Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 307–314 | Cite as

Do freshwater aquaculture facilities provide an invasion risk for zooplankton hitchhikers?

  • Ian C. Duggan
  • Steve G. Pullan
Original Paper

Abstract

While numerous examples exist of freshwater species from aquaculture facilities establishing non-indigenous populations following intentional release, and unintentional escape, clear links between invasions of non-target ‘hitchhiker’ species and this vector are to date are far less convincing. We examined zooplankton from nine New Zealand fish farms, including those with traditional outdoor pond systems, modern Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS), and of zooplankton cultured as food for fish, to determine the prevalence of non-indigenous species among these facilities. Several non-indigenous species were found during our surveys, from all three sources, indicating that freshwater aquaculture provides invasion risks for non-native zooplankton in a variety of ways. Significantly, the North American calanoid copepod Skistodiaptomus pallidus was recorded at five farms with pond operations, greatly strengthening the link between the establishment of this species in New Zealand lakes with the release of grass carp for aquatic weed control. Traditional pond systems were commonly found to contain large populations of non-indigenous species, with risk seemingly greatest where fish are released from these operations. RAS operations contained relatively low numbers of individuals overall, suggesting a movement to this form of aquaculture from pond systems will greatly reduce the invasion risk from the freshwater aquaculture industry. We recommend a tightening of regulations regarding fish release from aquaculture ponds, following the determination of best practice methods to reduce the potential movement of hitchhiking taxa.

Keywords

Freshwater aquaculture Incidental fauna Zooplankton Grass carp Goldfish 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Natasha Grainger from the Department of Conservation for facilitating this research, the fish farm owners for allowing access to their facilities, and Blake Abernethy (MPI) and Robert Hutton aid in sample collection.

References

  1. Alfonso G, Belmonte G (2008) Expanding distribution of Boeckella triarticulata (Thomson 1883) (Copepoda: Calanoida: Centropagidae) in Southern Italy. Aquat Invasions 3:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks CM, Duggan IC (2009) Lake construction has facilitated calanoid copepod invasions in New Zealand. Divers Distrib 15:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartley DM (2011) Aquaculture. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 27–32Google Scholar
  4. Breber P (2002) Introduction and acclimatisation of the Pacific Carpet Clam, Tapes philippinarum, to Italian Waters. In: Leppakoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe—distribution, impact and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman MA, Lewis MH, Winterbourn MJ (2011) Guide to the freshwater Crustacea of New Zealand. New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society, Christchurch, p 188Google Scholar
  6. Duggan IC (2010) The freshwater aquarium trade as a vector for incidental invertebrate fauna. Biol Invasions 12:3757–3770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duggan IC, Duggan KS (2011) Are botanical gardens a risk for zooplankton invasions? Biol Invasions 13:2997–3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duggan IC, Green JD, Burger DF (2006) First New Zealand records of three non-indigenous zooplankton species: Skistodiaptomus pallidus, Sinodiaptomus valkanovi and Daphnia dentifera. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 40:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duggan IC, Neale MW, Robinson KV, Verburg P, Watson NTN (2014) Skistodiaptomus pallidus (Copepoda: Diaptomidae) establishment in New Zealand natural lakes, and its effects on zooplankton community composition. Aquat Invasions 9:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrari I, Rossetti G (2006) New records of the centropagid Boeckella triarticulata (Thomson, 1883) (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Northern Italy: evidence of a successful invasion? Aquat Invasions 1:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrari I, Farabegoli A, Pugnetti A, Stella E (1991) The occurrence of a calanoid Australasian species, Boeckella triarticulata (Thomson), in fish ponds of Northern Italy. Verh Int Verein für Limnol 24:2822–2827Google Scholar
  12. Fuller PL, Nico LG, Williams JD (1999) Non-indigenous fishes introduced into Inland Waters of the United States. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 27, Bethesda, p 622Google Scholar
  13. Grosholz ED, Crafton E, Fontana RE, Pasari JR, Williams SL, Zabin CJ (2015) Aquaculture as a vector for marine invasions in California. Biol Invasions 17:1471–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hine PM, Diggles DK (2005) Import risk analysis: ornamental fish. Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstra D (2014) Grass carp effectiveness and effects. NIWA client report for the Department of Conservation: HAM2014-060Google Scholar
  16. Jha P, Barat S, Nayak CR (2008) Fish production, water quality and bacteriological parameters of koi carp ponds under live-food and manure based regimes. Zool Res 29:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirkagac MU (2004) A study on zooplankton of a grass carp nursing pond. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 10:462–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lang K (1948) Monographie der harpacticiden. Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri, Lund, p 1683Google Scholar
  19. Lawson TB (1995) Fundamentals of aquacultural engineering. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, pp 192–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ludwig GM (1993) Effects of trichlorofon, fenthion, and diflubenzuron on the zooplankton community and on production of reciprocal-cross hybrid striped bass fry in culture ponds. Aquaculture 110:301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martins CIM, Eding EH, Verdegem MCJ, Heinsbroea LTN, Schneider O, Blancheton JP, Roque d’Orbcastel E, Verretha JAJ (2010) New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: a perspective on environmental sustainability. Aquac Eng 43:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milstein A, Valdenberg A, Harpaz S (2006) Fish larvae—zooplankton relationships in microcosm simulations of earthen nursery ponds. I. Freshwater system. Aquac Int 14:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Minchin D (2007) Aquaculture and transport in a changing environment: overlap and links in the spread of alien biota. Mar Pollut Bull 55:302–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell CP (1989) Laboratory culture of Galaxias maculatus and potential applications. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 23:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moyle RM (2013) Zooplankton of the Hauraki Gulf: a potential new tool for monitoring the health of coastal pelagic ecosystems. Unpublished MSc Thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  26. Orlova-Bienkowskaja MY (2001) Cladocera: Anomopoda: Daphniidae: Genus Simocephalus. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world, 17. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, p 130Google Scholar
  27. Papa RDS, Li H, Tordesillas DT, Han B, Dumont HJ (2012) Massive invasion of Arctodiaptomus dorsalis (Copepoda, Calanoida, Diaptomidae) in Philippine lakes: a threat to Asian zooplankton biodiversity? Biol Invasions 14:2471–2478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parkes SM, Duggan IC (2012) Are zooplankton invasions in constructed waters facilitated by simple communities? Divers Distrib 18:1199–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piasecki W, Goodwin AE, Eiras JC, Nowak BF (2004) Importance of Copepoda in freshwater aquaculture. Zool Stud 43:193–205Google Scholar
  30. Pullan SG (1984). Japanese Koi (Cyprinus carpio) in the Waikato River system. New Zealand Ministry of agriculture and fisheries internal report. Report No. 2.Google Scholar
  31. Rahman S, Hussain MA (2008) A study on the abundance of zooplankton of a culture and a non-culture pond on the Rajshahi University campus. Univ J Zool, Rajshahi Univ 27:35–41Google Scholar
  32. Reid JW (2007) Arctodiaptomus dorsalis (Marsh): a case history of copepod dispersal. Banisteria 30:3–18Google Scholar
  33. Taylor CM, Duggan IC (2012) Can biotic resistance be utilized to reduce establishment rates of non-indigenous species in constructed waters? Biol Invasions 14:307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tucker J (2012) Marine fish. In: Lucas JS, Southgate PC (eds) Marine fish in aquaculture: farming aquatic animals and plants. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, p 429Google Scholar
  35. Watson NTN, Duggan IC, Hogg ID (2015) Assessing the diversity of New Zealand freshwater harpacticoid copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda). N Z J Zool 42:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winters B (2012) That pommie bastard. Ocean Books, Mount Maunganui, p 209Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science, Environmental Research InstituteThe University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Ministry for Primary IndustriesAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations