Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 2839–2848 | Cite as

Biodiversity influences invasion success of a facultative epiphytic seaweed in a marine forest

  • Emma CebrianEmail author
  • Fiona Tomas
  • Paula López-Sendino
  • Montserrat Vilà
  • Enric Ballesteros
Original Paper


The biotic resistance hypothesis predicts that more diverse communities should have greater resistance to invasions than species-poor communities. However for facultative and obligate epiphytic invaders a high native species richness, abundance and community complexity might provide more resources for the invader to thrive to. We conducted surveys across space and time to test for the influence of native algal species abundance and richness on the abundance of the invasive facultative epiphytic filamentous alga Lophocladia lallemandii in a Mediterranean Cystoseira balearica seaweed forest. By removing different functional groups of algae, we also tested whether these relationships were dependent on the complexity and abundance of the native algal community. When invasion was first detected, Lophocladia abundance was positively related to species richness, but the correlation became negative after two years of invasion. Similarly, a negative relationship was also observed across sites. The removal experiment revealed that more complex native communities were more heavily invaded, where also a positive relationship was found between native algal richness and Lophocladia, independently of the native algal abundance. Our observational and experimental data show that, at early stages of invasion, species-rich seaweed forests are not more resistant to invasion than species-poor communities. Higher richness of native algal species may increase resource availability (i.e. substrate) for invader establishment, thus facilitating invasion. After the initial invasion stage, native species richness decreases with time since invasion, suggesting negative impacts of invasive species on native biodiversity.


Benthic community Invasibility Cystoseira Epiphytic Functional groups Lophocladia Mediterranean marine community Removal experiment Seaweed 



This project has received funding from the Spanish Ministry Projects (CGL2016-76341-R and CGL2015-65346-R) and Fundación Biodiversidad. This output reflects only the authors’ views and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Managers of ACNP are acknowledged for sampling permissions. This is a contribution to CoCoNET (FP7 Grant Agreement: 287844) and INTRAMURAL CSIC 201330E065. EBD receives financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, through the Severo Ochoa Program for Centres of Excellence in R + D + I (SEV-2012-0262). EC is a member of the Marine Conservation Research Group ( from the Generalitat de Catalunya.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1736_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg (970 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 970 kb)
10530_2018_1736_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (34 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 33 kb)


  1. Arenas F, Sánchez I, Hawkins S, Jenkins S (2006) The invasibility of marine algal assemblages: role of functional diversity and identity. Ecology 87:2851–2861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballesteros E (1992) Els vegetals i la zonació litoral: espècies, comunitats i factors que influeixen en la seva distribució. Arx Secc Ciències IEC 101:1–656Google Scholar
  3. Ballesteros E, Cebrian E, Alcoverro T (2007) Mortality of shoots of Posidonia oceanica following meadow invasion by the red alga Lophocladia lallemandii. Bot Mar 50:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballesteros E, Garrabou J, Hereu B, Zabala M, Cebrian E, Sala E (2009) Deep water stands of Cystoseira zosteroides C. Agardh (Fucales, Ochrophyta) in the Northwestern Mediterranean: insights into assemblage structure and population dynamics. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 82:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonaviri C, Vega Fernández T, Fanelli G, Badalamenti F, Gianguzza P (2011) Leading role of the sea urchin Arbacia lixula in maintaining the barren state in southwestern Mediterranean. Mar Biol 158:2505–2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks WR, Jordan RC (2013) Propagule pressure and native species richness effects drive invasibility in tropical dry forest seedling layers. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 15:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulleri F, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2008) Facilitation of the introduced green alga, Caulerpa racemosa, by resident algal turfs: experimental evaluation of underlying mechanisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 364:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulleri F, Bruno JF, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2008) Beyond Competition: incorporating positive interactions between species to predict ecosystem invasibility. PLoS Biol 6(6):e162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulleri F, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Jaklin A, Ivesa L (2016) Linking disturbance and resistance to invasion via changes in biodiversity: a conceptual model and an experimental test on rocky reefs. Ecol Evol 6:2010–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaway RM, Reinhart KO, Moore GW, Moore DJ, Pennings SC (2002) Epiphyte host preferences and host traits: mechanisms for species-specific interactions. Oecologia 132:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capers RS, Selsky R, Bugbee GJ, White JC (2007) Aquatic plant community invasibility and scale-dependent patterns in native and invasive species richness. Ecology 88:3135–3143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catford JA, Vesk PA, Ricardson DM, Pysek P (2012) Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 18:44–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cebrian E, Ballesteros E (2009) Temporal and spatial variability in shallow- and deep-water population of the invasive Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea in the Western Mediterranean. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 83:469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cebrian E, Ballesteros E (2010) Invasion of Mediterranean benthic assemblages by red alga Lophocladia lallemandii (Montagne) F. Schmitz: depth-related temporal variability in biomass and phenology. Aquat Bot 92:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cebrian E, Ballesteros E, Canals M (2000) Shallow rocky bottom benthic assemblages as calcium carbonate producers in the Alboran Sea (Southwestern Mediterranean). Oceanol Acta 23:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ceccherelli G, Piazzi L, Balata D (2002) Spread of introduced Caulerpa species in macroalgal habitats. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 280:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark GF, Johnston EL (2011) Temporal change in the diversity–invasibility relationship in the presence of a disturbance regime. Ecol Lett 14:52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark GF, Johnston EL, Leung B (2013) Intrinsic time dependence in the diversity–invasibility relationship. Ecology 94:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fargione J, Tilman D (2005) Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects. Ecol Lett 8:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fargione J, Brown CS, Tilman D (2003) Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes. Proc Nat Acad Sci 100:8916–8920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fine PVA (2002) The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. J Trop Ecol 18:687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flores-Palacios A, García-Franco JG (2006) The relationship between tree size and epiphyte species richness: testing four different hypotheses. J Biogeogr 33:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fridley JD (2011) Invasibility of communities and ecosystems. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp 356–359Google Scholar
  26. Fridley JD, Stachowicz JJ, Naeem S, Sax DF, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Stohlgren TJ, Tilman D, Von Holle B (2007) The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giacconne G, Bruni A (1973) Le Cistoseire e la vegetazione sommersa del Mediterraneo. Atti Ist Ven Sci Lett Arti 131:59–103Google Scholar
  28. Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howard TG, Gurevitch J, Hyatt L, Carreiro M, Lerdau M (2005) Forest invasibility in communities in southeastern New York. Biol Invasion 6:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kennedy TA, Naeem S, Howe KM, Knops JMH (2002) Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 147:636–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knowlton N (2004) Multiple “stable” states and the conservation of marine ecosystems. Prog Oceanogr 60:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ladwig LM, Meiners SJ (2009) Impacts of temperate lianas on tree growth in young deciduous forests. For Ecol Manag 259:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levine JM, D’Antonio C (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis JEJ, Ellis CJ (2010) Taxon-compared with trait-based analysis of epiphytes, and the role of tree species and tree age in community composition. Plant Ecol Divers 3:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: a mechanistic model. Proc Nat Acad Sci 95:5632–5636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marbà N, Arthur R, Alcoverro T (2014) Getting turfed: the population and habitat impacts of Lophocladia lallemandii invasions on endemic Posidonia oceanica meadows. Aquat Bot 116:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maron J, Marler M (2008) Field-based competitive impacts between invaders and natives at varying resource supply. J Ecol 96:1187–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marraffini ML, Geller JB (2015) Species richness and interacting factors control invasibility of a marine community. Proc R Soc B 282:20150439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Wilsey BJ, Fuhlendorf SD, Miller JR, Debinski DM (2012) Grazing and an invasive grass confound spatial pattern of exotic and native grassland plant species richness. Basic Appl Ecol 13:654–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naeem S, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S (2000) Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Östman Ö, Eklöf J, Eriksson BK, Olsson J, Moksnes PO, Bergstrom U (2016) Top-down control as important as nutrient enrichment for eutrophication effects in North Atlantic coastal ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 53:1138–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Otero M, Cebrian E, Francour P, Galil B, Savini D (2013) Monitoring marine invasive species in Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas (MPAs): a strategy and practical guide for managers. IUCN, Malaga, p 136Google Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  45. Rejmánek M (1996) Species richness and resistance to invasions. In: Orians G, Dirzo R, Cushman H (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in tropical forests. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson GR, Quinn JF, Stanton ML (1995) Invasibility of experimental habitat islands in a California winter annual grassland. Ecology 76:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED, Don A, Schumacher J, Weller E (2007) Exploring the functional significance of forest diversity: a new long-term experiment with temperate tree species (BIOTREE). Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stachowicz JJ, Byrnes JE (2006) Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (1999) Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286:1577–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stohlgren TJ, Barnett DT, Kartesz JT (2003) The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 1:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valdivia N, Heidemann A, Thiel M, Molis M, Wahl M (2005) Effects of disturbance on the diversity of hard-bottom macrobenthic communities on the coast of Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 299:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Ruijven J, De Deyn GB, Berendse F (2003) Diversity reduces invasibility in experimental plant communities: the role of plant species. Ecol Lett 6:910–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Verlaque M, Ruitton S, Mineur F, Boudouresque CF (2015) CIESM Atlas of exotic species in the Mediterranean. In: Briand F (ed) Macrophytes, vol 4. CIESM, Monaco, p 364Google Scholar
  57. Vilà M, Pino J, Font X (2007) Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types. J Veget Sci 18:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut d’Ecologia Aquàtica, Facultat de CiènciesUniversitat de GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC)GironaSpain
  3. 3.Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (IMEDEA, UIB-CSIC)Illes BalearsSpain
  4. 4.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  5. 5.Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
  6. 6.Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC)SevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations