Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 847–858 | Cite as

A new comprehensive database of alien plant species in Chile based on herbarium records

  • Nicol Fuentes
  • Aníbal Pauchard
  • Paulina Sánchez
  • Jocelyn Esquivel
  • Alicia Marticorena
Original Paper

Abstract

There is an urgent need for comprehensive national databases on alien plant species, especially in developing countries. Despite the fact that plant invasions are considered a major threat to biodiversity, they have been poorly studied or not considered a conservation priority in South America. We aim to assess alien plant distribution in Chile, using the first comprehensive public alien plant database, and discuss the implications of using herbarium records to develop national databases of alien plants. We used herbarium records to assemble a comprehensive national database of alien plants. We calculated the number of alien and native species and specimens recorded in each 10 × 10 km cell. We evaluated sampling efforts and tested for relationships between alien and native species collections, as well as other spatial patterns along the latitudinal gradient. Alien and native species richness was positively correlated. Alien plants were mostly collected in central Chile, with few species collected in both the extreme north and south. However, native plants were strongly collected in central Chile, as well as in both extremes of the country. Alien and native plants followed the same pattern of accumulation along the latitudinal gradient, with native plants being relatively more collected than alien plants. Herbarium records provide valuable baseline information to evaluate plant species distribution. However, there are important gaps in this database, (e.g. variable sampling effort for alien and native plants, incomplete information on life-history traits). Given scientists and land managers increasing demand for baseline information and the high cost of collecting such data in developing countries, herbarium records should be used more frequently for research and management of plant invasions.

Keywords

Botanical records Database Invasive species Non-native plant Plant richness South America 

Supplementary material

10530_2012_334_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 476 kb)
10530_2012_334_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (645 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 645 kb)

References

  1. Aikio S, Duncan R, Hulme P (2010) Herbarium records identify the role of long-distance spread in the spatial distribution of alien plants in New Zealand. J Biogeogr 37:1740–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arroyo MTK, Marticorena C, Matthei O, Cavieres L (2000) Plant invasions in Chile: present patterns and future predictions. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, USA, pp 385–421Google Scholar
  3. Becerra P (2006) Invasion of alien trees in a pre-Andean watershed of central Chile. Gayana Bot 63:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brotons L, Herrando S, Pla M (2007) Updating bird species distribution at large spatial scales: applications of habitat modeling to data from long-term monitoring programs. Divers Distrib 13:276–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bustamante R, Simoneti J (2005) Is Pinus radiata invading the native vegetation in Central Chile? Demographic responses in a fragmented forest. Biol Invasions 7:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadotte M, Murray B, Lovett-Doust J (2006) Ecological patterns and biological invasions: using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biol Invasions 8:809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castro SA, Figueroa JA, Muñoz-Schick M, Jaksic FM (2005) Minimum residence time, biogeographic origin, and life cycle as determinants of the geographical extent of naturalized plants in continental Chile. Divers Distrib 11:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawford P, Hoagland B (2009) Can herbarium records be used to map alien species invasion and native species expansion over the past 100 years? J Biogeogr 36:651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delisle F, Lavoie C, Jean M, Lachance D (2003) Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens. J Biogeogr 30:1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiTomaso J, Healy E (2007) Weeds of California and Other Western States. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Figueroa J, Castro S, Marquet P, Jaksic F (2004) Exotic plant invasion to the Mediterranean region of Chile: causes, history and impacts. Rev Chil Hist Nat 77:465–483Google Scholar
  12. Fuentes N, Ugarte E, Kühn I, Klotz S (2008) Alien plants in Chile: inferring invasion periods from herbarium records. Biol Invasions 10:649–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuentes N, Ugarte E, Kühn I, Klotz S (2010) Alien plants in southern South America. A framework for evaluation and management of mutual risk of invasion between Chile and Argentina. Biol Invasions 12:3227–3236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuentes N, Marticorena A, Saldaña A (2011) Fallopia sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) Ronse Decr. (Polygonaceae): a new record for the alien flora of Chile. Gayana Bot 68:338–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Funk VA, Richardson KS (2002) Systematic data in biodiversity studies: use it or lose it. Syst Biol 51:303–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardener M, Bustamante R, Herrera I, Durigan G, Pivello V, Moro M, Stoll A, Langdon B, Baruch Z, Rico A, Arredondo-Nuñez A, Flores S (2011) Plant invasion in Latin America: fast track to a more focused agenda. Plant Ecol Divers 0: 1–8Google Scholar
  17. Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holm L, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) The world’s worst weeds. University Press of Hawaii, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  19. Holm L, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL (1979) A geographical Atlas of World Weeds. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. IABIN Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network (2011) http://www.iabin.net/. Accessed on August 2011
  21. Jiménez A, Pauchard A, Cavieres L, Marticorena A, Bustamante R (2008) Do climatically similar regions contain similar alien floras? A test from the Mediterranean areas of Chile and California. J Biogeogr 35:614–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jørgensen PM, León-Yánez S (1999) Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monogr Syst Bot Mo Bot Gard Press, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  23. Khuroo A, Weber E, Malik A, Dar GH, Reshi Z (2010) Taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in the native and alien woody flora of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Nord J Bot 28:685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kühn I, Durka W, Klotz S (2004) BiolFlor—a new plant-trait database as a tool for plant invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 10:363–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langdon B, Pauchard A, Aguayo M (2010) Pinus contorta invasion in the Chilean Patagonia: local patterns in a global context. Biol Invasions 12:3961–3971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lavoie C, Dufresne C (2005) The spread of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) in Québec: a spatio-temporal perspective. Écoscience 12:366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luebert F, Pliscoff P (2006) Sinopsis bioclimática y vegetacional de Chile. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar
  30. Luebert F, Pliscoff P (2009) Depuración y estandarización de la cartografía de pisos de vegetación de Chile. Chloris Chilensis 12. Available at: http://www.chlorischile.cl/
  31. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandák B, Pyšek P, Kateřina B (2004) History of the invasion and distribution of Reynoutria taxa in the Czech Republic: a hybrid spreading faster than its parents. Preslia 76:15–64Google Scholar
  33. Marticorena C, Matthei O, Rodriguez R, Arroyo MTK, Muñoz M, Squeo P, Arancio G (1998) Catalogo florístico de la Región de Antofagasta. Gayana Bot 55:23–83Google Scholar
  34. Matthei O (1995) Manual de las malezas que crecen en Chile. Alfabeta Impresores, ChileGoogle Scholar
  35. Mihulka S, Pyšek P (2001) Invasion history of Oenothera congeners in Europe: a comparative study of spreading rates in the last 200 years. J Biogeogr 28:597–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moerman DE, Estabrook GF (2006) The botanist effect: counties with maximal species richness tend to be home to universities and botanists. J Biogeogr 33:1969–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  38. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca G, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nuñez M, Pauchard A (2010) Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all? Biol Invasions 12:707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pauchard A, Cavieres L, Bustamante R, Becerra P, Rapoport E (2004) Increasing the understanding of plant invasions in southern South America: first symposium on Alien Plant Invasions in Chile. Biol Invasions 6:255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peña E, Hidalgo M, Langdon B, Pauchard A (2008) Patterns of spread of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. invasion in a Natural Reserve in southern South America. Forest Ecol Manag 256:1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Eno 52:273–288Google Scholar
  43. Pyšek P, Hulme PE (2005) Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: linking pattern to process. Écoscience 12:302–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pyšek P, Prach K (1993) Plant invasion and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. J Biogeogr 20:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster G, Williamson M, Kirschner J (2004) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raunkiaer C (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saldaña A, Fuentes N, Pfanzelt S (2009) Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr. (Polygonaceae): a new record for the alien flora of Chile. Gayana Bot 66:283–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seabloom EW, Williams JW, Slayback D, Stoms DM, Viers JH, Dobson AP (2006) Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled species in California. Ecol Appl 16:1338–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Settele J, Hammen V, Hulme P, Karlson U, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kunin WE, Marion G, O’Connor M, Petanidou T, Peterson K, Potts S, Pritchard H, Pyšek P, Rounsevell M, Spangenberg J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes MT, Vighi M, Zobel M, Kühn I (2005) ALARM: assessing large scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Humanit Econ 14:9–72Google Scholar
  53. Smith RJ, Muir RDJ, Walpole MJ, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N (2003) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Speziale K, Lambertucci S, Carrete M, Tella J (2012) Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America. Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-011-0162-0
  55. Squeo F, Cavieres L, Arancio G, Novoa J, Matthei O, Marticorena C, Rodriguez R, Arroyo MTK, Muñoz M (1998) Biodiversidad de la flora vascular en la Región de Antofagasta, Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 71:571–591Google Scholar
  56. Stadler J, Mungai G, Brandl R (1998) Weed invasion in East Africa: insights from herbarium records. Afr J Ecol 36:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tropicos. org. Missouri Botanical Garden (2011). http://www.tropicos.org
  58. Ugarte E, Fuentes N, Klotz S (2010) European plants in southern South America—unwanted visitors? In: Settele J, Penev L, Georgiev T, Grabaum R, Grobelnik V, Hammen V, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kühn I (eds) Atlas of biodiversity risk. Pensoft Sofia, Bulgaria, pp 148–149Google Scholar
  59. Weber E (2003) Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CABI Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu SH, Hsieh CF, Chaw SM, Rejmánek M (2004) Plant invasions in Taiwan: insights from the flora of casual and naturalized alien species. Divers Distrib 10:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuloaga FO, Morrone O, Belgrano M (2008) Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Cono Sur (Argentina, Sur de Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay) Volumen I, II, III. Monogr Syst Bot 107 Mo Bot Gard Press, St. LouisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicol Fuentes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aníbal Pauchard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paulina Sánchez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jocelyn Esquivel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alicia Marticorena
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Invasiones Biológicas (LIB), Facultad de Ciencias ForestalesUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  2. 2.Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB)SantiagoChile
  3. 3.Departamento de BotánicaUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile

Personalised recommendations