Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 203–215 | Cite as

Stronger predation in a subtropical community dampens an invasive species-induced trophic cascade

  • Katherine J. PapacostasEmail author
  • Amy L. Freestone
Original Paper

Abstract

Invasive predators can disrupt important predator–prey dynamics thereby facilitating invasions into prey communities. Lower latitude food webs can have strong consumer pressure and top-down control due to trophic complexity, however, and thus could be more robust to alterations by introduced predators than higher latitude food webs. We compared the strength of a marine invasive species-induced trophic cascade in a temperate and subtropical system, hypothesizing that a non-native tertiary consumer could facilitate non-native basal prey establishment through the consumption of a native secondary consumer. We further predicted that the ecological importance of this cascade may be reduced in the subtropical community relative to the temperate community due to stronger consumer pressure from top predators. Using marine invertebrates, we conducted experiments in temperate Long Island Sound, Connecticut, USA and subtropical Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA to test our hypothesis. We further examined predation pressure on tertiary consumers in order to assess any top-down control of the invasive species-induced cascade from higher trophic levels. We found evidence of a trophic cascade in both regions, but it was only maintained under ambient predation pressure in the temperate region. Our results also suggest that strong predation pressure on the non-native portunid crabs in the subtropical region may help explain the weakened cascade under ambient conditions. Studying predator invasions in the context of full communities and from a macroecological perspective can be used to predict both local and large scale patterns of invasion, and lead to identifying locations where high-impact invasions are more likely to occur.

Keywords

Biogeography Community Facilitation Marine Predator–prey Invertebrate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank M. McQuillan, J. Papacostas, S. Reed, and M. Vaca for field assistance; D. Janiak and R. Osman for sessile invertebrate identification assistance; ‘Team Benthos’ at the University of Connecticut for use of facilities and field sites as well as assistance with invertebrate collection; P. Petraitis, E. Cordes, R. Sanders and B. Sewall for useful feedback during the development of the project; and D. Long, K. Reuter, J. Carlton and one anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Smithsonian/Link Foundation fellowship program (Smithsonian Marine Station Contribution at Fort Pierce, Florida, No. 1002) and the National Science Foundation Division of Ocean Sciences under Grant #1225583.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1819_MOESM1_ESM.docx (244 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 244 kb)

References

  1. Baeta A, Cabral HN, Neto JM et al (2005) Biology, population dynamics and secondary production of the green crab Carcinus maenas (L.) in a temperate estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baynes TW, Szmant AM (1989) Effect of current on the sessile benthic community structure of an artificial reef. Bull Mar Sci 44:545–566Google Scholar
  3. Berger MS (1998) Predator–prey relations between the green crab, Carcinus maenas and three small gastropods, Mitrella lunata, Anachis lafresnayi, and Anachis avara. Senior Honors Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CTGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD, Garrity SD, Levings SC (1981) Predation pressure and gastropod foraging: a tropical-temperate comparison. Evolution (N Y) 35:995.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2407870 Google Scholar
  5. Blum JC, Chang AL, Liljesthrom M, Schenk ME, Steinberg MK, Ruiz GM (2007) The non-native solitary ascidian Ciona intestinalis (L.) depresses species richness. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342(1):5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchemousse S, Bishop JDD, Viard F (2016) Contrasting global genetic patterns in two biologically similar, widespread and invasive Ciona species (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). Sci Rep 6:24875.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes J, Stachowicz JJ, Hultgren KM et al (2005) Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecol Lett 9:61.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00842.x Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson NOL, Bustamante H, Strayer DL, Pace ML (2011) Biotic resistance on the increase: native predators structure invasive zebra mussel populations. Freshw Biol 56:1630–1637.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02602.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carver CE, Chisholm A, Mallet AL (2003) Strategies to mitigate the impact of Ciona intestinalis (L.) biofouling on shellfish production. J Shellfish Res 22:621–631Google Scholar
  10. Cohen AN (2011) The exotics guide: non-native marine species of the North American Pacific Coast. Center for research on aquatic bioinvasions, Richmond, CA, and San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland, CA. Revised September 2011. http://www.exoticsguide.org
  11. Cooper RN, Wissel B (2012a) Loss of trophic complexity in saline prairie lakes as indicated by cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecol Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00842.x Google Scholar
  12. Cooper RN, Wissel B (2012b) Loss of trophic complexity in saline prairie lakes as indicated by stable-isotope based community-metrics. Aquat Biosyst.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-9063-8-6 Google Scholar
  13. deRivera CE, Ruiz GM, Hines AH, Jivoff P (2005) Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology 86:3364–3376.  https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dijkstra J, Harris LG, Westerman E (2007) Distribution and long-term temporal patterns of four invasive colonial ascidians in the Gulf of Maine. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 342:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dineen JF, Clark PF, Hines AH et al (2001) Life history, larval description, and natural history of Charybdis Hellerii (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae), an Invasive Crab in the Western Atlantic. J Crustac Biol 21:774–805.  https://doi.org/10.1163/20021975-99990173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunne JA, Brose U, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2005) Modeling food-web dynamics: complexity–stability implications. In: Belgrano A, Scharler UM, Dunne J, Ulanowicz RE (eds) Aquatic food webs: an ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dybas CL (2002) Florida’s Indian River Lagoon: an Estuary in Transition. Bioscience 52:555.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5b0555:FSIRLA%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Springer, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fautin D, Dalton P, Incze LS et al (2010) An overview of marine biodiversity in United States waters. PLoS ONE 5:e11914.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fine PVA (2002) The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. J Trop Ecol 18:687–705.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467402002456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finke DL, Denno RF (2004) Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429:407–410.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman AS, Frischeisen A, Blakeslee AM (2016) Estuarine fouling communities are dominated by nonindigenous species in the presence of an invasive crab. Biol Invasions 18:1653–1665.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1108-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freestone AL, Osman RW, Ruiz GM, Torchin ME (2011) Stronger predation in the tropics shapes species richness patterns in marine communities. Ecology 92:983–993.  https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2379.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freestone AL, Ruiz GM, Torchin ME (2013) Stronger biotic resistance in tropics relative to temperate zone: effects of predation on marine invasion dynamics. Ecology 94:1370–1377.  https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1382.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galil BS, Clark PF, Carlton JT (eds) (2011) In the wrong place—Alien Marine Crustaceans: Distribution. Biology and Impacts, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  26. Grabowski JH, Hughes AR, Kimbro DL (2008) Habitat complexity influences cascading effects of multiple predators. Ecology 89:3413–3422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grosholz ED (2005) Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1088–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308547102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffen BD, Delaney DG (2007) Species invasion shifts the importance of predator dependence. Ecology 88:3012–3021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris MA, Moore AM, Lowen JB, DiBacco C (2017) Seasonal reproduction of the non-native vase tunicate Ciona intestinalis (Linneaus, 1767) in Nova Scotia, Canada, in relation to water temperature. Aquat Invasions 12:33–41.  https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.1.04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hines J, Gessner MO (2012) Consumer trophic diversity as a fundamental mechanism linking predation and ecosystem functioning. J Anim Ecol 81:1146–1153.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02003.x4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jeanne RL (1979) A latitudinal gradient in rates of ant predation. Ecology 60:1211.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1936968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen GC, McDonald PS, Armstrong DA (2007) Biotic resistance to green crab, Carcinus maenas, in California bays. Mar Biol 151:2231–2243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-007-0658-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaluza P, Kölzsch A, Gastner MT, Blasius B (2010) The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J R Soc Interface 7:1093–1103.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karimi R, Frisk M, Fisher NS (2013) Contrasting food web factor and body size relationships with Hg and Se concentrations in marine biota. PLoS ONE 8:e74695.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kimbro DL, Grosholz ED, Baukus AJ et al (2009) Invasive species cause large-scale loss of native California oyster habitat by disrupting trophic cascades. Oecologia 160:563–575.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1322-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kimbro DL, Cheng BS, Grosholz ED (2013) Biotic resistance in marine environments. Ecol Lett 16:821–833.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kimbro DL, Byers JE, Grabowski JH et al (2014) The biogeography of trophic cascades on US oyster reefs. Ecol Lett 17:845–854.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurle CM, Cardinale BJ (2011) Ecological factors associated with the strength of trophic cascades in streams. Oikos 120:1897–1908.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19465.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LeGresley MM, Martin JL, McCurdy P et al (2008) Non-indigenous tunicate species in the Bay of Fundy, eastern Canada. ICES J Mar Sci 65:770–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lejeusne C, Bock DG, Therriault TW et al (2011) Comparative phylogeography of two colonial ascidians reveals contrasting invasion histories in North America. Biol Invasions 13:635–650.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9854-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lemaitre R (1995) Charybdis Hellerii (Milne Edwards, 1867), a nonindigenous portunid crab system of Florida. Proc Biol Soc Wash 108:643–648Google Scholar
  42. Locke A, Hanson JM, Ellis KM et al (2007) Invasion of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence by the clubbed tunicate (Styela clava Herdman): potential mechanisms for invasions of Prince Edward Island estuaries. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 342:69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marczak LB, Ho CK, Wieski K et al (2011) Latitudinal variation in top-down and bottom-up control of a salt marsh food web. Ecology 92:276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Menge BA, Lubchenco J (1981) Community organization in temperate and tropical rocky intertidal habitats: prey refuges in relation to consumer pressure gradients. Ecol Monogr 51:429–450.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2937323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller LP, Gaylord B (2007) Barriers to flow: the effects of experimental cage structures on water velocities in high-energy subtidal and intertidal environments. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 344:215–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moody RM, Aronson RB (2012) Predator-induced defenses in a salt-marsh gastropod. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 413:78–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.11.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Osman R, Whitlatch R (1995) Predation on early ontogenetic life stages and its effect on recruitment into a marine epifaunal community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 117:111–126.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps117111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2004) The control of the development of a marine benthic community by predation on recruits. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 311:117–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2004.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pace Cole, Carpenter Kitchell (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75.  https://doi.org/10.1086/282400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Papacostas KJ, Rielly-Carroll EW, Georgian SE, Long DJ, Princiotta SD, Quattrini AM, Reuter KE, Freestone AL (2017) Biological mechanisms of marine invasions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 565:251–268.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pennings SC, Silliman BR (2005) Linking biogeography and community ecology: latitudinal variation in plant-herbivore interaction strength. Ecology 86:2310–2319.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Philpott SM, Pardee GL, Gonthier DJ (2012) Cryptic biodiversity effects: importance of functional redundancy revealed through addition of food web complexity. Ecology 93:992–1001.  https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1431.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Randall J (1998) Zoogeography of shore fishes of the Indo-Pacific region. Zool Stud 37:227–268Google Scholar
  56. Reed JK, Gore RH, Scotto LE, Wilson KA (1982) Community composition, structure, areal and trophic relationships of decapods associated with shallow- and deep-water Oculina varicosa Coral Reefs: studies on Decapod Crustacea from the Indian River Region of Florida, XXIV. Bull Mar Sci 32:761–786Google Scholar
  57. Rodriguez LF (2006) Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol Invasions 8:927–939.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5103-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers EM (1998) The autecology of three predatory gastropods Mitrella lunata, Anachis avara, and Anachis lafresnayi. Master’s Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CTGoogle Scholar
  59. Roman J (2006) Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader’s range. Proc Biol Sci 273:2453–2459.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenberger LJ (2001) Phylogenetic Relationships within the Stingray Genus Dasyatis (Chondrichthyes: Dasyatidae). Copeia 2001:615–627.  https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001%5b0615:PRWTSG%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED, Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. Am Zool 37:621–632.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/37.6.621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT et al (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Ashton G et al (2013) Geographic variation in marine invasions among large estuaries: effects of ships and time. Ecol Appl 23:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sargent PS, Wells T, Matheson K, McKenzie CH, Deibel D (2013) First record of vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1767), in coastal Newfoundland waters. Bioinvasions Records 2:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2013.2.2.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sax DF (2008) Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications for biogeography. J Biogeogr 28:139–150.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00536.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schemske DW, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV et al (2009) Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:245–269.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shurin JB, Borer ET, Seabloom EW et al (2002) A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 5:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B et al (2010) Predator–prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119:610–621.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18039.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smithsonian Marine Station (2017) The Indian River Lagoon species inventory. http://www.sms.si.edu/irlspec/Sp_Image_Collection.htm . Accessed 1 April 2017
  70. Son NT (2013) An annotated checklist of crabs of the superfamily Portunoidea Rafinesque, 1815 from the Philippines (Crustacea: Decopoda: Brachyura). Masters Thesis, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  71. Stachowicz JJ, Hay ME (2000) Geographic variation in camouflage specialization by a decorator crab. Am Nat 156:59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1086/303366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stoner D, Ben-Shlomo R, Rinkevich B, Weissman I (2002) Genetic variability of Botryllus schlosseri invasions to the east and west coasts of the USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:93–100.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps243093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strong DR (1992) Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73:747–754.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1940154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wagner A, Hulsmann S, Horn W et al (2013) Food-web-mediated effects of climate warming: consequences for the seasonal Daphnia dynamics. Freshw Biol 58:573–587.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02809.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wahle L (2002) Living treasures: the plants and animals of long island sound. Connecticut Sea Grant College Program, University of Connecticut, Marine Sciences Institute, GrotonGoogle Scholar
  76. Whitlatch RB, Bullard SG (2007) Introduction to the proceedings of the 1st international invasive sea squirt conference. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 342:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2265769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Worthy GAJ, Worthy TAM, Browning N (2011) Seasonal variability in the trophic ecology of bottlenose dolphins and their potential prey in the Indian River Lagoon, FL. Part 1, Final, Fort PierceGoogle Scholar
  79. Yund PO, Collins C, Johnson SL (2015) Evidence of a native Northwest Atlantic COI haplotype clade in the cryptogenic colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Biol Bull 228:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.ECS Federal, LLCFairfaxUSA
  3. 3.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries ServiceSilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations