Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 825–842 | Cite as

Evidence of multiple introductions and genetic admixture of the Asian brush-clawed shore crab Hemigrapsus takanoi (Decapoda: Brachyura: Varunidae) along the Northern European coast

  • Wataru Makino
  • Osamu Miura
  • Felix Kaiser
  • Mélanie Geffray
  • Tatsuya Katsube
  • Jotaro Urabe
Invasion Note
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

The Asian brush-clawed shore crab Hemigrapsus takanoi is a non-indigenous species along the Northern European coast. Although the history of range expansion of European H. takanoi has been well-documented, little is known about the genetic compositions of either the introduced European populations or the native Asian ones. We therefore collected H. takanoi broadly from their native Asian sites and introduced European ranges, and genotyped them by sequencing the mitochondrial 16S RNA gene and by analyzing nuclear microsatellite loci. Our results revealed that the H. takanoi Bay of Seine (France) populations consisted of a genetic admixture between populations in Japan and those in the Yellow Sea region. These French populations should be carefully monitored in the future, since the genetic admixture of multiple source populations may accelerate range expansion in non-indigenous organisms. Our results also suggested that shipping lines from East Asia were more probable vectors than historical juvenile oyster transportations from Japan for the foundation of present European H. takanoi populations. Interestingly, gene flow between populations in Japan and those in the Yellow Sea region (i.e., domestic invasion) was not observed despite the higher potential for artificial translocations via shipping lines in the native Asian range compared with those from Asia to Europe. The lack of domestic invasions implied that intra-specific priority effects of the resident H. takanoi populations played an important role in preventing the successful colonization of artificially-transferred individuals.

Keywords

Colonization Dispersal Genetic admixture Intra-specific priority effects Multiple introductions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Comments/suggestions/instructions from Susumu Chiba, Yuji Yamasaki, Ayako Suda, Takuya Kimura, the handling editor and anonymous referees significantly improved the manuscript, for which we are truly grateful. We are also grateful to Daiki Tazono, Akiyosi Shinada, Susumu Chiba, Takeshi Sonoda, Kentaro Watanabe, Kento Matsuo, Massa Nakaoka, Kenjiro Ui, Satoshi Takeda, Kyoko Kinoshita, Shin’ichiro Tsuchihashi, Takeshi Yuhara, Mitsuru Sato, Taeko Kimura, Atsushi Hirai, Tomohiro Koizumi, Koji Yamada, Tetsuya Watanabe, Jun’ya Tachikawa, Naotaka Miyajima, Tomoyuki Miura, Toru Kobari, Motohiro Shimanaga, Yoshio Kawamura, Yosuke Yamaguchi, Jiro Kawahara, Hiroyuki Doi, Yuji Tomaru, Masayuki Osawa, Masamu Fujiwara, Osamu Inamura, Mitsuhiro Fuwa, Tomoharu Kimura, Yoshihiko Machida, Ken Sakaguchi, Kotaro Kan, Masanori Sato, Shin’ichi Sato, S. Wijnhoven, J. Beermann, Maarten Boersma, and Ryuji J. Machida for helping us collect Hemigrapsus crabs. Invaluable suggestions and critical comments from AMH Blakeslee greatly improved the manuscript, for which we are grateful. The present study was supported by the Mitsui & Co., Ltd. Environmental Fund (F11-F1-020/R14-1009) and research project funds “Tohoku Ecosystem-Associated Marine Sciences (TEAMS)” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT).

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1604_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (5.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 5330 kb)

References

  1. Asakura A, Watanabe S (2005) Hemigrapsus takanoi, new species, a sibling species of the common Japanese intertidal crab H. penicillatus (Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsoidea). J Crustacean Biol 25:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blakeslee AMH, McKenzie CH, Darling JA, Byers JE, Pringle JM, Roman J (2010) A hitchhiker’s guide to the Maritimes: anthropogenic transport facilitates long-distance dispersal of an invasive marine crab to Newfoundland. Divers Distrib 16:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blakeslee AMH, Kamakura Y, Onufrey J, Makino W, Urabe J, Park S, Keogh CL, Miller AW, Minton MS, Carlton JT, Miura O (2017) Reconstructing the invasion history of the Asian shorecrab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus (De Haan 1835) in the Western Atlantic. Mar Biol 164:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boileau MG, Hebert PDN, Schwartz SS (1992) Non-equilibrium gene frequency divergence: persistent founder effects in natural populations. J Evol Biol 5:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlton JT, Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9 and earlier. User’s guide and application. https://purl.oclc.org/estimates
  9. Coutts ADM, Dodgshun TJ (2007) The nature and extent of organims in vessel sea-chests: a protected mechanism for marine bioinvasions. Mar Poll Bull 54:875–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coutts ADM, Moore KM, Hewitt CL (2003) Ships’ sea-chests: an overlooked transfer mechanism for non-indigenous marine species? Mar Poll Bull 46:1510–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cristescu ME (2015) Genetic reconstructions of invasion history. Mol Ecol 24:2212–2225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Meester L, Gómez A, Okamura B, Schwenk K (2002) The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecol 23:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L (2002) A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol 11:2571–2581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser CI, Banks SC, Waters JM (2015) Priority effects can lead to underestimation of dispersal and invasion potential. Biol Invasions 17:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frey MA, Simard N, Robichaud DD, Martin JL, Therriault TW (2014) Fouling around: vessel sea-chests as a vector for the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species. Manag Biol Invasions 5:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geburzi JC, Graumann G, Köhnk S, Brandis D (2015) First record of the Asian crab Hemigrapsus takanoi Asakura & Watanabe, 2005 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Varunidae) in the Baltic Sea. BioInvasions Rec 4:103–107 (in press) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gollasch S (1999) The Asian decapod Hemigrapsus penicillatus (de Haan, 1835) (Grapsidae, Decapoda) introduced in European waters: status quo and future perspective. Helgol Meeresunters 52:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gothland M, Dauvin JC, Denis L, Dufossé F, Jobert S, Ovaert J, Pezy JP, Tous Rios A, Spilmont N (2014) Biological traits explain the distribution and colonization ability of the invasive shore crab Hemigrapsus takanoi. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 142:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grizel H, Héral M (1991) Introduction into France of the Japanese oyster (Crassostrea gigas). J Cons Int Explor Mer 47:399–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatakeyama S (2006) Kaki raisan. Bungei Shunjyu, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  23. Hudson J, Viard F, Roby C, Rius M (2016) Anthoropogenic transport of species across native ranges: unpredictable genetic and evolutionary consequences. Biol Lett 12:20160620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Katsanevakis S, Zenetos A, Belchior C, Cardoso AC (2013) Invading European seas: assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens. Ocean Coast Manage 76:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kikuchi T (2001) Senpaku barasto mondai towa. Umito Anzen 509:2–11 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  28. Koganezawa A (1984) Matsushimagaki no konjyaku. Tohoku Suiken News 26:2–3 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  29. Lee S, Lee S-K, Rho HS, Kim W (2013) New report of the varunid crabs, Hemigrapsus takanoi and Sestrostoma toriumii (Crustacea: Decapoda: Varunidae) from Korea. Anim Syst Evol Divers 29:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Makino W, Kan K, Sato M, Mukai Y, Kaiser F, Katsube T, Suzuki T, Urabe J (2015) Usefulness of the side of dark spots on the body surface as a diagnostic character distinguishing two morphologically similar Hemigrapsus species (Decapoda: Brachyura: Varunidae). Plankton Benthos Res 10:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marin IN (2013) New data on the distribution of hairly-clawed shore crabs of the genus Hemigrapsus (Decapoda: Varunidae) along the Russian mainland coast of the Sea of Japan. Rus J Mar Biol 39:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markert A, Raupach MJ, Segelken-Voigt A, Wehrmann A (2014) Molecular identification and morphological characteristics of native and invasive Asian brush-clawed crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura) from Japanese and German coasts: Hemigrapsus penicillatus (De Haan, 1835) versus Hemigrapsus takanoi Asakura & Watanabe 2005. Org Divers Ecol 14:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mingkid WM, Akiwa S, Watanabe S (2006) Morphological characteristics, pigmentation, and distribution of the sibling penicillate crabs, Hemigrapsus penicillatus (De Haan, 1835) and H. takanoi Asakura & Watanabe, 2005 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Grapsidae) in Tokyo Bay. Crustaceana 79:1107–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miura O (2007) Molecular genetic approaches to elucidate the ecological and evolutionary issues associated with biological invasions. Ecol Res 22:876–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Molnar JL, Gamboa RL, Revenga C, Spalding MD (2008) Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Front Ecol Environ 6:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niwa N, Sanagawa H, Otani M (2012) Neoeriocheir leptognathus found on Chinese commercial fishing bait known as “Isogani”. Cancer 21:53–55 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  37. Noël PY, Tardy E, d’Udekem d‘Acoz C (1997) Will the crab Hemigrapsus penicillatus invade the coasts of Europe? Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris, Sciences de la Vie/Life Sciences 320:741–745Google Scholar
  38. Nunes AL, Katsanevakis S, Zenetos A, Cardoso AC (2014) Gateways to alien invasions in the European seas. Aquat Invasions 9:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ohba T, Kato M, Kitazato H, Koizumi I, Omura A, Sakai T, Takayama T (1991) Paleoenvironmental changes in the Japan Sea during the last 85,000 years. Paleoceanography 6:499–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Okamoto K, Kurihara Y (1987) Seasonal variation of population structure of Hemigrapsus penicillatus (De Haan) (Crustacea: Brachyura). Jpn J Ecol 37:81–89 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  41. Omura T, Noma T, Kitabayashi K, Yoshida K, Saito H (2014) Current status of ballast water and aquatic organisms transferred from and to Japan. La Mer 52:13–22 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  42. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Pillay KK, Ono Y (1978) The breeding cycles of two species of grapsid crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the north coast of Kyushu, Japan. Mar Biol 45:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  46. Rius M, Turon X, Bernardi G, Volckaert FAM, Viard F (2015) Marine invasion genetics: from spatio-temporal patterns to evolutionary outcomes. Biol Invasions 17:869–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schubart CD, Cuesta JA, Rodríguez A (2001) Molecular phylogeny of the crab genus Brachynotus (Brachyura: Varunidae) based on the 16S rRNA gene. Hydrobiologia 449:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seebens H, Gastner MT, Blasius B (2013) The risk of marine bioinvasion caused by global shipping. Ecol Lett 16:782–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Simon-Bouhet B, Garcia-Meunier P, Viard F (2006) Multiple introductions promote range expansion of the mollusc Cyclope neritea (Nassariidae) in France: evidence from mitochondrial sequence data. Mol Ecol 15:1699–1711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2008) ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:2498–2504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Tada R (1994) Paleoceanographic evolution of the Japan Sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 188:487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takano M, Ikeda M, Kijima A (1997) Biochemical and morphological evidence of two sympatric forms, interpreted as sibling species, in the estuarine grapsid crab Hemigrapsus penicillatus (De Haan). Benthos Res 52:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagner NK, Ochocki BM, Crawford KM, Compagnoni A, Miller TEX (2017) Genetic mixture of multiple source populations accelerates invasive range expansion. J Anim Ecol 86:21–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wood CA, Bishop JDD, Davies CJ, Delduca EL, Hatton JC, Herbert RJH, Clark PF (2015) Hemigrapsus takanoi Asakura & Watanabe, 2005 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsoidea): first records of the brush-clawed shore crab from Great Britain. BioInvasions Rec 4:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yamamoto K (2003) Furansu wo sukutta Nippon no kaki. Shogakkan Square, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  59. Yamasaki I, Doi W, Mingkid WM, Yokota M, Strüssmann CA, Watanabe S (2011) Molecular-based method to distinguish the sibling species Hemigrapsus penicillatus and Hemigrapsus takanoi (Decapoda: Brachyura: Varunidae). J Crust Biol 31:577–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zibrowis H (1991) Ongoing modification of the Mediterranean marine fauna and flora, by the establishment of exotic species. Mésogée 51:83–107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Life SciencesTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture and Marine ScienceKochi UniversityNankokuJapan

Personalised recommendations