Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 3515–3526 | Cite as

Urban trees: bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection

  • Trudy PaapEmail author
  • Treena I. Burgess
  • Michael J. Wingfield
URBAN INVASIONS

Abstract

Urban trees have been increasingly appreciated for the many benefits they provide. As concentrated hubs of human-mediated movement, the urban landscape is, however, often the first point of contact for exotic pests including insects and plant pathogens. Consequently, urban trees can be important for accidentally introduced forest pests to become established and potentially invasive. Reductions in biodiversity and the potential for stressful conditions arising from anthropogenic disturbances can predispose these trees to pest attack, further increasing the likelihood of exotic forest pests becoming established and increasing in density. Once established in urban environments, dispersal of introduced pests can proceed to natural forest landscapes or planted forests. In addition to permanent long-term damage to natural ecosystems, the consequences of these invasions include costly attempts at eradication and post establishment management strategies. We discuss a range of ecological, economic and social impacts arising from these incursions and the importance of global biosecurity is highlighted as a crucially important barrier to pest invasions. Finally, we suggest that urban trees may be viewed as ‘sentinel plantings’. In particular, botanical gardens and arboreta frequently house large collections of exotic plantings, providing a unique opportunity to help predict and prevent the invasion of new pests, and where introduced pests with the capacity to cause serious impacts in forest environments could potentially be detected during the initial stages of establishment. Such early detection offers the only realistic prospect of eradication, thereby reducing damaging ecological impacts and long term management costs.

Keywords

Biological invasions Biosecurity Invasion pathways Pathogens Pests Sentinel plants Urban trees 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper had its origins at a workshop on ‘Non-native species in urban environments’ hosted and funded by the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (CIB) in Stellenbosch, South Africa, in November 2016. We thank Duccio Migliorini for useful discussion on the movement of pathogens through nursery stock. This work was funded by the South African National Department of Environmental Affairs.

References

  1. Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos AR (2012) The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urban For Urban Green 11:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aukema JE, McCullough DG, Von Holle B et al (2010) Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 60:886–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aukema JE, Leung B, Kovacs K et al (2011) Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. PLoS ONE 6:e24587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Barham E (2016) The unique role of sentinel trees, botanic gardens and arboreta in safeguarding global plant health. Plant Biosyst 150:377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barham E, Sharrock S, Lane C et al (2016) The international plant sentinel network: a tool for regional and national plant protection organizations. EPPO Bull 46:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett LG, Thrall PH, Burdon JJ et al (2008) Life history determines genetic structure and evolutionary potential of host-parasite interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 23:678–685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw CJA, Leroy B, Bellard C et al (2016) Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects. Nat Commun 7:12986CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brasier CM (2008) The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol 57:792–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brasier C, Denman S, Brown A et al (2004) Sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum) discovered on trees in Europe. Mycol Res 108:1108–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brasier CM, Beales PA, Kirk SA et al (2005) Phytophthora kernoviae sp. nov., an invasive pathogen causing bleeding stem lesions on forest trees and foliar necrosis of ornamentals in the UK. Mycol Res 109:853–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Britton K, White P, Kramer A et al (2010) A new approach to stopping the spread of invasive insects and pathogens: early dection and rapid response via a global network of sentinel plantings. N Z J For Sci 40:109–114Google Scholar
  13. Brockerhoff EG, Kimberley M, Liebhold AM et al (2014) Predicting how altering propagule pressure changes establishment rates of biological invaders across species pools. Ecology 95:594–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ (2017) Pathogens on the move: a 100-year global experiment with planted eucalypts. Bioscience 67:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chavez V, Parnell S, Bosch F (2015) Designing strategies for epidemic control in a tree nursery: the case of ash dieback in the UK. Forests 6:4135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christie FJ, Hochuli DF (2005) Elevated levels of herbivory in urban landscapes: are declines in tree health more than an edge effect? Ecol Soc 10:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, Harrington TC et al (2001) The root rot fungus Armillaria mellea introduced into South Africa by early Dutch settlers. Mol Ecol 10:387–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Colunga-Garcia M, Magarey RA, Haack RA et al (2010) Enhancing early detection of exotic pests in agricultural and forest ecosystems using an urban-gradient framework. Ecol Appl 20:303–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Crous PW, Groenewald JZ (2005) Hosts, species and genotypes: opinions versus data. Australas Plant Path 34:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Slippers B et al (2016) Global food and fibre security threatened by current inefficiencies in fungal identification. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20160024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davison EM, Drenth A, Kumar S et al (2006) Pathogens associated with nursery plants imported into Western Australia. Australas Plant Path 35:473–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Desprez-Loustau M-L, Robin C, Buée M et al (2007) The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:472–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Desprez-Loustau M-L, Courtecuisse R, Robin C et al (2010) Species diversity and drivers of spread of alien fungi (sensu lato) in Europe with a particular focus on France. Biol Invasions 12:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 99:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke CR (2014) Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol Indic 43:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dodds KJ, Orwig DA (2011) An invasive urban forest pest invades natural environments—Asian longhorned beetle in northeastern US hardwood forests. Can J For Res 41:1729–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Donaldson JE, Hui C, Richardson DM et al (2014) Invasion trajectory of alien trees: the role of introduction pathway and planting history. Glob Chang Biol 20:1527–1537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Donovan GH, Butry DT, Michael YL et al (2013) The relationship between trees and human health. Am J Prev Med 44:139–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Engelbrecht CJB, Harrington TC, Steimel J et al (2004) Genetic variation in eastern North American and putatively introduced populations of Ceratocystis fimbriata f. platani. Mol Ecol 13:2995–3005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Epanchin-Niell RS, Haight RG, Berec L et al (2012) Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Lett 15:803–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Eschen R, Britton K, Brockerhoff E et al (2015a) International variation in phytosanitary legislation and regulations governing importation of plants for planting. Environ Sci Policy 51:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eschen R, Rigaux L, Sukovata L et al (2015b) Phytosanitary inspection of woody plants for planting at European Union entry points: a practical enquiry. Biol Invasions 17:2403–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Faccoli M, Gatto P (2015) Analysis of costs and benefits of Asian longhorned beetle eradication in Italy. Forestry 89:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fagan L, Bithell S, Dick M (2008) Systems for identifying invasive threats to New Zealand flora by using overseas plantings of New Zealand native plants. Surveillence for biosecurity: pre-border to pest management. New Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc), AucklandGoogle Scholar
  35. Gaertner M, Larson BMH, Irlich UM et al (2016) Managing invasive species in cities: a framework from Cape Town, South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan 151:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ganley RJ, Bulman LS (2016) Dutch elm disease in New Zealand: impacts from eradication and management programmes. Plant Pathol 65:1047–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goss EM, Larsen M, Vercauteren A et al (2010) Phytophthora ramorum in Canada: evidence for migration within North America and from Europe. Phytopathology 101:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Groenteman R, Forgie SA, Hoddle MS et al (2015) Assessing invasion threats: novel insect-pathogen-natural enemy associations with native New Zealand plants in southern California. Biol Invasions 17:1299–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grote R, Samson R, Alonso R et al (2016) Functional traits of urban trees: air pollution mitigation potential. Front Ecol Environ 14:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grünwald NJ, Garbelotto M, Goss EM et al (2012) Emergence of the sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Trends Microbiol 20:131–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Haack RA, Hérard F, Sun J et al (2010) Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: a worldwide perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 55:521–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Haack RA, Britton KO, Brockerhoff EG et al (2014) Effectiveness of the international phytosanitary standard ISPM No. 15 on reducing wood borer infestation rates in wood packaging material entering the United States. PLoS ONE 9:e96611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Haight RG, Homans FR, Horie T et al (2011) Assessing the cost of an invasive forest pathogen: a case study with oak wilt. Environ Manag 47:506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jung T, Orlikowski L, Henricot B et al (2016) Widespread Phytophthora infestations in European nurseries put forest, semi-natural and horticultural ecosystems at high risk of Phytophthora diseases. For Pathol 46:134–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keller RP, Lodge DM, Finnoff DC (2007) Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:203–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Klapwijk MJ, Hopkins AJM, Eriksson L et al (2016) Reducing the risk of invasive forest pests and pathogens: combining legislation, targeted management and public awareness. Ambio 45:223–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Kovacs KF, Haight RG, McCullough DG et al (2010) Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019. Ecol Econ 69:569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kovacs K, Václavík T, Haight RG et al (2011a) Predicting the economic costs and property value losses attributed to sudden oak death damage in California (2010–2020). J Environ Manag 92:1292–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kovacs KF, Mercader RJ, Haight RG et al (2011b) The influence of satellite populations of emerald ash borer on projected economic costs in U.S. communities, 2010–2020. J Environ Manag 92:2170–2181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kuo FE (2003) The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. J Arboric 29:148Google Scholar
  53. Lane CR, Beales PA, Hughes KJD et al (2003) First outbreak of Phytophthora ramorum in England, on Viburnum tinus. Plant Pathol 52:414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leung B, Springborn MR, Turner JA et al (2014) Pathway-level risk analysis: the net present value of an invasive species policy in the US. Front Ecol Environ 12:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liebhold AM, MacDonald WL, Bergdahl D et al (1995) Invasion by exotic forest pests: a threat to forest ecosystems. For Sci 41:1–49Google Scholar
  56. Liebhold AM, Brockerhoff EG, Garrett LJ et al (2012) Live plant imports: the major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US. Front Ecol Environ 10:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Liebhold AM, McCullough DG, Blackburn LM et al (2013) A highly aggregated geographical distribution of forest pest invasions in the USA. Divers Distrib 19:1208–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liebhold AM, Berec L, Brockerhoff EG et al (2016) Eradication of invading insect populations: from concepts to applications. Annu Rev Entomol 61:335–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lombaert E, Guillemaud T, Cornuet J-M et al (2010) Bridgehead effect in the worldwide invasion of the biocontrol harlequin ladybird. PLoS ONE 5:e9743CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Loo JA (2009) Ecological impacts of non-indigenous invasive fungi as forest pathogens. Biol Invasions 11:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lovett GM, Weiss M, Liebhold AM et al (2016) Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: impacts and policy options. Ecol Appl 26:1437–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. MacFarlane DW, Meyer SP (2005) Characteristics and distribution of potential ash tree hosts for emerald ash borer. For Ecol Manag 213:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McCullough DG, Work TT, Cavey JF et al (2006) Interceptions of nonindigenous plant pests at US ports of entry and border crossings over a 17-year period. Biol Invasions 8:611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Migliorini D, Ghelardini L, Tondini E et al (2015) The potential of symptomless potted plants for carrying invasive soilborne plant pathogens. Divers Distrib 21:1218–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mitchell RJ, Beaton JK, Bellamy PE et al (2014) Ash dieback in the UK: a review of the ecological and conservation implications and potential management options. Biol Conserv 175:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morin RS, Liebhold AM, Pugh SA, Crocker SJ (2017) Regional assessment of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, impacts in forests of the Eastern United States. Biol Invasions 19:703–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Green 4:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ocasio-Morales RG, Tsopelas P, Harrington TC (2007) Origin of Ceratocystis platani on native Platanus orientalis in Greece and its impact on natural forests. Plant Dis 91:901–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pautasso M, Aas G, Queloz V et al (2013) European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback: a conservation biology challenge. Biol Conserv 158:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pautasso M, Schlegel M, Holdenrieder O (2015) Forest health in a changing world. Microb Ecol 69:826–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Pereyra PJ (2016) Revisiting the use of the invasive species concept: an empirical approach. Austral Ecol 41:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 104:118–124Google Scholar
  75. Ramsfield T, Bentz B, Faccoli M et al (2016) Forest health in a changing world: effects of globalization and climate change on forest insect and pathogen impacts. Forestry 89:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rassati D, Faccoli M, Petrucco Toffolo E et al (2015) Improving the early detection of alien wood-boring beetles in ports and surrounding forests. J Appl Ecol 52:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Raupp MJ, Cumming AB, Raupp EC (2006) Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboric Urban For 32:297Google Scholar
  78. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Carlton JT (2011) A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology. The legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley, Oxford, pp 409–420Google Scholar
  79. Rizzo DM, Garbelotto M, Hansen EM (2005) Phytophthora ramorum: integrative research and management of an emerging pathogen in California and Oregon forests. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:309–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Roques A, J-t Fan, Courtial B et al (2015) Planting sentinel European trees in Eastern Asia as a novel method to identify potential insect pest invaders. PLoS ONE 10:e0120864CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Roy BA, Alexander HM, Davidson J et al (2014) Increasing forest loss worldwide from invasive pests requires new trade regulations. Front Ecol Environ 12:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Santini A, Ghelardini L, De Pace C et al (2013) Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytol 197:238–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Schrader G, Unger J-G (2003) Plant quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the framework of the international plant protection convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biol Invasions 5:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scott P, Burgess T, Hardy G (2013) Globalisation and Phytophthora. In: Lamour K (ed) Phytophthora: a global perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Siegert NW, McCullough DG, Liebhold AM et al (2014) Dendrochronological reconstruction of the epicentre and early spread of emerald ash borer in North America. Divers Distrib 20:847–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stagoll K, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E et al (2012) Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv Lett 5:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stenlid J, Oliva J, Boberg JB et al (2011) Emerging diseases in European forest ecosystems and responses in society. Forests 2:486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tomoshevich M, Kirichenko N, Holmes K et al (2013) Foliar fungal pathogens of European woody plants in Siberia: an early warning of potential threats? For Pathol 43:345–359Google Scholar
  90. Tubby KV, Webber JF (2010) Pests and diseases threatening urban trees under a changing climate. Forestry 83:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vettraino A, Roques A, Yart A et al (2015) Sentinel trees as a tool to forecast invasions of alien plant pathogens. PLoS ONE 10:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Webber JF, Mullettm M, Brasier CM (2010) Dieback and mortality of plantation Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) associated with infection by Phytophthora ramorum. New Dis Rep 22:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wingfield MJ, Coetzee MPA, Crous PW et al (2010) Fungal phoenix rising from the ashes? IMA Fungus 1:149–153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Wingfield MJ, Brockerhoff EG, Wingfield BD et al (2015) Planted forest health: the need for a global strategy. Science 349:832–836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trudy Paap
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Treena I. Burgess
    • 1
    • 3
  • Michael J. Wingfield
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI)University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity InstituteKirstenbosch Research CentreCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management, School of Veterinary and Life SciencesMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations