Abstract
In response to the first Dutch elm disease (DED) pandemic, Siberian elm, Ulmus pumila, was planted to replace the native elm, U. minor, in Italy. The potential for hybridization between these two species is high and repeated hybridization could result in the genetic swamping of the native species and facilitate the evolution of invasiveness in the introduced species. We used genetic markers to examine the extent of hybridization between these two species and to determine the pattern of introgression. We quantified and compared the level of genetic diversity between the hybrids and the two parental species. Hybrids between U. pumila and U. minor were common. The pattern of introgression was not as strongly biased towards U. pumila as was previously observed for hybrids between U. rubra and U. pumila in the United States. The levels of heterozygosity were similar between U. minor and the hybrids and both groups had higher levels of heterozygosity relative to U. pumila. The programs Structure and NewHybrids indicated the presence of first- (F1) and second- generation (F2) hybrids and of backcrosses in the hybrid population. The presence of healthy DED resistant U. minor individuals combined with the self-compatibility of U. minor could help explain the presence of F2 individuals in Italy. The presence of F2 individuals, where most of the variability present in the hybrids will be released, could facilitate rapid evolution and the potential evolution of invasiveness of U. pumila in Italy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229
Ansaloni A (1934) La moria degli olmi e la diffusione in Italia dell’olmo siberiano. Bologna Ed. La Selva 119 pp
Brasier CM (1988) Ophiostoma ulmi, cause of Dutch elm disease. Adv Plant Pathol 6:207–221
Brasier CM (1991) Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115:151–161
Burgess KS, Morgan M, Deverno L, Husband BC (2005) Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Mol Ecol 14:3471–3483
Cogolludo-Agustin MA, Agundez D, Gil L (2000) Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85:157–166
Collada C, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Gil L, Cervera MT (2004) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Ulmus minor Miller and cross-amplification in U. glabra Hudson and U. laevis Pall. Mol Ecol Notes 4:731–732
Collevatti RS, Grattapaglia D, Duvall Hay J (2001) High resolution microsatellite based analysis of the mating system allows the detection of significant biparental inbreeding in Caryocar brasiliense, an endangered tropical tree species. Heredity 86:60–67
Collin E (2002) Strategies and guidelines for the conservation of the genetic resources of Ulmus spp. In: Turok J, Eriksson G, Russell K, Borelli S (eds) Noble Hardwoods Network, 50–67, Report of the fourth meeting, September 1999, Gmunden, Austria, and the fifth meeting, May 2001, Blessington, Ireland. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
Crowl TA, Crist TO, Parmenter RR, Belovsky G, Lugo AE (2008) The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front Ecol Environ 6:238–246
Daehler C, Strong D (1997) Hybridization between introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alternifl ora; Poaceae) and native California cordgrass (S. foliosa) in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Am J Bot 84:607–611
Ding J, Reardon R, Wu Y, Zheng H, Fu W (2006) Biological control of invasive plants through collaboration between China and the United States of America: a perspective. Biol Invasions 8:1439–1450
Ellstrand NC, Elam D (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242
Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck K (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? PNAS 97:7043–7050
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491
Goidanich G (1936) La moria dell’olmo (Graphium ulmi). Ramo editoriale degli agricoltori, Roma 134 pp
Goidanich G (1941) Il problema della grafiosi dell’olmo nella fase risolutiva. Annali della R. Accademia di agricoltura di Bologna 1:3–23
Goidanich G, Azzaroli F (1941) Relazione sulle esperienze di selezione di olmi resistenti alla grafiosi e di inoculazioni artificiali di Graphium ulmi eseguite nel 1939–1940. Boll R Staz Pat Veg 21:287–306
Goodall-Copestake WP, Hollingsworth ML, Jenkins GI, Collin E (2005) Molecular markers and ex situ conservation of the European elms (Ulmus spp.). Biol Conserv 122:537–546
Hedge SG, Nason JD, Clegg JM, Ellstrand NC (2006) The evolution of California’s wild radish has resulted in the extinction of its progenitors. Evolution 60:1187–1197
Heybroek HM (1968) Taxonomy, crossability and breeding of elms. Typescript presented at international symposium on Dutch elm disease, Ames, Iowa, 26–28 Feb, pp 25
Kamen H (1997) Philip of Spain. Ed. espanola, Siglo XXI de Espana editores, Madrid
Keim P, Paige KN, Whitham TG, Lark KG (1989) Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm of Populus: Occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123:557–565
Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972a) Response of Ulmus pumila and U. pumila X U. rubra hybrids to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62:848–852
Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972b) Variation in ornamental traits and disease tolerance among crosses of Ulmus pumila, U. rubra and putative natural hybrids. Silvae Genetica 21:193–197
Machon N, Lefranc M, Bilger I, Mazer SJ, Sarr A (1997) Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: analysis of differentiation. Heredity 78:12–20
Mittempergher L, La Porta N (1991) Hybridization studies in the Eurasian Species of Elm (Ulmus spp.). Silvae Genetica 40:237–243
Mittempergher L, Santini A (2004) The history of elm breeding. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13:161–177
Passavalli L (1935) L’olmo siberiano (Ulmus pumila L.). Sua importanza nella difesa da Ceratostomella (Graphium) ulmi Buis. L’Alpe 22:409–418
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295
Prentis PJ, White EM, Radford IJ, Lowe AJ, Clarke AR (2007) Can hybridization cause local extinction: a case for demographic swamping of the Australian native Senecio pinnatifolius by the invasive Senecio madagascariensis?. New Phytol 176:902–912
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:83–109
Rieseberg LH, Zona S, Aberbom L, Martin TD (1989) Hybridization in the island endemic, Catalina mahogany. Conserv Biol 3:52–58
Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C (2003) Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301:1211–1216
Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332
Santamour FS Jr, Bentz SE (1995) Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America. J Arboric 21:122–131
Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Mittempergher L (2002) ‘San Zanobi’ and ‘Plinio’ elmtrees. HortScience 37:1139–1141
Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2005) Variation among Italian and French elm clones in their response to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi inoculation. Forest Pathol 35:183–193
Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2007) ‘Fiorente’ and ‘Arno’ Elm trees. HortScience 42:712–714
Santini A, La Porta N, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2008) Breeding against Dutch elm disease adapted to the Mediterranean climate. Euphytica 163:45–56
Sibilia C (1930) La moria degli olmi in Italia. Boll R Staz Pat Veg 10:281–283
Sibilia C (1932) La resistenza dell’Ulmus pumila a Ceratostomella ulmi. Boll R Staz Pat Veg 11:360–364
Smalley EB, Guries RP (1993) Breeding elms for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol 31:325–352
Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Buron M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Vanden Broeck A (2005) Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For Sci 51:134–141
USDA, NRCS. 2002. PLANTS Database, version 3.5. Online, website http://plants.usda.gov. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, US
Vila M, Weber E, D’Antonio CM (2000) Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2:207–217
Ware GH (1995) Little-known elms from China: landscape tree possibilities. J Arboric 21:284–288
Whiteley RE, Black-Samuelsson S, Clapham D (2003) Development of microsatellite markers for the European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) and cross-species amplification within the genus Ulmus. Mol Ecol Notes 3:598–600
Wiegrefe, SJ (1992) Molecular genetic variation in the Ulmaceae: phylogenetic implications. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Wyman D (1951) Elms grown in America. Arnoldia 11:79–93
Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2008a) Genetic diversity and relationships among Dutch elm disease tolerant Ulmus pumila L. accessions from China. Genome 51:492–500
Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2008b) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for red elm (Ulmus rubra Muhl.) and cross-species amplification with Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.). Molec Ecol Res 8:109–112
Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2009) Patterns of hybridization and introgression between invasive Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae) and native U. rubra. Am J Bot 96:1116–1128
Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2010) The extent of hybridization and its impact on the genetic diversity and population structure of an invasive tree, Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae). Evol Appl 3:157–168
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ignazio Graziosi for providing some samples. Eric Collin, Luisa Ghelardini and Francesca Bagnoli commented on the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation Minority Post-doctoral Fellowship to J.E. Zalapa (NSF award #0409651) and support from the USDA-ARS to J. Brunet.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 5 .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunet, J., Zalapa, J.E., Pecori, F. et al. Hybridization and introgression between the exotic Siberian elm, Ulmus pumila, and the native Field elm, U. minor, in Italy. Biol Invasions 15, 2717–2730 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0486-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0486-z