Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 2117–2131 | Cite as

Variation in tissue stoichiometry and condition index of zebra mussels in invaded Swedish lakes

  • Rahmat NaddafiEmail author
  • Willem Goedkoop
  • Ulf Grandin
  • Peter Eklöv
Original Paper

Abstract

We examined the spatial variation in carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometry and condition index of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), non-indigenous species, in four Swedish lakes with different productivity. Within-lake variability was observed in tissue C:N molar ratios of Dreissena in all lakes and in tissue C:P ratio only in three lakes. Depth had no effect on tissue C:P and N:P ratios of Dreissena. A positive correlation was found between C:N:P stoichiometry of seston and elemental composition of zebra mussel in one of the lakes. Tissue C:N and N:P ratios were the main factors that related to zebra mussel condition index. Zebra mussel condition was positively related to tissue C:N ratio. Smaller Dreissena had higher C:N ratio than larger Dreissena in two of the four lakes. Zebra mussels in the lake with highest productivity had lower C:P and N:P ratios than zebra mussels in the lake with lowest productivity. Our study suggests that the zebra mussel may modify their phosphorus content in relation to lake trophic state, and therefore cope with stoichiometric constraints which may explain the invasion success of this and other related species.

Keywords

Zebra mussel Tissue C:N:P stoichiometry Spatial variation Condition index Productivity Invasion success 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support of the Swedish Research Council to R. N. and P. E., Oscar and Lili Lamm Memorial Foundation to R. N., and the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency to U. G. We thank Helena Enderskog, Jan Johansson, and Nazila H. Koupayeh for assistance in laboratory analysis and Dr. Lars Rudstam for discussion. Comments from Dr. Ladd Johnson and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Acharya K, Jack JD, Smith AS (2006) Stoichiometry of Daphnia lumholtzi and their invasion success: are they linked? Arch Hydrobiol 165:433–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alunno-Bruscia M, Petraitis PS, Bourget E, Frechette M (2000) Body size-density relationship for Mytilus edulis in an experimental food-regulated situation. Oikos 90:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnott DL, Vanni MJ (1996) Nitrogen and phosphorus recycling by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the western basin of Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:646–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayne BL, Gee JM, Davey JT, Scullard C (1978) Physiological responses of Mytilus edulis L. to parasitic infestation by Mytilicola intestinalis. J Cons Int Explor Mer 38:12–17Google Scholar
  5. Boersma M, Elser JJ (2006) Too much of good thing: on stoichiometrically balanced diets and maximal growth. Ecology 85:1325–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Claudi R, Mackie GL (1994) Practical manual for zebra mussel monitoring and control. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Côté LM, Reynolds JD (2002) Predictive ecology to the rescue? Science 298:1181–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross WF, Benstead JP, Rosemand AD, Wallace JB (2003) Consumer-resource stoichiometry in detritusbased streams. Ecol Lett 6:721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eiler A, Bertilson S (2007) Flavobacteria blooms in four eutrophic lakes: linking population dynamics of freshwater bacterioplankton to resource availability. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3511–3518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elser JJ, Hayakawa K, Urabe J (2001) Nutrient limitation reduces food quality for zooplankton: Daphnia response to seston phosphorus enrichment. Ecology 82:898–903Google Scholar
  12. Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T, Watts T, Hobbie S, Fagan W, Schade J, Sterner RW (2003) Growth rate–Stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eschweiler N, Christensen HT (2011) Trade-off between increased survival and reduced growth for blue mussels living on Pacific oyster reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 403:90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frandsen RP, Dolmer P (2002) Effects of substrate type on growth and mortality of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) exposed to the predator Carcinus maenas. Mar Biol 141:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frost PC, Elser JJ (2002) Growth responses of littoral mayflies to the phosphorus content of their food. Ecol Lett 5:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frost PC, Evans-White MA, Finkel ZV, Jensen TC, Matzek V (2005) Are you what you eat? Physiological constraints on organismal stoichiometry in an elementally imbalanced world. Oikos 109:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frost PC, Benstead JP, Cross WF, Hillebrand H, Larson JH, Xenopoulos MA, Yoshida T (2006) Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers. Ecol Lett 9:774–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446:1079–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garton DW, Johnson LE (2000) Variation in growth rates of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, within Lake Wawasee. Freshw Biol 45:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goedkoop W, Naddafi R, Grandin U (2011) Retention of N and P by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas) and its quantitative role in the nutrient budget of eutrophic Lake Ekoln, Sweden. Biol Invasions 13:1077–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. González AL, Kominoski JS, Danger M, Ishida S, Iwai N, Rubach A (2010) Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions? Oikos 119:779–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grandin U, Larson D (2007) Dykinventering av vandrarmussla i Mälaren och Hjälmaren. Department of Environmental Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, report 27, Uppsala 17 pp (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  23. Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K (1983) Methods of seawater analysis, 2nd edn. Verlag ChemieGoogle Scholar
  24. Hessen DO (2006) Determinants of seston C:P-ratio in lakes. Freshw Biol 51:1560–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hessen DO, Van Donk E, Gulati R (2005) Seasonal seston stoichiometry: effects on zooplankton in cyanobacteria dominated lakes. J Plankton Res 27:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillebrand H, Kahlert M (2001) Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1881–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahlert M, Hasselrot AT, Hillebrand H, Pettersson K (2002) Spatial and temporal variation in the biomass and nutrient status of epilithic algae in Lake Erken, Sweden. Freshw Biol 47:1191–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kvarnäs H (2001) Morphometry and hydrology of the four large lakes of Sweden. Ambio 30:467–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liess A, Hillebrand H (2005) Stoichiometric variation in C:N, C:P and N:P ratios of littoral benthic invertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:256–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackie GL, Schloesser DW (1996) Comparative biology of zebra mussels in Europe and North America: an overview. Am Zool 36:244–258Google Scholar
  31. Malmaeus JM, Blenckner T, Markensten H, Persson I (2006) Lake phosphorus dynamics and climate warming: a mechanistic model approach. Ecol Model 190:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mersch J, Wagner P, Pihan JC (1996) Copper in indigenous and transplanted zebra mussels in relation to changing water concentrations and body weight. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:886–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mills EL, Chrisman JR, Baldwin B, Owens RW, O’Gorman R, Howell T, Roseman E, Raths MK (1999) Changes in the dreissenid community in the lower Great Lakes with emphasis on southern Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 25:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moe SJ, Stelzer RS, Forman MR, Harpole WS, Daufresne T, Yoshida T (2005) Recent advances in ecological stoichiometry: insights for population and community ecology. Oikos 109:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morehouse RL (2010) Stoichiometry in a benthic invasive: exploring how stoichiometric imbalances with algal resources affect zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) growth and condition. Oklahoma State University, M.Sc. thesis. pp 44Google Scholar
  36. Naddafi R, Eklöv P, Pettersson K (2007a) Non-lethal predator effects on the feeding rate and prey selection of the exotic zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Oikos 116:1289–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naddafi R, Pettersson K, Eklöv P (2007b) The effect of seasonal variation in selective feeding by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on phytoplankton community composition. Freshw Biol 52:823–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naddafi R, Pettersson K, Eklöv P (2008) Effects of the zebra mussel, an exotic freshwater species, on seston stoichiometry. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1973–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naddafi R, Eklöv P, Pettersson K (2009) Stoichiometric constraints do not limit successful invaders: zebra mussels in Swedish lakes. PLoS ONE 4:e5345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naddafi R, Pettersson K, Eklöv P (2010) Predation and water depth as structuring forces of the zebra mussel—effects on density and population size structure. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naddafi R, Blenckner T, Eklöv P, Pettersson K (2011) Physicochemical properties determine zebra mussel invasion success in lakes. Hydrobiologia 669:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Persson J, Brett MT, Vrede T, Ravvet JK (2007) Food quantity and quality regulation of trophic transfer between primary producers and a keystone grazer (Daphnia) in pelagic freshwater food webs. Oikos 116:1152–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qin P, Mayer CM, Schulz KL, Ji X, Ritchie M (2007) Ecological stoichiometry in benthic food webs: effect of light and nutrients on periphyton food quantity and quality in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1436–1443Google Scholar
  44. Ricciardi A, Neves RJ, Rasmussen JB (1998) Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. J Anim Ecol 67:613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Selig U, Hübener T, Heerkloss R, Schubert H (2004) Vertical gradient of nutrients in two dimictic lakes—influence of phototrophic sulfur bacteria on nutrient balance. Aquat Sci 66:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smaal AC, Stralen MRV (1990) Average annual growth and condition of mussels as a function of food source. Hydrobiologia 195:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smolders R, Bervoets L, Blust R (2002) Transplanted zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) as active biomonitors in an effluent dominated river. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1889–1896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Smolders R, Bervoets L, De Coen W, Blust R (2004) Cellular energy allocation in zebra mussels exposed along a pollution gradient: linking cellular effects to higher levels of biological organization. Environ Poll 129:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Soto M, Ireland MP, Marigomez I (2000) Changes in mussel biometry on exposure to metals: implications in estimation of metal bioavailability in ‘Mussel- Watch’ programmes. Sci Tot Environ 247:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sterner RW (1997) Modelling interactions of food quality and quantity in homeostatic consumers. Freshw Biol 38:473–481Google Scholar
  52. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry. Princeton University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Sterner RW, Andersen T, Elser JJ, Hessen DO, Hood J, Mccauley E, Urabe J (2008) Scale dependent carbon: nitrogen: phosphorus seston stoichiometry in marine and freshwaters. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1169–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strayer DL (2009) Twenty years of zebra mussels: lessons from the mollusk that made headlines. Front Ecol Environ 7:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tibbets TM, Krist AC, Hall RO Jr, Riley LA (2010) Phosphorus-mediated changes in life history traits of the invasive New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia 163:549–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Diepen JV, Davids C (1976) Zebra mussels and polystyrene. Hydrobiol Bull 19:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vanderploeg HA, Nalepa TF, Jude DJ, Mills EL, Holeck KT, Liebig JR, Grigorovich IA, Ojaveer H (2002) Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1209–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vanderploeg HA, Johengen TH, Liebig JR (2009) Feedback between zebra mussel selective feeding and algal composition affects mussel condition: did the regime changer pay a price for its success? Freshw Biol 54:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vanni MJ (2002) Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:341–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vanni MJ, Bowling AM, Dickman EM, Hale RS, Higgins KA, Horgan MJ, Knoll LB, Renwick WH, Stein RA (2006) Nutrient cycling by fish supports relatively more lake primary production as ecosystem productivity increases. Ecology 87:1696–1709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Voets J, Talloen W, de Tender T, van Dongen S, Covaci A, Blust R, Bervoets L (2006) Microcontaminant accumulation, physiological condition and bilateral asymmetry in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) from clean and contaminated surface waters. Aquat Toxicol 79:213–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wu RSS, Shin PKS (1998) Transplant experiments on growth and mortality of the fan mussel Pinna bicolor. Aquaculture 163:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahmat Naddafi
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Willem Goedkoop
    • 1
  • Ulf Grandin
    • 1
  • Peter Eklöv
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Aquatic Science and AssessmentSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Genetics/Limnology, Evolutionary Biology CentreUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental StudiesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations