Restoration of Breeding by Snowy Plovers Following Protection from Disturbance

  • Kevin D. Lafferty
  • Darcie Goodman
  • Cristina P. Sandoval
Article

Abstract

Promoting recreation and preserving wildlife are often dual missions for land managers, yet recreation may impact wildlife. Because individual disturbances are seemingly inconsequential, it is difficult to convince the public that there is a conservation value to restricting recreation to reduce disturbance. We studied threatened western snowy plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) at a public beach (Sands Beach, Coal Oil Point Reserve) in Santa Barbara, California (USA) before and during a period when a barrier directed foot traffic away from a section of upper beach where snowy plovers roost. The barrier reduced disturbance rates by more than half. Snowy plovers increased in abundance (throughout the season) and their distribution contracted to within the protected area. Snowy plovers that were outside the protected area in the morning moved inside as people began using the beach. Experiments with quail eggs indicated an 8% daily risk of nest trampling outside the protected area. Before protection, plovers did not breed at Coal Oil Point. During protection, snowy plovers bred in increasing numbers each year and had high success at fledging young. These results demonstrate how recreational disturbance can degrade habitat for shorebirds and that protecting quality habitat may have large benefits for wildlife and small impacts to recreation.

Keywords

Beach Birds Disturbance Dogs Recreation Shorebirds 

References

  1. Boyle, S.A., Samson, F.B. 1985Effects of nonconsumptive recreation on wildlife: a reviewWildlife Soc. Bull.13110116Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S., Hickey, C., Gill, B., Gorman, L., Gratto-Trevor, C., Haig, S., Harrington, B., Hunter, C., Morrison, G., Page, G., Sanzenbacher, P., Skagen, S., Warnock, N. 2000aNational Shorebird Conservation Assessment: Shorebird Conservation Status, Conservation Units, Population Estimates, Population Targets, and Species Prioritization, Manomet Center for Conservation SciencesMAManometGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S., Hickey, C., Harrington, B.E. 2000bThe U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan, Manomet Center for Conservation SciencesMAManometGoogle Scholar
  4. Burger, J. 1981The effect of human activity on birds at a coastal bayBiol. Conserv.21231241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger, J. eds. 1984Abiotic Factors Affecting Migrant ShorebirdsPlenum PressNew York173Google Scholar
  6. Burger, J. 1986The effect of human activity on shorebirds in two coastal bays in the northeastern United StatesEnviron. Conserv.13123130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger, J. 1989Least tern populations in coastal New Jersey: monitoring and management of a regionally-endangered speciesJ. Coastal Res.5801811Google Scholar
  8. Burger, J. 1991Foraging behavior and the effect of human disturbance on the Piping Plover Charadrius melodusJ. Coastal Res.73951Google Scholar
  9. Burger, J. 1993Shorebird squeezeNat. Hist.102814Google Scholar
  10. Burger, J. 1994The effect of human disturbance on foraging behavior and habitat use in piping plover Charadrius melodusEstuaries17695701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burger, J. 1995

    Beach recreation and nesting birds

    Knight, R.Gutzwiller, K. eds. Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and ResearchIsland PressWashington, DC281295
    Google Scholar
  12. Burger, J. 1998Effects of motorboats and personal watercraft on flight behavior over a colony of common ternsCondor100528534Google Scholar
  13. Cornelius, C., Navarrete, S.A., Marquet, P.A. 2001Effects of human activity on the structure of coastal marine bird assemblages in central ChileConserv. Biol.1513961404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLong A.K. 2002. Managing Visitor Use and Disturbance of Waterbirds – a Literature Review of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Appendix L. pp. 114 Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge Complex Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Boundary Revision (Vol. II), Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  15. Donefer C. 2003. Plover nesting areas compete with beachgoers. Land Lett. 10(11/20).Google Scholar
  16. Elias-Gerken, S.P. 1994Piping plover habitat suitability on central Long IslandNew York barrier islandsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg, Virginia48MS ThesisGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick, S., Bouchez, B. 1998Effects of recreational disturbance on the foraging behaviour of waders on a rocky beachBird Study45157171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gabrielsen, G.W., Smith, E.N. 1995Physiological responses of wildlife to disturbanceIsland PressWashington, DC95107Google Scholar
  19. Hockin, D., Ounsted, M., Gorman, M., Hill, D., Keller, V., Barker, M.A. 1992Examination of the effects of disturbance on birds with reference to its importance in ecological assessmentsJ. Environ. Manage.36253286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoopes, E.M. 1993Relationships between human recreation and piping plover foraging ecology and chick survivalUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst, Massachusetts106MS ThesisGoogle Scholar
  21. Howe, M.A., Geissler, P.H., Harrington, B.A. 1989Population trends of North American shorebirds based on the International Shorebird SurveyBiol. Conserv.49185200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ikuta, L.A., Blumstein, D.T. 2003Do fences protect birds from human disturbance?Biol. Conserv.112447452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein, M.L. 1993Waterbird behavioral responses to human disturbanceWildlife Soc. Bull.213139Google Scholar
  24. Lafferty, K.D. 2000Status, Trends and Conservation of the Western Snowy Plover with a Focus on the Devereux Slough population at Coal Oil Point Reserve, Santa Barbara County, CA, Museum of Systematics and EcologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara, Santa Barbara, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Lafferty, K.D. 2001aBirds at a southern California beach: seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activityBiodiv. Conserv.10114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lafferty, K.D. 2001bDisturbance to wintering western snowy ploversBiol. Conserv.101315325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lord, A., Waas, J.R., Innes, J. 1997Effects of human activity on the behaviour of Northern New Zealand dotterel Charadrius obscurus aquilonius chicksBiol. Conserv.821520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCrary, M.D., Pierson, M.O. 2000

    Influence of human activity on shorebird beach use in Ventura County, California

    Brown, D.R.Mitchell, K.L.Chang, H.W. eds. Fifth California Islands Symposium, OCS Study, MMS 99–0038Santa BarbaraCA424427
    Google Scholar
  29. Nudds, R.L., Bryant, D.M. 2000The energetic cost of short flights in birdsJ. Exp. Biol.20315611572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Page, G.W., Stenzel, L.E. 1981The breeding status of the snowy plover Charadrius alexandrinus in California, USAWestern Birds12140Google Scholar
  31. Peek, J.M. 1986A Review of Wildlife ManagementPrentice-HallNJ486Google Scholar
  32. Pfister, C., Harrington, B., Lavine, M. 1992The impact of human disturbance on shorebirds at a migration staging areaBiol. Conserv.60115126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Powell, A.N. 2001Habitat characteristics and nest success of snowy plovers associated with California Least Tern coloniesCondor103785792Google Scholar
  34. Powell, A.N. 2002Status of breeding and wintering Snowy Plovers in San Diego County, California1994–1999J. Field Ornithol.73156165Google Scholar
  35. Puttick, G.M. 1979Foraging behaviour and activity budgets of Curlew SandpipersArdea67111122Google Scholar
  36. Ruhlen, T.D., Abbot, S., Stenzel, L.E., Page, G.W. 2003Evidence that human disturbance reduces snowy plover chick survivalJ. Field Ornithol.74300304Google Scholar
  37. Strauss, E. 1990Reproductive success, life history patterns, and behavioral variation in a population of piping plovers subjected to human disturbance (1982–1989)Tufts UniversityMedford, Massachusetts143PhDGoogle Scholar
  38. U.S. and Fish Wildlife Service 2001. Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) Pacific Coast Population Draft Recovery Plan, Portland Oregon. xix + 630 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Verhulst, S., Oosterbeek, K., Ens, B.J. 2001Experimental evidence for effects of human disturbance on foraging and parental care in oystercatchersBiol. Conserv.101375380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warriner, J.S., Warriner, J.C., Page, G.W., Stenzel, L.E. 1986Mating system and reproductive success of a small population of polygamous snowy ploversWilson Bull.981537Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin D. Lafferty
    • 1
    • 2
  • Darcie Goodman
    • 2
  • Cristina P. Sandoval
    • 3
  1. 1.United States Geological SurveyWestern Ecological Research CenterUSA
  2. 2.Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and ManagementUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Marine Science InstituteUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations