Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 1641–1661 | Cite as

Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe

  • Juliette Young
  • Allan Watt
  • Peter Nowicki
  • Didier Alard
  • Jeremy Clitherow
  • Klaus Henle
  • Richard Johnson
  • Endre Laczko
  • Davy McCracken
  • Simone Matouch
  • Jari Niemela
  • Caspian Richards
Article

Abstract

Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities are becoming increasingly apparent in all European landscapes. The intensification of agricultural and silvicultural practices, land abandonment and other land uses such as recreation and hunting are all potential threats to biodiversity that can lead to conflicts between stakeholder livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. To address the global decline in biodiversity there is, therefore, a need to identify the drivers responsible for conflicts between human activities and the conservation of European biodiversity and to promote the management of these conflicts. Here, the drivers of biodiversity conflicts are analysed in a European context for five habitat types: agricultural landscapes, forests, grasslands, uplands and freshwater habitats. A multi- disciplinary approach to conflict management is described, with active stakeholder involvement at every stage of conflict identification and management as well as a range of other approaches including stakeholder dialogue and education, consumer education, improvement of political and legislative frameworks, financial incentives, and planning infrastructure.

Keywords

Biodiversity Conflict Conflict management Conservation Participation Stakeholder Sustainable development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agra-Europe,1991,Agriculture and the environment: how will the EC resolve the conflict? Agra-Europe Special Report 60,LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akademie für Natur- und Umweltschutz,1993,Grünland in roten Zahlen? Beiträge der Akademie für Natur- und Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg 14Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alard, D., Boullet, V., Molina, J. 2002

    Compte rendu d’expertise botanique sur les collines sous-vosgiennes. Fédération des Conservatoires Botaniques Nationaux

    Cuisinier, J.B.Glass, B. eds. Natura 2000 Alsace. Les collines sous-vosgiennes haut-rhinoises.Mission MAAPAR-MEDD.
    Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andres, C., Ojeda, F. 2002Effects of afforestation with pines on woody plant diversity of Mediterranean heathlands in southern SpainBiodiversity and Conservation1115111520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baudry, J., Bunce, R.G.H., Burel, F. 2000Hedgerows: an international perspective on their origin, function and managementJournal of Environmental Management60722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benstead, P., Drake, M., Jose, P., Mountford, O., Newbold, C., Treweek, J. 1997The Wet Grassland GuideRoyal Society for the Protection of BirdsSandy, UK.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bignal, E.M. 1999

    Agenda 2000: The Common Agricultural Policy reform proposals

    British Wildlife172176
    Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bignal, E.M., McCracken, D.I. 1996Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countrysideJournal of Applied Ecology33413424Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bignal, E.M., McCracken, D.I. 2000The nature conservation value of European traditional farming systemsEnvironmental Reviews8149171Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Binot-Hafke, M., Gruttke, H., Ludwig, G., Riecken, U., Korneck, D. 2000Bilanzierung der bundesweiten Roten Listen- ein EinfuhrungSchriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz65731Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blanco, G., Tella, J.L., Torre, I. 1998Traditional farming and key foraging habitats for chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax conservation in a Spanish pseudosteppe landscapeJournal of Applied Ecology35232239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breitholtz, M., Hill, C., Bengtsson, B.E. 2001Toxic substances and reproductive disorders in Baltic fish and crustaceansAmbio30210216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brooks, T.M., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Rylands, A.B., Konstant, W.R., Flick, P., Pilgrim, J., Oldfield, S., Magin, G., Hilton-Taylor, C. 2002Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversityConservation Biology16909923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cade, T.J., Enderson, J.H., Thelander, C.G., White, C.M. 1998Peregrine Falcon Populations: Their Management and RecoveryThe Peregrine FundBoiseIdaho.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carey, P.D., Barnett, C.L., Greensdale, P.D., Garbutt, R.A., Warman, E.A., Myhill, D., Scott, R.J., Smart, R.J., Manchester, S.J., Robinson, J., Walker, K.J., Howard, D.C., Firbank, L.G. 2002A comparison of the ecological quality of land between an English agri-environment scheme and the countryside as a wholeBiological Conservation108183197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Comins, J.S., Sendra, J.B., Sanz, F.M. 1993Crisis and permanence of the traditional Mediterranean landscape in the central region of SpainLandscape and Urban Planning23155166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conrad, B. 1997Die Giftbelastung der Vogelwelt DeutschlandsKildaGrevenGermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daumer, M.L., Beline, F., Guiziou, F., Martinez, J. 2001Phosphate Recovery Following Biological Aerobic Treatment of Pig SlurryCemagrefRennes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dömpke, S., Succow, M. 1998

    Cultural Landscapes and Nature Conservation in Northern Eurasia

    Naturschutzbund DeutschlandAIDEnvironmentand The Nature Conservation BureauBonn, Germany
    Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Donald, P.F. 1998Changes in the abundance of invertebrates and plants on British farmlandBritish Wildlife9279289Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Donald, P.F., Pisano, G., Rayment, M.D., Pain, D.J. 2002The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe’s farmland birdsAgricultureEcosystems and the Environment89167182Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Drake, C.M. 1998

    A Survey of the Aquatic Invertebrates of the Essex Grazing Marshes

    Nature Conservancy CouncilPeterboroughUK.
    Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duncan, P., Hewison, A.J.M., Houte, S., Rosoux, R., Tournebize, T., Dubs, F., Burel, F., Bretagnolle, V. 1999Long-term changes in agricultural practices and wildfowling in an internationally important wetlandand their effects on the guild of wintering ducksJournal of Applied Ecology361123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 25.
    Ellenberg, H. 1985Veränderungen der Flora Mitteleuropas unter dem Einfluß von Düngung und ImmissionenSchweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen1361939Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Ellenberg, H. 1991

    Ökologische Veränderungen in Biozönosen durch Stickstoffeintrag

    Henle, K.Kaule, G. eds. Arten- und Biotopschutzforschung für DeutschlandForschungszentrumJülichGermany7590
    Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elmgren, R. 2001Understanding human impact on the Baltic ecosystem: changing views in recent decadesAmbio30222231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    European Commission,1998,State of Application of Regulation (EEC) no. 2078/92,Evaluation of Agri-Environment Programmes. VI/7655/98, 9.11.1998 (01 June 01). In: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ agriculture/envir/programs/evalrep/text_en.pdf. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evans, A. 1997

    The importance of mixed farming for seed-eating birds in the UK

    Pain, D.J.Pienkowski, M.W. eds. Farming and Birds in Europe: The Common Agriculture Policy and Its Implications for Bird Conservation.Academic PressSan DiegoCalifornia
    Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    FAO,2001,Global Forest AssessmentFAO Forestry Paper 140,FAORomeItalyGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farina, A. 1997Landscape structure and breeding bird distribution in a sub-Mediterranean agro-ecosystemLandscape Ecology12365378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Farrell, L. 1993

    Lowland Heathland: The Extent of Habitat Change

    English NaturePeterboroughUK
    Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friese, K., Witter, B., Miehlich, G., Rode, M. 2000Stoffhaushalt von Auenökosystemen: Böden und HydrologieSchadstoffeBewertungenSpringerBerlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    W.Geller,P.Puncochar,D.Barion,H.Feldmann,H.Guhr,V.Jirásek,M.Simon,J.Smrtak,2000,Gewässerlandschaften. 9. Magdeburger Gewässerschutzseminar,ATV-DVWK (Deutsche Vereinigung für WasserwirtschaftAbwasser und Abfall)-Schriftenreihe 22.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldamer, J. 2001

    Proceedings of the XX IUFRO Congress

    XX IUFRO CongressKuala Lumpur.
    Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grant, S.A., Hunter, R.F. 1971Interaction of grazing and burning on heather moors. II. Effects of primary production and level of utilisation.Journal of the British Grassland Society26173181Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Green, R.E., Etheridge, B. 1999Breeding success of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in relation to the distribution of grouse moors and the red fox Vulpes vulpesJournal of Applied Ecology36472483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Green, R.E., Stowe, T.J. 1993The decline of the corncrake Crex crex in Britain and Ireland in relation to habitat changeJournal of Applied Ecology30689695Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grove, A.T., Rackham, O. 2001The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological HistoryYale University PressNew Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hanley, N., Whitby, M., Simpson, I. 1999Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy in the UKLand Use Policy166780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hansson, L. 2001Traditional management of forests: plant and bird community responses to alternative restoration of oak-hazel woodland in SwedenBiodiversity and Conservation1018651873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hellström, E. 2001Conflict cultures – quantitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestrySilva Fennica Monographs21109Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Henle, K., Bender, C., Schmidt-Loske, K., Asmussen, U. 1999

    PVAs in der Eingriffsplanung am Beispiel der Flurbereinigung von Weinbergen

    Amler, K.Bahl, A.Henle, K.Kaule, G.Poschlod, P.Settele, J. eds. Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis. Isolation, Flächenbedarf und Biotopansprüche von Pflanzen und Tieren. UlmerStuttgartGermany241248
    Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hodge, I., McNally, S. 1998Evaluating the environmentally sensitive areas: the value of rural environments and policy relevanceJournal of Rural Studies14357367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kapfer, A. 1993Biotopschutz am Beispiel der Wiesen und Weiden.Beitrage der Akademie fur Natur und Umweltschutz Baden-Wurttemberg141537Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kapfer, A. 1993Biotopschutz am Beispiel der Wiesen und Weiden.Beiträge der Akademie für Natur und Umweltschutz Baden-Wurttemberg141537Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaule, G. 1991Arten- und Biotopschutz. UlmerStuttgartGermany.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kononen, K. 2001Eutrophication, harmful algal blooms and species diversity in phytoplankton communities examples from the Baltic SeaAmbio30184189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Krebs, J.R., Wilson, J.D., Bradbury, R.B., Siriwardena, G.M. 1999The second Silent Spring?Nature400611612Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lindell, L., Mellin, M., Musil, P., Przybysz, J., Zimmerman, H. 1995Status and population development of breeding cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis of the Central-European FlywayArdea838192Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Luedecke, M., Reusswig, F. 1999Das Dust-Bowl-Syndrom in DeutschlandUmweltforschungszentrum UFZ,Leipzig, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    MacDonald, D., Crabtree, J.R., Wiesinger, G., Dax, T., Stamou, N., Fleury, P., Lazpita, J.G., Gibon, A. 2000Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy responseJournal of Environmental Management594769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mahanty, S., Russell, D. 2002High stakes: lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation networkSociety and Natural Resources15179188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marquiss, M., Madders, M. 1999

    White-tailed eagle dietMull 1999. Final report

    Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, BanchoryUK.
    Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mauro, F., Hardison, P.D. 2000Traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities: International debate and policy initiativesEcological Applications1012631269Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McCool, S.F., Guthrie, K., Smith, J.K. 2000Building consensus: legitimate hope or seductive paradox? USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Research PaperGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McCracken, D.I., Bignal, E.M. 1998Applying the results of ecological studies to land-use policies and practicesJournal of Applied Ecology35961967Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    McGowan, G.M., Thurlow, M., Bayfield, N.G. 1999

    Use of a Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) Monitoring Scheme at Aonach Mor Ski ResortScotland 1989–1999

    Institute for Terrestrial Ecology, BanchoryUK.
    Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Moreira, F., Rego, F.C., Ferreira, P.G. 2001Temporal (1958–1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrenceLandscape Ecology16557567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Morris, C., Young, C. 1997Towards environmentally beneficial farming? An evaluation of the countryside stewardship schemeGeography82305316Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mühlenberg, M., Slowik, J. 1997Kulturlandschaft als LebensraumQuelle & MeyerWiesbaden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Myers, N. 1993Questions of mass extinctionBiodiversity and Conservation2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Myers, N., Knoll, A.H. 2001The biotic crisis and the future of evolutionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA9853895392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Novacek, M.J., Cleland, E.E. 2001The current biodiversity extinction event: Scenarios for mitigation and recoveryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA9854665470Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ojaveer, E., Lehtonen, H. 2001Fish stocks in the Baltic Sea: finite or infinite resource?Ambio30217221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ouin, A., Burel, F. 2002Influence of herbaceous elements on butterfly diversity in hedgerow agricultural landscapesAgricultureEcosystems and the Environment934553Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ovenden, G.N., Swash, A.R.H., Smallshire, D. 1998Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in EnglandJournal of Applied Ecology35955960Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pain, D.J., Pienkowski, M.W. 1997

    Conclusions: a future for farming and birds?

    Pain, D.J.Pienkowski, M.W. eds. Farming and Birds in Europe.Academic PressSan DiegoCalifornia358388
    Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Pain, D.J., Pienkowski, M.W. 1997Farming and Birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and Its Implications for Bird Conservation.Academic PressLondon.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Peach, W.J., Lovett, L.J., Wotton, S.R., Jeffs, C. 2001Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UKBiological Conservation101361373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pedrini, P., Sergio, F. 2001Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos density and productivity in relation to land abandonment and forest expansion in the AlpsBird Study48194199Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Petersen, J.-E. 2003

    Agri-environmental programmes and the Candidate Countries

    Ecologic,  eds. EU: CAP and Enlargement – An Opportunity for Nature and Environment?. Ecologic,PotsdamGermany
    Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Pimm, S.L., Raven, P. 2000Biodiversity – extinction by numbersNature403843845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pointereau, P., Bazile, D. 1995Arbres des champs: haies, alignements, prés, vergers ou l’art du bocage. SolagroToulouseFrance.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Potschin, M.B., Haines-Young, R.H. 2003Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from Southern GermanyLandscape and Urban Planning6393108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 76.
    Potter, C. 1997

    Europe’s changing farmed landscape

    Pain, D.J.Pienkowski, M.W. eds. Farming and Birds in Europe.Academic PressLondon2542
    Google Scholar
  76. 75.
    Potter, C. 2002

    Agri-environmental policy development in the European Union

    Brouwer, F.van der Straaten, J. eds. Nature and Agriculture in the European Union: New Perspectives on Policies that Shape the European Countryside.Edward ElgarCheltenhamUK6787
    Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rich, T.C.G., Woodruff, E.R. 1996Changes in the vascular plant floras of England and Scotland between 1930–1960 and 1987–1988: The BSBI monitoring schemeBiological Conservation75 217229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Robertson, P.A., Park, K.J., Barton, A.F. 2001Loss of heather Calluna vulgaris moorland in the Scottish uplands: the role of red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus managementWildlife Biology71116Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Robinson, R.A., Sutherland, W.J. 2002Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great BritainJournal of Applied Ecology39157176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Robinson, R.A., Wilson, J.D., Crick, H.Q.P. 2001The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland landscapesJournal of Applied Ecology3813861386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Rüger, A., Neumann, T. 1982

    Das Projekt Seeadlerschutz in Schleswig-Holstein

    Landwirtschaftliche Kontroll- und Dienstleistungs GmbHKiel, Germany.
    Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Russ, J.M., Montgomery, W.I. 2002Habitat associations of bats in Northern Ireland: implications for conservationBiological Conservation1084958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Schneeweiss, N., Schneeweiss, U. 1997Amphibienverluste infolge mineralischer Düngung auf AgrarflächenSalamandra3318Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Shrubb, M. 1990Effects of agricultural change on nesting lapwings Vanellus vanellus in England and WalesBird Study37115127Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Simon.G,1998,Le Marais Poitevin: Rapport au Ministre de l’Amenagement du Territoire et de l’Environnement,Conseil Regional des Ponts et Chaussees.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Singh, J.S. 2002The biodiversity crisis: a multifaceted reviewCurrent Science82638647Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Siriwardena, G.M., Baillie, S.R., Buckland, S.T., Fewster, R.M., Marchant, J.H., Wilson, J.D. 1998Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indicesJournal of Applied Ecology352443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Stanners, D., Bourdeau, P. 1995Europe’s Environment: The Dobris AssessmentEuropean Environment AgencyCopenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Stoate, C., Boatman, N.D. 2001Ecological impacts of arable intensification in EuropeJournal of Environmental Management63337365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T. 2002From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: experience from Germany and South AfricaSociety and Natural Resources15161177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sukopp.H,Trautman.W,Korneck.D,1978Auswertung der Roten Liste der gefährdeten Farn- und Blütenpflanzen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland für den Arten- und Biotopschutz,Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 12.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Sutherland, W.J. 2002Restoring a sustainable countrysideTrends in Ecology and Evolution17 148150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tattersall, F.H., Macdonald, D.W., Hart, B.J., Johnson, P., Manley, W., Feber, R. 2002Is habitat linearity important for small mammal communities on farmland?Journal of Applied Ecology39643652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Thomas, G.J., Jose, P., Hirons, G. 1995Wet grasslands in the millenniumEnact346Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tucker, G.M., Heath, M.F. 1994Birds in Europe: Their Conservation StatusBirdlife InternationalCambridgeUK.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Underwood, A.J. 1995Ecological research and research into environmental managementEcological Applications5232247Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Underwood, A.J. 1998Relationships between ecological research and environmental managementLandscape and Urban Planning40123130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Virkkala, R., Toivonen, H. 1999

    Maintaining Biological Diversity in Finnish Forests

    The Finnish Environment 278. The Finnish Environment InstituteHelsinkiFinland.
    Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Wakeham-Dawson, A., Aebischer, N.J. 1998Factors determining winter densities of birds on Environmentally Sensitive Area arable reversion grassland in southern Englandwith special reference to skylarks (Alauda arvensis)AgricultureEcosystems and the Environment70189201Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Willems, J.H. 1900

    Calcareous grasslands in Continental Europe

    Hillier, S.H.Walteon, D.H.W.Wells, D.A. eds. Calcareous Grasslands – Ecology and Management.Bluntisham BooksHuntingdon, UK310
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliette Young
    • 1
  • Allan Watt
    • 1
  • Peter Nowicki
    • 2
  • Didier Alard
    • 3
  • Jeremy Clitherow
    • 4
  • Klaus Henle
    • 5
  • Richard Johnson
    • 6
  • Endre Laczko
    • 7
  • Davy McCracken
    • 8
  • Simone Matouch
    • 9
  • Jari Niemela
    • 10
  • Caspian Richards
    • 11
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (Banchory)UK
  2. 2.ECNCthe Netherlands
  3. 3.University of RouenFrance
  4. 4.English NatureUK
  5. 5.UFZ Leipzig-HalleGermany
  6. 6.Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Sweden
  7. 7.University of BaselSwitzerland
  8. 8.Scottish Agricultural CollegeUK
  9. 9.ARGE Austria
  10. 10.University of HelsinkiFinland
  11. 11.Macaulay InstituteUK

Personalised recommendations