Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 1999–2016 | Cite as

Biogeographical comparison of the invasive Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges

  • Hariet L. Hinz
  • Mark Schwarzländer
  • Jessica L. McKenney
  • Michael G. Cripps
  • Bradley Harmon
  • William J. Price
Original Paper

Abstract

Invasive plants are expected to perform better and consequently be more abundant in their introduced compared to their native ranges. However, few studies have simultaneously compared plant and population traits along with biotic and abiotic environmental parameters for invasive and native plant populations. We compared 17 native Eastern European, 14 expanded Western European and 31 introduced US populations of the invasive Lepidium draba over 2 years. Most parameters were similar between the two European ranges, but differed for the US. Density, cover, and biomass of L. draba were greater in the US while cover of other vegetation was lower. Bare-ground and litter cover were greater for US populations in 1 year, as was L. draba shoot height and seed output. Availability of labile soil nitrogen was also greater in the US range. Endophagous shoot herbivory was greater in Western Europe compared to the US in 1 year. As expected, specialist herbivores were only found in Europe. Differences between ranges were not explained by varying environmental conditions (climate, altitude and latitude). In summary our results indicate that lower interspecific competition, higher resource availability and the lack of specialist natural enemies may all contribute to the increased performance of L. draba in its introduced US range. Additionally, L. draba is well adapted to disturbance events, which may further benefit its competitiveness at degraded sites. In general our results were consistent between years, which reinforces their validity. However, some of the differences were only significant in one of the 2 years, which, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance to ideally conduct biogeographic comparisons over multiple years.

Keywords

Hoary cress Invasive species Invasion mechanism Biological control Herbivory 

References

  1. Alvarez CR, Alvarez R, Grigera MS, Lavado RS (1998) Associations between organic matter fractions and the active soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 30:767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bais HP, Vepachedu RV, Gilroy S, Callaway RM, Vivanco JM (2003) Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: from molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 301:1377–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball PW (1964) Cardaria Desv. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA et al (eds) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastlová-Hanzélyová D (2001) Comparative study of native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria: population characteristics, site and community relationships. In: Brundu G, Brock J, Camarda I, Child L, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  5. Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan LL (1937) A new species of Ceutorhynchus from North America (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Bull Brooklyn Entomol Soc 32:205–207Google Scholar
  8. Buckley YM, Downey P, Fowler SV, Hill R, Memmot J, Norambuena H, Pitcairn M, Shaw R, Sheppard AW, Winks C, Wittenberg R, Rees M (2003) Are invasives bigger? A global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs. Ecology 84:1434–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buschmann H, Edwards PJ, Dietz H (2005) Variation in growth pattern and response to slug damage among native and invasive provenances of four perennial Brassicaceae species. J Ecol 93:322–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbours: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:521–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callaway RM, Waller LP, Diaconu A, Pal R, Collins AR, Mueller-Schaerer H, Maron JL (2011) Escape from competition: neighbors reduce C. stoebe performance at home but not away. Ecology 92:2208–2213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choesin DN, Boerner REJ (1991) Allyl isothiocyanate release and the allelopathic potential of Brassica napus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 78:1083–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corns WG, Frankton C (1952) Hoary cress in Canada with particular reference to their distribution and control in Alberta. Sci Agric 32:484–495Google Scholar
  16. Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Ewards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. The 26th symposium of the British ecological society held jointly with the linnean society of London. Blackwell, London, pp 429–453Google Scholar
  17. Cripps MG, Hinz HL, McKenney JL, Harmon BL, Merickel FW, Schwarzlaender M (2006a) Comparative survey of the phytophagous arthropod faunas associated with Lepidium draba in Europe and the western United States, and the potential for biological weed control. Biocontrol Sci Tech 16:1007–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cripps MG, Schwarzlaender M, McKenney JL, Hinz HL, Price WJ (2006b) Biogeographical comparison of the arthropod herbivore communities associated with Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced range. J Biogeogr 33:2107–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cripps MG, Hinz HL, McKenney JL, Price WJ, Schwarzlaender M (2009) No evidence for an ‘evolution of increased competitive ability’ for the invasive Lepidium draba. Basic Appl Ecol 10:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cripps MG, Edwards GR, Bourdôt GW, Saville DJ, Hinz HL, Fowler SV (2010) Enemy release does not increase performance of Cirsium arvense in New Zealand. Plant Ecol 209:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparison of co-occuring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 34:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Antonio CM, Dudley TL, Mack M (1999) Disturbance and biological invasions: direct effects and feedbacks. In: Walker LR (ed) Ecosystems of disturbed ground. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 413–452Google Scholar
  23. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diez JM, Dickie I, Edwards G, Hulme PE, Sullivan JJ, Duncan RP (2010) Negative soil feedbacks accumulate over time for non-native plant species. Ecol Lett 13:803–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ebeling SK, Hensen I, Auge H (2007) The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range. Divers Distrib 14:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards KR, Adams MS, Kvet J (1998) Differences between European native and American invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria. Appl Veg Sci 1:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Engelkes T, Morriën E, Verhoeven KJF, Bezemer TM, Biere A, Harvey JA, McIntyre LM, Tamis WLM, van der Putten WH (2008) Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature 456:946–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erfmeier A, Bruelheide H (2004) Comparison of native and invasive Rhododendron ponticum populations: Growth, reproduction and morphology under field conditions. Flora 199:120–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fowler SV, Harman HM, Memmott J, Paynter Q, Shaw R, Sheppard AW, Syrett P (1996) Comparing the population dynamics of broom, Cytisus scoparius, as a native plant in the United Kingdom and France and as an invasive alien weed in Australia and New Zealand. In: Moran VC, Hoffmann JH (eds) Proceedings of the IX international symposium on biological control of weeds. University of Cape Town, Stellenbosch, pp 19–26Google Scholar
  30. Francis A, Warwick SI (2008) The biology of Canadian weeds. 3. Lepidium draba L., L. chalepense L., L. appelianum Al-Shehbaz (updated). Can J Plant Sci 88:379–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA (2003) Bermudagrass management in the southern piedmont USA: III. Particulate and biologically active soil carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaskin JF, Zhang D, Bon M-C (2005) Invasion of Lepidium draba (Brassicaceae) in the western United States: distributions and origins of chloroplast DNA haplotypes. Mol Ecol 14:2331–2341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grigulis K, Sheppard AW, Ash JE, Groves RH (2001) The comparative demography of the pasture weed Echium plantagineum between its native and invaded ranges. J Appl Ecol 38:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Hegi G (1986) Illustrierte flora von Mitteleuropa. Spermatophyta, Band IV Teil 1. Angiospermae, Dicotyledones 2. Paul Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Herrera AM, Carruthers RI, Mills NJ (2010) Introduced populations of Genista monspessulana (French broom) are more dense and produce a greater seed rain in California, USA, than native populations in the Mediterranean Basin of Europe. Biol Inv 13:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hierro JL, Villarreal D, Eren Ö, Graham JM, Callaway RM (2006) Disturbance facilitates invasion: the effects are stronger abroad than at home. Am Nat 168:144–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hinz HL, Schwarzländer M (2004) Comparing invasive plants from their native and exotic range: what can we learn for biological control? Weed Technol 18:1533–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huenneke LF, Hamburg SP, Koide R, Mooney HA, Vitousek PM (1990) Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71:478–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huston M, Smith T (1987) Plant succession: life history and competition. Am Nat 130:168–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jakobs G, Weber E, Edwards PJ (2004) Introduced plants of the invasive Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) are larger and grow denser than conspecifics in the native range. Divers Distrib 10:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kiemnec GL, McInnis ML (2002) Hoary cress (Cardaria draba) root extract reduces germination and root growth of five plant species. Weed Technol 16:231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kingsbury JM (1964) Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  46. Knick ST (1999) Requiem for a sagebrush ecosystem? Northwest Sci 73:53–57Google Scholar
  47. Larson L, Kiemnec G, Smergut T (2000) Hoary cress reproduction in a sagebrush ecosystem. J Range Manag 53:556–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lau JA, Puliafico KP, Kopshever JA, Steltzer H, Jarvis EP, Schwarzländer M, Strauss SY, Hufbauer RA (2008) Inference of allelopathy is complicated by effects of activated carbon on plant growth. New Phytol 178:412–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyons KE (1998) Elemental stewardship abstract for Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. Heart-podded hoary cress, Cardaria chalepensis (L.) Hand-Maz. Lens-podded hoary cress and Cardaria pubescens (C.A. Meyer) Jarmolenko Globe-podded hoary cress. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  50. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McInnis ML, Kiemnec GL, Larson LL, Carr J, Sharratt D (2003) Heart-podded hoary cress. Rangelands 25:18–23Google Scholar
  53. McKenney JL (2005) An inter-continental comparison of vigor and herbivory for the invasive plant Lepidium draba. MSc Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USAGoogle Scholar
  54. McKenney JL, Cripps MG, Price WJ, Hinz HL, Schwarzlaender M (2007) No difference in competitive ability between invasive North American and native European Lepidium draba populations. Plant Ecol 193:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mealor BA, Hild AL, Shaw NL (2004) Native plant community composition and genetic diversity associated with long-term weed invasions. West North Am Nat 64:503–513Google Scholar
  56. Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Dugav CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone AL, Hall RJ, Harrison S, Hastings A, Holland M, Holoak M, Lambrinos J, Moore K, Yokomizo H (2007) Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett 10:77–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller RF, Svejcar TJ, Rose JA, McInnis ML (1994) Plant development, water relations, and carbon allocation of heart-podded hoary cress. Agron J 86:487–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Müller C, Martens N (2005) Testing predictions of the ‘evolution of increased competitive ability’ hypothesis for an invasive crucifer. Evol Ecol 19:533–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mulligan GA, Frankton C (1962) Taxonomy of the genus Cardaria with particular reference to the species introduced into North America. Can J Bot 40:1411–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Noble IR (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading process: terrestrial and vascular plants. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, DiCastri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New York, pp 301–313Google Scholar
  62. Paynter Q, Fowler SV, Memmott J, Sheppard AW (1998) Factors affecting the establishment of Cytisus scoparius in southern France: implications for managing both native and exotic populations. J Appl Ecol 35:582–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Prati D, Bossdorf O (2002) A comparison of native and introduced populations of the South African Ragwort Senecio inaequidens DC. In the field. In: Breckle S-W, Schweizer B, Fangmeier A (eds) Results of worldwide ecological studies. Günter Heimbach, Stuttgart, pp 353–359Google Scholar
  64. Puliafico KP, Schwarzlaender M, Price WJ, Harmon BL, Hinz HL (2011) Native and exotic grass competition with invasive hoary cress (Cardaria draba). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Qasem JR (1994) Allelopathic effect of white top (Lepidium draba) on wheat and barley. Allelopath J 1:29–40Google Scholar
  66. Qasem JR (2001) Allelopathic potential of white top and Syrian sage on vegetable crops. Agron J 93:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Qasem JR (2004) Allelopathic plants: 11. Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. Allelopath J 13:165–172Google Scholar
  68. Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rice PM (2005) INVADERS database system. Retrieved from http://invader.dbs.umt.edu on 2 February 2001. Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812-4824
  70. Roché BFJ, Roché CT, Chapman RC (1994) Impacts of grassland habitat on yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) invasion. Northwest Sci 68:86–96Google Scholar
  71. SAS Institute Inc. (2008) SAS, 9.2, Online Doc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  72. Scharenbroch BC, Lloyd JE (2004) A literature review of nitrogen availability indices for use in urban landscapes. Int Soc Arboric 30:214–230Google Scholar
  73. Scheibner RA (1963) A taxonomic study of the genus Ceutorhynchus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). PhD thesis, Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  74. Scurfield G (1962) Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. (Lepidium draba L.). J Ecol 50:489–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Selleck GW (1964) An ecological study of lens- and globe-podded hoary cresses in Saskatchewan. Weeds 13:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sheppard AW, Brun LA, Lewis RC (1996) A demographic comparison of common heliotrope, Heliotropium europaeum L.: southern Australia and southern France. In: Shepherd RCH (ed) Proceedings of the 11th Australian weeds conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp 286–290. Weed Science Society of VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  78. Sheppard AW, Hodge P, Paynter Q, Rees M (2002) Factors affecting invasion and persistence of broom Cytisus scoparius in Australia. J Appl Ecol 39:721–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. USDA, NRCS. 2011. The PLANTS database. Retrieved from http://plants.usda.gov on 2 February 2011. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA
  80. Van Grunsven RHA, Van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM, Tamis WLM, Berendse F, Veenendaal EM (2007) Reduced plant-soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives. J Ecol 95:1050–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van TK, Rayamajhi MB, Center TD (2001) Understanding the ecology of Melaleuca quinquenervia. Retrieved from http://www.weedbiocontrol.org/report/ecology on 5 May 2004
  82. Vilà M, Maron JL, Marco L (2005) Evidence for the Enemy Release Hypothesis in Hypericum perforatum. Oecologia 142:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Warton B, Matthiessen JN, Shackleton MA (2003) Cross-enhancement:enhanced biodegradation of isothiocyanates in soils previously treated withmetham sodium. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1123–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Watts SM (2010) Pocket gophers and the invasion and restoration of native bunchgrass communities. Restor Ecol 18:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weiss PW, Milton S (1984) Chrysanthemoides monilifera and Acacia longifolia in Australia and South Africa. In: Dell B (ed) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mediterranean Ecosystems, Perth, Australia, pp 159–160. Botany Department of the University of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  86. Wolfe LM (2002) Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. Am Nat 160:705–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woodburn TL, Sheppard AW (1996) The demography of Carduus nutans as a native and alien weed. Plant Prot Q 11:236–238Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hariet L. Hinz
    • 1
  • Mark Schwarzländer
    • 2
  • Jessica L. McKenney
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michael G. Cripps
    • 2
    • 4
  • Bradley Harmon
    • 2
  • William J. Price
    • 5
  1. 1.CABIDelémontSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  3. 3.Entomology DepartmentLouisiana State University AgCenterBaton RougeUSA
  4. 4.Lincoln UniversityLincolnNew Zealand
  5. 5.Statistical ProgramsCollege of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations