Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 13, pp 3151–3168 | Cite as

A Test of the Higher-Taxon Approach in the Identification of Candidate Sites for Marine Reserves

Article

Abstract

Alternatives to species-level identification have been advocated as one solution to the problem of selecting marine reserves with limited information on the distribution of marine biodiversity.This study evaluated the effects on selection of candidate sites for marine reserves from using the higher-taxon approach as a surrogate for species-level identification of intertidal molluscs and rocky reef fishes. These effects were evaluated by determining the percentage of species included in candidate reserves identified from genus-, family- and order-level data by a complementarity-based reserve selection algorithm, and by testing for correlations between the irreplaceability values of locations. Candidate reserves identified from genus- and family-level data of intertidal molluscs included a similar percentage of all species as the reserves identified from species-level data. Candidate reserves selected from genus- and family-level data of rocky reef fishes included, respectively, 3–7% and 14–23% fewer species than reserves selected from species-level data. When the reserve identification process was constrained by a practical planning limit (a maximum of 20% locations able to be reserved) the reserves selected from genus- and family-level data of intertidal molluscs, and genus-level data of rocky reef fishes, included a similar percentage of species as the reserves identified from species-level data. Irreplaceability values of locations for species, genera and families of intertidal molluscs were highly correlated, and irreplaceability values of locations for species and genera of rocky reef fishes were highly correlated. This study suggests that genus- and family-level data for intertidal molluscs, and genus-level data for rocky reef fishes, are suitable surrogates for species in the identification of candidate sites for marine reserves.

Key words:

Biodiversity survey Intertidal rocky shore Irreplaceability Marine protected area Molluscs Rocky reef fishes Species richness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council). 1999. Strategic Plan of Action for the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas: A Guide for Action by Australian Governments. Environment AustraliaCanberra.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balmford, A., Green, M.J.B., Murray, M.G. 1996aUsing higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. Regional testsProc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B26312671274Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balmford, A., Jayasuriya, A.H.M., Green, M.J.B. 1996bUsing higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: II. Local applicationsProc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B26315711575Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balmford, A., Lyon, A.J.E., Lang, R.M. 2000Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungiBiol. Conserv.93209217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beesley P.L., Ross G.J.B. and Wells A. (eds),, 1998. Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol 5. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman, M.G. 1998Relationships between spatial patterns of benthic assemblages in a mangrove forest using different levels of taxonomic resolutionMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.1627178Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P.H., Pressey, R.L., Camm, J.D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A.R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M., Sahr, K. 1997A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in OregonBiol. Conserv.808397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferraro, S.P., Cole, F.A. 1990Taxonomic level and sample size sufficient for assessing pollution impacts on the Southern California Bight macrobenthosMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.67251262Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrier, S., Pressey, R.L., Barrett, T.W. 2000A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinementBiol. Conserv.93303325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaston, K.J. 1996

    Spatial covariance in the species richness of higher taxa

    Hichberg, M.E.Clobert, J.Barbault, R. eds. Aspects of the Genesis and Maintenance of Biological DiversityOxfordOxford University Press221242
    Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaston, K.J. 2000Biodiversity: higher taxon richnessProg. Phys. Geogr.24117127Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gladstone, W. 2002The potential value of indicator groups in the selection of marine reservesBiol. Conserv.104211220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gladstone, W., Davis, J. 2003Reduced survey intensity and its consequences for marine reserve selectionBiodiv. Conserv.1215251536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    Gladstone, W., Krupp, F., Younis, M. 2003Development and management of a regional network of marine protected areas for the Red Sea and Gulf of AdenOcean Coast. Manage.46741761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    Gladstone, W., Schreider, M. 2003Effects of pruning a temperate mangrove forest on the associated assemblages of macroinvertebratesMar.Freshwater Res.54683690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopkinson, P., Travis, J.M.J., Evans, J., Gregory, R., Telfer, M.G., Williams, P.H. 2001Flexibility and the use of indicator taxa in the selection of sites for nature reservesBiodiv. Conserv.10271285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howard, P.C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T.R.B., Kigenyi, F.W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C.J., Lwanga, J.S., Matthews, R.A., Balmford, A. 1998Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in UgandaNature394472475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hutchings, P., Ponder, W. 2003Marine invertebrates and their conservationMar. Poll. Bull.46153154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jablonski, D., Flessa, K.W. 1986The taxonomic structure of shallow-water marine faunas: implications for Phanerozoic extinctionsMalacologia274366Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    James, R.J., Lincoln Smith, M.P., Fairweather, P.G. 1995Sieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution needed to describe natural spatial variation in marine macrofaunaMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.118187198Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kay, E.A., Wells, F.E., Ponder, W.F. 1998

    Class Gastropoda

    Beesley, P.L.Ross, G.J.B.Wells, A. eds. Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis Part BCSIRO PublishingCanberra565604
    Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelleher, G., Bleakley, C., Wells, S. 1995.A Global Representative System of Marine Protected Areas, Vol. 1The World BankWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kershaw, M., Mace, G.M., Williams, P.H. 1995Threatened status, rarity, and diversity as alternative selection measures for protected areas: a test using Afrotropical antelopesConserv. Biol.9324334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirkpatrick, J.B. 1983An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from TasmaniaBiol. Conserv.25127134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuiter, R.H. 2000.Coastal Fishes of South-Eastern AustraliaGary AllenSydneyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lasiak, T. 2003Influence of taxonomic resolution, biological attributes and data transformations on multivariate comparisons of rocky macrofaunal assemblagesMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.2502934Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lincoln Smith, M.P. 1989Improving multispecies rocky reef fish censuses by counting different groups of species using different proceduresEnviron. Biol. Fish.262937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manly, B.F.J. 1997Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in BiologyChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Margules, C.R., Pressey, R.L. 2000Systematic conservation planningNature405243253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McAllister, D.E., Schueler, F.W., Roberts, C.M., Hawkins, J.P. 1994

    Mapping and GIS analysis of the global distribution of coral reef fishes on an equal area grid

    Miller, R.I. eds. Mapping the Diversity of NatureChapman and HallLondon155175
    Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Myers, A.A. 1997Biogeographic barriers and the development of marine biodiversityEstuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.44241248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    NSWMPAMPASWG(New South Wales Marine Parks Authority Marine Protected Area Strategy Working group)2001Developing a Representative System of Marine Protected Areas in NSW-an OverviewMarine Parks AuthoritySydneyGoogle Scholar
  33. 34.
    Olsgard, F., Brattegard, T., Holthe, T. 2003Polychaetes as surrogates for marine biodiversity: lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groupsBiodivers. Conserv.1210331049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    Olsgard, F., Somerfield, P.J., Carr, M.R. 1998Relationships between taxonomic resolution, macrobenthic community patterns and disturbanceMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.1722536Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pharo, E.J., Beattie, A.J., Pressey, R.L. 2000Effectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichensBiol. Conserv.96371378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pik, A.J., Oliver, I., Beattie, A.J. 1999Taxonomic sufficiency in ecological studies of terrestrial invertebratesAust. J. Ecol.24555562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ponder, W., Hutchings, P., Chapman, R. 2002Overview of the Conservation of Australian Marine InvertebratesAustralian MuseumSydney and Environment AustraliaCanberraGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pressey, R.L. 1998

    Algorithms, politics and timber: an example of the role of science in a public, political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests

    Wills, R.Hobbs, R. eds. Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, the Public and the PoliticiansSurrey Beatty and SonsSydney7387
    Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pressey, R.L. 1999Applications of irreplaceability analysis to planning and management problemsParks94251Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pressey, R.L., Johnson, I.R., Wilson, P.D. 1994Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goalBiodiv. Conserv.3242262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pressey, R.L., Taffs, K.H. 2001Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation lossBiol. Conserv.100355376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rebelo, A.G., Siegfried, W.R. 1992Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? – models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximising the protection of floral diversity.Conserv. Biol.6243252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reid, W.V. 1998Biodiversity hotspotsTREE13275280Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Reyers, B., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Kruger, M. 2000Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategyProc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B267505513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roberts C.M. and Hawkins J.P. 2000. Fully Protected Marine Reserves: A Guide. WWF Endangered Seas Campaign USA and University of York, UK. Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Roy, K., Jablonski, D., Valentine, J.W. 1996Higher taxa in biodiversity studies: patterns from eastern Pacific marine molluscsPhilos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B35116051613Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tardiff, B., DesGranges, J.L. 1998Correspondence between bird and plant hotspots of the St Lawrence River and influence of scale on their locationBiol. Conserv.845363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thackway, R. 1996

    Developing consistent national criteria for the identification and selection of a national representative system of marine protected areas

    Thackway, R. eds. Developing Australia's Representative System of Marine Protected Areas: Criteria and Guidelines for Identification and SelectionDepartment of the Environment Sport and TerritoriesCanberra2028
    Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Underwood, A.J., Kingsford, M.J., Andrew, N.L. 1991Patterns in shallow subtidal marine assemblages along the coast of New South WalesAust. J. Ecol.6231249Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vanderklift, M.A., Ward, T.J., Phillips, J.C. 1998Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversityBiol. Conserv.86307315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    van Jaarsveld, A.S., Freitag, S., Chown, S.L., Muller, C., Koch, S., Hull, H., Bellamy, C., Kruger, M., Endrody-Younga, S., Mansell, M.W., Scholtz, C.H. 1998Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategiesScience27921062108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J., Williams, P.H. 1991What to protect? – Systematics and the agony of choiceBiol. Conserv.55235254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Walls, K. 1995

    The New Zealand experience in developing a marine biogeographic regionalisation

    Muldoon, J. eds. Towards a Marine Regionalisation for AustraliaGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park AuthorityTownsville3348
    Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ward, T., Vanderklift, M.A., Nicholls, A.O., Kenchington, R.A. 1999Selecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversityEcol. Appl.9691698Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Warwick, R.M. 1988Analysis of community attributes of the macrobenthos of Frierfjord/Langesundfjord at taxonomic levels higher than speciesMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.46167170Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wilkinson, C. 2002Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002Global Coral Reef Monitoring NetworkTownsvilleGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wilkinson, D.M., Davis, S.R. 2000Rapid assessments of microbial biodiversity using relationships between genus and species richness. Studies on testate amoebaeActa Protozool.392326Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Williams P.H. 1999. WORLDMAP iv Windows: Software and Help Document 4.1. Privately distributed, London.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Williams, P.H., Gaston, K.J. 1994Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher taxon richness predict wholesale species richness?Biol. Conserv.67211217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 61.
    Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C., Pressey, R. 1996A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birdsConserv. Biol.10155174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 60.
    Williams, P.H., Humphries, C.J. 1994

    Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness and endemism in conservation

    Florey, P.L.Humphries, C.J.Vane-Wright, R.I. eds. Systematics and Conservation EvaluationOxfordClarendon Press,269287
    Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yurick, D. 1995

    Development of a marine protected area system planning regional framework in Canada

    Muldoon, J. eds. Towards a Marine Regionalisation for AustraliaGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park AuthorityTownsville1332
    Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zacharias, M.A., Roff, J.C. 2000A hierarchical ecological approach to conserving marine biodiversityConserv. Biol.1413271334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zacharias, M.A., Roff, J.C. 2001Explanations of patterns of intertidal diversity at regional scalesJ. Biogeogr.28471483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable Use of Coasts and Catchments, School of Applied SciencesUniversity of Newcastle (Ourimbah Campus)OurimbahAustralia

Personalised recommendations