Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 337–345

What would Darwin have written now?



We often wonder how many of the pristine places left on Earth we can protect from deterioration before it is too late. The assumption that remote regions remain pristine plays a key role in directing policies for regional environmental management and conservation, and affects the local and global financial impetus to do so. In this paper, we use Argentinean Patagonia and the SW Atlantic as examples to argue that the assumption ‘remote region = pristine region’ is unjustified and based on a lack of information rather than on scientific evidence. We also discuss the major existing environmental threats to this supposedly ‘pristine’ region, and use emblematic examples to provide a more realistic picture of the regional environmental integrity and to set recommendations directed to improve environmental management and conservation within this context.


Biodiversity Conservation Ecology Environmental integrity Interactions Patagonia Pristine regions SW Atlantic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aagensen D. (2000). Crisis conservation at the end of the world: sheep ranching in Argentine Patagonia. Environ. Conserv. 27: 208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisbal G. (1995). The southeast south American shelf large marine ecosystem. Mar. Policy 19: 21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bortolus A. 2005. Finding a lost world in the mythic Patagonia: setting physiographic and ecological baseline information of the austral salt marshes of South America. XXX Jornadas Argentinas de Botanica. Rosario, Argentina.Google Scholar
  4. Casas G., Scrosati R. and Piriz M.L. (2004). The invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) reduces native seaweed diversity in Nuevo Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina). Biol. Invasions 6: 411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chebez J.C. (1994). Los que se van. Albatros, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman F.C. and Williams S.L. (2002). Overexploiting marine ecosystem engineers: potential consequences for biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elissalde N.O., Gagliardini D.A. and Milovich J. (1998). Status of desertification in the Patagonian region: assessment and mapping from satellite imagery. Arid Soil Res. Rehabil. 12: 95–122Google Scholar
  8. Dentoni M. 2001. Fire Situation in Argentina. In: Goldammer J.G. and Mutch R.W. (eds), FRA Global Forest Fire Assessment 1990–2000. Forest Resources Assessment Programme, Working Paper 55 FAO, Rome, pp. 457–462.Google Scholar
  9. Dobson A.P., Bradshaw A.D. and Baker A.J.M. (1997). Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277: 515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esteves J.L., Ciocco N.F., Colombo J.C., Freije H., Harris G., Iribarne O., Isla I., Nabel P., Pascual M.S., Penchaszadeh P.E., Rivas A.L. and Santinelli N. (2000). The Argentine Sea: the southeast South American shelf marine ecosystem. In: Sheppard, C.R.C. (eds) Seas at the Millenium: An Environmental Evaluation, pp 749–771. Pergamon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Faber P. (2000). Grass wars. Good intentions gone awry. Why would anyone bring an alien cordgrass into S.F. Bay?. California Coast and Ocean 16: 14–17Google Scholar
  12. FAO 1992. Review of the state of the world fishery resources. Part 1: The marine resources FAO Fisheries Circular, No 710, Rev 8, Part 1, Rome.Google Scholar
  13. Gandini P., Boersma P.D., Frere E., Gandini M., Holik T. and Lichtschein V. (1994). Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). Affected by chronic petroleum pollution along the coast of Chubut, Argentina. Auk 111: 20–27Google Scholar
  14. INDEC 2005. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos.
  15. Ingham R.J. and Summers D. (2002). Falkland Islands cruise ship tourism: an overview of the 1999–2000 season and the way forward. Aqua. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 12: 145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaksic F.M., Iriarte J.A., Jiménez J.E. and Martínez D.R. (2002). Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biol. Invasions 4: 157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaiser J. (2002). Argentina: economic crash brings ill winds for science. Science 295: 2356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lizarralde M.S. (1993). Current status of the introduced beaver (Castor canadensis) population in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Ambio 22: 351–358Google Scholar
  19. Lizarralde M.S. and Escobar J.M. (2000). Mamíferos exóticos en la Tierra del Fuego. Ciencia Hoy 10: 52–63Google Scholar
  20. Lizarralde M.S., Deferrari G.A., Alvarez S.E. and Escobar J.M. (1996). Effects of beaver (Castor canadensis) on the nutrient dynamics of the southern beech forest of Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). Ecol. Aust. 6: 101–105Google Scholar
  21. Marzuola C. (2002). Argentina’s crisis heralds time of torment for scientists. Nature 415: 104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Robles-Gil P., Pilgrim J., Brooks T. and Konstant W.R. (2002). Wilderness. Earth’s Last Wild Places. CEMEX, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  23. Orensanz J.M., Schwindt E., Pastorino G., Bortolus A., Casas G., Darrigran G., Elías R., López Gappa J.J., Obenat S., Pascual M., Penchaszadeh P., Piriz M.L., Scarabino F., Spivak E.D. and Vallarino E.A. (2002). No longer a pristine confine of the world ocean-a survey of exotic marine species in the Southwestern Atlantic. Biol. Invasions 4: 115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pascual M.A., Orensanz J.M., Parma A. and Saba S.L. (1998). The Patagonian challenge: melding conservation with development. In: Fiedler, P.L. and Kareiva, P.M. (eds) Conservation biology for the coming decade, pp 410–425. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Pascual M., Macchi P., Urbanski J., Marcos F., Riva Rossi C., Novara M. and Dell’ Arciprete P. (2002). Evaluating potential effects of exotic freshwater fish from incomplete species presence-absence data. Biol. Invasions 4: 101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perez-Iratxeta C. and Andrade M.A. (2002). Worldwide scientific publishing activity. Science 297: 519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi J. (2000). The wild shores of Patagonia: the Valdes peninsula and Punta Tombo. Abrams, H.NGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwindt E. and Bortolus A. 2004. Evaluando la predictibilidad de los patrones y procesos ecológicos con especies exóticas: comparación entre áreas de origen e invadidas. II Reunión Binacional de Ecología Argentina y Chile, Argentina, p.74.Google Scholar
  29. Schwindt E., Bortolus A. and Iribarne O. (2001). Invasion of a reef-builder polychaete: its direct and indirect impacts on the native benthic community structure. Biol. Invasions 3: 137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. The Columbia Encyclopedia 2000. In: Lagasse P. (ed.), 6th edn. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Veblen T.T., Kitzberger T., Villalba R. and Donnegan J. (1999). Fire history in northern Patagonia: the role of humans and climate variations. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yorio P. (2001). Areas marinas protegidas en la Argentina. Ciencia Hoy 11: 32–38Google Scholar
  33. Yorio P., Frere E., Gandini P. and Schiavini A. (2001). Tourism and recreation at seabird breeding sites in Patagonia, Argentina: current concerns and future prospects. Bird Conserv. Intern. 11: 231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecología Terrestre, Centro Nacional PatagónicoPuerto Madryn, ChubutArgentina
  2. 2.Biología y Manejo de Recursos Acuáticos, Centro Nacional PatagónicoPuerto MadrynArgentina

Personalised recommendations