Biological Invasions

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 1559–1566 | Cite as

Why not harvest existing invaders for bioethanol?

  • Lauren D. QuinnEmail author
  • A. Bryan Endres
  • Thomas B. Voigt
Perpectives and paradigms


Some ecologists and environmentalists have asked whether existing plant invaders could be used as sources of lignocellulosic ethanol, as an alternative to the introduction of potentially invasive non-native energy crops. Although the idea is tempting and could theoretically motivate the control or eradication of large invasive populations, we recognize that a number of major economic, logistic, and legal barriers currently prevent adoption of this plan. Here, we enumerate these barriers in detail, but conclude with an idealistic vision for the role of invasive biomass in the bioenergy industry.


Bioenergy Biofuel Biomass Biorefinery Ethanol Invasive Weed 



We acknowledge and thank James S.N. McCubbins and Elise C. Scott for their intellectual contributions toward this concept, and members of the Sustainable Bioenergy Network for stimulating discussions on the topic. This work was funded by the Energy Biosciences Institute.


  1. Baxter L (2005) Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy. Fuel 84:1295–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boland JM (2008) The roles of floods and bulldozers in the break up and dispersal of Arundo donax (giant reed). Madrono 55:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boose AB, Holt JS (1999) Environmental effects on asexual reproduction in Arundo donax. Weed Res 39:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley YM, Bolker BM, Rees M (2007) Disturbance, invasion and re-invasion: managing the weed-shaped hole in disturbed ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:809–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christen DC, Matlack GR (2009) The habitat and conduit functions of roads in the spread of three invasive plant species. Biol Invasions 11:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke S, Eng P, Preto F (2011) Biomass densification for energy production. Ontario ministry of agriculture, food, and rural affairs (OMAFRA) factsheet. Order no. 11-035, AGDEX 737/120Google Scholar
  7. Endres J (2013) Legitimacy, innovation, and harmonization: precursors to operationalizing biofuels sustainability standards. South Ill Law Rev 37:1–52Google Scholar
  8. Federal Register (2007) Environmental protection agency. Regulation of fuels and fuel additives: renewable fuel standard program; final rule. May 1, 2007. 72, No. 83:23900–24014Google Scholar
  9. Federal Register (2013) Regulation of fuels and fuel additives: additional qualifying renewable fuel pathways under the renewable fuel standard program; final rule Approving renewable fuel pathways for giant reed (Arundo donax) and napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum). July 11, 2013. 78:41703-41716Google Scholar
  10. Gerla P, Cornett M, Ekstein J et al (2012) Talking big: lessons learned from a 9000 hectare restoration in the Northern Tallgrass Prairie. Sustainability 4:3066–3087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giessow J, Casanova J, Leclerc R et al (2011) Arundo donax (giant reed): distribution and impact report. State Water Resrouces Control Board, Agreement No. 06-374-559-0Google Scholar
  12. Goldstein D (2013) Giant reed: getting rid of a problem weed and a problem waste. Ventura County Star. Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group, Camarillo Google Scholar
  13. Henderson S, Dawson TP, Whittaker RJ (2006) Progress in invasive plants research. Prog Phys Geogr 30:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herndon CW, Busby DP, Phillips AL (2008) Construction cost sensitivity of a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Dallas TexasGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess JR, Wright CT, Kenney KL (2007) Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin Biofpr 1:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IERCD (2010) Invasive species removal projects; summary for arundo, tamarisk, and castor bean removal. Inland Empire Resource Conservation District. Available online: Accessed 24 July 2013
  17. Jakubowski AR, Casler MD, Jackson RD (2010) The benefits of harvesting wetland invaders for cellulosic biofuel: an ecosystem services perspective. Restor Ecol 18:789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kettenring KM, Adams CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 48:970–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King D (2010) The future of industrial biorefineries. World Economic Forum white paper. Available at: Accessed 29 July 2012
  20. Krishnakumar P, Ileleji KE (2010) A comparative analysis of the economics and logistical requirements of different biomass feedstock types and forms for ethanol production. Appl Eng Agric 26:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambertucci SA, Speziale KL (2011) Protecting invaders for profit. Science 332:35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lane J (2012) Yecch, ptooey! The 13 oddest and strangest biofuels feedstocks. Biofuels Digest, June 4, 2012. Available at: Accessed 29 Oct 2013
  23. Leightley L (2012) The biomass/bioenergy industry in Virginia: a comment for the joint commission for energy and technology. Available at Content/Materials/Biomass.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2013
  24. McCubbins JSN, Endres AB, Quinn L et al (2013) Frayed seams in the “patchwork quilt” of American federalism: an empirical analysis of invasive plant species regulation. Environ Law 43:35–81Google Scholar
  25. Miao ZW, Shastri Y, Grift TE et al (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass feedstock transportation alternatives, logistics, equipment configurations, and modeling. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin Biofpr 6:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miceli TJ, Sirmans CF (2007) The holdout problem, urban sprawl, and eminent domain. J Hous Econ 16:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM et al (2000) Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:316–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen J, Diebold J, Walton T et al (2011) Converting riparian restoration waste to energy: testing tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) woody biomass as fuel for downdraft gasification. Ecol Restor 29:270–278Google Scholar
  29. Nunez MA, Kuebbing S, Dimarco RD et al (2012) Invasive species: to eat or not to eat, that is the question. Conserv Lett 5:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. PVWMA (2011) Platte Valley and West Central Weed Management Area’s invasive species control in the Central Platte River, 2008-2011 Summary. Available online: Quinn et al_Harvesting existing invaders_Biol InvR1a_BE.docx. Accessed 24 July 2013Google Scholar
  32. Quinn LD, Barney JN, McCubbins JSN et al (2013) Navigating the “noxious” and “invasive” regulatory landscape: suggestion for improved regulation. Bioscience 63:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renewable Fuels Association (2013) Biorefinery locations and feedstock types. Available at Accessed 19 July 2013
  34. Rindos E, Galli-Noble E, Bockness S (2012) Innovative conservation approaches to invasive plant management in the missouri river watershed—From invasive species prevention and control, to biomass utilization and bioenergy generation. Conservation Innovation Grant Semi-Annual Progress Report. April 1, 2012–December 31, 2012. Agreement #69-3A75-10-175Google Scholar
  35. Romano A, Henry B (2012) River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area: Southern Illinois Invasive Species Strike Team 2012 Annual Report. Available at Accessed 19 July 2013
  36. Rosen W (2012) DuPont advances commercialization of cellulosic ethanol with iowa biorefinery groundbreaking. DuPont Co. Press Release. Available at Accessed 24 July 2013
  37. Secchi S, Babcock BA (2007) Impact of high crop prices on environmental quality: a case of Iowa and the Conservation Reserve Program. Working Paper—Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Grime JP et al (2001) Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5-year invasion experiment using native species. J Ecol 89:1054–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Urgenson LS, Prozesky HE, Esler KJ (2013) Stakeholder perceptions of an ecosystem services approach to clearing invasive alien plants on private land. Ecol Soc 18:26Google Scholar
  40. US Department of Energy (2011) Billion-Ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. In: Perlack RD and Stokes BJ (eds) ORNL/TM-2011/224. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 227Google Scholar
  41. van Loo S, Koppejan J (2008) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Venere E (2010) Press release: New biofuels processing method for mobile facilities. University News Service, Purdue University. Available at: Accessed 2 Aug 2013
  43. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 21:986–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2008) Do cities export biodiversity? Traffic as dispersal vector across urban-rural gradients. Divers Distrib 14:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright LL (1994) Production technology status of woody and herbaceous crops. Biomass Bioenergy 6:191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young SL, Gopalakrishnan G, Keshwani DR (2011) Invasive plant species as potential bioenergy producers and carbon contributors. J Soil Water Conserv 66:45A–50ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zaleski O (2008) Biofuel feedstocks latest candidate: Kudzu. Huffington Post, 7/4/2008. Available at: Accessed 29 Oct 2013
  48. Zarnetske PL, Seabloom EW, Hacker SD (2010) Non-target effects of invasive species management: beachgrass, birds, and bulldozers in coastal dunes. Ecosphere 1:art13Google Scholar
  49. Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol Evol 16:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren D. Quinn
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Bryan Endres
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas B. Voigt
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Energy Biosciences InstituteUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations