Spatial modeling improves understanding patterns of invasive species defoliation by a biocontrol herbivore
Spatial modeling has proven to be useful in understanding the drivers of plant populations in the field of ecology, but has yet to be applied to understanding variation in biocontrol impact. In this study, we employ multi-scale analysis (Moran’s Eigenvector Maps) to better understand the variation in tree canopy exposed to defoliation by a biocontrol beetle (Diorhabda spp.). The control of the exotic tree Tamarix in riparian areas has long been a priority for land managers and ecologists in the American southwest. Diorhabda spp. was introduced as a bio-control agent beginning in 2001 and has since become an inseparable part of Tamarix-dominated river systems in the southwest. Between 2013 and 2016 tamarisk dieback was assessed at 79 sites across Grand County, Utah, arguably the epicenter of Diorhabda impact in the U.S. Canopy cover of Tamarix was between 73 and 81% at these sites, with the percent that was live cover fluctuating by year with a minimum of 42%. Using a traditional general linear model, we found that readily and commonly measured environmental factors could explain only up to 26% of the variation in Tamarix live canopy each year. The number of defoliations was correlated with an increase rather than a decrease in percent live canopy, suggesting compensatory growth. Spatial structure alone explained 22–40% of variation. We found fine scale spatial structure at less than 10 km and broad scale spatial structure from 10 to 30 km. Combining both traditional and novel spatial statistical methods we increased that percentage to 43–63%, depending on year. These results suggest that scientists and land managers must look beyond commonly measured environmental variables to explain non-random biocontrol impact in this system. In particular, this study points to the potential for biotic interactions and variation in flood cycles for further exploration of the identified spatial structure.
KeywordsBiological control Diorhabda spp. Moran’s Eigenvector Maps Spatial modeling Tamarix spp.
We would like to thank the following funding sources for supporting this project: Val A. Browning Foundation, Utah Department of Agriculture and Food, Utah Weed Supervisor’s Association (APHIS funds), Tamarisk Coalition, National Park Service, Grand County, Utah. Eduardo González’s participation in this work was partially supported by a Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (ESFFORES Project Grant Number 299044) and the U.S. Geological Survey, Invasive Species Program. Tim Higgs, Grand County Weed Department—Supervisor, oversaw the collection and release of beetles as well as all subsequent monitoring projects within the county. Field assistant George Gerhart contributed to the bulk of data collection with Tim Graham helping out at several locations and always being ready to assist with identifying unknown groundcover plants growing on survey lines. We would also like to thank all the undergraduate assistants in data entry and management, specifically Grace Fierle, Carlie McGuire, April Rose, James Sheinbaum, and Maddie Sligh, as well as graduate student Lisa Buie Clark. Joe Ryan from the Center for Statistics and Visualization at the University of Denver also helped on this project by creating web applications to visualize beetle defoliation over time. We are also are indebted to Melissa Islam at the Kathryn Kalmbach Herbarium at the Denver Botanic Gardens, and Eric Tabacchi at EcoLab (UPS-INP-CNRS) for helping to identify and verify plants. Finally, we thank our associate editor and two anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions greatly improved the manuscript.
The data associated with this paper have been deposited in a Dryad digital repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2ts54jj.
- Bonham CD (1989) Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cordes LD, Hughes FMR, Getty M (1997) Factors affecting the regeneration and distribution of riparian woodlands along a northern prairie river: the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada. J Biogeogr 24:675–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1997.tb00077.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cossé AA, Bartelt RJ, Zilkowski BW, Bean DW, Petroski RJ (2005) The aggregation pheromone of Diorhabda elongata, a biological control agent of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.): identification of two behaviorally active components. J Chem Ecol 31:657–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-2053-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeLoach CJ, Lewis PA, Herr JC, Carruthers RI, Tracy JL, Johnson J (2003) Host specificity of the leaf beetle, Diorhabda elongata deserticola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from Asia, a biological control agent for saltcedars (Tamarix: Tamaricaceae) in the Western United States. Biol Control 27:117–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00003-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiTomaso JM, Kyser GB et al (2013) Weed control in natural areas in the western United States. Weed Research and Information Center, University of California, p 544Google Scholar
- ESRI (2014) ArcGIS desktop: release 10.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
- Friedman JM, Roelle JE, Gaskin JF, Pepper AE, Manhart JR (2008) Latitudinal variation in cold hardiness in introduced Tamarix and native Populus. Evol Appl 1:598–607Google Scholar
- Gaskin J (2013) Genetics of Tamarix. In: Sher A, Quigley MF (eds) Tamarix: a case study of ecological change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- González E, Sher A, Anderson R, Bay R, Bean D, Bissonnete G, Bourgeois B, Cooper D, Dohrenwend K, Eichhorst K, El Waer H, Kennard D, Harms-Weissinger R, Henry A, Makarick L, Ostoja S, Reynolds L, Robinson W, Shafroth P (2017) Vegetation response to invasive Tamarix control in southwestern U.S. rivers: a collaborative study including 416 sites. Ecol Appl 27:1789–1804. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hultine KR, Nagler PL, Morino K, Bush SE, Burtch KG, Dennison PE, Glenn EP, Ehleringer JR (2010b) Sap flux-scaled transpiration by tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) before, during and after episodic defoliation by the saltcedar leaf beetle (Diorhabda carinulata). Agric For Meteorol 150:1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jamison LR, van Riper C, Bean DW (2015) The influence of Tamarix ramosissima defoliation on population movements of the northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) within the Colorado Plateau. In: The Colorado Plateau VI, pp 281–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183pc7f.22
- Kennard D, Louden N, Gemoets D, Ortega S, González E, Bean D, Cunningham P, Johnson T, Rosen K, Stahlke A (2016) Tamarix dieback and vegetation patterns following release of the northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) in western Colorado. Biol Control 101:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Legendre P, Legendre L (eds) (2012) Multiscale analysis: spatial eigenfucntions. In: Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modeling, vol 24, Chap 14. Elsevier, pp 859–906Google Scholar
- Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240Google Scholar
- Lewis PA, DeLoach CJ, Knutson AE, Tracy JL, Robbins TO (2003) Biology of Diorhabda elongata deserticola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), an Asian leaf beetle for biological control of saltcedars (Tamarix spp.) in the United States. Biol Control 27:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1049-9644(03)00002-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Long RW, Bush SE, Grady KC, Smith DS, Potts DL, D’Antonio CM, Dudley TL, Fehlberg SD, Gaskin JF, Glenn EP, Hultine KR (2017) Can local adaptation explain varying patterns of herbivory tolerance in a recently introduced woody plant in North America? Conserv Physiol 5:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cox016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mcshane RR, Auerbach DA, Friedman JM, Auble GT, Shafroth PB, Merigliano MF, Scott ML, Poff NL (2015) Distribution of invasive and native riparian woody plants across the western USA in relation to climate, river flow, floodplain geometry and patterns of introduction. Ecography (Cop) 38:1254–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merritt DM (2013) Reciprocal relations between riparian vegetation, fluvial landforms, and channel processes. Treatise Geomorphol 9:219–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00239-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nagler PL, Brown T, Hultine KR, van Riper C, Bean DW, Dennison PE, Murray RS, Glenn EP (2012) Regional scale impacts of Tamarix leaf beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) on the water availability of western U.S. rivers as determined by multi-scale remote sensing methods. Remote Sens Environ 118:227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nagler PL, Pearlstein S, Glenn EP, Brown TB, Bateman HL, Bean DW, Hultine KR (2014) Rapid dispersal of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) biocontrol beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) on a desert river detected by phenocams, MODIS imagery and ground observations. Remote Sens Environ 140:206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Michin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
- Tamarisk Coalition (2016) 2007–2015 Tamarisk beetle distribution map. http://www.tamariskcoalition.org/programs/tamarisk-beetle-maps
- Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2006) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 11:2697–2708. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2697:AOEBDU]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- USDA-NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2016) The PLANTS database. http://plants.usda.gov
- USGS (U.S. Department of the Interior-United States Geological Survey) (2014) The national map https://viewer.nationalmap.gov
- U.S. Climate Data (2016). https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/moab/utah/united-states/usut0165
- Zavaleta E (2000) Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. In: Mooney H, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, pp 462–467Google Scholar