Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1445–1452 | Cite as

Is the serpentine aster, Symphyotrichum depauperatum (Fern.) Nesom, a valid species and actually endemic to eastern serpentine barrens?

  • Danny J. GustafsonEmail author
  • Roger Earl Latham


Serpentine aster, Symphyotrichum depauperatum (Fern.) Nesom, is the ‘flagship’ species of the eastern serpentine barrens, inhabiting 20 of the 26 remaining occurrences of significant size of this globally rare community type and long recognized as its only known endemic species. Previous studies have called into question both the validity of the taxon and its status as a true endemic of the serpentine barrens. We used amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis to compare seven serpentine barrens populations, one alleged diabase glade population, and two populations each of the two species with which S. depauperatum is lumped by some authors. Our analysis supports the validity of S. depauperatum as a distinct species, which grows almost entirely on shallow soils overlying serpentinite bedrock in Pennsylvania and Maryland, but it confirms an earlier hypothesis that S. depauperatum also includes small, disjunct populations on diabase glades in North Carolina.


AFLP analysis Aster Conservation genetics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chmielewski, J.G., Semple, J.C. 1989The cytogeography of Aster pilosus var. pilosus in southern Ontario revisited (Compositae: Astereae)Canadian Journal of Botany6735173519Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clayton, P. 1993Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to delist the plant Hedeoma apiculatum (McKittrick pennyroyal) and remove its critical habitat designationFederal Register584924449247Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deevey, E.S., Flint, R.F. 1957Postglacial hypsithermal intervalScience125182184Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franklin, S.B., Gibson, D.J., Robertson, P.A., Pohlmann, H.T., Fralish, J.T. 1995Parallel analysis: a method for detecting significant principal componentsJournal of Vegetation Science699106Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Froelich, A.J., Gottfried, D. 1999Early Mesozoic – igneous and contact metamorphic rocksShultz, C.H. eds. The Geology of PennsylvaniaPennsylvania Geological Survey and Pittsburgh Geological SocietyHarrisburg and PittsburghPennsylvania202209Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gustafson, D.J., Romano, G., Latham, R.E., Morton, J.K. 2003Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of genetic relationships among the serpentine barrens endemic Cerastium velutinum Rafinesque var. villosissimum Pennell (Caryophyllaceae) and closely related Cerastium speciesJournal of the Torrey Botanical Society130218223Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Haas, J.N., McAndrews, J.H. 2000The summer drought related hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) decline in eastern North America 5700 to 5100 years agoMcManus, K.A.Shields, K.S.Souto, D.R. eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Sustainable Management of Hemlock Ecosystems in Eastern North AmericaGeneral Technical Report NE-267U.S.D.A. Forest ServiceNortheastern Research Station, Newtown SquarePennsylvania8188Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Harrison, S., Inouye, B.D. 2002High β diversity in the flora of California serpentine ‘islands’Biodiversity and Conservation1118691876Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Hart, R. 1990Aster depauperatus: a midwestern migrant on eastern serpentine barrens?Bartonia562328Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, A.G. 1984Nomenclatural notes on Aster (Asteraceae) II. New combinations and some transfersPhytologia55373388Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, A.G. 1989AsterBrachyactis in IllinoisIllinois Natural History Survey Bulletin34139194Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jordan, L. 1993Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; removal of Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. inermis (spineless hedgehog cactus) from the list of endangered and threatened plantsFederal Register584924249244Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy, K. 1999Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to delist the plant Echinocereus lloydii (Lloyd’s hedgehog cactus) from the federal list of endangered and threatened speciesFederal Register643379633800Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Latham, R.E. 1993The serpentine barrens of temperate eastern North America: critical issues in the management of rare species and communitiesBartonia57 (Suppl.)6174Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy, F., Wilbur, R.L. 1990Disjunct populations of the alleged serpentine endemic Aster depauperatus (Porter) Fern., on diabase glades in North CarolinaRhodora921421Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linhart, Y.B., Grant, M.C. 1996Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plantsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics27237277Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Longman, R.S., Cota, A.A., Holden, R.R., Fekken, G.C. 1989A regression equation for the parallel analysis criterion in principal components analysis: mean and 95th percentile eigenvaluesMultivariate Behavioral Research245969Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marye, W.B. 1955The great Maryland barrens (parts I, II and III)Maryland Historical Magazine501123120–142, 234–253Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division2001Rarethreatenedand endangered plants of MarylandMaryland Department of Natural ResourcesAnnapolis, Maryland24 (accessed June 2003).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nesom, G.L. 1994Review of the taxonomy of Aster sensu lato (Asteraceae: Astereae), emphasizing the New World speciesPhytologia77141297Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.2003Element occurrence search pageNorth Carolina Office of Conservation and Community AffairsRaleighNorth (updated May 2003; accessed June 2003).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pavlik, B.M. 2003Plants that protect ecosystems: a survey from CaliforniaBiodiversity and Conservation12717729Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory2003Biota of concern in Pennsylvania: plantsPennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural ResourcesBureau of ForestryHarrisburg, Pennsylvania (revised 30 April 2003; accessed June 2003).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rhoads, A.F., Block, T.A. 2000The Plants of Pennsylvania; An Illustrated ManualUniversity of Pennsylvania PressPhiladelphiaPennsylvania1061 pp.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Root, K.V., Akcakaya, H.R., Ginzburg, L. 2003A multispecies approach to ecological valuation and conservationConservation Biology17196206Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rutman, A. 1993Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to delist the plant Tumamoca macdougaliiFederal Register583356233565Google Scholar
  27. 28.
    Semple, J.C., Chmielewski, J.G. 1985The cytogeography of Aster pilosus (Compositae–Astereae) II. Survey of the range with notes on A. depauperatusA. parvicepsA. porteriRhodora87367379Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Semple, J.C., Chmielewski, J.G., Chinnappa, C.C. 1983Chromosome number determinations in Aster L. (Compositae) with comments on cytogeography, phylogeny, and chromosome morphologyAmerican Journal of Botany7014321443Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith, R.P. 1996Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to delist the plant Bidens cuneata (cuneate bidens), a Hawaiian plantFederal Register6143724373Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tarp, K. 2002Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; proposal to delist the California plant Berberis (=Mahonia) sonnei (Truckee barberry)Federal Register675625456257Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tyndall, R.W., Hull, J.C. 1999Vegetation, floraand plant physiological ecology of serpentine barrens of eastern North AmericaAnderson, R.C.Fralish, J.S.Baskin, J.M. eds. Savannas, Barrens, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North AmericaCambridge University PressCambridgeUK6782Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2003. Threatened and Endangered Species System (TESS). (accessed April 2003); Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    World Conservation Union (IUCN)1999Situation analysis: an IUCN approach and methods for strategic analysis and planningIUCNGlandSwitzerland26 (accessed April 2003).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    World Conservation Union (IUCN)2001IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1IUNC Species Survival CommissionIUCNGlandSwitzerlandii + 30 p. (accessed April 2003).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wright, H.E.,Jr. 1976The dynamic nature of Holocene vegetation: a problem in paleoclimatology, biogeography, and stratigraphic nomenclatureQuaternary Research6581596Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Continental ConservationRose ValleyUSA

Personalised recommendations