Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1507–1522 | Cite as

The genetic structure of the introduced house sparrow populations in Australia and New Zealand is consistent with historical descriptions of multiple introductions to each country

  • Samuel C. Andrew
  • Monica Awasthy
  • Peri E. Bolton
  • Lee A. Rollins
  • Shinichi Nakagawa
  • Simon C. Griffith
Original Paper


The house sparrow is one of the most widely introduced vertebrate species around the world, making it an important model species for the study of invasion ecology. Population genetic studies of these invasions provide important insights into colonisation processes and adaptive responses occurring during invasion. Here we use microsatellite data to infer the population structure and invasion history of the introduced house sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Australia and New Zealand. Our results identify stronger population structure within Australia in comparison to New Zealand and patterns are consistent with historical records of multiple introduction sites across both countries. Within the five population clusters identified in Australia, we find declines in genetic diversity as we move away from the reported introduction site within each cluster. This pattern is consistent with sequential founder events. Interestingly, an even stronger decline in genetic diversity is seen across Australia as we move away from the Melbourne introduction site; secondary historical reports suggest this site imported a large number of sparrows and was possible the source of a single range expansion across Australia. However, private allele numbers are highest in the north, away from Melbourne, which could be a result of drift increasing the frequency of rare alleles in areas of smaller population size or due to an independent introduction that seeded or augmented the northern population. This study highlights the difficulties of elucidating population dynamics in introduced species with complex introduction histories and suggests that a combination of historical and genetic data can be useful.


Passer domesticus Invasive species Colonization history Population structure Founder effect Natural experiment 



For funding support: SCA was supported by Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarships (No. 2013077). SCG was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT130101253). SN was supported by a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (New Zealand) and an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT130100268). Fragment analysis was conducted at Macrogen, Inc. We would like to thank the large number of people who helped us with access to urban catch sites for sampling the human commensal house sparrow. We would also like to thank, Amanda D. Griffith, Elizabeth L. Sheldon, Anna Feit, Ondi Crino and Peter Bird for their participation with field work in Australia and Karin Ludwig in New Zealand. We would also like to thank Elizabeth L. Sheldon for their assistance with lab work.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1643_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (154 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 153 kb)
10530_2017_1643_MOESM2_ESM.docx (3 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 3038 kb)


  1. Anderson TR (2006) Biology of the ubiquitous house sparrow: from genes to populations. University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew SC, Griffith SC (2016) Inaccuracies in the history of a well-known introduction: a case study of the Australian House Sparrow (Passer domesticus). Avian Res 7:9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baalsrud HT, Saether B-E, Hagen IJ et al (2014) Effects of population characteristics and structure on estimates of effective population size in a house sparrow metapopulation. Mol Ecol 23:2653–2668. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmford R (1981) Early introductions of birds to Victoria. Vic Nat 98:96–105Google Scholar
  5. Barrett SCH (2014) Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy. Mol Ecol 24:1927–1941. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8.
  7. Benazzo A, Ghirotto S, Vilaça ST, Hoban S (2015) Using ABC and microsatellite data to detect multiple introductions of invasive species from a single source. Heredity (Edinb) 115:262–272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackburn TM (2008) Using aliens to explore how our planet works. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:9–10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colautti RI, Lau JA (2015) Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol Ecol 24:1999–2017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole SR, Parkin DT (1986) Adenosine-deaminase polymorphism in house sparrow, Passer-domesticus. Anim Genet 17:77–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cristescu ME (2015) Genetic reconstructions of invasion history. Mol Ecol 24:2212–2225. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson DA, Horsburgh GJ, Krupa AP et al (2012) Microsatellite resources for Passeridae species: a predicted microsatellite map of the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Mol Ecol Resour 12:501–523. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Mita S, Thuillet A-C, Gay L et al (2013) Detecting selection along environmental gradients: analysis of eight methods and their effectiveness for outbreeding and selfing populations. Mol Ecol 22:1383–1399. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. de Villemereuil P, Frichot É, Bazin É et al (2014) Genome scan methods against more complex models: When and how much should we trust them? Mol Ecol 23:2006–2019. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Earl DA, VonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Estoup A, Guillemaud T (2010) Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: Why, how and so what? Mol Ecol 19:4113–4130. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Excoffier L, Foll M, Petit RJ (2009a) Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:481–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Excoffier L, Hofer T, Foll M (2009b) Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population. Heredity (Edinb) 103:285–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Francois O, Martins H, Caye K, Schoville S (2016) A tutorial on controlling false discoveries in genome scans for selection. Mol Ecol 25:454–469. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Frantz AC, Cellina S, Krier A et al (2009) Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: Clusters or isolation by distance? J Appl Ecol 46:493–505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Günther T, Coop G (2013) Robust identification of local adaptation from allele frequencies. Genetics 195:205–220. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hagen IJ, Billing AM, Rønning B et al (2013) The easy road to genome-wide medium density SNP screening in a non-model species: development and application of a 10 K SNP-chip for the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Mol Ecol Resour 13:429–439. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Higgins PJ, Peter JM, Cowling SJ (2006) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds: Boatbill to starlings, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 1102–1126Google Scholar
  29. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jakobsson M, Edge MD, Rosenberg NA (2013) The relationship between FST and the frequency of the most frequent allele. Genetics 193:515–528. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen H, Moe R, Hagen IJ et al (2013) Genetic variation and structure of house sparrow populations: Is there an island effect? Mol Ecol 22:1792–1805. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson MTJ, Munshi-South J (2017) Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358:eaam8327Google Scholar
  33. Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jombart T, Pontier D, Dufour A-B (2009) Genetic markers in the playground of multivariate analysis. Heredity (Edinb) 102:330–341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F et al (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kekkonen J, Hanski IK, Jensen H et al (2011a) Increased genetic differentiation in house sparrows after a strong population decline: from panmixia towards structure in a common bird. Biol Conserv 144:2931–2940. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kekkonen J, Seppä P, Hanski IK et al (2011b) Low genetic differentiation in a sedentary bird: house sparrow population genetics in a contiguous landscape. Heredity (Edinb) 106:183–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2016) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-32.
  40. Langella O (2002) POPULATIONS. Bioinformatics.
  41. Lee CEE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lever C (1985) Naturalized Mammals of the World. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Lever C (1992) They dined on eland. Quiller Press Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Lever C (2005) Naturalised birds of the world. T & A D Poyser, London, pp 204–218Google Scholar
  45. Liebl AL, Schrey AW, Andrew SC et al (2015) Invasion genetics: lessons from a ubiquitous bird, the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Curr Zool 61:465–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lima MR, Macedo RHF, Martins TLF et al (2012) Genetic and morphometric divergence of an invasive bird: the introduced house sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Brazil. PLoS ONE. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Long JL (1981) Introduced birds of the world: the worldwide history, distribution and influence of birds introduced to new environments. Universe Books, Campbelltown, pp 372–381Google Scholar
  48. Long JL (1988) Introduced birds and mammals in Western Australia. Agric. Prot. Board West. Aust. Agriculture Protection Board, Perth, pp 13–14Google Scholar
  49. Lotterhos KE, Whitlock MC (2014) Evaluation of demographic history and neutral parameterization on the performance of FST outlier tests. Mol Ecol 23:2178–2192. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1997) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity. Mol Ecol 7:639–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller N, Estoup A, Toepfer S et al (2005) Multiple transatlantic introductions of the western corn rootworm. Science 310:992. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ockendon N, Griffith SC, Burke T (2009) Extrapair paternity in an insular population of house sparrows after the experimental introduction of individuals from the mainland. Behav Ecol 20:305–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orsini L, Vanoverbeke J, Swillen I et al (2013) Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization. Mol Ecol 22:5983–5999. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Parkin DT, Cole SR (1985) Genetic differentiation and rates of evolution in some introduced populations of the house sparrow, Passer domesticus in Australia and New Zealand. Heredity (Edinb) 54:15–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pascual M, Chapuis MP, Mestres F et al (2007) Introduction history of Drosophila subobscura in the New World: a microsatellite-based survey using ABC methods. Mol Ecol 16:3069–3083. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenALEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Peter BM, Slatkin M (2015) The effective founder effect in a spatially expanding population. Evolution 69:721–734. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Preuss S, Berggren Å, Cassel-Lundhagen A (2015) Genetic patterns reveal an old introduction event and dispersal limitations despite rapid distribution expansion. Biol Invasions 17:2851–2862. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
  63. Raymond M, Rousset F (1993) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rellstab C, Gugerli F, Eckert AJ et al (2015) A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol Ecol 24:4348–4370. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rollins LA, Woolnough AP, Wilton AN et al (2009) Invasive species can’t cover their tracks: using microsatellites to assist management of starling (Sturnus vulgaris) populations in Western Australia. Mol Ecol 18:1560–1573. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenberg NA (2004) Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sætre G-P, Riyahi S, Aliabadian M et al (2012) Single origin of human commensalism in the house sparrow. J Evol Biol 25:788–796. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH et al (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:465–471. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Schrey AW, Grispo M, Awad M et al (2011) Broad-scale latitudinal patterns of genetic diversity among native European and introduced house sparrow (Passer domesticus) populations. Mol Ecol 20:1133–1143. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Schrey AW, Liebl AL, Richards CL, Martin LB (2014) Range expansion of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in Kenya: evidence of genetic admixture and human-mediated dispersal. J Hered 105:60–69. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomson GM (1922) The Naturalisation of Animals and Plants in New Zealand. University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tufto J, Ringsby T, Dhondt AA et al (2005) A parametric model for estimation of dispersal patterns applied to five passerine spatially structured populations. Am Nat 165:E13–E26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Vangestel C, Mergeay J, Dawson DA et al (2011) Spatial heterogeneity in genetic relatedness among house sparrows along an urban-rural gradient as revealed by individual-based analysis. Mol Ecol 20:4643–4653. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wagner CH (1982) Simpson’s paradox in real life. Am Stat 36:46–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  4. 4.Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations