Intra- and intercontinental variation in the functional responses of a high impact alien invasive fish
Recently, a body of literature has indicated the utility of comparisons among introduced and native species of their functional responses, that is, the relationship between resource use (e.g. predator consumption rate) and resource availability (e.g. prey density) to predict their impact. However, a key feature of this methodology, that has not yet been examined, is the degree to which the functional response curves of an introduced species differ within and between its native and introduced geographical ranges. Information on the variation in functional responses is key to make robust assessments on the ecological impact and to assess possible differences between native and invasive species. Here, we examine the predatory functional responses in multiple native and introduced populations of a globally high impact alien invasive fish, the topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva). In standardised aquaria and with two prey species, significant differences in the functional responses among and between different populations occurring in the native and the invaded range were found. Among populations in the native range, the functional response indicated little variation, and fish always showed a Type II response, irrespective of the type of prey used. In the introduced range, populations showed a Type II response when fed chironomid larvae as prey, while a Type III response was observed when feeding Daphnia magna. Populations in the invaded range consumed overall more prey when fed D. magna compared to the populations in the native range. When feeding chironomid larvae, no consistent trend was observed. Context dependencies as well as species-specific traits and fish density most likely play an important role when comparing the functional response between populations occurring in their native and invaded ranges.
KeywordsTopmouth gudgeon Alien species Pseudorasbora parva Impact assessment Functional response
Pieter Boets was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO Vlaanderen, Belgium). This study was supported in part by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (26250044) and the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (70437771). Ciaran Laverty, Kyle D. Green and Jaimie T.A. Dick were funded by the Department of Employment and Learning (DEL) N. Ireland, the ITSligo President’s Award and Inland Fisheries Ireland.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Boets P, Pauwels IS, Lock K, Goethals PLM (2013) Using an integrated modelling approach for risk assessment of the ‘killer shrimp’ Dikerogammarus villosus. River Res Appl 4:403–412Google Scholar
- Cuthbert RN, Dalu T, Wasserman RJ, Dick JTA, Mofu L, Callaghan A, Weyl OLF (2018). Intermediate predator naïveté and sex-skewed vulnerability predict the impact of an invasive higher predator. Sci Rep. vol 8, Article number: 14282Google Scholar
- Dick JTA, Laverty C, Lennon JJ, Barrios-O’Neill D, Mensink PJ, Britton JR, Medoc V, Boets P et al (2017) Invader relative impact potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species. J Appl Ecol 154(4):259–1267Google Scholar
- Gozlan RE, Andreou D, Asaeda T, Beyer K, Bouhadad R, Burnard D, Caiola N, Cakic P, Djikanovic V, Esmaeili HR, Falka I, Golicher D, Harka A, Jeney G, Kováč V, Musil J, Nocita A, Povz M, Poulet N, Virbickas T, Wolter C, Serhan Tarkan A, Tricarico E, Trichkova T, Verreycken H, Witkowski A, Guang Zhang C, Zweimueller I, Britton RJ (2010) Pan-continental invasion of Pseudorasbora parva: towards a better understanding of freshwater fish invasions. Fish Fish 11:315–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hassell MP (1978) Functional responses. In: Hassell MP (ed) The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 28–49Google Scholar
- Juliano SA (2001) Non-linear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vilà M, Essl F, Jeschke JM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Dick JTA, Evans T, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Mrugała A, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Winter M (2015) Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, scope, caveats and recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laverty C, Green KD, Dick JTA, Barrios-O’Neill D, Mensink PJ, Medoc V, Spataro T, Cafrrey JM, Lucy FE, Boets P, Britton JR, Pegg J, Gallagher C (2017) Assessing the ecological impacts of invasive species based on their functional responses and abundances. Biol Invasions 19(5):1653–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Verreycken H, Anseeuw D, Van Thuyne G, Quataert P, Belpaire C (2007) The non-indigenous freshwater fishes of Flanders (Belgium): review, status and trends over the last decade. J Fish Biol 71(Supplement D):1–13Google Scholar
- Yalçın-Özdilek Ş, Kırankaya ŞG, Ekmekçi FG (2013) Feeding ecology of the topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846) in the Gelingüllü Reservoir. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 13(1):87–94Google Scholar