Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 3–23 | Cite as

Arthropod Diversity in Lama Forest Reserve (South Benin), a Mosaic of Natural, Degraded and Plantation Forests

  • Thibault Lachat
  • Serge Attignon
  • Julien Djego
  • Georg Goergen
  • Peter Nagel
  • Brice Sinsin
  • Ralf Peveling
Article

Abstract

Arthropod assemblages were examined in Lama forest reserve, a protected area situated in the Dahomey gap, southern Benin, composed of plantations, degraded forest and remnants of natural forest. The objectives were to compare assemblages in relation to forest type and use, to elucidate the value of forest plantations for biodiversity conservation and to identify indicator species for specific forest habitats. Arthropods were collected over an 11-month period, using standardized sets of traps (pitfall, emergence, Malaise and flight intercept traps). Nine different habitats were studied, including natural and degraded forest, forest plantations (Tectona grandis and Senna siamea) of different age, and isolated forest fragments. Our analysis focused on detritivorous and xylophagous arthropods but also included ground beetles and heteropterans, totalling 393 species. We found no differences in species richness among natural and degraded forest habitats in the centre of the reserve (Noyau central). Outside of the Noyau central, species richness was highest in old teak plantations and isolated forest fragments and lowest in young teak and fuelwood plantations. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) separated three main groups: (1) natural forest, (2) degraded forest and young plantations, and (3) old plantations and isolated forest fragments. Multiple regression of DCA scores of the first two axes on environmental variables identified one natural and three disturbance-related predictors of arthropod assemblages in Lama forest: soil type (texture), canopy height, naturalness (proportion of Guineo-Congolian plant species) and understorey vegetation cover. We identified 15 indicator species for six different forest habitats. The highest numbers were found in abandoned settlements and old teak plantations. β-diversity was similar among the three DCA ordination groups (degraded forest excluded). Values for β-diversity were relatively high, suggesting that all major forest habitats contribute significantly to regional species pools and should therefore be protected. To enhance arthropod diversity, we propose that management practices in Lama forest should aim to encourage the development of species-rich understorey vegetation of the Guineo-Congolian phytogeographical region.

Keywords

Arthropod assemblages Biodiversity conservation Dahomey gap Degraded forest Forest plantations Indicator species Natural forest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angermeier, P.L. 1999The natural imperative for biological conservationConserv. Biol.14373381Google Scholar
  2. Ashton, P.M.S., Gunatilleke, C.V.S., Gunatilleke, I.A.U.N. 1993

    A shelterwood method of regeneration for sustained timber production in Mesua-Shorea forest of Southwest Sri Lanka

    Erdelen, W.Preu, C.Ishwaran, C.M.Bandara, M. eds. Ecology and Landscape Management in Sri LankaMargraf VerlagWeikersheim255274
    Google Scholar
  3. Attignon S.E., Weibel D., Lachat T., Sinsin B., Nagel P., Peveling R. 2004. Leaf litter breakdown in natural and plantation forests of the Lama forest reserve in Benin. Appl. Soil Ecol. in press.Google Scholar
  4. Ballouche, A., Akoègninou, A., Neumann, K., Salzmann, U., Sowunmi, M.A. 2000Le projet ’Dahomey Gap: une contribution à l’histoire de la végétation au Sud-Bénin et Sud-Ouest du NigeriaBerichte des Sonderforschungsbereichs268237251Google Scholar
  5. Barbosa, O., Marquet, P.A. 2001Effects of forest fragmentation on the beetle assemblage at the relict forest of Fray JorgeChileOecologia132296306Google Scholar
  6. Chao, A., Ma, M.-C., Yang, M.C.K. 1993Stopping rules and estimation for recapture debugging with unequal failure ratesBiometrica80193201Google Scholar
  7. Colwell R.K. 1997. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
  8. Davis, A.J., Holloway, J.D., Huijbregts, H., Krikken, J., Kirk-Spriggs, A.H., Sutton, S.L. 2001Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forests of northern BorneoJ. Appl. Ecol.38593616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deshmukh, I. 1986Ecology and Tropical BiologyBlackwell Scientific PublicationsBostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Didham, R.K., Ghazoul, J., Stork, N.E., Davis, A.J. 1996Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approachTree11255260Google Scholar
  11. Didham, R.K., Hammond, P.M., Lawton, J.H., Eggleton, P., Stork, N.E. 1998Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentationEcol. Monogr.68295323Google Scholar
  12. Duelli, P., Obrist, M.K. 1998In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areasBiodiv. Conserv.7297309Google Scholar
  13. Dufrêne, M., Legendre, P. 1997Species assemblages and indicator species: the need of a flexible asymmetrical approachEcol. Monogr.67345366Google Scholar
  14. Eggleton, P., Bignell, D.E., Hauser, S., Dibog, L., Norgrove, L., Madong, B. 2002Termite diversity across an anthropogenic disturbance gradient in the humid forest zone of West AfricaAgr. Ecosyst. Environ.90189202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, S., Blakesley, D., Anusaransunthron, V. 1998Forests for the Future – Growing and Planting Native Trees for Restoring Forest EcosystemsForest Restoration Research Unit. Chiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO2000Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000Main reportRomeGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO. 2001. State of the World’s Forests 2001. Rome.Google Scholar
  18. FAO-UNESCO. 1974. Map of the World. Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Fermon, H., Schulze, C.H., Waltert, M., Mühlenberg, M. 2001The butterfly fauna of the Noyau centralLama Forest (Republic of Benin), with notes on its ecological composition and geographic distributionAfr. Entomol.9177185Google Scholar
  20. Gemerden, B.S.V., Shu, G.N., Olff, H. 2003Recovery of conservation values in Central African rain forest after logging and shifting cultivationBiodiv. Conserv.1215531570Google Scholar
  21. Giulio, M.D., Edwards, P.J., Meister, E. 2001Enhancing insects in agricultural grasslands: the roles of management and landscape structureJ. Appl. Ecol.38310319Google Scholar
  22. Goodman, S.M., Rakotondravony, D., Schatz, G., Wilmé, L. 1996Species richness of forest-dwelling birds, rodents and insectivores in a planted forest of native trees: a test case from AnkaratraMadagascarEcotropica2109120Google Scholar
  23. Hill, C.J. 1995Linear strips of rain forest vegetation as potential dispersal corridors for rain forest insectsConserv. Biol.915591566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, M.O., Gauch, H.G.J. 1980Detrended correspondance analysis: an improved ordination techniqueVegetatio424758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holloway J.D., Kirk-Spriggs A.H. and Khen C.V. 1992. The response of some rain forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. In: Marshall A.G. and Swaine M.D. (eds), Tropical Rain Forest: Disturbance and Recovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B. 335: 425–436.Google Scholar
  26. Jennrich, R.I., Turner, F.B. 1969Measurement of non-circular home rangeJ. Theor. Biol.22227237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kalif, K.A.B., Azevedo-Ramos, C., Moutinho, P., Malcher, S.A.O. 2001The effect of logging on the ground-foraging ant community in eastern AmazoniaStud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ.3615Google Scholar
  28. Kapos, V. 1989Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian AmazonJ. Trop. Ecol.5173185Google Scholar
  29. Klein, B. 1989Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in central AmazoniaEcology7017151725Google Scholar
  30. Lamb, D. 1998Large-scale ecological restoration of degraded tropical forest lands: the potential role of timber plantationsRestor. Ecol.6271279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laurance, W.F., Lovejoy, T.E., Vasconcelos, H.L., Bruna, E.M., Didham, R.K., Stouffer, P.C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R.O., Laurance, S.G., Sampaio, E. 2002Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigationConserv. Biol.16605618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawton, J.H., Bignell, D.E., Bolton, B., Bloemers, G.F., Eggleton, P., Hammond, P.M., Hodda, M., Holt, R.D., Larsen, T.B., Mawdsley, N.A., Stork, N.E., Srivastava, D.S., Watt, A.D. 1998Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forestNature3917276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, S.-M., Chao, A. 1994Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture modelsBiometrics508897Google Scholar
  34. Mantel, N. 1967The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approachCancer Res.27209221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. McCune, B., Mefford, M.J. 1999PC-ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological DataMjM Software DesignGleneden Beach, OregonGoogle Scholar
  36. Mühlenberg, M. 1993Freilandökologie. UTB für WissenschaftQuelle und Meyer HeidelbergWiesbachGoogle Scholar
  37. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., d. Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J. 2000Biodiversity hotspots for conservation prioritiesNature403853858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. New, T.R. 1998Invertebrate Surveys for ConservationOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Nummelin, M., Hanski, I. 1989Dung beetles of the Kibale ForestUganda; comparison between virgin and managed forestsJ. Trop. Ecol.5349352Google Scholar
  40. Rainio, J., Niemelä, J. 2003Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicatorsBiodiv. Conserv.12487506Google Scholar
  41. Sayer, J.A., Harcourt, C.S., Collins, N.M. 1992The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests. AfricaIUCNNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Southwood, T.R.E. 1978Ecological Methods: with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect PopulationChapman and HallLondon, New-YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Specht, I. 2002La forêt de la LamaBénin–SIG basé sur Landsat 7. Opuscula Biogeographica Basileensia 2BaselSwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  44. Speight, M.R., Wylie, F.R. 2001Insect Pests in Tropical ForestryCABI PublishingOxford, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanton, N.L. 1979Patterns of species diversity in the temperate and tropical litter mitesEcology60295304Google Scholar
  46. Stork, N.E., Srivastava, D.S., Watt, A.D., Larsen, T.B. 2003Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of CameroonBiodiv. Conserv.12387410Google Scholar
  47. Townes, H. 1972A light-weight malaise trapEntomol. News83239247Google Scholar
  48. Tucker, N., Murphy, T. 1997The effect of ecological rehabilitation on vegetation recruitment: some observations from the wet tropics of North QueenslandForest Ecol. Manage.99133152Google Scholar
  49. Vasconcelos, H.L., Vilhena, J.M.S., Caliri, G.J.A. 2000Responses of ants to selective logging of a central Amazonian forestJ. Appl. Ecol.37508514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watt, A.D., Stork, N.E., McBeeath, C., Lawson, G.L. 1997Impact of forest management on insect abundance and damage in a lowland tropical forest in southern CameroonJ. Appl. Ecol.34985998Google Scholar
  51. White, F. 1983The Vegetation of AfricaUNESCOParisGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilkening, A.J., Foltz, J.L., Atkinson, T.H., Connor, M.D. 1981An omnidirectional flight trap for ascending and descending insectsCan. Entomol.113453455Google Scholar
  53. Whittaker, R.H. 1960Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and CaliforniaEcol. Monogr.30279338Google Scholar
  54. Zapfack, L., Engwald, S., Sonke, B., Achoundong, G., Madong, B.A. 2002The impact of land conversion on plant biodiversity in the forest zone of CameroonBiodiv. Conserv.1120472061Google Scholar
  55. Zar, J.H. 1999Biostatistical AnalysisPearson EducationNew JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thibault Lachat
    • 1
  • Serge Attignon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julien Djego
    • 2
  • Georg Goergen
    • 3
  • Peter Nagel
    • 1
  • Brice Sinsin
    • 2
  • Ralf Peveling
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Natur-, Landschafts- und Umweltschutz (NLU) – BiogeographieUniversität BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Ecologie Appliquée, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques (FSA)Université d’Abomey-CalaviBenin
  3. 3.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)Biodiversity CentreBenin

Personalised recommendations