Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 3491–3497 | Cite as

Native granivores reduce the establishment of native grasses but not invasive Bromus tectorum

  • Jacob E. Lucero
  • Ragan M. Callaway
Original Paper


Seed predation can structure plant communities by imposing strong population controls on some species but not others. In this context, studies from various ecosystems report that native granivores selectively forage for seeds from native species over seeds from exotic invaders, which could disproportionately favor the establishment of invaders and facilitate their dominance in communities. However, few studies have connected selective foraging for native seeds to differential patterns of establishment among native and invasive species. Thus, the extent to which preferential foraging for native seeds favors the establishment of invasive plants is unclear. Here, we used experimental seed additions and exclosure treatments at five field sites distributed across ≈ 80,000 km2 of the Great Basin Desert, USA to compare the effects of rodent foraging on the establishment of less-preferred cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum—an annual species native to Eurasia that is exotic and highly invasive across the Great Basin) and four species of more-preferred native grasses that commonly co-occur with cheatgrass. Rodent foraging reduced the establishment of each native species by at least 80% but had no effect on the establishment of cheatgrass, and this finding was consistent across study sites. Our results suggest that selective foraging for native species may favor the establishment of cheatgrass over native grasses, potentially exacerbating one of the most extensive plant invasions in North America.


Bromus tectorum Enemy release hypothesis Great Basin Rodents Seed predation 



The authors are grateful for funding from the Montana Institute on Ecosystems, the National Science Foundation Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research Track-1 EPS-1101342 (INSTEP 3), the Organismal Biology and Ecology Program at The University of Montana, and the American Museum of Natural History. We also thank Dean Pearson and John Maron for insightful comments that improved our work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1789_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)


  1. Allen PS, Benech-Arnold RL, Batlla D, Bradford KJ (2007) Modeling of seed dormancy. In: Bradford KJ, Nonogaki H (eds) Seed development, dormancy and germination. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 72–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN (1989) How important is seed predation to recruitment in stable populations of long-lived perennials? Oecologia 81:310–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Balch JK, Bradley BA, D’Antonio CM, Gomez-Dans J (2013) Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980–2009). Glob Change Biol 19:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa P, Hines J, Kaplan I, Martinson H, Szczepaniec A, Szendrei Z (2009) Associational resistance and susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaney CS, Kotanen PM (2001) Post-dispersal losses to seed predators: an experimental comparison of native and exotic old field plants. Can J Bot 79:284–292Google Scholar
  6. Brown JH, Heske EJ (1990) Control of a desert–grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250:1705–1707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:521–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cappuccino N, Carpenter D (2005) Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants. Biol Lett 1:435–438CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Clair St. SB, O’Connor R, Gill R, McMillan B (2016) Biotic resistance and disturbance: rodent consumers regulate post-fire plant invasions and increase plant community diversity. Ecology 97:1700–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceradini JP, Chalfoun AD (2017) Species’ traits help predict small mammal responses to habitat homogenization by an invasive grass. Ecol Appl 27:1451–1465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging; the marginal value theorem. Theor Pop Biol 9:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connolly BM, Pearson DE, Mack RN (2014) Granivory of invasive, naturalized, and native plants in communities differentially susceptible to invasion. Ecology 95:1759–1769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Anotonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enge S, Nylund GM, Pavia H (2013) Native generalist herbivores promote invasion of a chemically defended seaweed via refuge-mediated apparent competition. Ecol Letters 16:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flake LD (1973) The food habits of four species of rodents on a short-grass prairie in Colorado. J Mammal 54:636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffith AB (2010) Positive effects of native shrubs on Bromus tectorum demography. Ecology 91:141–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gross CL, Mackay D (2014) Two decades of demography reveals that seed and seedling transitions limit population persistence in a translocated shrub. Ann Bot 114:85–96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper KT, Freeman DC, Ostler WK, Klikoff LG (1978) The flora of Great Basin mountain ranges: diversity, sources, and dispersal ecology. Gt Basin Nat Mem 2:81–103Google Scholar
  21. Hassan MA, West NE (1986) Dynamics of soil seed pools in burned and unburned sagebrush semi-deserts. Ecology 67:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayssen V (1991) Dipodomys microps. Mammal Species 389:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Pop Biol 12:197–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hulme PE (1998) Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography and evolution. Perspect Plant Ecol 1:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphrey LD, Schupp EW (2001) Seed banks of Bromus tectorum-dominated communities in the Great Basin. West North Am Nat 61:85–92Google Scholar
  26. Jogesh T, Carpenter D, Cappuccino N (2008) Herbivory on invasive exotic plants and their non-invasive relatives. Biol Invasions 10:797–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones WT (1989) Dispersal distance and the range of nightly movement in Merriam’s kangaroo rats. J Mammal 70:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamil AC, Balda RP (1985) Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark’s nutcracker (Nucifraga colombiana). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 11:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA (1985) Nutritional and physical attributes of seeds of some common sagebrush-steppe plants: some implications for ecological theory and management. J Range Manag 38:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR, Sisson DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68:327–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larios L, Pearson DE, Maron JL (2017) Incorporating the effects of generalist seed predators into plant community theory. Funct Ecol 31:1856–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Longland WS, Jenkins SH, Vander Wall SB, Veech JA, Pyare S (2001) Seedling recruitment in Oryzopsis hymenoides: are desert granivores mutualists or predators? Ecology 82:3131–3148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Louda SM (1982) Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecol Monogr 52:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Louda SM (1989) Predation in the dynamics of seed regeneration. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (eds) Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucero JE (2017) A biogeographic perspective on the impacts and importance of rodent granivory on native vs. invasive plants. Dissertation, The University of MontanaGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucero JE, Allen PS, McMillan BR (2015) Increased primary production from an exotic invader does not subsidize native rodents. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0131564CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. MacMahon JA, Mull JF, Crist TO (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:265–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maron JL, Cone E (2006) Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc R Soc B 273:2575–2584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Maron JL, Kauffman M (2006) Habitat-specific consumer impacts on plant population dynamics. Ecology 87:113–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Maron JL, Vila M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maron JL, Pearson DE, Potter T, Ortega Y (2012) Seed size and provenance mediate the joint effects of disturbance and seed predation on community assembly. J Ecol 100:1492–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer SE, Allen PS (2009) Predicting seed dormancy loss and germination timing in a semiarid environment using hydrothermal time models. Seed Sci Res 19:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norton U, Mosier AR, Morgan JA, Derner JD, Ingram JL, Stahl PD (2008) Moisture pulses, trace gas emissions and soil C and N in cheatgrass and native grass-dominated sagebrush-steppe in Wyoming, USA. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1421–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Farrell MJ (1978) Home range dynamics of rodents in a sagebrush community. J Mammal 59:657–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Orrock JL, Witter MS, Reichman OJ (2008) Apparent competition with an exotic plant reduces native plant establishment. Ecology 89:1168–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ostoja SM, Schupp EW (2009) Conversion of sagebrush shrublands to exotic annual grasslands negatively impacts small mammal communities. Divers Distrib 15:863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostoja SM, Schupp EW, Durham S, Klinger R (2013) Seed harvesting is influenced by associational effects in mixed seed neighbourhoods, not just by seed density. Funct Ecol 27:775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paine CET, Beck H, Terborgh J (2016) How mammalian predation contributes to tropical tree community structure. Ecology 97:3326–3336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2008) Weed-control insects reduce native-plant recruitment through second-order apparent competition. Ecol Appl 18:1489–1500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearson DE, Callaway RM, Maron JL (2011) Biotic resistance via granivory: establishment by invasive, naturalized, and native asters reflects generalist preference. Ecology 92:1748–1757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Ozkan E, Hierro JL (2015) Quantifying “apparent” impact and distinguishing impact from invasiveness in multispecies plant invasions. Ecol Appl 26:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearson DE, Eren O, Ortega YK, Villareal D, Sentürk M, Miguel MF, Weinzettel CM, Prina A, Hierro JL (2017) Are exotic plants more abundant in the introduced versus native range? J Ecol 00:1–10Google Scholar
  56. Pulliam HR (1974) On the theory of optimal diets. Am Nat 108:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  58. Reader RJ (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some oldfield species. J Ecol 81:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rehmeier RL, Kaufman GA, Kaufman DW (2004) Long distance movements of the deer mouse in tallgrass prairie. J Mammal 85:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rose KE, Louda SM, Rees M (2005) Demographic and evolutionary impacts of native and invasive insect herbivores on Cirsium canescens. Ecology 86:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Biological Sciences and the Institute on EcosystemsThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations