Biological Invasions

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 1365–1378 | Cite as

Can gypsy moth stand the heat? A reciprocal transplant experiment with an invasive forest pest across its southern range margin

  • Trevor M. Faske
  • Lily M. Thompson
  • Nana Banahene
  • Andi Levorse
  • Melisa Quiroga Herrera
  • Kayla Sherman
  • Sarah E. Timko
  • Banruo Yang
  • David R. Gray
  • Dylan Parry
  • Patrick C. Tobin
  • Andrew J. Eckert
  • Derek M. Johnson
  • Kristine L. GraysonEmail author
Original Paper


Temperature provides important physiological constraints that can influence the distribution of an invasive species. Gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) is a generalist defoliator in North America and supraoptimal temperatures (above the optimal for developmental rate) have been implicated in range dynamics at the southern invasion front in West Virginia and Virginia. We sourced egg masses from the Appalachian Mountains (AM), where the gypsy moth range is expanding, from the Coastal Plain (CP), where range retraction is occurring, and from a long-established population in New York (NY) and conducted a reciprocal transplant experiment to compare development and fitness components among these populations at two sites along the southern invasion front. We found evidence of sublethal effects from rearing in the CP, with decreased pupal mass and fewer eggs compared to individuals reared in the AM, but little difference between source populations in developmental traits. The AM and NY populations did experience reductions in egg viability under a southern winter at the CP site compared to control wintering conditions, while the CP egg masses had equivalent survival. This study provides empirical support for negative fitness consequences of supraoptimal temperatures at the southern range edge, consistent with patterns of range retraction and spread in the region, as well as suggesting the potential for local adaptation through variation in egg survival. Our work illustrates that sublethal effects from high temperature can be an important factor determining the distribution of invasive species under current and future climates.


Lymantria dispar Forest defoliator Common garden experiment Local adaptation Supraoptimal temperatures 



Funding for this project was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant (Grant Number 2014-67012-23539 to KLG), the National Science Foundation (Award Number 1556111 to PCT and DEB-1556767 to DMJ), the University of Richmond School of Arts and Sciences, and an award in Interdisciplinary Research from the Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust (KLG). We thank the University of Richmond Biology Department for use of research facilities and supplies. Many thanks to Mountain Lake Biological Station (University of Virginia) for the use of supplies and space. Thanks to Laura Blackburn (US Forest Service) for mapping assistance and to Sarah Bailey for rearing assistance. Thanks to Ksenia Onufrieva, Andrea Hickman, and the STS Foundation for technical guidance. Thanks to Chelsea Jahant-Miller for comments on the manuscript. We also thank Kerry Bailey (West Virginia Department of Agriculture), Chris Elder, and Randy Copeland (NCDA & CS Gypsy Moth program) for collecting the egg masses used in these experiments. Gypsy moths were transported and housed under USDA APHIS permit Numbers P526P-14-00377 (DP), P526P-12-01012 (DJ), P526P-15-00488 (KG).

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1907_MOESM1_ESM.docx (40 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 39 kb)


  1. Addo-Bediako A, Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2000) Thermal tolerance, climatic variability and latitude. Proc R Soc B 267:739–745. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen JC (1976) A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days. Environ Entomol 5:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen JC, Foltz JL, Dixon WN et al (1993) Will the gypsy moth become a pest in Florida? Fla Entomol 76:102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonovics J (1976) The nature of limits to natural selection. Ann Mo Bot Gard 63:224–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayres MP, Scriber JM (1994) Local adaptation to regional climates in Papilio Canadensis (Lepidoptera: papilionidae). Ecol Monogr 64:465–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banahene N, Salem SK, Faske TM et al (2018) Thermal sensitivity of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) during larval and pupal development. Environ Entomol. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo D, Molina JM (2005) Fecundity-body size relationship and other reproductive aspects of Streblote panda (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 98:191–196.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casagrande RA, Logan PA, Wallner WE (1987) Phenological model for gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), larvae and pupae. Environ Entomol 16:556–562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chevin L-M, Lande R, Mace GM (2010) Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chown SL, Gaston KJ (1999) Exploring links between physiology and ecology at macro-scales: the role of respiratory metabolism in insects. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 74:87–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colautti RI, Barrett SCH (2013) Rapid adaptation to climate facilitates range expansion of an invasive plant. Science 342:364–366. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Colautti RI, Lau JA (2015) Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol Ecol 24:1999–2017. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB et al (2008) Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6668–6672. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17:1170–1188. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson AL, Espeland EK, Wagner V, Nelson CR (2016) Can local adaptation research in plants inform selection of native plant materials? An analysis of experimental methodologies. Evol Appl 9:1219–1228. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray DR (2004) The gypsy moth life stage model: landscape-wide estimates of gypsy moth establishment using a multi-generational phenology model. Ecol Model 176:155–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray DR, Logan JA, Ravlin FW, Carlson JA (1991) Toward a model of gypsy moth egg phenology: using respiration rates of individual eggs to determine temperature-time requirements of prediapause development. Environ Entomol 20:1645–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grayson KL, Johnson DM (2018) Novel insights on population and range edge dynamics using an unparalleled spatiotemporal record of species invasion. J Anim Ecol 87:581–593. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajek AE, Tobin PC (2011) Introduced pathogens follow the invasion front of a spreading alien host. J Anim Ecol 80:1217–1226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hajek AE, Carruthers RI, Soper RS (1990) Temperature and moisture relations of sporulation and germination by Entomophaga maimaiga (Zygomycetes: Entomophthoraceae), a fungal pathogen of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ Entomol 19:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hajek AE, Elkinton JS, Witcosky JJ (1996) Introduction and spread of the fungal pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga (Zygomycetes: Entophthorales) along the leading edge of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Spread. Environ Entomol 25:1235–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halbritter AH, Billeter R, Edwards PJ, Alexander JM (2015) Local adaptation at range edges: comparing elevation and latitudinal gradients. J Evol Biol 28:1849–1860. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill JK, Griffiths HM, Thomas CD (2011) Climate change and evolutionary adaptations at species’ range margins. Annu Rev Entomol 56:143–159. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Honěk A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huey RB, Pascual M (2009) Partial thermoregulatory compensation by a rapidly evolving invasive species along a latitudinal cline. Ecology 90:1743–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kawecki TJ (2008) Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:321–342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keller SR, Taylor DR (2008) History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecol Lett 11:852–866. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kingsolver JG, Woods HA (1997) Thermal sensitivity of growth and feeding in Manduca sexta caterpillars. Physiol Zool 70:631–638. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH (1997) Evolution of a species’ range. Am Nat 150:1–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Krehenwinkel H, Tautz D (2013) Northern range expansion of European populations of the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi is associated with global warming-correlated genetic admixture and population-specific temperature adaptations. Mol Ecol 22:2232–2248. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lande R (2009) Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation. J Evol Biol 22:1435–1446. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lande R (2015) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in colonizing species. Mol Ecol 24:2038–2045. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Langlet O (1971) Two hundred years genecology. Taxon 20:653–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leonard DE (1970) Feeding rhythm in larvae of the gypsy moth. J Econ Entomol 63:1454–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leonard DE (1981) Bioecology of the gypsy moth. In: Doane CC, McManus ML (eds) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. USDA-Forest Service Technical Bulletin 1584, Washington, D.C, pp 9–29Google Scholar
  38. Liebhold AM, Gottschalk KW, Muzika R-M, et al (1995) Suitability of North American tree species to the gypsy moth: a summary of field and laboratory tests. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-211. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, p 34Google Scholar
  39. Logan JA, Casagrande RA, Liebhold AM (1991) Modeling environment for simulation of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larval phenology. Environ Entomol 20:1516–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Centers for Environmental Information. Integrated Surface Database. In: National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration. Accessed 23 Oct 2017
  41. Pahl AT, Kollmann J, Mayer A, Haider S (2013) No evidence for local adaptation in an invasive alien plant: field and greenhouse experiments tracing a colonization sequence. Ann Bot 112:1921–1930. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Preisser EL, Elkinton JS, Abell K (2008) Evolution of increased cold tolerance during range expansion of the elongate hemlock scale Fiorinia externa Ferris (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Ecol Entomol 33:709–715. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
  44. Régnière J, Nealis V (2002) Modelling seasonality of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), to evaluate probability of its persistence in novel environments. Can Entomol 134:805–824. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Régnière J, Saint-Amant R, Béchard A, Moutaoufik A (2017) BioSIM 11 User’s Manual. Can For Serv Info Rep LAU-X-137Google Scholar
  46. Roff D (1980) Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the “ups and downs” of clinal variation. Oecologia 45:202–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rossiter MC (1991) Environmentally-based maternal effects: a hidden force in insect population dynamics? Oecologia 87:288–294. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Savolainen O, Lascoux M, Merilä J (2013) Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 14:807–820. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharov AA, Roberts EA, Liebhold AM, Ravlin FW (1995) Gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) spread in the central Appalachians: three methods for species boundary estimation. Environ Entomol 24:1529–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharov AA, Leonard DS, Liebhold AM et al (2002) Slow the spread: a national program to contain the gypsy moth. J For 100:30–35Google Scholar
  51. Sheth SN, Angert AL (2018) Demographic compensation does not rescue populations at a trailing range edge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:2413–2418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegert NW, McCullough DG, Hajek AE, Andresen JA (2008) Effect of microclimatic conditions on primary transmission of the gypsy moth fungal pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) in Michigan. Gt Lakes Entomol 41:111–128Google Scholar
  53. Sinclair BJ, Williams CM, Terblanche JS (2012) Variation in thermal performance among insect populations. Physiol Biochem Zool 85:594–606. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Śniegula S, Golab MJ, Johansson F (2016) Time constraint effects on phenology and life history synchrony in a damselfly along a latitudinal gradient. Oikos 125:414–423. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson LM, Faske TM, Banahene N et al (2017) Variation in growth and developmental responses to supraoptimal temperatures near latitudinal range limits of gypsy moth Lymantria dispar (L.), an expanding invasive species. Physiol Entomol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tobin PC, Whitmire SL, Johnson DM et al (2007) Invasion speed is affected by geographical variation in the strength of Allee effects. Ecol Lett 10:36–43. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tobin PC, Bai BB, Eggen DA, Leonard DS (2012) The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States. Int J Pest Manag 58:195–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tobin PC, Gray DR, Liebhold AM (2014) Supraoptimal temperatures influence the range dynamics of a non-native insect. Divers Distrib 20:813–823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tobin PC, Cremers KT, Hunt L, Parry D (2016) All quiet on the western front? Using phenological inference to detect the presence of a latent gypsy moth invasion in northern Minnesota. Biol Invasions 18:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vanhanen H, Veteli TO, Päivinen S et al (2007) Climate change and range shifts in two insect defoliators: gypsy moth and nun moth-a model study. Silva Fenn 41:621–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Venette RC, Kriticos DJ, Magarey RD et al (2010) Pest risk maps for invasive alien species: a roadmap for improvement. Bioscience 60:349–362. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trevor M. Faske
    • 1
  • Lily M. Thompson
    • 2
  • Nana Banahene
    • 2
  • Andi Levorse
    • 2
  • Melisa Quiroga Herrera
    • 2
  • Kayla Sherman
    • 2
  • Sarah E. Timko
    • 2
  • Banruo Yang
    • 2
  • David R. Gray
    • 5
  • Dylan Parry
    • 3
  • Patrick C. Tobin
    • 4
  • Andrew J. Eckert
    • 1
  • Derek M. Johnson
    • 1
  • Kristine L. Grayson
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of RichmondRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA
  4. 4.School of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry CentreNatural Resources CanadaFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations