Enemy of my enemy: evidence for variable soil biota feedbacks of Vincetoxicum rossicum on native plants
Interactions between plants and soil biota can be major drivers of plant invasions. The ‘Enemy of my enemy’ hypothesis (EEH) predicts that native plants are more negatively impacted by enemies (e.g. pathogens) that accumulate and spillover from the invader’s rhizosphere than the invaders themselves, thereby facilitating the invasion. We tested EEH using Vincetoxicum rossicum, one of the most invasive plant species in Eastern North America, and a total of eight co-occuring native plant species. Specifically, we predicted that the native species would grow less in presence of soil biota associated with V. rossicum than that from uninvaded soils. Field soils were collected from four V. rossicum invaded and neighboring uninvaded areas for use in two experiments. In Experiment 1, V. rossicum and each of five native plant species were grown in a plant growth chamber for 3 months, either in presence or absence of soil biota from the invaded and uninvaded soils. We found that only one species (Solidago canadensis) supported EEH. In contrast, the legume Desmodium canadense more than doubled its biomass in response to V. rossicum -associated soil biota. In Experiment 2, four native legume species, including D. canadense, were examined for EEH in the same manner as in Experiment 1. Only one species (Lespedeza hirta) supported EEH and, again, V. rossicum-associated soil biota was advantageous to D. canadense. In summary, we found inconsistent support for the EEH between V. rossicum and native co-occurring species in Eastern North America. We conclude that the accumulation of rhizosphere enemies in native plants may not be a major factor in the invasive success of V. rossicum.
KeywordsVincetoxicum rossicum Enemy of my enemy hypothesis Accumulation of local pathogens Plant-soil feedback Plant invasions Desmodium canadense
This research was conducted in Robinson-Huron Treaty territory and the traditional territory of the Anishnaabeg, specifically the Garden River and Batchewana First Nations, as well as Métis People. We thank Jamie Davidson (Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority), Ken Towle (Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority), John Standeven (Orono Crown Lands), Elizabeth Heighington (Toronto Zoo), and Bohdan Kowalyk (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) for site information and access; Dr. Hafiz Maherali for advice on phylogenetic analysis; Ontario Forest Research Institute, in particular Darren Derbowka and Kevin Maloney, for technical assistance and infrastructure access; Susan Meades, curator of the Northern Ontario Plant Database, for support with plant identification. Funding was provided by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and a Canada Research Chair to PMA.
All authors contributed to designing the experiment. A. Dukes conducted the experiments. A. Dukes and A. Koyama analyzed the data. A. Koyama, P.M Antunes and A. Dukes wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final article.
This work was funded through an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and bursaries from the University of Guelph to A. Dukes and a NSERC Discovery Grant and a Canada Research Chair awarded to P.M. Antunes.
- Antunes PM, Rajcan I, Goss MJ (2006) Specific flavonoids as interconnecting signals in the tripartite symbiosis formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Bradyrhizobium japonicum (Kirchner) Jordan and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Soil Biol Biochem 38(3):533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bradley JD (2013) Southern Ontario vascular plant species list. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. http://www.forestry.utoronto.ca/Settledlandscapes/VSP/documents/SouthOntPlantList_Scientific.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2015
- Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, Van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, Mcgeoch MA, Mcrae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cahill JF, Cale JA, Karst J, Bao T, Pec GJ, Erbilgin N (2016) No silver bullet: different soil handling techniques are useful for different research questions, exhibit differential type I and II error rates, and are sensitive to sampling intensity. New Phytol 216(1):11–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cappuccino N, Mackay R, Eisner C (2002) Spread of the invasive alien vine Vincetoxicum rossicum: tradeoffs between seed dispersability and seed quality. Am Midl Nat 148(2):263. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2002)148[0263:SOTIAV]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crins WJ, Gray PA, Uhlig PWC, Wester MC (2009) The ecosystems of Ontario, part 1: ecozones and ecoregions. Technical Report SIB TER IMA TR-01. Ministry of Natural Resources. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Science & Information Branch Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment Section. Technical Report SIB TER IMA TR-01, Peterborough, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- DiTommaso A, Lawlor FM, Darbyshire SJ (2005) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 2. Cynanchum rossicum (Kleopow) Borhidi [= Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleopow) Barbar] and Cynanchum louiseae (L.) Kartesz and Gandhi [= Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench]. Can J Plant Sci 85(1):243–263. https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, Gonzalez P, Grosholz ED, Ibañez I, Miller LP, Sorte CJB, Tatem AJ (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485 Google Scholar
- Knevel I, Lans T, Menting FJ, Hertling U, van der Putten WH (2004) Release from native root herbivores and biotic resistance by soil pathogens in a new habitat both affect the alien Ammophila arenaria in South Africa. Oecologia 141:502–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1662-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Magidow LC, DiTommaso A, Ketterings QM, Mohler CL, Milbrath LR (2013) Emergence and performance of two invasive swallowworts (Vincetoxicum spp.) in contrasting soil types and soil pH. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6(2):281–291. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-12-00073.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malcolm SB, Cockrell BJ, Brower LP (1993) Spring recolonization of eastern North America by the monarch butterfly: successive brood or single sweep migration? In: Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County; Science Series, p 38Google Scholar
- McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA (1990) A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 115(3):495–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ontario Geological Survey (1991) Bedrock geology of Ontario, Southern sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Map2544, Scale 1:1 000 000Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R version 3.4.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
- Sanon A, Beguiristain T, Cebron A, Berthelin J, Ndoye I, Leyval C, Sylla S, Duponnois R (2009) Changes in soil diversity and global activities following invasions of the exotic invasive plant, Amaranthus viridis L., decrease the growth of native sahelian Acacia species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70(1):118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schnitzer SA, Klironomos JN, HilleRisLambers J, Kinkel LL, Reich PB, Xiao K, Rillig MC, Sikes BA, Callaway RM, Mangan SA, Van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2011) Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. Ecology 92(2):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0773.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Klironomos JN (2006) Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol 4(5):e140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar