Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 163–174 | Cite as

It takes two to tango: variable architectural strategies boost invasive success of Lantana camara L. (sensu lato) in contrasting light environments

  • Neha Goyal
  • Gyan Prakash SharmaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Lantana camara L. (sensu lato) primarily invades open, well-lit environments. However, the species is expanding its range in shaded habitats. To decipher the strategies behind the species’ invasive success in contrasting light environments, key performance-related architectural and functional traits of sun and shade-dwelling individuals were estimated. L. camara exhibited significant differences in performance-related traits at whole plant, branch, and leaf-level in response to light. DNA ploidy level of each sampled individual was also estimated to determine whether observed trait differences in response to light can be related to adaptive trait modulations or to the ploidal differences. L. camara individuals dwelling in sun and shade were of similar ploidy level. Consequently, the performance of L. camara in variable light is a function of structural and functional trait differences, but not an attribute of ploidy. Sun-dwelling L. camara exhibited alterations in architecture, affecting the reproductive output, which exert local/regional propagule pressure. However, shade-dwelling individuals exhibited architectural alterations affecting plant expanse which attributes local ingress, creating a local masking effect. Both the strategies boost performance and invasive success of L. camara in contrasting light environments. The present study gives an insight that physical removal of the plant in sun and shade would imply differential benefits in the local environment.

Keywords

Compaction index Invasion Light heterogeneity Performance-related architectural trait (PRAT) Performance-related functional trait (PRFT) Ploidy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions and linguistic corrections on the previous versions which have considerably improved the manuscript. Valuable inputs on management strategies gained during a personal discussion with Michael D. Day, Biosecurity Queensland, Australia are duly acknowledged. NG acknowledges Senior Research Fellowship support from University Grants Commission, India. NG thanks Ankita for her kind help during fieldwork. GPS acknowledges funding support from University of Delhi and Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, India. We are grateful to Prof. Anju Shrivastava, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, India for the flow cytometry facility. We duly acknowledge Prof. Jaroslav Doležel for his kind support and invaluable suggestions regarding flow cytometry. As Prof. Jan Suda (deceased) wished, we honor him with the smile and a merry mind and thank him for his useful suggestions during the course of the study. Prateek Arora and Dr. Vinay Gupta, BD Biosciences are also thanked for the technical support.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1813_MOESM1_ESM.docx (111 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 110 kb)

References

  1. Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99:375–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhagwat SA, Breman E, Thekaekara T, Thornton TF, Willis KJ (2012) A battle lost? Report on two centuries of invasion and management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa. PLoS ONE 7:e32407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonser SP (2013) High reproductive efficiency as an adaptive strategy in competitive environments. Funct Ecol 27:876–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrión-Tacuri J, Rubio-Casal AE, De Cires A, Figueroa ME, Castillo JM (2011) Lantana camara L.: a weed with great light-acclimation capacity. Photosynthetica 49:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrión-Tacuri J, Rubio-Casal AE, de Cires A, Figueroa ME, Castillo JM (2013) Effect of low and high temperatures on the photosynthetic performance of Lantana camara L. leaves in darkness. Russ J Plant Physiol 60:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles-Dominique T, Edelin C, Bouchard A (2010) Architectural strategies of Cornus sericea, a native but invasive shrub of Southern Quebec, Canada, under an open or a closed canopy. Ann Bot 105:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charles-Dominique T, Edelin C, Brisson J, Bouchard A (2012) Architectural strategies of Rhamnus cathartica in relation to canopy openness. Botany 90:976–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheplick GP (2006) A modular approach to biomass allocation in an invasive annual (Microstegium vimineum; Poaceae). Am J Bot 93:539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Day MD, Wiley CJ, Playford J, Zalucki MP (2003) Lantana: current management status and future prospects. ACIAR Monograph Series, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duchoslav M, Šafářová L, Krahulec F (2010) Complex distibution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of Allium oleraceum (Alliaceae) in the Czech Republic. Ann Bot 105:719–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Funk JL (2013) The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environments. Conserv Physiol 1:cot026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geber MA, Griffen LR (2003) Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. Int J Plant Sci 164:S21–S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92Google Scholar
  16. Godin C, Sinoquet H (2005) Functional-structural plant modeling. New Phytol 166:705–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godoy O, Valladares F, Castro-Díez P (2011) Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity. Funct Ecol 25:1248–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goncalves E, Herrera I, Duarte M, Bustamante RO, Lampo M, Grisel V, Sharma GP, García- Rangel S (2014) Global invasion of Lantana camara: has the climatic niche been conserved across continents? PLoS ONE 9:e111468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goyal N, Pardha-Saradhi P, Sharma GP (2014) Can adaptive modulation of traits to urban environments facilitate Ricinus communis L. invasiveness? Environ Monit Assess 186:7941–7948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goyal N, Esler KJ, Sharma GP (2018) Does residence time in invaded range drives performance potential of Lantana camara L. (sensu lato)? Trop Ecol 59:57–68Google Scholar
  21. Gratani L (2014) Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Adv Botany 2014:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson L, Margaret AB, Johnson T, Bennett MD (2005) First nuclear DNA C-values for 18 Eudicot families. Ann Bot 96:1315–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heuret P, Barthélémy D, Guedon Y, Coulmier X, Tancre J (2002) Synchronization of growth, branching and flowering processes in the South American tropical tree Cecropia obtuse (Cecropiaceae). Am J Bot 89:1180–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu L, Li M (2014) Climbing capacity of the invasive vine Mikania micrantha Kunth on vertical artificial poles. Biol Invasions 16:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber H, Stuefer JF (1997) Shade induced changes in the branching pattern of a stoloniferous herb: functional response or allometric effect? Oecologia 110:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hülber K, Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, Berger A, Dobrovsky R, Niessner S, Nigl T, Schneeweiss GM, Kubešová M, Rauchová J, Suda J (2009) Ecological segregation drives fine-scale cytotype distribution of Senecio carniolicus in the Eastern Alps. Preslia 81:309–319Google Scholar
  27. Ježilová E, Nožková-Hlaváčková V, Duchoslav M (2015) Photosynthetic characteristics of three ploidy levels of Allium oleraceum L. (Amaryllidaceae) differing in ecological amplitude. Plant Species Biol 30:212–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kannan R, Shackleton CM, Shaanker RU (2013) Reconstructing the history of introduction and spread of the invasive species, Lantana, at three spatial scales in India. Biol Invasions 15:1287–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawamura K (2010) A conceptual framework for the study of modular responses to local environmental heterogeneity within the plant crown and a review of related concepts and ideas. Ecol Res 25:733–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kozuka T, Kobayashi J, Horiguchi G, Demura T, Sakakibara H, Tsukaya H, Nagatani A (2010) Involvement of auxin and brassinosteroid in the regulation of petiole elongation under the shade. Plant Physiol 153:1608–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Academic Press Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Laughlin DC, Joshi C, van Bodegom PM, Bastow ZA, Fulé PZ (2012) A predictive model of community assembly that incorporates intraspecific trait variation. Ecol Lett 15:1291–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leicht SA, Silander JA (2006) Differential responses of invasive Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae) and native C. scandens to changes in light quality. Am J Bot 93:972–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leishman MR, Thomson VP, Cooke J (2010) Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. J Ecol 98:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levin DA (2002) The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin PH, Canham CD, Kobe RK (2010) Divergence from the growth-survival trade-off and extreme high growth rates drive patterns of exotic tree invasions in closed-canopy forests. J Ecol 98:778–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matzek V (2012) Trait values, not trait plasticity, best explain invasive species’ performance in a changing environment. PLoS ONE 7:e48821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Niphadkar M (2016) Mapping invasive species Lantana camara in a high diversity tropical ecosystem of Western Ghats, India. Ph.D. Thesis. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  39. Ojha BM, Dayal N (1992) Cytological investigations in the genus Lantana in India. Cytologia 57:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Panda RM, Behera MD, Roy PS (2018) Assessing distributions of two invasive species of contrasting habits in future climate. J Environ Manage 213:478–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pandit MK, Pocock MJO, Kunin WE (2011) Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants. J Ecol 99:1108–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Priyanka N, Joshi PK (2013) A review of Lantana camara studies in India. IJSRP 3:1–11Google Scholar
  44. Pyšek P, Pergl J, Essl F, Lenzner B, Dawson W, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Winter M, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castaño N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Dullinger S, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Genovesi P, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Maurel N, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent D, Nowak PM, Pagad S, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Schulze M, Seebens H, Shu W, Thomas J, Velayos M, Weber E, Wieringa JJ, Baptiste MP, van Kleunen M (2017) Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion. Preslia 89:203–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raizada P, Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS (2008) Ingress of Lantana in dry tropical forest fragments: edge and shade effects. Curr Sci 94:180–182Google Scholar
  46. Rascher U, Blossfeld S, Fiorani F, Jahnke S, Jansen M (2011) Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean. Funct Plant Biol 38:968–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ray A, Quader S (2014) Genetic diversity and population structure of Lantana camara in India indicates multiple introductions and gene flow. Plant Biol 16:651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—a global review. Divers Distrib 17:788–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richardson DM, Bond WJ, Dean WR, Higgins SI, Midgley GF, Milton SJ, Powrie LW, Rutherford MC, Samways MJ, Schulze RE (2000) Invasive alien species and global change: a South African perspective. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 303–349Google Scholar
  50. Saito W, Kawamura K, Takeda H (2012) Relative importance of overstory canopy openness and seedling density on crown morphology and growth of Acer nipponicum seedlings. Botany 90:1152–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sexton JP, McKay JK, Sala A (2002) Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecol Appl 12:1652–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharma GP, Esler KJ (2008) Phenotypic plasticity among Echium plantagineum populations in different habitats of Western Cape, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 74:746–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS (2009) Lantana invasion alters soil nitrogen pools and processes in the tropical dry deciduous forest of India. Appl Soil Ecol 42(2):134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS (2010) How Lantana invades dry deciduous forest: a case study from Vindhyan highlands, India. Trop Ecol 51:305–316Google Scholar
  55. Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS (2011) Lantana camara L. invasion and impact on herb layer diversity and soil properties in a dry deciduous forest of India. Appl Ecol Env Res 9:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2005) Lantana invasion: an overview. Weed Biol Manag 5:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singh V, Singh H, Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS (2011) Ecophysiological performance of invasive weed congeners (Ageratum conyzoides L. and Ageratum houstonianum Mill.) in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Environ Monit Assess 178:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, Escobar García P, Rauchová J, Suda J, Schneeweiss GM, Hülber K, Schönswetter P (2010) Distribution and habitat segregation on different spatial scales among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae) in the Eastern Alps. Ann Bot 106:967–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. SPSS Inc. (2007) SPSS for windows, version 16.0 release. SPSS Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  60. Sultan SE (2003) Phenotypic plasticity in plants: a case study in ecological development. Evol Dev 5:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sundaram B, Hiremath AJ, Krishnaswamy J (2015) Factors influencing the local scale colonisation and change in density of a widespread invasive plant species, Lantana camara, in South India. NeoBiota 25:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Brysting AK, Suda J, Kubešová M, Pyšek P (2012) The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Ann Bot 09:19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tian H, Banger K, Bo T, Dadhwal VK (2014) History of land use in India during 1880–2010: large-scale land transformations reconstructed from satellite data and historical archives. Glob Planet Change 121:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Totland O, Nyeko P, Bjerknes A, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A (2005) Does forest gap size affects population size, plant size, reproductive success and pollinator visitation in Lantana camara, a tropical invasive shrub? Forest Ecol Manag 215:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Dostal P (2011) Research on invasive-plant traits tells us a lot. Trends Ecol Evol 26:317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vendramini F, Díaz S, Gurvich DE, Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (2002) Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytol 154:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weijschedé J, Berentson R, de Kroon H, Huber H (2008) Variation in petiole and internode length affects plant performance in Trifolium repens under opposing selection regimes. Evol Ecol 22:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yamashita N, Ishida A, Kushima H, Tanaka N (2000) Acclimation to sudden increase in light favoring an invasive over native trees in subtropical islands, Japan. Oecologia 125:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. You WH, Han CM, Fang LX, Du DL (2016) Propagule pressure, habitat conditions and clonal integration influence the establishment and growth of an invasive clonal plant, Alternanthera philoxeroides. Front Plant Sci 7:568Google Scholar
  70. Younginger BS, Sirová D, Cruzan MB, Ballhorn DJ (2017) Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness? Appl Plant Sci 5:1600094CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations