Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 11, pp 2271–2281 | Cite as

A comparative analysis of the factors promoting deer invasion

Original Paper

Abstract

Invasive non-native deer can cause negative impacts at ecosystem, community and population levels. Here we aim to determine which characteristics predict success at two stages of the invasion process, establishment and spread, in introduced deer. We collected historical data on the outcomes of introduction events and compiled a dataset of species traits. Characteristics correlated to the success of invasion were identified using linear modelling methods, which control for the non-independence of the introduction events. A phylogenetic tree of the deer was reconstructed using DNA markers in order to control for the effects of common ancestry in species level analyses. At the species level, we found weaning age, age at sexual maturity and native range size are predictive of establishment, whereas weaning body mass is predictive of spread. At the population level we found that establishment success is primarily determined by the number of introduced individuals whereas breadth of habitat and diet determine which of the established populations will spread.

Keywords

Deer Establishment Generalised estimator equations Invasion Phylogeny Spread 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Rory Putman for his valuable suggestions and comments on the manuscript. Sven Bacher generously provided access to the mammal introduction database, and Simon Reader kindly shared the data on brain masses. We thank William Pearse for his advice on coding in R. Edinburgh and Chester Zoos provided samples for the phylogenetic analysis. Finally, we would like to thank three anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the paper. This study was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the British Deer Society, the Royal Society and the European Research Council.

Supplementary material

10530_2012_228_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (278 kb)
Trait data for introduced deer species (PDF 403 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (106 kb)
Deer introduction data (PDF 106 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (105 kb)
Sources of DNA sequence data used in the phylogenetic analysis (PDF 104 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (149 kb)
Results of GLM and GLMM analyses of establishment at the population level (PDF 148 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (136 kb)
Results of GLM and GEE analyses of establishment at the species level (PDF 136 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (139 kb)
Results of GLM and GLMM analyses of spread at the population level (PDF 139 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (134 kb)
Results of GLM and GEE analyses of spread at the species level (PDF 134 kb)
10530_2012_228_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (37 kb)
Plots of predicted probability of establishment and spread (PDF 188 kb)

References

  1. Acevedo P, Ward AI, Real R, Smith GC (2010) Assessing biogeographical relationships of ecologically related species using favourability functions: a case study on British deer. Divers Distrib 16:515–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allendorf FW (2003) Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv Biol 17:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball MC, Pither R, Manseau M, Clark J, Petersen SD, Kingston S, Morrill N, Wilson P (2007) Characterization of target nuclear DNA from faeces reduces technical issues associated with the assumptions of low-quality and quantity template. Conserv Genet 8:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck B, Walkup K, Rodrigues M, Unwin S, Travis D, Stoinski T (2007) Best practice guidelines for re-introduction of great apes. SSC Primate Specialist Group of the World Conservation UnionGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn TM, Duncan RP (2001) Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414:195–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bomford M, Darbyshire RO, Randall L (2009) Determinants of establishment success for introduced exotic mammals. Wildl Res 36:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyle AE (1996) The Rio convention on biological diversity. In: Bowman M, Redgwell C (eds) International law and the conservation of biological diversity. Kluwer Law International, London, pp 33–49Google Scholar
  9. Chadwick AH, Ratcliffe PR, Abernethy K (1996) Sika deer in Scotland: density, population size, habitat use and fertility—some comparisons with red deer. Scott For 50:8–16Google Scholar
  10. Chapman NG, Claydon K, Claydon M, Forde PG, Harris S (1993) Sympatric populations of muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)—a comparative analysis of their ranging behavior, social organization and activity. J Zool 229:623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman N, Harris S, Stanford A (1994) Reeves’ Muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in Britain: their history, spread, habitat selection, and the role of human intervention in accelerating their dispersal. Mamm Rev 24:113–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clout MN, Russell JC (2008) The invasion ecology of mammals: a global perspective. Wildl Res 35:180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooke A, Farrell L (1998) Chinese water deer. Mammal Society and British Deer Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke AS, Farrell L (2001) Impact of muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) at Monks Wood National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, Eastern England. Forestry 74:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke AS, Lakhani KH (1996) Damage to coppice regrowth by muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) and protecting with electric fencing. Biol Conserv 75:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cote SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Courchamp F, Chapuis JL, Pascal M (2003) Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol Rev 78:347–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Danilkin A (1996) Behavioural ecology of Siberian and European roe deer. Wildlife ecology and behaviour series, vol 2. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. DEFRA (2004) The sustainable management of wild deer populations in England: an action plan. DEFRA and Foresty Commission, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  20. Dolman PM, Waber K (2008) Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer. Wildl Res 35:202–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan RP (2001) High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. J Anim Ecol 70:621–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrlich P (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading process: vertebrates. Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. University Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldhamer G, Armstrong W (1993) Interspecific competition between four exotic species and native artiodactyls in the United States. In: Transactions of the North American wildlife and natural resources conference, vol 58, pp 468–478Google Scholar
  25. Feldhamer GA, Demarais S (2009) Free ranging and confined sika deer in North America: current status, biology and management. In: McCullough DR, Takatsuki S, Kaji K (eds) Sika deer biology and management of native and introduced populations. Springer, New York, pp 615–642Google Scholar
  26. Forde PG (1989) Comparative ecology of Muntiacus reevesi and roe deer Capreolus capreolus in a commercial coniferous forest. Ph.D. thesis, University of BristolGoogle Scholar
  27. Forsyth DM, Duncan RP (2001) Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. Am Nat 157:583–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsyth DM, Coomes DA, Nugent G, Hall GMJ (2002) Diet and diet preferences of introduced ungulates (Order: Artiodactyla) in New Zealand. NZ J Zool 29:323–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forsyth DM, Duncan RP, Bomford M, Moore G (2004) Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conserv Biol 18:557–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Forsyth DM, Wilmshurst JM, Allen RB, Coomes DA (2010) Impacts of introduced deer and extinct moa on New Zealand ecosystems. NZ J Ecol 34:48–65Google Scholar
  31. Fuller RJ, Gill RMA (2001) Ecological impacts of increasing numbers of deer in British woodland. Forestry 74:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilbert C, Ropiquet A, Hassanin A (2006) Mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies of Cervidae (Mammalia, Ruminantia): systematics, morphology, and biogeography. Mol Phylogen Evol 40:101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. Forestry 65:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gill RMA, Morgan G (2010) The effects of varying deer density on natural regeneration in woodlands in lowland Britain. Forestry 83:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodman SJ, Barton NH, Swanson G, Abernethy K, Pemberton JM (1999) Introgression through rare hybridization: a genetic study of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (genus Cervus) in Argyll, Scotland. Genetics 152:355–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hassanin A, Pasquet E, Vigne JD (1998) Molecular systematics of the subfamily Caprinae (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) as determined from cytochrome b sequences. J Mammal Evol 5:217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hemami MR, Watkinson AR, Dolman PM (2004) Habitat selection by sympatric muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland commercial pine forest. For Ecol Manag 194:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hemami MR, Watkinson AR, Dolman PM (2005) Population densities and habitat associations of introduced muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and native roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland pine forest. For Ecol Manag 215:224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jaksic FM, Iriarte JA, Jiménez JE, Martínez DR (2002) Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biol Invasions 4:157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jeschke JM (2008) Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds. Divers Distrib 14:913–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2006) Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Glob Chang Biol 12:1608–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33:511–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keiper RR (1985) Are sika deer responsible for the decline of white-tailed deer on Assateague Island, Maryland? Wildl Soc Bull 13:144–146Google Scholar
  46. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lande R (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 142:911–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lever C (1985) Naturalized mammals of the world. Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  49. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Long JL (2003) Introduced mammals of the world. CSIRO, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  51. Lowe VPW, Gardiner AS (1975) Hybridization between red deer (Cervus elaphus) and sika deer (Cervus nippon) with particular reference to stocks in NW England. J Zool 177:553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2001) MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, 4.02nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  53. Moriarty A (2004) The liberation, distribution, abundance and management of wild deer in Australia. Wildl Res 31:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nunez MA, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA (2010) Population, community and ecosystem effects of exotic herbivores: a growing global concern. Biol Invasions 12:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  56. Paradis E, Claude J (2002) Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J Theor Biol 218:175–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pimentel D (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pitra C, Fickel J, Meijaard E, Groves PC (2004) Evolution and phylogeny of old world deer. Mol Phylogen Evol 33:880–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pocock RI (1910) On the specialized cutaneous glands of ruminants. Proc Zool Soc 80:840–845Google Scholar
  61. Pollard E, Cooke AS (1994) Impact of muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) on egg-laying sites of the white admiral butterfly (Ladoga camilla) in a Cambridgeshire wood. Biol Conserv 70:189–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Putman RJ, Moore NP (1998) Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mamm Rev 28:141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  64. Randi E, Mucci N, Pierpaoli M, Douzery E (1998) New phylogenetic perspectives on the Cervidae (Artiodactyla) are provided by the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Proc R Soc B 265:793–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Randi E, Mucci N, Claro-Hergueta F, Bonnet A, Douzery E (2001) A mitochondrial DNA control region phylogeny of the Cervinae: speciation in Cervus and implications for conservation. Anim Conserv 4:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ratcliffe PR (1987) Distribution and current status of sika deer (Cervus nippon) in Great Britain. Mamm Rev 17:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Relva MA, Nunez MA, Simberloff D (2010) Introduced deer reduce native plant cover and facilitate invasion of non-native tree species: evidence for invasional meltdown. Biol Invasions 12:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rodriguez-Cabal MA, Barrios-Garcia MN, Simberloff D (2009) Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds (reply). Divers Distrib 15:911–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Senn HV, Pemberton JM (2009) Variable extent of hybridization between invasive sika (Cervus nippon) and native red deer (C. elaphus) in a small geographical area. Mol Ecol 18:862–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Simberloff D (1996) Hybridization between native and introduced wildlife species: importance for conservation. Wildl Biol 33:143–150Google Scholar
  74. Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. PNAS 102:5460–5465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L (2008a) Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. In: Symposium of the American Society of Naturalists, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp S63–S71Google Scholar
  76. Sol D, Vila M, Kuhn I (2008b) The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions. Biol Invasions 10:1119–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Theodorou K, Couvet D (2006) On the expected relationship between inbreeding, fitness, and extinction. Genet Sel Evol 38:371–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walker B, Steffen W (1997) An overview of the implications of global change for natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Conserv Ecol 1. http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art2
  79. Ward AI (2005) Expanding ranges of wild and feral deer in Great Britain. Mamm Rev 35:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. White PCL, Ford AES, Clout MN, Engeman RM, Roy S, Saunders G (2008) Alien invasive vertebrates in ecosystems: pattern, process and the social dimension. Wildl Res 35:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Fautley
    • 1
  • Tim Coulson
    • 1
  • Vincent Savolainen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of BiologyImperial College LondonAscot, BerkshireUK
  2. 2.Royal Botanic GardensKewUK

Personalised recommendations