Biological Invasions

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 315–327 | Cite as

Assessment of the Argentine ant invasion management by means of manual removal of winter nests in mixed cork oak and pine forests

  • Mireia Diaz
  • Sílvia Abril
  • Martha L. Enríquez
  • Crisanto Gómez
Original Paper


The dynamic in Argentine ant colonies varies seasonally, influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. In winter the spatial range of the colony is contracted in large formations (winter nests) containing a large number of queens and workers. Winter nests are the clue to the species’ dispersion power and the invasion of new habitats. For this reason a yearly elimination of queens and workers in winter at the edge (front) of the invasion could be a useful tool for weakening the species’ dispersion and therefore limiting its establishment in new areas. Here, we determined the spatial dynamics of the Argentine ant nests during 1 year, and we assessed the invasion management by means of manual removal of winter nests for two consecutive winters, determining its effects during the following 3 years. We mapped nests found in 18 plots divided into two groups: extirpated (with removal of nests) and non-extirpated (control), along the fronts of three locations. Seasonal variation in the abundance of nests and workers, together with the two-year extirpation effects were evaluated. We found that colonies tended to follow an annual cycle of contraction and dispersion, with a decrease in the number of nests as we approached the invasion front. The extirpation was effective only in the front area, where it promoted smaller, less lasting and aggregated nests, as well as a decrease in the abundance of queens and workers. Nests also experienced a decrease during the two first winters but a recovery in the third, when no extirpation was done. Thus, a yearly perturbation should be performed to keep the expansion of the Argentine ant at a low rate, and to limit its establishment in new areas.


Argentine ant Invasion front Long-term extirpation effects Seasonal colony dynamics Spatial nest distribution 



Thanks to F. Fatú for assistance in the field. This work was financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with the support of a predoctoral grant (BES-2008-005102) associated with research projects MEC/FEDER2007-64080-C02-02/BOS and CGL2010-16451, and a FI grant from the European Social Fund and the DIUE of the Autonomous Government of Catalonia in support of MLE.


  1. Abril S, Gómez C (2009) Ascertaining key factors behind the coexistence of the native ant species Plagiolepis pygmaea with the invasive argentine ant Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 53:559Google Scholar
  2. Abril S, Oliveras J, Gómez C (2007) Foraging activity and dietary spectrum of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in invaded natural areas of the northeast Iberian Peninsula. Environ Entomol 36:1166–1173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abril S, Oliveras J, Gómez C (2008) Effect of seasonal dynamics on queen densities of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in an invaded natural area of the NE Iberian Peninsula. Sociobiology 51:645–655Google Scholar
  4. Abril S, Diaz M, Enríquez ML, Gómez C (2013) More and bigger queens: a clue to the invasive success of the Argentine ant in natural habitats. Myrmecol News 18:19–24Google Scholar
  5. Benois A (1973) Influence of ecological factors on the annual cycle and seasonal activity of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the French Riviera. Insectes Soc 20:267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blancafort X, Gómez C (2005) Consequences of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), invasion on pollination of Euphorbia characias (L.) (Euphorbiaceae). Oikos 28:49–55Google Scholar
  7. Bond W, Slingsby P (1984) Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex Humilis) and Myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65:1031–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brightwell RJ, Labadie PE, Silverman J (2010) Northward expansion of the invasive Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Eastern United States is constrained by winter soil temperatures. Environ Entomol 39:1659–1665. doi: 10.1603/EN09345 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cardé RT (1990) Principles of mating disruption. In: Ridgway RL, Silverstein RM, Inscoe MN (eds) Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect management: application of pheromones and other attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 47–71Google Scholar
  10. Carpintero S, Reyes-López J (2008) The role of competitive dominance in the invasive ability of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Biol Invasions 10:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cerdà X, Dahbi A, Retana J (2002) Spatial patterns, temporal variability, and the role of multi-nest colonies in a monogynous Spanish desert ant. Ecol Entomol 27:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Environmental. Government of Catalonia (2002) LANDSAT-TM. Classification soil use in CataloniaGoogle Scholar
  14. Diaz M, Abril S, Enríquez ML, Gómez C (2013) Where to move when it gets cold: winter nesting sites attractive to the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 18:51–58Google Scholar
  15. Enríquez ML (2012) The Argentine ant in mediterranean ecosystems: impacts and control. PhD dissertation, University of GironaGoogle Scholar
  16. Estany-Tigerström D, Bas JM, Pons P (2010) Does Argentine ant invasion affect prey availability for foliage-gleaning birds? Biol Invasions 12:827–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gómez C, Espadaler X (2006) Exotic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Balearic Islands. Myrmecol News 8:225–233Google Scholar
  18. Gómez C, Oliveras J (2003) Can the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile Mayr) replace native ants in myrmecochory? Oikos 24:47–53Google Scholar
  19. Guerrieri FJ, Nehring V, Jørgensen CG, Nielsen J, Galizia CG, d’Ettorre P (2009) Ants recognize foes and not friends. Proc R Soc B 276:2461–2468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heller NE (2004) Colony structure in introduced and native populations of the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Insectes Soc 51:378–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heller NE, Gordon DM (2006) Seasonal spatial dynamics and causes of nest movement in colonies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Ecol Entomol 31:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller NE, Sanders NJ, Gordon DM (2006) Linking temporal and spatial scales in the study of an Argentine ant invasion. Biol Invasions 8:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heller NE, Sanders NJ, Shors JW, Gordon DM (2008a) Rainfall facilitates the spread, and time alters the impact, of the invasive Argentine ant. Oecologia 155:385–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heller NE, Ingram KK, Gordon DM (2008b) Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants. Insectes Soc 55:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1977) The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 64:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holway DA (1998) Factors governing rate of invasion: a natural experiment using Argentine ants. Oecologia 115:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hooper-Bui L, Rust MK (2000) Oral toxicity of Abamectin, boric Acid, Fipronil, and Hydramethylnon to laboratory colonies of Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 93:858–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Human KG, Gordon DM (1996) Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingram KK (2002) Flexibility in nest density and social structure in invasive populations of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Oecologia 133:492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klotz JH, Greenberg L, Amrhein C, Rust MK (2000) Toxicity and repellency of borate-sucrose water baits to Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 93:1256–1258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krushelnycky PD, Reimer NJ (1998a) Efficacy of maxforce bait for control of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park, Maui. Hawaii Environ Entomol 27:1473–1481Google Scholar
  33. Krushelnycky PD, Reimer NJ (1998b) Bait preference by the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park. Hawaii Environ Entomol 27:1482–1487Google Scholar
  34. Liang D, Silverman J (2000) You are what you eat: diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Naturwissenschaften 87:412–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martínez-Dueñas WA (2004) INRA–Indíce Integrado Relativo de Antropización: propuesta técnica-conceptual y aplicación. Intropica: Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones Tropicales 5:37–46Google Scholar
  36. Nishisue K, Sunamura E, Tanaka Y, Sakamoto H, Suzuki S, Fukumoto T, Terayama M, Tatsuki S (2010) Long-term field trial to control the invasive Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with synthetic trail pheromone. J Econ Entomol 103:1784–1789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliveras J, Bas JM, Casellas D, Gómez C (2005) Numerical dominance of the Argentine ant versus native ants and consequences on soil resource searching in mediterranean cork-oak forest (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 45:643–658Google Scholar
  38. Passera L (1994) Characteristics of tramp species. In: Williams DF (ed) Exotic ants: biology, impact, and control of introduced species, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  39. Pons X (2011) MiraMon7.0. Geographic information system and teledetection software. Centre of Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), SpainGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2010) R, A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  41. Rodríguez-Cabal M, Stuble KL, Nuñez MA, Sanders NJ (2009) Quantitative analysis of the effects of the exotic Argentine ant on seed dispersal mutualisms. Biol Lett 5:499–502PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roura-Pascual N, Bas JM, Hui C (2010) The spread of the Argentine ant: environmental determinants and impacts on native ant communities. Biol Invasions 12:2399–2412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roura-Pascual N, Hui C, Ikeda T, Leday G, Richardson DM, Carpintero S, Espadaler X, Gómez C, Guénard B, Hartley S, Krushelnycky P, Lester PJ, McGeoch MA, Menke S, Pedersen J, Pitt J, Reyes J, Sanders NJ, Suarez AV, Touyama Y, Ward DF, Ward P, Worner SP (2011) The relative roles of climatic suitability and anthropogenic influence in determining the pattern of spread in a global invader. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:220–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanders NJ, Gotelli NJ, Heller NE, Gordon DM (2003) Community disassembly by an invasive ant species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2474–2477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silverman J, Brightwell RJ (2008) The Argentine ant: challenges in managing an invasive unicolonial pest. Ann Rev Entomol 53:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Silverman J, Liang D (2001) Colony disassociation following diet partitioning in a unicolonial ant. Naturwissenschaften 88:73–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79:2041–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suarez AV, Richmond JQ, Case TJ (2000) Prey selection in horned lizards following the invasion of Argentine ants in southern California. Ecol Appl 10:711–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2001) Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1095–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Suckling D, Peck R, Manning L, Stringer L, Cappadonna J, El-Sayed A (2008) Pheromone disruption of Argentine ant trail integrity. J Chem Ecol 34:1602–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suckling D, Peck R, Stringer L, Snook K, Banko P (2010) Trail pheromone disruption of Argentine ant trail formation and foraging. J Chem Ecol 36:122–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tanaka Y, Nishisue K, Sunamura E, Suzuki S, Sakamoto H, Fukumoto T, Terayama M, Tatsuki S (2009) Trail-following disruption in the invasive Argentine ant with a synthetic trail pheromone component (Z)-9-hexadecenal. Sociobiology 54:139–152Google Scholar
  53. Visser D, Wright MG, Giliomee JH (1996) The effect of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on flower visiting insects of Protea nitida mill. (Proteaceae). Afr Entomol 4:285–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mireia Diaz
    • 1
  • Sílvia Abril
    • 1
  • Martha L. Enríquez
    • 1
  • Crisanto Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of de GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations