductions (excluding genetically modified organisms)

    Calow, P. eds. Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and ManagementBlackwellOxford, UK
    Google Scholar
  85. Simberloff, D. 2003How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species?Conserv. Biol.178392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smallwood, K.S. 1994Site invisibility by exotic birds and mammalsBiol. Conserv.69251259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Smyth, A.K., James, C.D. 2004Characteristics of Australia's rangelands and key design features for monitoring biodiversityAust. Ecol.29315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sol, D., Timmermans, S., Lefebvre, L. 2002Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birdsAnim. Behav.63495502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stephens, P.A., Jules, N.P., Sutherland, W.J. 2003Agriculture, transport policy and landscape heterogeneityTrends Ecol. Evol.18555556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Suding, K.N., Gross, K.L., Houseman, G.R. 2004Alternative stable states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecologyTrends Ecol. Evol.194653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M., Knight, T.M. 2004The need for evidence-based conservationTrends Ecol. Evol.19305308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Turpie, J. 2004The role of resource economics in the control of invasive alien plants in South AfricaS. Afr. J. Sci.1008793Google Scholar
  93. Vitousek, P.M., d’Antonio, C.M., Loope, L.L., Westbrooks, R. 1996Biological invasions as global environmental changeAm. Sci.84468478Google Scholar
  94. Wainger, L.A., Price, E.W. 2004Evaluating quality of lifeeconomic vulnerabilities, and drivers of ecosystem changeEnviron. Monitor. Assess.946984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wallace, J.F., Caccetta, P.A., Kiiveri, T. 2004Recent developments in analysis of spatial and temporal data for landscape qualities and monitoringAust. Ecol.29100107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Warwick, T. 1940A contribution to the ecology of the musk-rat (Ondatra zibethica) in the British IslesProc. Zool. Soc. London, Ser. A110165201Google Scholar
  97. Watkinson, A.R., Freckleton, R.P., Robinson, R.A., Sutherland, W.J. 2000Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant cropsScience28915541557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Watson, I., Novelly, P. 2004Making the biodiversity monitoring system sustainable: design issues for large-scale monitoring systemsAust. Ecol.291630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Watson, L., Stokes, A. 2004Seahorses to Seaurchins. The Next Big Splash in Irish Aquaculture. Technical ReportBord Iascaigh Mara Aquaculture Development Division, Irish Sea Fisheries BoardIrelandGoogle Scholar
  100. Wheeler, Q.D. 2004Taxonomic triage and the poverty of taxonomyPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc.359571583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Williamson, M. 1989

    Mathematical models of invasion

    Drake, J.A.Mooney, H.A.di Castri, F.Groves, R.H.Kruger, F.J.Rejmánek, M.Williamson, M. eds. Biological Invasions: A Global PerspectiveJohn Wiley & SonsChichester, UK329350
    Google Scholar
  102. Williamson, M. 1996Biological InvasionsChapman and HallLondon, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. Stokes
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. P. O℉Neill
    • 1
  • W. I. Montgomery
    • 1
  • J. T. A. Dick
    • 1
  • C. A. Maggs
    • 1
  • R. A. McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.QUERCUS, School of Biology & BiochemistryQueens University BelfastBelfastUK
  2. 2.CSIRO EntomologyCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations