Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 2261–2276 | Cite as

Reconstructing the introduction history of an invasive fish predator in South Africa

  • John S. Hargrove
  • Olaf L. F. Weyl
  • James D. Austin
Original Paper

Abstract

The Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) is a global invader with demonstrated ecological impacts on native fish communities. Introductions of fishes in freshwater ecosystems are often characterized as complex processes, yet an understanding of the nature of the introduction can inform management and conservation actions. Early in the twentieth century, two introductions of Largemouth Bass were made into South Africa for the establishment of a recreational fishery, and subsequent translocations have expanded their distribution to include much of southern Africa. In this study we quantified neutral genetic variation, modeled potential introduction scenarios, and identified potential source regions from within the native range. We documented limited levels of genetic diversity in nuclear microsatellite genotypes across populations (mean allelic richness = 1.80 and mean observed heterozygosity = 0.16) and observed low levels of genetic differentiation among four of the five focal populations (mean pairwise fixation index = 0.09), with a fifth population displaying greater levels of genetic divergence (mean pairwise fixation index = 0.27). A total of three cytochrome b haplotypes were recovered from South Africa samples and the single most common haplotype (93% of individuals) was identical to a haplotype from a population of Largemouth Bass in Maryland, USA. Using limited available stocking data along with outputs from Principal Component Analysis and approximate Bayesian evaluation of competing introduction scenarios we confirm the presence of multiple introductions. Despite evidence for multiple introductions, Largemouth Bass in South African water bodies harbor extremely low neutral genetic diversity, suggesting that even a very limited number of propagules can experience a high likelihood of success in invading nonnative waters.

Keywords

Invasion reconstruction Microsatellite Freshwater fish Centrarchidae DIYABC 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the National Research Foundation of South Africa National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF, UID: 77444) and the Department of Science and Technology/NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (CIB). Micheal Allen and three anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments that greatly improved the quality of this manuscript. A.N. Carr is thanked for assistance in generating maps. M.Fedler and C.R. Carneiro are thanked for their help with lab work. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources was incredibly helpful in tracking down key references regarding bass propagation and distributions in Maryland. Financial assistance for JSH was provided by the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida (UF), the UF Center for African Studies, the Jeanne and Hunt Davis Graduate Research Award, and the UF International Center Research Abroad for Graduate Students Program.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1437_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplemental Table 1 Details of microsatellite primers and multiplex PCR conditions used to generate genotype profiles for Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) sampled from South Africa. The quantities of Qiagen mastermix (7.5 µL) and DNA (1 µL @ 20 ng/µL) were identical for all multiplex reactions with varying amounts of water added to create a total reaction volume equal to 15 µL (DOCX 18 kb)
10530_2017_1437_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplemental Table 2 List of cytochrome b gene sequences from Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) and Florida Bass (Micropterus floridanus) used to explore relationships among introduced (South African) and native populations (DOCX 22 kb)
10530_2017_1437_MOESM3_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplemental Table 3 Summary statistics for nine microsatellite loci (and their associated GenBank accession numbers) used to characterize the levels of genetic diversity in invasive populations of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) collected from five South African water bodies (DOCX 24 kb)
10530_2017_1437_MOESM4_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplemental Table 4 Frequency of alleles for all loci used to examine the genetic characteristics of invasive Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) in South Africa (DOCX 19 kb)

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Lundquist LL (2003) Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv Biol 17:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai J, Lutz-Carrillo DJ, Quan Y et al (2008) Taxonomic status and genetic diversity of cultured largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides in China. Aquaculture 278:27–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS et al (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3:e3376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthel BL, Lutz-Carrillo DJ, Norberg KE et al (2010) Genetic relationships among populations of Florida Bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:1615–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GC (1983) The fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  7. Britton JR, Harper DM, Oyugi DO (2010) Is the fast growth of an equatorial Micropterus salmoides population explained by high water temperature? Ecol Freshw Fish 19:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cambray JA (2003) Impact on indigenous species biodiversity caused by the globalisation of alien recreational freshwater fisheries. Hydrobiologia 500:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cambray JA, Stuart CT (1985) Aspects of the biology of a rare redfin minnow, Barbus burchelli (Pisces, Cyprinidae), from South Africa. S Afr J Zool 20:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapple DG, Whitaker AH, Chapple SNJ et al (2012) Biosecurity interceptions of an invasive lizard: origin of stowaways and human-assisted spread within New Zealand. Evol Appl 6:324–339CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornuet J-M, Pudlo P, Veyssier J et al (2014) DIYABC v2.0: a software to make approximate Bayesian computation inferences about population history using single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA sequence and microsatellite data. Bioinformatics 8:1187–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cristescu ME (2015) Genetic reconstructions of invasion history. Mol Ecol 24:2212–2225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Darling JA (2015) Genetic studies of aquatic biological invasions: closing the gap between research and management. Biol Invasions 17:951–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeMoor I, Bruton M (1988) Atlas of Alien and translocated indigenous aquatic animals in Southern Africa. CSIR, National Scientific Programmes Unit, Delhi, p 317Google Scholar
  16. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dlugosch KM, Anderson SR, Braasch J et al (2015) The devil is in the details: genetic variation in introduced populations and its contributions to invasion. Mol Ecol 24:2095–2111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Driscoll MT, Schramm H, Hunt KM (2012) Trends in fishery agency assessments of black bass tournaments in the southeastern United States. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of Southeastern association of fisheries and wildlife agencies, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  19. Edwards AWF (1971) Distances between populations on the basis of gene frequencies. Biometrics 27:873–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellender BR, Weyl OL (2014) A review of current knowledge, risk and ecological impacts associated with non-native freshwater fish introductions in South Africa. Aquat Invasions 9:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellender BR, Woodford DJ, Weyl OLF et al (2014) Managing conflicts arising from fisheries enhancements based on non-native fishes in southern Africa. J Fish Biol 85:1890–1906CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Estoup A, Guillemaud T (2010) Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: Why, how and so what? Mol Ecol 19:4113–4130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaskin JF, Bon M-C, Cock MJW et al (2011) Applying molecular-based approaches to classical biological control of weeds. Biol Control 58:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gratwicke B, Marshall BE (2001) The relationship between the exotic predators Micropterus salmoides and Serranochromis robustus and native stream fishes in Zimbabwe. J Fish Biol 58:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hargrove JS, Austin JD (2016) Parentage and mating patterns in a Florida Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides floridanus) hatchery. Aquac Res. doi: 10.1111/are.13051 Google Scholar
  27. Hargrove JS, Weyl OLF, Allen MS et al (2015) Using tournament angler data to rapidly assess the invasion status of alien sport fishes (Micropterus spp.) in Southern Africa. PLoS ONE 10:e0130056CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrison AC (1936) Black bass in the Cape Province: second report on the progress of American largemouth black bass (Micropterus salmoides, Lacepede). South Africa Division of Fisheries Investigational Report, Pretoria, p 119Google Scholar
  29. Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heidinger RC (1975) Life history and biology of the largemouth bass. In: Stroud RH, Clepper H (eds) Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, pp 11–20Google Scholar
  31. Heidinger RC (2000) A White paper on the status and needs of Largemouth bass culture in the North Central Region. North Central Region Aquaculture Center, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  32. Ivanova NV, Dewaard JR, Hebert PDN (2006) An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 6:998–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson DA (2002) Ecological effects of Micropterus introductions: the dark side of black bass. In: Phillip DP, Ridgway MS (eds) Black bass: ecology, conservation, and management. American fisheries society symposium 31. Bethesda, Rockville, pp 221–232Google Scholar
  34. James NC, Whitfield AK, Cowley PD (2008) Long-term stability of the fish assemblages in a warm-temperate South African estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:723–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jost LOU (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kalinowski ST, Muhlfeld CC, Guy CS et al (2010) Founding population size of an aquatic invasive species. Conserv Genet 11:2049–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ (2014) Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:e281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kassler T, Koppelman J, Near T et al (2002) Molecular and morphological analyses of the black basses: implications for taxonomy and conservation. American Fisheries Society Symposium. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 291–322Google Scholar
  41. Kawamura K, Yonekura R, Katano O et al (2006) Origin and dispersal of bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus, in Japan and Korea. Mol Ecol 15:613–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A et al (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kinziger A, Nakamoto R, Harvey B (2014) Local-scale invasion pathways and small founder numbers in introduced Sacramento pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus grandis). Conserv Genet 15:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee DS, Norden A, Gilbert CR (1981) A revised list of the freshwater fishes of Maryland and Delaware. In: Southeastern fishes council proceedings, pp 205–211Google Scholar
  45. Leng L, Zhang D (2011) Measuring population differentiation using G ST or D? A simulation study with microsatellite DNA markers under a finite island model and nonequilibrium conditions. Mol Ecol Resour 20:2494–2509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Long J, Allen M, Porak W et al. (2015) A historical perspective of black bass management in the United States. In: American Fisheries Society Symposium, pp 99–122Google Scholar
  47. Loppnow GL, Vascotto K, Venturelli PA (2013) Invasive smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu): history, impacts, and control. Manag Biol Invasions 4:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lorenzoni M, Martin Dörr AJ, Erra R et al (2002) Growth and reproduction of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides Lacépède, 1802) in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy). Fish Res 56:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S et al (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  50. Lowe SR, Woodford DJ, Impson DN et al (2008) The impact of invasive fish and invasive riparian plants on the invertebrate fauna of the Rondegat River, Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Afr J Aquatic Sci 33:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM et al (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89:238–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. MacCrimmon HR, Robbins WH (1975) Distribution of the black basses in North America. In: Stroud RH, Clepper H (eds) Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, pp 56–66Google Scholar
  53. McCafferty J, Ellender B, Weyl O et al (2012) The use of water resources for inland fisheries in South Africa. Water SA 38:327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muirhead JR, Gray DK, Kelly DW et al (2008) Identifying the source of species invasions: sampling intensity vs. genetic diversity. Mol Ecol 17:1020–1035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers RA, Allen MS (2005) Factors related to angler catch of trophy largemouth bass in Texas reservoirs. Lake Reserv Manag 21:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Near TJ, Kassler TW, Koppelman JB et al (2003) Speciation in North American black basses, Micropterus (Actinopterygii: Centrarchidae). Evolution 57:1610–1621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Noble RL (2002) Reflections on 25 years of progress in black bass management. In: Philipp D, Ridgway M (eds) Black bass: ecology, conservation, and management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 419–431Google Scholar
  59. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peery MZ, Kirby R, Reid BN et al (2012) Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol Ecol 21:3403–3418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Philipp DP, Childers WF, Whitt GS (1983) A biochemical genetic evaluation of the northern and Florida subspecies of largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 112:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1999) Computer note. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Powell AM (1967) Historical information of Maryland commission of fisheries: with some notes on game. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  64. Quinn S, Paukert C (2009) Centrarchid fisheries. In: Cooke S, Philipp D (eds) Centrarchid fishes diversity, biology and conservation. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 312–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  66. Ribeiro F, Collares-Pereira MJ (2010) Life-history variability of non-native centrarchids in regulated river systems of the lower River Guadiana drainage (south-west Iberian Peninsula). J Fish Biol 76:522–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rius M, Turon X, Ordóñez V et al (2012) Tracking invasion histories in the sea: facing complex scenarios using multilocus data. PLoS ONE 7:e35815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Schramm HL, Hunt KM (2007) Issues, benefits, and problems associated with fishing tournaments in inland waters of the United States: a survey of fishery agency administrators. Fisheries 32:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seyoum S, Barthel B, Tringali M et al (2013) Isolation and characterization of eighteen microsatellite loci for the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, and cross amplification in congeneric species. Conserv Genetic Resour 5:697–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Skelton PH, Cambray JA, Lombard A et al (1995) Patterns of distribution and conservation status of freshwater fishes in South Africa. S Afr J Zool 30:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Takamura K (2007) Performance as a fish predator of largemouth bass [Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède)] invading Japanese freshwaters: a review. Ecol Res 22:940–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N et al (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor GC, Weyl OL, van Wyk J (2012) Otoliths versus scales: evaluating the most suitable structure for ageing largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, in South Africa. Afr Zool 47:358–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dolédec S et al (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Trippel NA, Hargrove JS, Leone EH, et al. (In Press) Angling-induced impacts on recruitment and contribution to reproduction in Florida Bass, Micropterus floridanus. Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyGoogle Scholar
  78. Truitt RV, Bean BA, Fowler HW (1929) The fishes of Maryland. State of Maryland Conservation Department, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  79. Uller T, Leimu R (2011) Founder events predict changes in genetic diversity during human-mediated range expansions. Glob Change Biol 17:3478–3485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. U.S. Department of Interior (2011) National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. United States Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM et al (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Watling R, Watling H (1983) Metal surveys in South African estuaries VII Bushmans, Kariega, Kowie and Great Fish Rivers. Water SA 9:66–70Google Scholar
  83. Welcomme R (1988) International introduction of aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 294. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  84. Weyl OL, Hecht T (1999) A successful population of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, in a subtropical lake in Mozambique. Environ Biol Fishes 54:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weyl OL, Lewis H (2006) First record of predation by the alien invasive freshwater fish Micropterus salmoides L. (Centrarchidae) on migrating estuarine fishes in South Africa. Afr Zool 41:294–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weyl PS, De Moor F, Hill M et al (2010) The effect of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides on aquatic macro-invertebrate communities in the Wit River, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 35:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weyl OLF, Ellender BR, Woodford DJ et al (2013) Fish distributions in the Rondegat River, Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, and the immediate impact of rotenone treatment in an invaded reach. Afr J Aquat Sci 38:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weyl OLF, Finlayson B, Impson ND et al (2014) Threatened endemic fishes in South Africa’s cape floristic region: a new beginning for the Rondegat River. Fisheries 39:270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wildlife Ecology and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB)GrahamstownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Center for Invasion BiologySAIABGrahamstownSouth Africa
  4. 4.Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations