Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 9, pp 1919–1929 | Cite as

Variation in native micro-predator abundance explains recruitment of a mobile invasive fish, the common carp, in a naturally unstable environment

  • Przemyslaw G. Bajer
  • Christopher J. Chizinski
  • Justin J. Silbernagel
  • Peter W. Sorensen
Original Paper

Abstract

Why certain species of fish become invasive is poorly understood and a key obstacle to restoring many of the world’s ecosystems. In this study we tested whether variation in biotic resistance exerted by native predators might explain the reproductive success of the common carp, a large and fecund invasive species that typically spawns in outlying and unstable shallow habitat. An initial three-year study of the relative abundance of young-of-year (YOY) carp in interconnected lakes in the Upper Mississippi River Basin discovered that YOY carp are only found in shallow waters that experience winter hypoxia (winterkill) and have low densities of the native egg-predators that otherwise dominate these locales. A follow-up experiment tested if native fish predation on carp eggs could explain this distribution. It found that while carp eggs survived in winterkill lakes, they only survived in non-winterkill lakes when protected by a mesh that excluded fish. Large numbers of carp eggs were found in the stomachs of native fish inhabiting lakes that did not winterkill. We conclude that common carp, and likely many other highly mobile and fecund invasive fish, have evolved life histories to avoid egg predators and can become invasive when they are absent.

Keywords

Biological invasion Common carp Cyprinus carpio Biotic resistance Egg predation Bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus Winterkill Hypoxia Integrated pest management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund, the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, and the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District. Brett Miller, Mary Headrick, Brian Moe and Jordan Wein helped with collecting field samples. Daryl Ellison and Paul Diedrich (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) helped with study site selection and sampling techniques. David Andow and Bruce Vondracek (University of Minnesota) provided many useful comments that improved the manuscript. Dr. Sanford Weisberg (University of Minnesota) assisted with statistical analyses.

Supplementary material

10530_2012_203_MOESM1_ESM.doc (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 30 kb)

References

  1. Bajer PG, Sorensen PW (2010) Recruitment and abundance of an invasive fish, the common carp, is driven by its propensity to invade and reproduce in basins that experience winter-time hypoxia in interconnected lakes. Biol Invasions 12:1101–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajer PG, Chizinski CJ, Sorensen PW (2011) Using the Judas technique to locate and remove wintertime aggregations of invasive common carp. Fisheries Manag Ecol 18:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balon EK (1995) Origin and domestication of the wild carp, Cyprinus carpio—from Roman gourmets to swimming flowers. Aquaculture 129:3–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barus V, Penaz M, Kohlmann K (2001) Cyprinus carpio. In: Barnescu PM, Paepke H-J (eds) The freshwater fishes of Europe, Vol. 5. Cyprinidae – 2. AULA-Verlag, Wiebelsheim, Germany, pp 85–179Google Scholar
  5. Billard R (1999) Carp biology and culture. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton JR, Cucherousset J, Davies GD, Godard MJ, Copp GH (2010) Non-native fishes and climate change: predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshw Biol 55:1130–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chippari-Gomes AR, Gomes LC, Lopes NP, Val AL, Almeida-Val V (2005) Metabolic adjustments in two Amazonian cichlids exposed to hypoxia and anoxia. Comp Biochem Phys B 141:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. deRivera CE, Ruiz GM, Hines AH, Jivoff P (2005) Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology 86:3364–3376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross MR, MacMillan AM (1981) Predation and the evolution of colonial nesting in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill AM, Lodge DM (1999) Replacement of resident crayfishes by an exotic crayfish: the roles of competition and predation. Ecol Appl 9:678–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollebone A, Hay M (2007) Propagule pressure of an invasive crab overwhelms native biotic resistance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 342:191–196Google Scholar
  13. Ims RA (1990) On the adaptive value of reproductive synchrony as a predator-swamping strategy. Am Nat 136:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keenleyside MHA (1972) Intrapsecific intrusions into nests of spawning longear sunfish (Pisces: Centrarchidae). Copeia 1972:272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King AJ, Humphries JP, Lake PS (2003) Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:773–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koblitskaya AF (1977) The succession of spawning communities in the Volga Delta. J Ichthyol 17:534–547Google Scholar
  17. Koed A, Balleby K, Mejlhede P, Aarestrup K (2006) Annual movement of adult pike (Esox lucius L.) in a lowland river. Ecol Freshw Fish 15:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korsu K, Huusko A, Muotka T (2007) Niche characteristics explain the reciprocal invasion success of stream salmonids in different continents. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9725–9729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koster FW, Mollmann C (2000) Trophodynamic control by clupeid predators on recruitment success in Baltic cod? ICES J Mar Sci 57:310–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lohmeyer AM, Garvey JE (2009) Placing the North American invasion of Asian carp in a spatially explicit context. Biol Invasions 11:905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marchetti MP, Light T, Moyle PB, Viers JH (2004) Fish invasions in California watersheds: testing hypotheses using landscape patterns. Ecol Appl 14:1507–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marking LL (1992) Evaluation of toxicants for the control of carp and other nuisance fishes. Fisheries 17:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mazerolle MJ (2011) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 1.17. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg
  26. Moyle PB, Light T (1996a) Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol Conserv 78:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moyle PB, Light T (1996b) Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77:1666–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moyle PB, Marchetti MP (2006) Predicting invasion success: freshwater fishes in California as a model. Bioscience 56:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborne J (2012) Distribution, abundance, and overwinter survival of young-of-year carp in a Midwestern watershed. MS Thesis, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  30. Petrosky BR, Magnuson JJ (1973) Behavioral responses of northern pike, yellow perch and bluegill to oxygen concentrations under simulated winter conditions. Copeia 1973:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phelps QE, Graeb BDS, Willis DW (2008) Influence of the Moran effect on spatiotemporal synchrony in common carp recruitment. T Am Fish Soc 137:1701–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pope KL, Willis DW (1998) Early life history and recruitment of black crappie (Pomoxic nigromaculatus) in two South Dakota waters. Ecol Freshw Fish 7:56–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Potter IC (1980) Ecology of larval and metamorphising lampreys. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:1641–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahel FJ (1984) Factors structuring fish assemblages along a bog lake successional gradient. Ecology 65:1276–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roth BM, Tetzlaff JC, Alexander ML, Kitchell JF (2007) Reciprocal relationships between exotic rusty crayfish, macrophytes, and Lepomis species in northern Wisconsin lakes. Ecosystems 10:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Silbernagel JJ (2011) Field and laboratory studies suggest that recruitment of the invasive common carp is controlled by native fish in stable lakes of the Upper Mississippi Basin. MS Thesis, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  37. Sorensen PW, Bajer PG (2011) The common carp. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of invasive introduced species. University of California Press Berkeley, California, pp 100–103Google Scholar
  38. Spotte S (2007) Bluegills: biology and behavior. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Stuart IG, Jones M (2006) Large, regulated forest floodplain is an ideal recruitment zone for non-native common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Mar Freshw Res 57:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swee UB, McCrimmon HR (1966) Reproductive biology of the carp, Cyprinus carpio L., in Lake St. Lawrence, Ontario. T Am Fish Soc 95:372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tonn WM, Magnuson JJ (1982) Patterns in the species composition and richness of fish assemblages in northern Wisconsin lakes. Ecology 63:1149–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tonn WM, Magnuson JJ, Rask M, Toivonen J (1990) Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages - the balance between local and regional processes. Am Nat 136:345–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ward-Fear G, Brown GP, Shine R (2010) Using a native predator (the meat ant, Iridomyrmex reburrus) to reduce the abundance of an invasive species (the cane toad, Bufo marinus) in tropical Australia. J Appl Ecol 47:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weaver MJ, Magnuson JJ, Clayton MK (1997) Distribution of littoral fishes in structurally complex macrophytes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2277–2289Google Scholar
  46. Weber MJ, Brown ML (2009) Effects of common carp on aquatic ecosystems 80 years after “carp as a dominant”: ecological insights for fisheries management. Rev Fish Sci 17:524–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welcomme RL (1995) Relationships between fisheries and the integrity of river systems. Regul River 11:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Werner EE, Hall DJ (1974) Optimal foraging and the size selection by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wiley RW (2008) The 1962 rotenone treatment of the Green River, Wyoming and Utah, revisited: lessons learned. Fisheries 33:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolfe MD, Santucci JJ Jr, Einfalt LM, Wahl DH (2009) Effects of common carp on reproduction, growth, and survival of largemouth bas and bluegills. T Am Fish Soc 138:975–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Przemyslaw G. Bajer
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Chizinski
    • 2
  • Justin J. Silbernagel
    • 1
  • Peter W. Sorensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations