Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 12, pp 2665–2685 | Cite as

Edaphic, salinity, and stand structural trends in chronosequences of native and non-native dominated riparian forests along the Colorado River, USA

  • David M. MerrittEmail author
  • Patrick B. Shafroth
Original Paper

Abstract

Tamarix spp. are introduced shrubs that have become among the most abundant woody plants growing along western North American rivers. We sought to empirically test the long-held belief that Tamarix actively displaces native species through elevating soil salinity via salt exudation. We measured chemical and physical attributes of soils (e.g., salinity, major cations and anions, texture), litter cover and depth, and stand structure along chronosequences dominated by Tamarix and those dominated by native riparian species (Populus or Salix) along the upper and lower Colorado River in Colorado and Arizona/California, USA. We tested four hypotheses: (1) the rate of salt accumulation in soils is faster in Tamarix-dominated stands than stands dominated by native species, (2) the concentration of salts in the soil is higher in mature stands dominated by Tamarix compared to native stands, (3) soil salinity is a function of Tamarix abundance, and (4) available nutrients are more concentrated in native-dominated stands compared to Tamarix-dominated stands. We found that salt concentration increases at a faster rate in Tamarix-dominated stands along the relatively free-flowing upper Colorado but not along the heavily-regulated lower Colorado. Concentrations of ions that are known to be preferentially exuded by Tamarix (e.g., B, Na, and Cl) were higher in Tamarix stands than in native stands. Soil salt concentrations in older Tamarix stands along the upper Colorado were sufficiently high to inhibit germination, establishment, or growth of some native species. On the lower Colorado, salinity was very high in all stands and is likely due to factors associated with floodplain development and the hydrologic effects of river regulation, such as reduced overbank flooding, evaporation of shallow ground water, higher salt concentrations in surface and ground water due to agricultural practices, and higher salt concentrations in fine-textured sediments derived from naturally saline parent material.

Keywords

Tamarix Populus Soil salinity Colorado River Flow regime Dams 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge David Canter, Julie Roth, Ron Osborne, Eligio Aragon, Kirsten Romig, Brett Wolk, Chris Dodge, John Swett, David Graf, and Steven Rauth for assistance in the field and with logistics. Thank you to Terry Waddle who directed the topographic surveying on the lower Colorado River, Rick Anderson who directed the topographic surveying on the upper Colorado River, Tammy Fancher for preparing Fig. 1, and L. Scott Baggett for assisting with the smearing technique for Figs. 2 through 6. Cathy Stewart provided assistance with soil texture analysis. We extend special appreciation to Laura Perry who provided helpful review and editorial suggestions. Funding from Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado River Regional Office and the U.S. Geological Survey Invasive Species Program supported PBS and funding from TNC David H. Smith fellowship program and an interagency agreement (no. 2216-08-IA-312) with the Bureau of Reclamation supported DMM’s work. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

References

  1. Adair EC, Binkley D, Andersen DC (2004) Patterns of nitrogen accumulation and cycling in riparian floodplain ecosystems along the Green and Yampa Rivers. Oecologia 139:108–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson BW (1995) Salt cedar, revegetation and riparian ecosystems in the Southwest. In: Proceedings of the California Exotic Plant Pest Council 1995 Symposium. http://www.cal-ipc.org/symposia/archive/pdf/1995_symposium_proceedings1797.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2008
  3. Auble GT, Scott ML, Friedman JM (2005) Use of individualistic streamflow-vegetation relations along the Fremont River, Utah, USA to assess impacts of flow alteration on wetland and riparian areas. Wetlands 25:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey RG (1995) Description of the ecoregions of the United States, 2nd edn. Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Balian EV, Naiman RJ (2005) Abundance and production of riparian trees in the lowland floodplain of the Queets River, Washington. Ecosystems 8:841–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauchamp VB, Walz C, Shafroth PB (2009) Salinity tolerance and mycorrhizal responsiveness of native xeroriparian plants in semi-arid western USA. Appl Soil Ecol 43:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchamp VB, Shafroth PB (2011) Floristic composition, beta diversity and nestedness of reference sites for restoration of xeroriparian areas in semi-arid western USA. Ecol Appl 21:465–476Google Scholar
  8. Berry WL (1970) Characteristics of salts secreted by Tamarix aphylla. Am J Bot 57:1226–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertin C, Yang XH, Weston LA (2003) The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boggs K, Weaver T (1994) Changes in vegetation and nutrient pools during riparian succession. Wetlands 14:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosabalidis AM, Thomson WW (1984) Light microscopical studies on salt gland development in Tamarix aphylla L. Ann Bot 54:169–174Google Scholar
  12. Brock JH (1994) Tamarix spp. (salt cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of Western USA. In: de Waal LC, Child LE, Wade PM, Brock JH (eds) Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants. Wiley, Chichester, pp 27–44Google Scholar
  13. Busch DE (1995) Effects of fire on southwestern riparian plant community structure. Southwest Nat 40:259–267Google Scholar
  14. Busch DE, Smith SD (1993) Effects of fire on water and salinity relations of riparian woody taxa. Oecologia 94:186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Busch DE, Smith SD (1995) Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern U.S. Ecol Monogr 65:347–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carman JG, Brotherson JD (1982) Comparisons of sites infested and not infested with saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Weed Sci 30:360–364Google Scholar
  17. Conway CJ, Nadeau CP, Piest L (2010) Fire helps restore natural disturbance regime to benefit rare and endangered marsh birds endemic to the Colorado River. Ecol Appl 20:2024–2035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper DJ, Merritt DM (2012) Assessing the water needs of riparian and wetland vegetation in the Western United States. RMRS-GTR-282. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Tomaso JM (1998) Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol 12:326–336Google Scholar
  20. Dressen DR, Wangen LE (1981) Elemental composition of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) impacted by effluents from a coal-fired power plant. J Environ Qual 10:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duan N (1983) Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Assoc 78:605–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ellis LM (2001) Short-term response of woody plants to fire in a Rio Grande riparian forest, Central New Mexico, USA. Biol Conserv 97:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellis L, Crawford C, Molles M (1998) Comparison of litter dynamics in native and exotic riparian vegetation along the Middle Rio Grande of central New Mexico, U.S.A. J Arid Environ 38:283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. EPA (1983) Methods for chemical analyses of water and wastes. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  26. Fageria NK, Gheyi HR, Moreira A (2011) Nutrient availability in salt affected soils. J Plant Nutr 34:945–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fierke MK, Kauffman JB (2005) Structural dynamics of riparian forests along a black cottonwood successional gradient. For Ecol Manag 215:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman JM, Vincent KR, Shafroth PB (2005) Dating floodplain sediments using tree-ring response to burial. Earth Surf Proc Land 30:1077–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaskin JF, Schaal BA (2002) Hybrid Tamarix widespread in US invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11256–11259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glenn EP, Nagler PL (2005) Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western US riparian zones. J Arid Environ 61:419–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glenn E, Tanner R, Mendez S et al (1998) Growth rates, salt tolerance and water use characteristics of native and invasive riparian plants from the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico. J Arid Environ 40:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glenn EP, Morino K, Nagler PL et al (2012) Roles of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated river. J Arid Environ 79:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graf WL (2006) Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology 79:336–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harron WRA, Webster GR, Cairns RR (1983) Relationship between exchangeable sodium and sodium adsorption ratio in a solonetzic soil association. Can J Soil Sci 63:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hillel D (1980) Movement of solutes and soil salinity. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–261Google Scholar
  36. Jackson J, Ball JT, Rose MR (1990) Assessment of the salinity tolerance of eight Sonoran desert riparian trees and shrubs. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Yuma, AZ and University of Nevada System, Desert Research Institute. Biological Sciences Center, Reno, p 102Google Scholar
  37. Jolly ID, Walker GR, Thorburn PJ (1993) Salt accumulation in semiarid floodplain soils with implications for forest health. J Hydrol 150:589–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kennedy TA, Hobbie SE (2004) Saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima) invasion alters organic matter dynamics in a desert stream. Freshw Biol 49:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleinkopf GE, Wallace A (1974) Physiological basis for salt tolerance of Tamarix ramosissima. Plant Sci Lett 3:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and minerological methods. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  41. Ladenburger CG, Hild AL, Kazmer DJ et al (2006) Soil salinity patterns in Tamarix invasions in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA. J Arid Environ 65:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laura RD (1977) Salinity and nitrogen mineralization in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 9:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lesica P, DeLuca TH (2004) Is tamarisk allelopathic? Plant Soil 267:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Menges ES (1986) Environmental correlates of herb species composition in five southern Wisconsin floodplain forests. Am Midl Nat 115:106–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merigliano MF (2005) Cottonwood understory zonation and its relation to floodplain stratigraphy. Wetlands 25:356–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merritt DM, Cooper DJ (2000) Riparian vegetation and channel change in response to river regulation: a comparative study of regulated and unregulated streams in the Green River basin, USA. Reg Riv Res Manag 16:543–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Merritt DM, Poff NL (2010) Shifting dominance of riparian Populus and Tamarix along gradients of flow alteration in western North American rivers. Ecol Appl 20:135–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moline AB, Poff NL (2008) Growth of an invertebrate shredder on native (Populus) and non-native (Tamarix, Elaeagnus) leaf litter. Freshw Biol 53:1012–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Molles MC, Crawford CS, Ellis LM et al (1998) Managed flooding for riparian ecosystem restoration. Bioscience 48:749–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nable RO, Banuelos GS, Paull JG (1997) Boron toxicity. Plant Soil 193:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nagler PL, Morino K, Didan K et al (2009) Wide-area estimates of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) evapotranspiration on the lower Colorado River measured by heat balance and remote sensing methods. Ecohydrology 2:18–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nagler PL, Glenn EP, Jarnevich CS et al (2011) Distribution and abundance of saltcedar and Russian olive in the western United States. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:508–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nanson GC, Beach HF (1977) Forest succession and sedimentation on a meandering-river floodplain, northeast British Columbia, Canada. J Biogeogr 4:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neuman DS, Wagner M, Braatne JH et al (1996) Stress physiology—abiotic. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD Jr, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  56. NOAA (2010) Climatological report (monthly). In: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=gjt, http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov. Accessed 20 Oct 2010
  57. Ohrtman MK (2009) Quantifying soil and groundwater chemistry in areas invaded by Tamarix spp. along the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. Natural Sciences and Mathematics. University of Denver, DenverGoogle Scholar
  58. Pavlovic P, Mitrovic M, Djurdjevic L (2004) An ecophysiological study of plants growing on the fly ash deposits from the “Nikola tesla-A” thermal power station in Serbia. Environ Manag 33:654–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pockman WT, Sperry JS (2000) Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran desert vegetation. Am J Bot 87:1287–1299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricutural handbook no. 60. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  61. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Braun DP et al (1998) A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Reg Riv Res Manag 14:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmidt JC, Wilcock PR (2008) Metrics for assessing the downstream effects of dams. Water Resour Res 44Google Scholar
  63. Schweingruber FH (1993) Trees and wood in dendrochronology: morphological, anatomical, and tree-ring analytical characteristics of trees frequently used in dendrochronology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Shafroth PB, Briggs MK (2008) Restoration ecology and invasive riparian plants: an introduction to the special section on Tamarix spp. in western North America. Restor Ecol 16:94–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shafroth PB, Auble GT, Stromberg JC et al (1998) Establishment of woody riparian vegetaion in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18:577–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shafroth PB, Beauchamp VB, Briggs MK et al (2008) Planning riparian restoration in the context of Tamarix control in western North America. Restor Ecol 16:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shani U, Hanks RJ (1993) Model of integrated effects of boron, inert salt, and water-flow on crop yield. Agron J 85:713–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sher AA, Marshall DL, Taylor JP (2002) Establishment patterns of native Populus and Salix in the presence of invasive nonnative Tamarix. Ecol Appl 12:760–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Singh M, Jain M, Pant RC (1999) Clonal variability in photosynthetic and growth characteristics of Populus deltoides under saline irrigation. Photosynthetica 36:605–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith SD, Devitt DA, Sala A et al (1998) Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands 18:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sookbirsingh R, Castillo K, Gill TE et al (2010) Salt separation processes in the saltcedar Tamarix ramosissima (Ledeb.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1271–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Spark DL (1996) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  73. Storey R, Thomson WW (1994) An X-ray microanalysis study of the salt glands of intracellular calcium crystals of Tamarix. Ann Bot 73:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stromberg J (1998a) Dynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) populations along the San Pedro River, Arizona. J Arid Environ 40:133–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stromberg JC (1998b) Functional equivalency of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) along a free-flowing river. Wetlands 18:675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stromberg JC (2001) Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. J Arid Environ 49:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stromberg JC, Beauchamp VB, Dixon MD et al (2007) Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in and south-western United States. Freshw Biol 52:651–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor JP, Smith LM, Haukos DA (2006) Evaluation of woody plant restoration in the middle Rio Grande: ten years after. Wetlands 26:1151–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thomson WW, Berry WL, Liu LL (1969) Localization and secretion of salt by the salt glands of Tamarix aphylla. Proc Nat Acad Sci 63:310–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tibbets TM, Molles MC (2005) C: N: P stoichiometry of dominant riparian trees and arthropods along the middle Rio Grande. Freshw Biol 50:1882–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tiegs SD, O’Leary JF, Pohl MM et al (2005) Flood disturbance and riparian species diversity on the Colorado River delta. Biodivers Conserv 14:1175–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ungar IA (1978) Halophyte seed germination. Bot Rev 44:233–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Uowolo AL, Binkley D, Adair EC (2005) Plant diversity in riparian forests in northwest Colorado: effects of time and river regulation. For Ecol Manag 218:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Van Steeter MM, Pitlick J (1998) Geomorphology and endangered fish habitats of the upper Colorado River: hisroric changes in stream flow, sediment load, and channel morphology. Water Resour Res 34:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vandersande MW, Glenn EP, Walworth JL (2001) Tolerance of five riparian plants from the lower Colorado River to salinity drought and inundation. J Arid Environ 49:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Walker LR, Smith SD (1997) Impacts of invasive plants on community and ecosystem properties. In: Luken JO, Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer, New York, pp 69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weidenhamer JD, Callaway RM (2010) Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. J Chem Ecol 36:59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wiesenborn WD (1996) Saltcedar impacts on salinity, water, fire frequency and flooding. Satlcedar Management Workshop, Rancho MirageGoogle Scholar
  89. Wilson RE (1970) Succession in stands of Populus deltoides along the Missouri River in southeastern South Dakota. Am Midl Nat 83:330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Xiong SJ, Nilsson C, Johansson ME et al (2001) Responses of riparian plants to accumulation of silt and plant litter: the importance of plant traits. J Veg Sci 12:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yeo A (1998) Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of whole-plant physiology. J Exp Bot 49:915–929Google Scholar
  92. Zeide B (2010) Comparison of self-thinning models: an exercise in reasoning. Trees Struct Funct 24:1117–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.(outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USFS National Watershed, Fish and Wildlife StaffFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.US Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science CenterFt. CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations