Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 2133–2140

Fragment reattachment, reproductive status, and health indicators of the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum with implications for dispersal

Original Paper
  • 360 Downloads

Abstract

The invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum is now widespread in coastal and offshore waters of New England, USA. D. vexillum can inflict ecological and economic damage through biofouling and habitat modification. Natural and anthropogenic processes that fragment colonies of D. vexillum may be accelerating the spread of this invader. Reattachment success and fragment viability were confirmed in the laboratory after four weeks of suspension in experimental aquaria. The shape of suspended D. vexillum fragments progressed from flattened to globular spheres and then flattened again after reattachment to the substrate. Reproductive activity, confirmed by the presence of eggs and larvae, was observed for fragments suspended up to 3 weeks suggesting that D. vexillum is capable of reproducing while in a fragmented, suspended state. An index of colony health was used to monitor change in D. vexillum health while in suspension. Overall, colony health declined with time in suspension although colonies that appeared dead (black and gray in overall color) still contained a substantial number of healthy live zooids. These results suggest that activities that cause fragmentation can significantly facilitate the spread of D. vexillum. Coastal managers should consider reducing or eliminating, when practical, activities that return fragmented colonies of D. vexillum to the water. In-water cleaning of biofouling and dredging are likely expediting the spread of this invasive species unless biofouling can be contained and removed from the water.

Keywords

Didemnum vexillum Invasive species Tunicate 

References

  1. Adams CM, Shumway SE, Whitlatch RB, Getchis T (2011) Biofouling in marine molluscan shellfish aquaculture: a survey assessing the business and economic implications of mitigation. J World Aquac Soc 42(2):242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bock DG, Zhan A, Lejeusne C, MacIsaac HJ, Cristescu ME (2011) Looking at both sides of the invasion: patterns of colonization in the violet tunicate Botrylloides violaceus. Mol Ecol 20:503–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bullard SG, Lambert G, Carman MR, Byrnes J, Whitlatch RB, Ruiz G, Miller RJ, Harris L, Valentine PC, Collie JS, Pederson J, McNaught DC, Cohen AN, Asch RG, Dijkstra J, Heinonen K (2007a) The invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum sp.: current distribution, basic biology and potential threat to marine communities of the northeast and west coasts of North America. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullard SG, Sedlack B, Reinhardt JF, Litty C, Gareau K, Whitlatch RB (2007b) Fragmentation of colonial ascidians: differences in reattachment capability among species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:166–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carman MR, Grunden DW (2010) First occurrence of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in eelgrass habitat. Aquat Invasions 5:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carman MR, Morris JA, Karney RC, Grunden DW (2010) An initial assessment of native and invasive tunicates in shellfish aquaculture of the North American east coast. J Appl Ichthyol 26:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver CE, Mallet AL, Vercaemer B (2006) Biological synopsis of the colonial tunicates, Botryllus schlosseri and Botrylloides violaceus. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2747: v +42pGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen CS, McCann L, Davis T, Shaw L, Ruiz G (2011) Discovery and significance of the colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum in Alaska. Aquat Invasions 6:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coutts ADM, Sinner J (2003) An updated benefit-cost analysis of management options for Didemnum vexillum in Queen Charlotte Sound. Cawthron Report No. 925, Biosecurity New Zealand, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dijkstra JA, Nolan R (2011) Potential of the invasive colonial ascidian, Didemnum vexillum, to limit escape response of the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. 6:451–456Google Scholar
  11. Dijkstra J, Harris LG, Westerman E (2007) Distribution and long-term temporal patterns of four invasive colonial ascidians in the Gulf of Maine. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guenther J, Southgate PC, deNys R (2006) The effect of age and shell size on accumulation of fouling organisms on the Akotya pearl oyster Pinctata fucata (Gould). Aquaculture 253:366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopkins GA, Forrest BM, Piola RF, Gardner JPA (2010) Factors affecting survivorship of defouled communities and the effect of fragmentation on establishment success. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 396(2):233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambert G (2005) Ecology and natural history of the protochordates. Can J Zool 83:34–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lambert G (2007) Invasive sea squirts: a growing global problem. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lambert G (2009) Adventures of a sea squirt sleuth: unraveling the identity of Didemnum vexillum, a global ascidian invader. Aquat Invasions 4:5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lengyel NL, Collie JS, Valentine PC (2009) The invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum on Georges Bank—ecological effects and genetic identification. Aquat Invasions 4:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Locke A, Hanson JM, Ellis KM, Thompson J, Rochette R (2007) Invasion of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence by the clubbed tunicate (Styela clava Herdman): potential mechanisms for invasions of Prince Edward Island estuaries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy A, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2007) Effects of temperature on growth rates of colonial ascidians: a comparison of Didemnum sp. to Botryllus schlosseri and Botrylloides violaceus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:172–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mercer JM, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (2009) Potential effects of the invasive colonial ascidian (Didemnum vexillum) on pebble-cobble bottom habitats in Long Island Sound, USA. Aquat Invasions 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris JA Jr, Carman MR, Hoagland KE, Green-Beach ERM, Karney RC (2009) Impact of the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum on the recruitment of the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians irradians) and implications for recruitment of the sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) on Georges Bank. Aquat Invasions 4:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2007) Variation in the ability of Didemnum sp. to invade established communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pederson, J, Bullock R, Carlton J, Dijkstra, Dobroski N et al. (2005) Marine invaders in the Northeast. Rapid assessment survey of non-native and native marine species of float dock communities, August 2003. MIT Sea Grant College Program Publication No. 05-3, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p 40Google Scholar
  24. Ryland JS, Warner GF (1986) Growth and form in modular animals: ideas on the size and arrangement of zooids. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 313:53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stefaniak L, Lambert G, Gittenberger A, Zhang H, Lin S, Whitlatch RB (2009) Genetic conspecificity of the worldwide populations of Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. Aquat Invasions 4:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stoner DS (1989) Fragmentation: a mechanism for the stimulation of genet growth rates in an encrusting colonial ascidian. Bull Mar Sci 45:277–287Google Scholar
  29. Valentine PC, Carman MR, Blackwood D, Heffron E (2007a) Ecological observations on the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. in a New England tide pool habitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Valentine PC, Collie JS, Reid RN, Asch RG, Guida VG, Blackwood DS (2007b) The occurrence of the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. on Georges Bank gravel habitat—ecological observations and potential effects on groundfish and scallop fisheries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valentine PC, Carman MR, Dijkstra J, Blackwood DS (2009) Larval recruitment of the invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum, seasonal water temperatures in New England coastal and offshore waters, and implications for spread of the species. Aquat Invasions 4:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (2000) Geographical distributions and organism-habitat associations of shallow-water introduced marine fauna in New England. In: Pederson J (ed) Marine bioinvasions: proceedings of the first national conference. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Sea Grant College Program, MITSG 00-2, Cambridge, pp 61–65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NOAA National Ocean ServiceNational Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NOAA/NOS/NCCOS)BeaufortUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations