Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 14, pp 3577–3592 | Cite as

The Contribution of Tropical Secondary Forest Fragments to the Conservation of Fruit-feeding Butterflies: Effects of Isolation and Age

  • Dorthe Veddeler
  • Christian H. Schulze
  • Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
  • Damayanti Buchori
  • Teja Tscharntke
Article

Abstract

Concomitant with the rapid loss of tropical mature forests, the relative abundance of secondary forests is increasing steadily and the latter are therefore of growing interest for conservation. We analysed species richness of fruit-feeding nymphalid butterflies in secondary forest fragments of different age and isolation and in mature forest at the eastern margin of the Lore Lindu National Park in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. From April to August 2001 we collected 2322 individuals of fruit-feeding butterflies, belonging to 33 species. Butterfly species richness increased with succession, but was significantly higher in mature forests than in all types of secondary forest. Isolation of the forest fragments did not have a significant effect on butterfly species richness in the range of distances (up to 1700 m) studied. Rather it appeared to affect only a few species. Species richness of endemic species was higher than of non-endemic species. Although endemic species were most diverse in mature forests, many species captured were restricted to secondary forests. Our results show that mature forest is essential for the conservation of nymphalid butterflies and for the endemic species in this area. However, considering the relatively large number of species found in these rather small habitat islands, secondary forest fragments, especially older successional stages, can be taken into account in conservation efforts and thus contribute to the preservation of tropical biodiversity on a landscape scale.

Keywords

Endemic species Isolation Landscape Species richness Secondary forests Succession Tropical forests 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beattie, A.J., Oliver, I. 1994Taxonomic minimalismTrends in Ecology and Evolution9488490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, J., Schulze, C.H. 2000Diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies (Nymphalidae) along a gradient of tropical rainforest succession in Borneo with some remarks on the problem of ‘pseudoreplicates’Trans. Lepidopterol. Soc. Jpn.518998Google Scholar
  3. Beck, J., Schulze, C.H., Linsenmair, K.E., Fiedler, K. 2002From forest to farmland: diversity and community structure of geometer moths along two habitat gradients on BorneoJ. Trop. Ecol.183351Google Scholar
  4. Beer, J. 1987Advantages, disadvantages and desirable characteristics of shade trees for coffeecacaoand teaAgroforest. Syst.5313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, K.S., Hutchings, R.W. 1997

    Disturbancefragmentation, and the dynamics of diversity in Amazonian forest butterflies

    Laurence, W.F.Bierregaard, R.O.,Jr. eds. Tropical Forest Remnants. Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented CommunitiesThe University of Chicago PressChicago91110
    Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S., Lugo, A.E. 1990Tropical secondary forestsJ. Trop. Ecol.6132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, V.K., Southwood, T.R.E. 1987

    Secondary succession: patterns and strategies

    Gray, A.J.Crawley, M.J.Edwards, P.J. eds. Colonization, Succession and StabilityOxfordBlackwell315338
    Google Scholar
  8. Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 1997. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 5. User’s Guide and application published at http:// viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
  9. Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 2000. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 6. User’s Guide and application published at http:// viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
  10. Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R. 1995Preservation of biodiversity in small rainforest patches: rapid evaluations using butterfly trappingBiodiv. Conserv.43555Google Scholar
  11. Hamer, K.C., Hill, J.K., Lace, L.A., Langhan, A.M. 1997Ecological and biogeographical effects of forest disturbance on tropical butterflies of SumbaIndonesiaJ. Biogeogr.246775Google Scholar
  12. Hill, J.K., Hamer, K.L., Lace, L.A., Banham, W.M.T. 1995Effects of selective logging on tropical forest butterflies on BuruIndonesiaJ. Appl. Ecol.32754760Google Scholar
  13. Intachat, J., Holloway, J.D., Speight, M.R. 1999The impact of logging on geometrid moth populations and their diversity in lowland forests of Peninsular MalaysiaJ. Trop. Forest Sci.116176Google Scholar
  14. Janzen, D.H. 1988Ecological characterization of a Costa Rican dry forest caterpillar faunaBiotropica20120135Google Scholar
  15. Kennard, D. 2002Secondary forest succession in a tropical dry forest: patterns of development across a 50-year chronosequence in lowland BoliviaJ. Trop. Ecol.185366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein, A.M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Buchori, D., Tscharntke, T. 2002Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps.Conserv. Biol.11683693Google Scholar
  17. Lawton, J.H., Bignell, D.E., Bolton, B., Bloemers, G.F., Eggleton, P.P., Hammond, M., Hodda, M., Holt, R.D., Larsen, T.B., Mawsley, N.A., Stork, D.S., Srivastava, D.S., Watt, A.D. 1998Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forestNature3917276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, O.T. 2001Effect of experimental selective logging on tropical butterfliesConserv. Biol.15389400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lovejoy, T.E.R, Bierregaard, O., Rylands, A.B., Malcolm, J.R., Quintela, C.E., Harper, L.H., Brown, K.S., Powell, A.H., Schubart, H.O.R., Hays, M.B. 1986

    Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments

    Soule, M.E. eds. Conservation Biology: Science of Scarity and DiversitySinauer AssociatesMassachusetts257285
    Google Scholar
  20. Mac Arthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Manugistics1997Statgraphics Plus for Windows, Version1, User ManualManugistics Inc.Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  22. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J. 2000Biodiversity hotspots for conservation prioritiesNature403853858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ocana, G., Rubinoff, I., Smythe, N., Werner, D. 1992

    Alternativen zur Zerstörung: forschungen in Panama

    Wilson, E.O. eds. Ende der Biologischen Vielfalt?Spektrum Akademischer VerlagHeidelberg397403
    Google Scholar
  24. Perfecto, I., Snelling, R. 1995Biodiversity and the transformation of a tropical agroecosystem: ants in coffee plantationsEcol. Appl.510841097Google Scholar
  25. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. 1996Microclimatic changes in the indirect loss of ant diversity in a tropical agroecosystemOecologia108577582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. 2002Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in Southern MexicoConserv. Biol.16174182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pimentel, D., Stachow, U., Takacs, D.A., Brubaker, H.W., Dumas, A.R., Meany, J.J., O’Neil, J.A.S., Douglas, O.E., Corzilius, D.B. 1992Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systemsBioScience42354362Google Scholar
  28. Pinheiro, C.E.G., Ortiz, V.C. 1992Communities of fruit-feeding butterflies along a vegetation gradient in Central BrazilJ. Biogeogr.19505511Google Scholar
  29. Raman, T.R. 2001Effect of slash-and burn shifting cultivation on rainforest birds in Mizoramnortheast IndiaConserv. Biol.15685698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricketts, T.H. 2001The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapesAm. Nat.1588799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ricketts, T.H., Daily, G.D., Ehrlich, P.R., Fay, J.P. 2000Countryside biogeography of moths in a fragmented landscape: biodiversity in native and agricultural landscapesConserv. Biol.15378388Google Scholar
  32. Sala, O.E., Chapin, F.S., Armesto, J.J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L.F., Jackson, R.B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D.M., Mooney, H.A., Oesterhel, M., Poff, N.L., Sykes, M., Walker, B.H., Walker, M., Wall, D.H. 2000Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100Science28717701774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J., Margueles, C.R. 1991Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentationConserv. Biol.51832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schelhas, J., Greenberg, R. 1996Forest Patches in Tropical LandscapesIsland PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Schulze, C.H., Linsenmair, K.E., Fiedler, K. 2002Understorey versus canopy – patterns of stratification and diversity among Lepidoptera in a Bornean rainforestPlant Ecol.153 133152Google Scholar
  36. Schulze C.H., Waltert M., Kessler P.J.A., Pitopang R., Shahabuddin, Veddeler D., Mühlenberg M., Gradstein S.R., Leuschner C., Steffan-Dewenter I. and Tscharntke T. 2004. Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: Comparing plants, birds and insects. Ecol. Appl. (in press).Google Scholar
  37. Shahabuddin, G., Terborgh, J.W. 1999Frugivorous butterflies in Venezuelan forest fragments: abundancediversity and the effects of isolationJ. Trop. Ecol.15703722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singer, M.C., Ehrlich, P.R. 1991Host specialization of satyrinae butterflies, and their response to habitat fragmentation in TrinidadJ. Res. Lepidoptera30248256Google Scholar
  39. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1995Biometry, the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological ResearchFremsn and CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Southwood, T.R.E., Brown, V.K., Reader, P.M. 1979The relationship of plant and insect diversities in successionBiol. J. Linn. Soc.12327348Google Scholar
  41. Spitzer, K., Novotný, V., Tonner, M., Leps, J. 1993Habitat preferences, distribution and seasonality of the butterflies (LepidopteraPapilionoidea) in a montane tropical rain forestVietnamJ. Biogeogr.20109121Google Scholar
  42. StatSoft1999Statistica for Windows5.5. Statsoft Inc.TulsaGoogle Scholar
  43. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. 1997Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fieldsOecologia109294302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. 2000Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitatsEcol. Lett.3449456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitten, A.J., Mustafa, M., Henderson, G.S. 1988The ecology of SulawesiGadjah Mada University PressGadjah MadaGoogle Scholar
  46. World Wildlife Fond1981Lore Lindu National Park. Management plan 1981–1986WWFBogorGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorthe Veddeler
    • 1
  • Christian H. Schulze
    • 2
  • Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
    • 1
  • Damayanti Buchori
    • 3
  • Teja Tscharntke
    • 1
  1. 1.AgroecologyUniversity of GoettingenGoettingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Animal EcologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  3. 3.Department of Plant Pests and DiseasesJL. Raya Pajajaran, Institut Pertanian BogorBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations