Biological Invasions

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 239–256 | Cite as

Pest species distribution modelling: origins and lessons from history

  • Robert W. Sutherst
Perpectives and paradigms


Pest species distribution modelling was designed to extrapolate risks in the biosecurity sector in order to protect agricultural crops against the spread of both endemic and introduced pest species. The need to identify sources of biological control agents for importation added to this demand. Independently, biogeographers mapped species distributions to interpolate their niche requirements. Recently the threat of climate change caused an explosion in demand for guidance on likely shifts in potential distributions of species. The different technology platforms in the two sectors resulted in divergence in their approaches to mapping actual and potential species distributions under rapidly changing environmental scenarios. Much of the contemporary discussion of species mapping ignores the lessons from the history of pest species distribution modelling. This has major implications for modelling of the non-equilibrium distributions of all species that occur with rapid climate change. The current review is intended to remind researchers of historical findings and their significance for current mapping of all species. I argue that the dream of automating species mapping for multiple species is an illusion. More modest goals and use of other approaches are necessary to protect biodiversity under current and future climates. Pest risk mapping tools have greater prospects of success because they are generic in nature and so able to be used both to interpolate and to extrapolate from field observations of any species based on climatic variables. In addition invasive species are less numerous and usually better understood, while the risk assessments are applied on regional scales in which climate is the dominant variable.


Geographical distribution Extrapolation Biosecurity Biodiversity Climate change Non-equilibrium 



My thanks to Dr Darren Kriticos and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems for facilitating my participation in the International Pest Mapping Workshop in Port Douglas in August 2010. Prof Myron Zalucki and Prof Janet Franklin made helpful comments on the draft manuscript. The Ecology Centre at the University of Queensland kindly provided research facilities to enable me to conduct the review.


  1. Anderson RP, Lew D (2003) Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol Model 162:211–232Google Scholar
  2. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson WD, Shorrocks B (1984) Aggregation of larval diptera over discrete and ephemeral breeding sites: the implications for coexistence. Am Nat 124:336–351Google Scholar
  4. Austin MP (1987) Models for the analysis of species’ response to environmental gradients. Vegetatio 69:35–45Google Scholar
  5. Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Doherty MD et al (1994) Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a β-function. J Veg Sci 5:215–228Google Scholar
  6. Ayala FJ (1969) Experimental invalidation of principle of competitive exclusion. Nature 224:1076–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker CRB (1991) The validation and use of a life-cycle simulation model for risk assessment of insect pests. Bull OEPP/EPPO 21:615–622Google Scholar
  8. Baker RHA, Sansford CE, Jarvis CH et al (2000) The role of climatic mapping in predicting the potential geographical distribution of non-indigenous pests under current and future climates. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:57–71Google Scholar
  9. Ball J (1910) Climatological diagrams. Cairo Sci J 4:280–281Google Scholar
  10. Ball ED (1917) Distribution of alfalfa weevil in Utah. Bien Rpt State Hort Com Utah 1914–1916. 144–145Google Scholar
  11. Bodenheimer FS (1938) Problems of animal ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Bodenheimer FS (1951) Citrus entomology. W. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  13. Bodenheimer FS (1958) Animal ecology today. Monogr Biol 6:1–276Google Scholar
  14. Bontemps S, Defourny P, Van Bogaert E (2010) GLOBCOVER 2009. Product description and validation report. European Space Agency and Universite Catholique de Louvain p 30. Accessed 14 Dec 2013
  15. Booth TH, Stein JA, Nix HA et al (1989) Mapping regions climatically suitable for particular species: an example using Africa. For Ecol Manag 28:19–31Google Scholar
  16. Booth TH, Jovanovic T, Old KM et al (2000a) Climatic mapping to identify high-risk areas for Cylindrocladium quinqueseptatum leaf blight on eucalypts in mainland South East Asia and around the world. Environ Pollut 108:365–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Booth TH, Old KM, Jovanovic T (2000b) A preliminary assessment of high risk areas for Puccinia psidii (Eucalyptus rust) in the Neotropics and Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:295–301Google Scholar
  18. Bosch vdR, Messenger PS (1973) Biological control. Intext Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryant SR, Thomas CD, Bale JS (2002) The influence of thermal ecology on the distribution of three nymphalid butterflies. J Appl Ecol 39:43–55Google Scholar
  20. Busby JR (1991) BIOCLIM-a bioclimate analysis and prediction system. Plant Prot Q 6:8–9Google Scholar
  21. Carter RN, Prince SD (1981) Epidemic models used to explain biogeographical distribution limits. Nature 293:644–645Google Scholar
  22. Carter RN, Prince SD (1988) Distribution limits from a demographic viewpoint. In: Davy AJ, Hutchings MJ, Watkinson AR (eds) Plant population ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Coakley SM, McDaniel LR (1988) Quantifying how climatic factors affect variation in plant disease severity: a general method using a new way to analyze meteorological data. Clim Chang 12:57–75Google Scholar
  24. Coakley SM, Line RF, McDaniel LR (1988) Predicting stripe rust severity on winter wheat using an improved method for analyzing meteorological and rust data. Phytopathology 78:543–550Google Scholar
  25. Cook WC (1923) Studies in the physical ecology of the Noctuidae. Minnesota Agric Expt Sta Univ Farm St Paul Minn Tech Bull 12:38Google Scholar
  26. Cook WC (1924) The distribution of the pale western cutworm, Porosagrotis orthogonia Morr.:a study in physical ecology. Ecology 5:60–69Google Scholar
  27. Cook WC (1925) The distribution of the alfalfa weevil (Phytonomus posticus Gyll.) a study in physical ecology. J Agric Res 30:479–491Google Scholar
  28. Cook WC (1929) A bioclimate zonation for studying the economic distribution of injurious insects. Ecology 10:282–293Google Scholar
  29. Cook WC (1931) Notes on predicting the probable future distribution of introduced insects. Ecology 12:245–247Google Scholar
  30. Crisp MD, Arroyo MTK, Cook LG et al (2009) Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458:754–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Csurhes SM, Kriticos D (1994) Gleditisa triacanthos L. (Caesalpiniaceae), another thorny, exotic fodder tree gone wild. Plant Prot Q 9:101–105Google Scholar
  32. Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH et al (1998a) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis AJ, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B et al (1998b) Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change. J Anim Ecol 67:600–612Google Scholar
  34. Elith J, Graham CH (2009) Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:66–77Google Scholar
  35. Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677–697Google Scholar
  36. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151Google Scholar
  37. Eyre D, Baker RHA, Brunel S et al (2012) Rating and mapping the suitability of the climate for pest risk analysis. EPPO Bull 42:48–55Google Scholar
  38. Fitt GP (1989) The role of interspecific interactions in the dynamics of tephritid populations. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G (eds) Fruit flies their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 281–300Google Scholar
  39. Fitzpatrick EA, Nix HA (1970) The climatic factor in Australian grassland ecology. In: Moore RM (ed) Australian grasslands. Australian National University Press, Sydney, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  40. Franklin J (2009) Mapping species distributions: spatial inferences and prediction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Gallien L, Munkemuller T, Albert CH et al (2010) Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? Divers Distrib 16:331–342Google Scholar
  42. Gause GF (1934) Experimental analysis of Vito Volterra’s mathematical theory of the struggle for existence. Science 79:16–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Grinnell J (1917) The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. The Auk 34:427–433Google Scholar
  44. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009Google Scholar
  45. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186Google Scholar
  46. Gutierrez AP (2000) Crop ecosystem responses to climatic change: pests and population dynamics. In: Reddy KR, Hodges HF (eds) Climate change and global crop productivity. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 353–374Google Scholar
  47. Gutierrez AP, Nix HA, Havenstein DE et al (1974) The ecology of Aphis craccivora Koch and subterranean clover stunt virus in south-east Australia. III. A regional perspective of the phenology and migration of the cowpea aphid. J Appl Ecol 11:21–35Google Scholar
  48. Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, d’Oultremont T et al (2008) Climate change effects on poikilotherm tritrophic interactions. Clim Chang 87:S167–S192Google Scholar
  49. Hall M, Wall R (1995) Myiasis of humans and domestic animals. Adv Parasitol 35:257–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Haufe WO, Burgess L (1956) Development of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) at Fort Churchill, Manitoba, and prediction of dates of emergence. Ecology 37:500–519Google Scholar
  51. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978Google Scholar
  52. Hodkinson ID (1999) Species response to global environmental change or why ecophysiological models are important: a reply to Davis et al. J Anim Ecol 68:1259–1262Google Scholar
  53. Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science 105:367–368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hutchinson GE (1957) Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Concluding Remark 22:415–427Google Scholar
  55. Hutchinson MF (1995) Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:385–403Google Scholar
  56. Kearney M, Porter WP (2004) Mapping the fundamental niche: physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard. Ecology 85:3119–3131Google Scholar
  57. Kearney M, Porter W (2009) Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecol Lett 12:334–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kearney MR, Wintle BA, Porter WP (2010) Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conserv Lett 3:203–213Google Scholar
  59. Keig G, McAlpine JR (1969) Watbal. A computer system for the estimation and analysis of soil moisture regimes from simple climatic data. CSIRO Div L Res 69(9):1–47 Technical MemorandumGoogle Scholar
  60. Kingsolver JG (1989) Weather and the population dynamics of insects: integrating physiological and population ecology. Physiol Zool 62:314–334Google Scholar
  61. Köppen W (1931) Grundiss der Klimakunde. Walter de Gruyter Co., BerlinGoogle Scholar
  62. Korzukhin MD, Porter SD, Thompson LC et al (2001) Modeling temperature-dependent range limits for the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Solenopsis invicta) in the United States. Environ Entomol 30:645–655Google Scholar
  63. Kriticos DJ, Randall PR (2001) A comparison of systems to analyse potential weed distributions. In: Groves RH, Panetta FD, Virtue JG (eds) Weed risk assessment. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 61–79Google Scholar
  64. Kriticos DJ, Brown JR, Maywald GF et al (2003) SPAnDX: a process-based population dynamics model to explore management and climate change impacts on an invasive alien plant, Acacia nilotica. Ecol Model 163:187–208Google Scholar
  65. Kriticos DJ, Yonow T, McFadyen RE (2005) The potential distribution of Chromolaena odorata (Siam Weed) in relation to climate. Weed Res 45:246–254Google Scholar
  66. Kriticos DJ, Webber BL, Leriche A, Ota N, Macadam I, Bathols J, Scott JK (2012) CliMond: global high-resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Meth Ecol Evol 3:53–64Google Scholar
  67. Leemans R (1996) Biodiversity and global change. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell publishers, pp 367–387Google Scholar
  68. Leibold MA (1995) The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76:1371–1382Google Scholar
  69. Lindenmayer DB, Nix HA, McMahon JP et al (1991) The conservation of Leadbeater’s possum’ Gymnobelideus leadbeateri (McCoy): a case study of the use of bioclimatic modelling. J Biogeogr 18:371–383Google Scholar
  70. Mack RN, Simberloff B, Lonsdale WM et al (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710Google Scholar
  71. Magarey RD, Fowler GA, Borchert DM et al (2007) NAPPFAST: an internet system for the weather-based mapping of plant pathogens. Plant Dis 91:1–10Google Scholar
  72. Mansfield K (1924) Nachrbl. deut. Pflanzenschutzdienst (Berlin) 4:45–46Google Scholar
  73. Maywald GF, Sutherst RW (1985) User’s guide to CLIMEX: a computer program for comparing climates in ecology. CSIRO Aust Div Entomol Rep 35:1–29Google Scholar
  74. Maywald GF, Sutherst RW, Zalucki MP (1997) Generic modelling for integrated pest management. In: McDonald AD and McAleer M (eds) Modsim 97, international congress on modelling and simulation proceedings. The modelling and simulation cociety of Australia, University of Tasmania, pp 1115–1116Google Scholar
  75. Maywald GF, Sutherst RW, Zalucki MP (1999) DYMEX professional: modelling natural systems. CD-ROM, CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  76. Maywald GF, Kriticos DJ, Sutherst RW, Bottomley W (2004a) DYMEX V2. Model builder user’s guide. Hearne Scientific Software Inc, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  77. Maywald GF, Kriticos DJ, Sutherst RW, Bottomley W (2004b) DYMEX V2. Model simulator user’s guide. Hearne Scientific Software Inc., Melbourne Google Scholar
  78. Meats A (1989) Bioclimatic potential. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G (eds) World crop pests. Fruit flies their biology, natural enemies and control, Ch.8.5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 241–252Google Scholar
  79. Messenger PS (1959) Bioclimatic studies with insects. Annu Rev Entomol 4:183–206Google Scholar
  80. Messenger PS (1970) Bioclimatic inputs to biological control and pest management programs. In: Rabb RL, Guthrie FE (eds) Concepts of pest management. State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 84–99Google Scholar
  81. Messenger PS, Flitters NE (1954) Bioclimatic studies of three species of fruit flies in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 47:756–765Google Scholar
  82. Murray MD, Nix HA (1987) Southern limits of distribution and abundance of the biting-midge Culicoides brevitarsis Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in south-eastern Australia: an application of the GROWEST model. Aust J Zool 35:575–585Google Scholar
  83. Neave HM, Norton TW (1991) Integrated management of forest wildlife: comments on new ways to research habitat. In: Lunney D (ed) Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, NSW, pp 229–236Google Scholar
  84. New M, Hulme M, Jones PD (2000) Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 2: development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Clim 13:2217–2238Google Scholar
  85. Nix HA (1981) Simplified simulation models based on specified minimum data sets: the CROPEVAL concept. In: Berg A (ed) Application of remote sensing to agricultural production forecasting. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 151–169Google Scholar
  86. Nix H (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In: Longmore R (ed) Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra, pp 4–15Google Scholar
  87. Nix HA, Fitzpatrick EA (1969) An index of crop water stress related to wheat and grain sorghum yields. Agric Meteorol 6:321–337Google Scholar
  88. Pardey PG, Beddow JM, Kriticos DJ et al (2013) Right-sizing stem-rust research. Science 340:147–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Park T (1948) Experimental studies of interspecies competition I. Competition between populations of flour beetles Tribolium confusum and Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Ecol Monogr 18:265–308Google Scholar
  90. Park T (1954) Experimental studies of interspecies competition 2. Temperature, humidity, and competition in 2 species of Tribolium. Physiol Zool 27:177–238Google Scholar
  91. Parmesan C (1996) Climate and species’ range. Nature 382:765–766Google Scholar
  92. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Berry PM et al (2002) SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecol Model 154:289–300Google Scholar
  94. Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modelling. Q Rev Biol 78:419–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Peterson AT, Ortega-Huerta MA, Bartley J et al (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416:626–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Pheloung PC (1996) Climate. A system to predict the distribution of an organism based on climate preference. Agriculture Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  97. Porter WP, Budaraju S, Stewart WE et al (2000) Physiology on a landscape scale: applications in ecological theory and conservation practice. Am Zool 40:1175–1176Google Scholar
  98. Porter WP, Sabo JL, Tracy CR et al (2002) Physiology on a landscape scale: plant-animal interactions. Integr Comp Biol 42:431–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Randolph SE (1997) Abiotic and biotic determinants of the seasonal dynamics of the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol 11:25–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Randolph SE (2004) Tick ecology: processes and patterns behind the epidemiological risk posed by ixodid ticks as vectors. Parasitology 129:S37–S65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Randolph SE, Rogers DJ (1997) A generic population model for the African tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Parasitology 265–279 Google Scholar
  102. Rogers D (1979) Tsetse population dynamics and distribution: a new analytical approach. J Anim Ecol 48:825–849Google Scholar
  103. Rogers DJ (1995) Remote sensing and the changing distribution of tsetse flies in Africa. In: Harrington R, Stork NE (eds) Insects in a changing environment. Academic Press, London, pp 177–193Google Scholar
  104. Rogers DJ (2006) Models for vectors and vector-borne diseases. Adv Parasitol 62(62):1–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Rogers DJ, Packer MJ (1993) Vector-borne diseases, models, and global change. Lancet 342:1282–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Rogers DJ, Randolph SE (1986) Distribution and abundance of tsetse flies (Glossina spp.). J Anim Ecol 55:1007–1025Google Scholar
  107. Rogers DJ, Randolph SE (1991) Mortality rates and population density of tsetse flies correlated with satellite imagery. Nature 351:739–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Rogers KJ, Randolph SE (1993) Distribution of tsetse and ticks in Africa: past, present and future. Parasitol Today 9:266–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Sanderson ED (1908) The influence of minimum temperatures in limiting the northern distribution of insects. J Econ Entomol 1:245–262Google Scholar
  110. Schwartz MW (1992) Potential effects of global climate change on the biodiversity of plants. For Chron 68:462–471Google Scholar
  111. Senaratne KADW, Palmer WA, Sutherst RW (2006) Use of CLIMEX modelling to identify prospective areas for exploration to find new biological control agents for prickly acacia. Aust J Entomol 45:298–302Google Scholar
  112. Shelford VE (1913) Animal communities in temperate America, University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  113. Shelford VE (1931) Some concepts of bio-ecology. Ecology 12:455–467Google Scholar
  114. Shorrocks B (1975) The distribution and abundance of woodland species of British Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Anim Ecol 44:857–864Google Scholar
  115. Silvertown J (2004) The ghost of competition past in the phylogeny of island endemic plants. J Ecol 92:168–173Google Scholar
  116. Slatyer RO (1960) Agricultural climatology of the Katherine area, NT. CSIRO Div L Res Reg Surv 13:35–39 Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  117. Slatyer RO (1968) The use of soil water balance relationships in agroclimatology. UNESCO natural resources research No. 7: agroclimatological method pp 73–87Google Scholar
  118. Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J Anim Ecol 46:337–365Google Scholar
  119. Sutherst RW (1990) Impact of climate change on pests and diseases in Australasia. Search 21:230–232Google Scholar
  120. Sutherst RW (1991) Pest risk analysis and the greenhouse effect. Rev Agric Entomol 79:1177–1187Google Scholar
  121. Sutherst RW (1996) A hierarchical approach to pest risk analysis under climate change. Global change and terrestrial ecosystems working document No. 25. Impact of climate change on pests, weeds and diseases in Australia. IGBP-GCTE, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  122. Sutherst RW (1998) Implications of global change and climate variability for vector-borne diseases: generic approaches to impact assessments. Int J Parasitol 28:935–945PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Sutherst RW (2000) Climate change and invasive species: a conceptual framework. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 211–240Google Scholar
  124. Sutherst RW (2001) The vulnerability of animal and human health to parasites under global change. Int J Parasitol 31:933–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Sutherst RW (2004) Global change and human vulnerability to vector-born diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:136–173PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Sutherst RW, Bourne AS (2009) Modelling non-equilibrium distributions of invasive species: a tale of two modelling paradigms. Biol Invasions 11:1231–1237Google Scholar
  127. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF (1985) A computerised system for matching climates in ecology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 13:281–300Google Scholar
  128. Sutherst RW, Maywald G (2005) A climate-model of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): implications for invasion of new regions, particularly Oceania. Environ Entomol 34:317–335Google Scholar
  129. Sutherst RW, Yonow T, Chakraborty S et al (1996) A generic approach to defining impacts of climate change on pests, weeds and diseases in Australasia. In: Bouma WJ, Pearman GI, Manning MR (eds) Greenhouse: coping with climate change. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 281–307Google Scholar
  130. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Russell BL (2000) Estimating vulnerability under global change: modular modelling of pests. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:303–319Google Scholar
  131. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Bourne AS (2007a) Including species-interactions in risk assessments for global change. Glob Change Biol 13:1843–1859Google Scholar
  132. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Kriticos DJ (2007b) CLIMEX Version 3:  Users Guide.  Hearne ScientificGoogle Scholar
  133. Teng PS, Heong KL, Kropff MJ et al (1996) Linked pest-crop models under global change. In: Walker B, Steffen W (eds) Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  134. Thomas D, Cameron A, Green RE et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Thornthwaite CW (1931) The climates of North America according to a new classification. Geogr Rev 21:633–655Google Scholar
  136. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94Google Scholar
  137. Thuiller W (2003) Biomod-optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Glob Change Biol 9:1353–1362Google Scholar
  138. Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R et al (2009) BIOMOD—a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32:369–373Google Scholar
  139. van der Ploeg RR, Bohm W, Kirkham MB (1999) On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1055–1062Google Scholar
  140. Venette RC, Kriticos DJ, Magarey RD et al (2010) Pest risk maps for invasive alien species: a roadmap for improvement. Bioscience 60:349–362Google Scholar
  141. Vera MT, Rodriguez R, Segura DF et al (2002) Potential geographical distribution of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), with emphasis on Argentina and Australia. Environ Entomol 31:1009–1022Google Scholar
  142. Virdee SR, Hewitt GM (1994) Clines for hybrid dysfunction in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Evolution 48:392–407Google Scholar
  143. Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118:558–560Google Scholar
  144. von Walter HB, Leith H (1960) Klimadiagramm-Weltatlas. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, JenaGoogle Scholar
  145. Walker PA, Cocks KD (1991) HABITAT: a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr lett 1:108–118Google Scholar
  146. Walther GR, Post E, Convet P et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Watts MJ, Worner SP (2008) Comparing ensemble and cascaded neural networks that combine biotic and abiotic variables to predict insect species distribution. Ecol Inform 3:354–366Google Scholar
  148. Watts MJ, Worner SP (2009) Estimating the risk of insect species invasion: Kohonen self-organising maps versus k-means clustering. Ecol Model 220:821–829Google Scholar
  149. Webber BL, Yates CJ, Le Maitre DC, Scott JK, Kriticos DJ, Ota N, McNeill A, Le Roux JJ, Midgley GF (2011) Modelling horses for novel climate courses: insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models. Divers Distrib 17:978–1000 Google Scholar
  150. Williams SE, Bolitho EE, Fox S (2003) Climate change in Australian tropical rainforests: an impending environmental catastrophe. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:1887–1892Google Scholar
  151. Williams SE, VanDerWal J, Isaac J et al (2010) Distributions, life-history specialization, and phylogeny of the rain forest vertebrates in the Australian Wet Tropics. Ecology 91:2493Google Scholar
  152. Williamson M (1972) The analysis of biological populations. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  153. Worner SP, Gevrey M (2006) Modelling global insect pest species assemblages to determine risk of invasion. J Appl Ecol 43:858–867Google Scholar
  154. Xu T, Hutchinson MF (2013) New developments and applications in the ANUCLIM spatial climatic and bioclimatic modelling package. Environ Model Softw 40:267–279Google Scholar
  155. You L, Wood S, Wood-Sichra U (2006) Generating global crop maps: from census to grid. Selected paper, IAAE (International Association of Agricultural Economists) Annual Conference, Gold Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  156. Zalucki MP, Rochester WA (2004) Spatial and temporal population dynamics of monarchs down-under: lessons for north America. In: Oberhauser K, Solensky M (eds) The monarch butterfly: Biology and conservation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 219–228Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ecology Centre, School of Biological SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations